Great report about Climate change issues

[otto105]

Is Obama one of those black Jews?

Wow, got both racial slurs in one fuckup post.

10 points for Slytherin

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Wow, got both racial slurs in one fuckup post.

10 points for Slytherin

Jew isn't a slur, neither is black you moronic twat.

Besides.....I'm mocking EMH's idiocy.
Get in line. Or go away.

 

[Robert W]

As if I don't already know that...

But he WON'T BUST IT FOR FRAUD, because HE DOESN'T WANT TO because HE IS PART OF IT just like Toddster and Dung.

The reason you get all excited about a video by "Dr. Richard Lindzen" is precisely BECAUSE CO2 FRAUD was not busted more than a decade ago.

If W/homO Mukasey/Holder/Lynch/Sessions/Barr wanted to bust it for the fraud it has always been, they would have. "Dr. Richard Lindzen" was not part of the case.... just as he won't answer those questions...


Dr. Richard Lindzen is a FAILURE of a "scientist" and there is no reason to give him the time of day... since he has spent his whole life studying something and STILL DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT ANSWER

You refuse to answer your own questions. Oh you pretended to answer one of them.

Here is my sole mission.

To inform posters that they have nothing to fear from what is observed climate changes. It is mild and will never harm them. They would be smarter to fear volcanos or even what is going on at Yellowstone National Park. What you do is waste all of your time and mine with you.

 

[EMH]

Is Obama one of those black Jews?

We know Smollett is...

Black Jewish actor Jussie Smollett violently assaulted

Smollett was born to a Jewish father and African-American mother. In 2015, Smollett came out as gay.

www.jpost.com

the question of what is homO isn't quite as clear.

He applied for a HS scholarship as a "Muslim"

He attended a gay Christian Church in Chicago, gaying off with the choir master before offing him.

Choir Director at Barack Obama's Church Found Slain

Donald Young, 47, found shot to death in his apartment. Death ruled a homicide.

www.foxnews.com

But his mommy was Ann Dunham...

ann dunham obama's mother at DuckDuckGo

DuckDuckGo. Privacy, Simplified.

duckduckgo.com

Dunn and Hamm are both Jewish last names....

 

[Robert W]

Wow, got both racial slurs in one fuckup post.

10 points for Slytherin

You have one wild imagination.

 

[EMH]

You refuse to answer your own questions

Which one?

Though post 110 answered all of them...


If you actually cared about truth, you wouldn't have just lied about that...


Did the Mossad get to you??

 

[EMH]

To inform posters that they have nothing to fear from what is observed climate changes. It is mild and will never harm them. They would be smarter to fear volcanos or even what is going on at Yellowstone National Park. What you do is waste all of your time and mine with you.

which will successfully accomplish nothing...

To stop CO2 FRAUD, you must BUST CO2 FRAUD, and you and Toddster and Lindzen don't appear to be very interested in doing so....


and it would be oh so anti semitic as to speculate WHY....

 

[otto105]

Jew isn't a slur, neither is black you moronic twat.

Besides.....I'm mocking EMH's idiocy.
Get in line. Or go away.

Okay, I will step to the side.

 

[EMH]

Okay, I will step to the side.

a Left Wing Zionist Fascist Traitor willing to "step aside" for a "right wing" Zionist Fascist Traitor, who has already been routed in every debate he's participated in...

LOL!!


how sweet....

 

[otto105]

a Left Wing Zionist Fascist Traitor willing to "step aside" for a "right wing" Zionist Fascist Traitor, who has already been routed in every debate he's participated in...

LOL!!


how sweet....

Darth Vader awards 15 points to Slytherin

 

[Foxfyre]

Climate, a period of time where weather is measured and tabulated.

Danger? A matter of harm prevented by masses of humans.
Man influence? A period where man is told he controls climate, even though he does not.

We learned in the press that we are entering a super cold time. Did man cause it to get cold?

I honestly don't know what to expect 5, 10, 20, 50 years from now and almost certainly won't live long enough to find out. But our children and grandchildren will and, what I am certain of, is that the cumulative supposedly developed nations of the world have wasted trillions and trillions of dollars in the name of climate change while not changing the climate one whit with all that money, time, effort, infrastructure, etc.

For certain adding seven billion people to the existing one billion who were here at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution will almost certainly affect the environment of most. But what is also certain is that even if the world warms 2 or 3 Centigrade by the turn of the 22nd Century, the cost to humankind and all other species of flora and fauna on Earth would be manageable and perhaps even turned to our advantage. Meanwhile the projected cost of manually fighting climate change will likely set us back generations in quality of life.

If you want improved environment, then improve the prosperity of the people as it is those who prosper who demand clean air, water, soil and beautiful aesthetics. Those interested only in how they will obtain their next meal or survive the elements could care less about their environment or climate.

And while we are creating environments and economies that help people prosper, we would better utilize our time, talent, resources helping people adapt constructively to inevitable climate change instead of trying to force climate to change to what we think it should be.

 

[otto105]

I honestly don't know what to expect 5, 10, 20, 50 years from now and almost certainly won't live long enough to find out. But my grandchildren will and what I am certain of is that the cumulative supposedly developed nations of the world have wasted trillions and trillions of dollars in the name of climate change while not changing the climate one whit with all that money, time, effort, infrastructure, etc.

For certain adding seven billion people to the existing one billion who were here at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution will almost certainly affect the environment of most. But what is also certain is that even if the world warms 2 or 3 Centigrade by the turn of the 22nd Century, the cost to humankind and all other species of flora and fauna on Earth would be manageable and perhaps even turned to our advantage. Meanwhile the projected cost of manually fighting climate change will likely set us back generations in quality of life.

If you want improved environment, then improve the prosperity of the people as it is those who prosper who demand clean air, water, soil and beautiful aesthetics. Those interested only in how they will obtain their next meal or survive the elements could care less about their environment or climate.

And while we are creating environments and economies that help people prosper, we would better utilize our time, talent, resources helping people adapt constructively to inevitable climate change instead of trying to force climate to change to what we think it should be.

You expect to die before the bad events happen to your kids.

Thanks mom

 

[Foxfyre]

You expect to die before the bad events happen to your kids.

Thanks mom

The way of all flesh. None of us make it out of the world we now live in alive. If you think I'm selfish because I will likely die in the next 20 years or so, you have a very VERY peculiar idea of what selfish is.

 

[otto105]

The way of all flesh. None of us make it out of the world we now live in alive. If you think I'm selfish because I will likely die in the next 20 years or so, you have a very VERY peculiar idea of what selfish is.

No, you have explicitly put the burden on your offspring.

And you selfishly defend that.

 

[Robert W]

I honestly don't know what to expect 5, 10, 20, 50 years from now and almost certainly won't live long enough to find out. But our children and grandchildren will and, what I am certain of, is that the cumulative supposedly developed nations of the world have wasted trillions and trillions of dollars in the name of climate change while not changing the climate one whit with all that money, time, effort, infrastructure, etc.

For certain adding seven billion people to the existing one billion who were here at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution will almost certainly affect the environment of most. But what is also certain is that even if the world warms 2 or 3 Centigrade by the turn of the 22nd Century, the cost to humankind and all other species of flora and fauna on Earth would be manageable and perhaps even turned to our advantage. Meanwhile the projected cost of manually fighting climate change will likely set us back generations in quality of life.

If you want improved environment, then improve the prosperity of the people as it is those who prosper who demand clean air, water, soil and beautiful aesthetics. Those interested only in how they will obtain their next meal or survive the elements could care less about their environment or climate.

And while we are creating environments and economies that help people prosper, we would better utilize our time, talent, resources helping people adapt constructively to inevitable climate change instead of trying to force climate to change to what we think it should be.

Foxfyre:
Wonderful to read a rational post. You and I can do far more to solve problems than the alarmists can do. I want alarmists to do this simple test. Start in an area of moderate temperature such as the SF Bay Area. Drive (by car or even on your computer) down to Fresno, CA. SF will be around 65 degrees when at Fresno it will be 110 degrees. Notice if you see masses of humans in Fresno dying of heat?

This is a test of course.

 

[Foxfyre]

No, you have explicitly put the burden on your offspring.

And you selfishly defend that.

Still haven't taken that remedial reading comprehension course eh Otto?

If you actually read and understood what I wrote, my goal is to take the burden off the children and grandchildren. An unrealistic and so far 100% non productive burden the woke climate religionists have put on us all and will even more burden our children and grandchildren.

 

[Foxfyre]

Foxfyre:
Wonderful to read a rational post. You and I can do far more to solve problems than the alarmists can do. I want alarmists to do this simple test. Start in an area of moderate temperature such as the SF Bay Area. Drive (by car or even on your computer) down to Fresno, CA. SF will be around 65 degrees when at Fresno it will be 110 degrees. Notice if you see masses of humans in Fresno dying of heat?

This is a test of course.

Thank you.

A year round temp of 65 degrees would be harmful to a lot of life on Earth because most plants and animals thrive better at warmer temperatures. Year round temp of 110 degrees would be harmful to a lot of life on Earth because most plants and animals thrive better at cooler temperatures.

But paleontological history informs us that life on Earth thrives nicely and perhaps more efficiently when the average temperatures are warmer than they are now.

But all the trillions of dollars or euros or whatever spent and all the draconian measures put into effect in the name of fighting climate change for decades now has not reduced the CO2 in the atmosphere by one particle so far as we know. Even the most woke scientists don't say that it has. As their predictions come and go without consequence, they just keep moving the goal posts down the road and try to scare the people into submission by telling them that we have only so many more years until a figurative doomsday.

To continue down that path is not only foolish on the face of it, but constitutes government malfeasance by those who control the money and the mandated policies.

It is time to say enough and take another approach.

A Balanced View of Climate Change

Paraphrased from my source for this thread: more than a million people are killed and multi millions injured in traffic accidents every year that goes by. We could reduce that carnage to near zero if we just reduced traffic speeds to 3 miles an hour. Anybody willing to agree to that to save...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

No, you have explicitly put the burden on your offspring.

And you selfishly defend that.

Ruining our economies and wasting trillions on less reliable energy while China and India
more than make up for our reduced CO2 emissions will put an even larger burden on our children.

We need more reliable, cheap energy, not more unreliable, expensive energy.
How many new nuclear power plants should we build, to save our offspring?

 

[Robert W]

Thank you.

A year round temp of 65 degrees would be harmful to a lot of life on Earth because most plants and animals thrive better at warmer temperatures. Year round temp of 110 degrees would be harmful to a lot of life on Earth because most plants and animals thrive better at cooler temperatures.

But paleontological history informs us that life on Earth thrives nicely and perhaps more efficiently when the average temperatures are warmer than they are now.

But all the trillions of dollars or euros or whatever spent and all the draconian measures put into effect in the name of fighting climate change for decades now has not reduced the CO2 in the atmosphere by one particle so far as we know. Even the most woke scientists don't say that it has. As their predictions come and go without consequence, they just keep moving the goal posts down the road and try to scare the people into submission by telling them that we have only so many more years until a figurative doomsday.

To continue down that path is not only foolish on the face of it, but constitutes government malfeasance by those who control the money and the mandated policies.

It is time to say enough and take another approach.

A Balanced View of Climate Change

Paraphrased from my source for this thread: more than a million people are killed and multi millions injured in traffic accidents every year that goes by. We could reduce that carnage to near zero if we just reduced traffic speeds to 3 miles an hour. Anybody willing to agree to that to save...

www.usmessageboard.com

I gave you the gold cup for that report that included words by Bjorn Lomborg. I also have long followed his advice. He puts the dollars to the metal as one thinks of a gas pedal. He cuts to the chase.

Americans are wasting effort and billions of dollars chasing that rabbit down the hole. We should band together with Trump and put a end to it.

 

[Robert W]

The way of all flesh. None of us make it out of the world we now live in alive. If you think I'm selfish because I will likely die in the next 20 years or so, you have a very VERY peculiar idea of what selfish is.

I am 86 but hope to live too for another 20 years so long as I don't end up the way Carter ended up for several last years he lived. I find my experience in life is of value. I recall FDR for instance. I recall Herbert Hoover and even Charles Lindbergh. I also have accumulated a large library in my interest in books.