Tumblin Tumbleweed
Platinum Member
- Mar 16, 2015
- 29,669
- 11,200
- 465
Yeah sure you do, a Jimmy Carter, habitat for humanity isnt in the $600,000 range or even the $60,000 range, nice try.Dude, you play the Rules for Radicals game quite well, but why the **** would I want to be such a retard like the old bald white guy, who has to **** all the rest of US with Socialist policies, while he gets to have more than a welfare puke like you? Where is the FAIRNESS in that? Or are you just a dumbass, publicly educated, moron, who adores your politicians to the point that you get a thrill up your leg or cum down your chin when a liberal political hack puts his dick in your mouth?I hope he gets the nomination over the ancient, Socialist asshole who owns three $600,000 houses which he doesnt share with anyone else.
You sound bitterly envious to me.
Holy ****, dude. Now that made me LOL. So cringe worthy. Just like a creepy uncle. Wingers have some vivid imaginations.
I'm a capitalist. I'm here for the money, and I'll get all I can. You can pee in your panties about 'FAIRNESS' all you like, hippie. Life isn't fair. I vote for the candidate that has a better chance of doubling (or tripling, that'd be nice) my yearly capital. I also don't feel the need to whinge about $600,000 houses either. I build houses worth much more than that.
Spec homes, champ. You couldn't afford them.
. So cringe worthy. Just like a creepy uncle. Wingers have some vivid imaginations.
