So, anyway, back at the ranch. I am a islamaphobe, but I don't condone violence. It's why I am against Islam, a hoodoo made up religion that uses violence as a hedge because their made up religion needs people to strap on bombs , slash people with knives harming innocent people (ironic, isn't it?) to prove how good they are. Islam is a last bastion of the scoundrel, to use a popular phrase.
See, that's the fallacy right there (one of them) -- the false premise your entire post is built on.
And the reference doesn't make sense anyway --- the guy slashing people with knives does not appear to be a Muslim, considering his posts wanting to kill them and anybody else who doesn't follow "the love of Jesus Christ" <--- there's your irony btw. Bigly.
NOT that that means we must in turn blame Christianism for Christian. That would be as fallacious as blaming Islam. That is in fact why I keep asking, sarcastically, if anybody had said "the solution is simple --- nuke the Vatican" upon learning the identity of Eric Rudolph (or for that matter, Adolf Hitler).
That's the Double Standard that keeps getting reiterated even when it's called out, to wit: When "we" do it (Jeremy Christian, Robert Dear, Eric Rudolph, the Klan, etc) they're "outliers" who absolutely don't represent their religion. They're sick, they're drugged, they're mentally ill. But then when "they" do it (al Qaeda, DAESH, 9/11 hijackers etc) suddenly they become absolute paragons of their religion, completely honest in their faith, and therefore the religion itself is a 'made up religion that needs people to strap on bombs". That doesn't wash, and it never will.
NONE of these people act out of their religion; they act
in spite of it. They act out of politics. That's what terrorism is
about.
The last terrorist bombing in Manchester was done by the IRA. They didn't do it because Catholicism is a "made up hoodoo religion that needs people to bomb".
They did it because they wanted the Brits out of their island. I mean DUH.