'Great' Moments In Democrat History

[PoliticalChic]

You are going to have a hard time beating the victimization drum, when the left give a carte blanche to every minority to be bigots toward straight folks, Christians, men, white folks, etc.

It's getting to the point, where folks just don't give a **** anymore if you are a racist. Who cares?

Why should we care when these purveyors of hate politics clearly don't? Have you ever seen some of that TEE VEE?

Why do you conservatives never address the ******* comment that was just made?

You do not know much about the history of conservatives do you?

You never heard of the Birch society? You don't know about Barry Goldwater and his opposition to the Civil Rights movement?

Gads, you're a moron.....Goldwater was in the forefront of the civil rights movement.


1. According to this liberal myth, Goldwater and the Republicans were racists and used racism to appeal to racist southerners to change the electoral map. To believe the tale, one must be either a reliable Democrat voter, and/or be ignorant of the history of the time.

2. When Goldwater voted against the 1964 Civil Rights act, it was due to libertarian belief that the commerce clause did not allow restrictions on private property.

3. “ He ended racial segregation in his family department stores, and he was instrumental in ending it in Phoenix schools and restaurants and in the Arizona National Guard.” http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/daily/may98/goldwater30.htm

Democrats today castigate Republican Senator Barry Goldwater as anti-black. However a review of Senator Barry Goldwater’s record shows that he was a Libertarian, not a racist. Goldwater was a member of the Arizona NAACP and was involved in desegregating the Arizona National Guard.

Goldwater also supported the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and the Civil Rights Act of 1960, as well as the constitutional amendment banning the poll tax. His opposition to the more comprehensive Civil Rights Act of 1964 was based on his libertarian views about government. Goldwater believed that the 1964 Act, as written, unconstitutionally extended the federal government's commerce power to private citizens, furthering the government’s efforts to "legislate morality" and restrict the rights of employers.

It is instructive to read the entire text of Goldwater's 1964 speech at the 28th Republican National Convention, accepting the nomination for president that is available from the Arizona Historical Foundation. By the end of his career, Goldwater was one of the most respected members of either party and was considered a stabilizing influence in the Senate. Senator Goldwater's speech may be found also on the Internet at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/daily/may98/goldwaterspeech.htm http://www.nationalblackrepublicans...#Democrats_Smeared_Dr._Martin_Luther_King__Jr.

4. Who founded the Arizona chapter of the NAACP?

5. Once the Democrats got involved, civil rights became just another racket with another mob. Unlike previous civil rights laws, the 1964 Civil Rights Act included provisions aimed at purely private actors, raising the hackles of some constitutional purists, notably Barry Goldwater, the Republicans’ 1964 presidential nominee. Goldwater, like the rest of his party, had supported every single civil rights bill until the 1964 act. But he broke with the vast majority of his fellow Republicans to oppose the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

Like many other conservatives opposed to a living, growing, breathing Constitution, Goldwater actually opposed only two of the seven major provisions of the bill, those regulating privately owned housing and public accommodations. But there were other provisions he would have made tougher. For example, Goldwater wanted to make it mandatory that federal funds be withheld from programs practicing discrimination, rather than discretionary, as President Kennedy had requested.

Goldwater was a vehement foe of segregation. He was a founder of the NAACP in Arizona, donating the equivalent of several thousand dollars to the organization’s efforts to integrate the public schools. When he was head of the Arizona National Guard, he had integrated the state Guard before Harry Truman announced he was integrating the U.S. military. As the Washington Post said, Goldwater “ended racial segregation in his family department stores, and he was instrumental in ending it in Phoenix schools and restaurants and in the Arizona National Guard.”

But he was also a believer in limited government. It was, after all, racist Democratic politicians in the South using the force of the government to violate private property rights by enforcing the Jim Crow laws in the first place. As Sowell points out, it wasn’t the private bus companies demanding that blacks sit in the back of the bus, it was the government.

Goldwater not only had personally promoted desegregation, he belonged to a party that had been fighting for civil rights for the previous century against Democratic obstructionism. Lyndon Johnson voted against every civil rights bill during his tenure in the Senate. But by the time he became president, he had flipped 180 degrees. Appealing to regional mobs wouldn’t work with a national electorate.

Unlike mob-appeasing Democrats, Goldwater based his objections to certain parts of the 1964 Civil Rights Act on purely constitutional principles. Along with other constitutional purists in the Republican Party, Goldwater opposed federal initiatives in a lot of areas, not just those involving race. By contrast, segregationist Democrats routinely criticized the exercise of federal power and expenditure of federal funds when it involved ending discrimination against blacks, but gladly accepted federal pork projects for their states.

Demonic, chapter 10





Conservative utility is immediate, ineluctable, and applicable across aisles and ages. For proof, consider that even John F. Kennedy, Jr., and his family, staunch political opponents of Barry Goldwater, recognize the value of his conservative assertions. Robert F, Kennedy, Jr., in his afterward to Goldwater’s book, writes: “for Goldwater, the purpose of government was to foster societies where human potential could flourish. Conservatism, he explains in [his] book, is the art of achieving the maximum amount of freedom for the individual that is consistent with the maintenance of the social order.” [See “The Conscience of a Conservative,” Goldwater, p. 123-124.] Christian Camerota, “Reinventing the Right,” p. 28.

I noticed you left out the fact he voted AGAINST the 1964 civil rights act ...I know more about this than you, this is why it is so easy to make you folks look pathetic...

Conservatives Try to Rewrite Civil Rights History (Again)

"I noticed you left out the fact he voted AGAINST the 1964 civil rights act ...I know more about this than you, this is why it is so easy to make you folks look pathetic..."


You 'noticed' no such thing, you lying low-life.

I wrote this:

"Gads, you're a moron.....Goldwater was in the forefront of the civil rights movement.


1. According to this liberal myth, Goldwater and the Republicans were racists and used racism to appeal to racist southerners to change the electoral map. To believe the tale, one must be either a reliable Democrat voter, and/or be ignorant of the history of the time.

2. When Goldwater voted against the 1964 Civil Rights act, it was due to libertarian belief that the commerce clause did not allow restrictions on private property.




Now, where is your apology??????????

So he did vote against it.

Did you vote against the "Infanticide President," Obama?

 

[RealDave]

Proud Democrat voters can certainly find great moments to celebrate.....if they are oblivious to the real history of their chosen party.

Said history can be reduced to slavery, segregation laws, eugenics, and abortion.



"You see, what do slavery, segregation laws, eugenics, and abortion have in common? They were all top priorities for the Democratic Party throughout history.

• 1828 — Democratic Party is founded by Andrew Jackson — a passionate advocate of slavery and key figure behind the ‘Trail of Tears’ — a state-sanctioned slaughter of around 15,000 Native Americans

WRONG. The Democratic Party was organized in 1834 by Martin van Buren, Jackson's successor. Jackson ran for President three times (1824/1828/1832) without a political party behind him. His body of supporters were simply called "Jacksonians" for lack of a name. His detractors were simply called "Anti-Jacksonians" for the same reason.

But the reason you made this leap is that Martin van Buren was an abolitionist. We can't have that in our propaganda.

• 1866 — Ku Klux Klan is founded by a group of Democratic former confederate soldiers who fought to prevent blacks living in the South from voting

WRONG AGAIN. The Klan was founded by six ex-soldiers (Maj James Crowe, Calvin Jones, Capt John B. Kennedy, Capt John Lester, Maj. Frank O. McCord, Richard R. Reed), at 205 West Madison Street in Pulaski Tennessee, the office of Jones' father, Christmas 1865, not 66, BEFORE there was any postwar voting going on, BEFORE that state had rejoined the union, as a college fraternity-type activity modeled directly after Kuklos Adelphon, having no political purpose and its founders having no political affiliations, Tennessee having no political parties to affiliate with at the time anyway.

But again the reason you changed the date is that the revised date would obscure the fact that the KKK already existed before Reconstruction, and we can't have those inconvenient dates in our propaganda either. Oh and you gave no names. I just gave you ALL of them. And while we're about it, since that Klan disappeared by 1872 and officially disbanded 1869, it had to be re-formed in 1915 (see next entry) by a huckster former minister named William J. "Colonel Joe" Simmons --- who also had no known political affiliations. That was the much bigger one that spread coast to coast and numbered its members in the millions.

Nor do you seem to mention the existence of literally dozens of similar local/regional vigilante groups springing up like weeds at the time (the Caucasian Club(s) (Louisiana 1869); the Constitutional Union Guard (North Carolina 1868-70); the Council of Safety; Heggie's Scouts (Mississippi); Heroes of America (South Carolina); the Knights of the Black Cross (Mississippi); the Knights of the Red Hand; the Knights of the Rising Sun (Texas 1868); the Knights of the White Camellia (Louisiana 1867-69); the Knights of the White Carnation (Alabama); Men of Justice; Native Sons of the South (Mississippi); Order of Pale Faces (Tennessee 1869 or 1867); the Order of the White Rose; Red Caps (Tennessee); Red Jackets (Tennessee); Red Strings (South Carolina); the Robertson Family (Mississippi); the Society of the White Rose (Mississippi); the Seymour Knights (Louisiana); the Southern Cross (New Orléans1865); the White Brotherhood (North Carolina 1868-70); the White League (Louisiana 1874); the White Line (Mississippi); the Yellow Jackets (Tennessee) and the '76 Association (Louisiana 1869) (partial list) ---- where's my propaganda bullshit about how "Democrats" founded all these too, even in places that were not part of the United States and/or had no political parties? How were they prescient to form themselves to prevent voting that wasn't even going on yet? And why so many groups? If you're going to organize something to oppose a single national political party, wouldn't you do so with a single national organization?

• 1915— First motion-picture movie to be shown in the White House is The Birth of Nation, a Democratic-Party produced propaganda film depicting the KKK as heroes.

WRONG. "Birth of a Nation" was strictly Hollywood, born of the controversial Thomas Dixon book "The Clansman" (1905) which begat a play, which begat the film, all of which were begat by the Cult of the Lost Cause which had started rewriting history soon after the Civil War, imagining the "nobility" of the Southern cause. Both Dixon and Griffith were Southerners and proponents of the Lost Cause, which also begat a flurry of activity from the United Daughters of the Confederacy (UDC) who spent most of their resources literally rewriting history books and putting up hundreds of monuments and statues all over the country to sell this revisionist propaganda, in public places where they would propagandize the most. Those would be the same monuments and statues recently under fire to be removed FROM those public spaces.

​

Back to the film, the 1915 "Birth of a Nation" which did indeed portray the Klan of decades past as heroes -- part of the Lost Cause revisionism --- sparked a national buzz, which in turn incited the aforementioned Simmons to rent a bus and take some sycophants up Stone Mountain on Thanksgiving that year to re-establish the Klan under a bible, an unsheathed sword, and the first-ever Klan burning cross, an affectation he took from the movie, which just made it up. In short, both the 1915 Klan and the film "Birth of a Nation" were undertaken for the same simple reason --- to make money for their creators.


Simmons too had no political affiliation and he pointedly described his Klan effusively as ""the most powerful, secret, non-political organization in existence" (Wade, The Fiery Cross, p. 151). Nevertheless after control was wrested away from Simmons the Klan did dabble in politics in the 1920s, electing Rice Means (Sen, CO), Owen Brewster (Gov/Sen, ME), Ben Paulen (Gov, KS), Clarence Morley (Gov, CO), Ed Jackson (Gov, IN), George Baker (Mayor, Portland OR) and numerous local officers and Reps in various states such as one Albert Johnson:

>> Johnson was the chief author of the Immigration Act of 1924, which in 1927 he justified as a bulwark against "a stream of alien blood, with all its inherited misconceptions respecting the relationships of the governing power to the governed."[2] Johnson has been described as "an unusually energetic and vehement racist and nativist."[3] He was the head of 'The Eugenics Research Association', a group which opposed interracial marriage and supported forced sterilization of the mentally disabled. In support of his 1919 proposal to suspend immigration he included this quote from a State Department Official referring to Jewish people as "filthy, un-American, and often dangerous in their habits."[4]

– The Klan was public and effusive in its support of Albert Johnson. Time Magazine noted in 1924 that Johnson’s immigration restriction law was “generally supported by the West and South, admittedly with the backing of the Ku Klux Klan.” It reported in 1926 that one of the national KKK’s top four political priorities was the “Renomination and re-election of Representative Albert Johnson of Washington, so he can continue to be Chairman of the House Committee on Immigration and fight for restricted immigration laws.” << (Wiki)​

All of the aforementioned --- Johnson, Means, Brewster, Paulen, Morley, Jackson, Baker --- were Republicans. Not to mention the same Klan endorsed Calvin Cooldige in 1924 and Herbert Hoover in 1928 while running a national smear campaign against the Democrat Al Smith.

None of this of course makes the Klan "Republicans" --- that would require Ass-ociation Fallacy, which is your domain. But it sure as hell doesn't make them "Democrats" either. That Klan opposed not just blacks but Jews (part of its founding contingent had participated in the Leo Frank lynch mob), immigrants, Catholics and labor unions, all of which were and are Democratic Party constituents. Not real smart to organize a hate group against your own base, now is it.

DUH.

• 1960s — “I’ll have those ******* voting Democratic for the next 200 years” – Lyndon B. Johnson

Unsourced uncorroborated myth-quote.




Prove *ANYTHING* I've posted above to be inaccurate. You know, like I just did yours.

What's more you've been told *ALL* of this in the past, REPEATEDLY, have *NEVER* refuted a single one of my facts, and yet here you are spraying the same shitstorm expecting different results. Message board masturbation.

Funeral services for this OP will be held Feb 6th, 2019, 10:00 am...at Mt. Calvary Baptist Church By The Rock On The Hill....Rev. Jeremiah Wright will give the eulogy....

View attachment 244253

Then, Obama chooses as his spiritual guide, the anti-American pastor-nee-Muslim, Jeremiah Wright.

“Long before Reverend Wright entered the national stage, Ryan Lizza of The New Republic, in the March 19, 2007 issue, dropped this little gem:

Wright was a former Muslim and black nationalist who had studied at Howard and Chicago, and Trinity’s guiding principles–what the church calls the “Black Value System”

The racist paranoia of AIDS being developed by white America to kill blacks and other inexcusable statements are from the same framework of the NOI and Farrakhan. In fact:

In 1984, Wright was one of the inner circle that traveled with Farrakhan to visit Libyan strongman Col. Muammar Khadafy.

…why did Wright’s church put the racist and anti-Semitic Farrakhan on the cover of its magazine Trumpet? Why did Trinity Church post:
a manifesto by Hamas that defended terrorism as legitimate resistance, refused to recognize the right of Israel to exist and compared the terror group’s official charter – which calls for the murder of Jews – to America’s Declaration of Independence[?]


The three points above show a consistent pattern of Wright parroting not only the language and but also the attitude of the Nation of Islam.

The Reverend Wright may no longer be a Muslim, but he clearly embraces Hamas, Minister Farrakhan and others because they dovetail with his established world view, as with other syncretic religions.

Reverend Wright’s hate speeches are a glimpse of someone who has blended Nation of Islam and Black Nationalist Liberation Theology into a subversive Christianity,…”
Jeremiah Wright Was a Muslim: Why That Matters


A comfortable arena for our Muslim former President.

Really, Obama was a Muslin bullshit

you ger dumber with every post you make.

Wright hated America??? Really?

The Democrats champion abortion, yet not one of their voters can come up with a way to support it.



Is there any argument for the "right" of a woman to authorize the killing of her unborn baby that would not apply to her authorizing the similar slaughter of a year old that she was breastfeeding?


'cause....if there isn't, and one is murder, so, then, is the other.

That's called logic.

So, you are sayting awomabn can just decide to have an abortion at any time without any restraints?

 

[PoliticalChic]

There can be no argument as to the association of the Democrat Party and abortion…..


But there is more: it is the atavistic belief in infanticide that fuels Democrats.




“As Princeton ethicist, Peter Singer, has argued for decades, why don’t we legalise infanticide? After all, if it is legal to murder a baby the moment before it is born, what makes it wrong to murder after it exits the mother’s womb? Why would we ever want to obstruct a woman’s choice?

The true face of the Democratic is grim, and many are even scared to delve into the party’s history. If we wish to understand the true monstrosity of the recent New York abortion legislation, we must understand and acknowledge the history of the party from which it has come. As LifeSiteNews has rightly argued, “The democrats are now the party of infanticide, and no one can deny it.”
Kill More Babies! · Caldron Pool





Not only did the crypto-Islamist, Obama, endorse infacticide….he hired the above psychopath, Peter Singer, as his ‘science adviser.’

“Peter Singer Joins Obama's Health Care Administrators” http://www.experienceproject.com/stories/Am-Not-A-Fan-Of-Peter-Singer/657290

 

[RealDave]

I have a question about this: 2019 — Reproductive Health Act legalises the murdering of a child up to the day of birth

Is this a proposal? Has the House voted on it? And did the Senate pass it if it got to them yet. Thanks. I'm not up on the Reproductive Health Act and didn't know about it.

Thanks.

It is a NYState law, enacted by NY Democrats.



The same idea was supported by Democrat Virginia Governor Northam

It failed in the Virginia House of Delegates because there are more Republicans there.

Thanks, PoliticalChic. Killing a baby at birth horrifies me, and just thinking about aborting a preborn American citizen just makes me sick at my stomach, and I don't think the Supreme Court Justices really thought of the consequences of having 58 million preborn American citizens suffering a painful, cruel death instead of a chance at living a life its parents bestowed upon it, then one or both of them decided to take that chance away. Sometimes at evening vespers, I just cry. Killing makes a person angry, and sometimes drives them to kill some more. I think they know not what they do, because if they did, their future would be as destroyed as the little person they did away with in a moment of human despair, goaded on by an asocial sisterhood of sorts. Serial killers are said to be asocial, and now we have millions of women who have committed themselves to have abortions instead of giving their child the gift of life. A society of asocial people cannot stand. And that's what I think. 58 million abortions are only the ones the doctors report. That's all. Thanks again for clarification.

I pray that someone will establish for this society what scientists have known for centuries: life starts out (begins) when the egg fertilizes and lodges in its mother. From then on, it needs protection for its presence to come out into the world after 9 months of growing strong enough to withstand the rest of life's stages in the open air.

B-.....I've documented both
a. the horrific history of the Democrat Party.....slavery, segregation laws, eugenics

None of the adherents have been able to deny said history


b. now, with the NYDemocrats, and the Democrats of Virginia, we find that it is also the party of abortion and infancticide
Yet.....their supporters stick to the party like manure to a wet blanket.


It presages the end of America.....and perhaps of Western Civilization.





"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky

You've been debunkd overt & over with your eugenics claim & Planned Parenthood.

You Are really a shitty liar. Trump is a better liar than you.

 

[RealDave]

There can be no argument as to the association of the Democrat Party and abortion…..


But there is more: it is the atavistic belief in infanticide that fuels Democrats.




“As Princeton ethicist, Peter Singer, has argued for decades, why don’t we legalise infanticide? After all, if it is legal to murder a baby the moment before it is born, what makes it wrong to murder after it exits the mother’s womb? Why would we ever want to obstruct a woman’s choice?

The true face of the Democratic is grim, and many are even scared to delve into the party’s history. If we wish to understand the true monstrosity of the recent New York abortion legislation, we must understand and acknowledge the history of the party from which it has come. As LifeSiteNews has rightly argued, “The democrats are now the party of infanticide, and no one can deny it.”
Kill More Babies! · Caldron Pool





Not only did the crypto-Islamist, Obama, endorse infacticide….he hired the above psychopath, Peter Singer, as his ‘science adviser.’

“Peter Singer Joins Obama's Health Care Administrators” http://www.experienceproject.com/stories/Am-Not-A-Fan-Of-Peter-Singer/657290

Liar. Obama never endorsed infantcide.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Proud Democrat voters can certainly find great moments to celebrate.....if they are oblivious to the real history of their chosen party.

Said history can be reduced to slavery, segregation laws, eugenics, and abortion.



"You see, what do slavery, segregation laws, eugenics, and abortion have in common? They were all top priorities for the Democratic Party throughout history.

• 1828 — Democratic Party is founded by Andrew Jackson — a passionate advocate of slavery and key figure behind the ‘Trail of Tears’ — a state-sanctioned slaughter of around 15,000 Native Americans

WRONG. The Democratic Party was organized in 1834 by Martin van Buren, Jackson's successor. Jackson ran for President three times (1824/1828/1832) without a political party behind him. His body of supporters were simply called "Jacksonians" for lack of a name. His detractors were simply called "Anti-Jacksonians" for the same reason.

But the reason you made this leap is that Martin van Buren was an abolitionist. We can't have that in our propaganda.

• 1866 — Ku Klux Klan is founded by a group of Democratic former confederate soldiers who fought to prevent blacks living in the South from voting

WRONG AGAIN. The Klan was founded by six ex-soldiers (Maj James Crowe, Calvin Jones, Capt John B. Kennedy, Capt John Lester, Maj. Frank O. McCord, Richard R. Reed), at 205 West Madison Street in Pulaski Tennessee, the office of Jones' father, Christmas 1865, not 66, BEFORE there was any postwar voting going on, BEFORE that state had rejoined the union, as a college fraternity-type activity modeled directly after Kuklos Adelphon, having no political purpose and its founders having no political affiliations, Tennessee having no political parties to affiliate with at the time anyway.

But again the reason you changed the date is that the revised date would obscure the fact that the KKK already existed before Reconstruction, and we can't have those inconvenient dates in our propaganda either. Oh and you gave no names. I just gave you ALL of them. And while we're about it, since that Klan disappeared by 1872 and officially disbanded 1869, it had to be re-formed in 1915 (see next entry) by a huckster former minister named William J. "Colonel Joe" Simmons --- who also had no known political affiliations. That was the much bigger one that spread coast to coast and numbered its members in the millions.

Nor do you seem to mention the existence of literally dozens of similar local/regional vigilante groups springing up like weeds at the time (the Caucasian Club(s) (Louisiana 1869); the Constitutional Union Guard (North Carolina 1868-70); the Council of Safety; Heggie's Scouts (Mississippi); Heroes of America (South Carolina); the Knights of the Black Cross (Mississippi); the Knights of the Red Hand; the Knights of the Rising Sun (Texas 1868); the Knights of the White Camellia (Louisiana 1867-69); the Knights of the White Carnation (Alabama); Men of Justice; Native Sons of the South (Mississippi); Order of Pale Faces (Tennessee 1869 or 1867); the Order of the White Rose; Red Caps (Tennessee); Red Jackets (Tennessee); Red Strings (South Carolina); the Robertson Family (Mississippi); the Society of the White Rose (Mississippi); the Seymour Knights (Louisiana); the Southern Cross (New Orléans1865); the White Brotherhood (North Carolina 1868-70); the White League (Louisiana 1874); the White Line (Mississippi); the Yellow Jackets (Tennessee) and the '76 Association (Louisiana 1869) (partial list) ---- where's my propaganda bullshit about how "Democrats" founded all these too, even in places that were not part of the United States and/or had no political parties? How were they prescient to form themselves to prevent voting that wasn't even going on yet? And why so many groups? If you're going to organize something to oppose a single national political party, wouldn't you do so with a single national organization?

• 1915— First motion-picture movie to be shown in the White House is The Birth of Nation, a Democratic-Party produced propaganda film depicting the KKK as heroes.

WRONG. "Birth of a Nation" was strictly Hollywood, born of the controversial Thomas Dixon book "The Clansman" (1905) which begat a play, which begat the film, all of which were begat by the Cult of the Lost Cause which had started rewriting history soon after the Civil War, imagining the "nobility" of the Southern cause. Both Dixon and Griffith were Southerners and proponents of the Lost Cause, which also begat a flurry of activity from the United Daughters of the Confederacy (UDC) who spent most of their resources literally rewriting history books and putting up hundreds of monuments and statues all over the country to sell this revisionist propaganda, in public places where they would propagandize the most. Those would be the same monuments and statues recently under fire to be removed FROM those public spaces.

​

Back to the film, the 1915 "Birth of a Nation" which did indeed portray the Klan of decades past as heroes -- part of the Lost Cause revisionism --- sparked a national buzz, which in turn incited the aforementioned Simmons to rent a bus and take some sycophants up Stone Mountain on Thanksgiving that year to re-establish the Klan under a bible, an unsheathed sword, and the first-ever Klan burning cross, an affectation he took from the movie, which just made it up. In short, both the 1915 Klan and the film "Birth of a Nation" were undertaken for the same simple reason --- to make money for their creators.


Simmons too had no political affiliation and he pointedly described his Klan effusively as ""the most powerful, secret, non-political organization in existence" (Wade, The Fiery Cross, p. 151). Nevertheless after control was wrested away from Simmons the Klan did dabble in politics in the 1920s, electing Rice Means (Sen, CO), Owen Brewster (Gov/Sen, ME), Ben Paulen (Gov, KS), Clarence Morley (Gov, CO), Ed Jackson (Gov, IN), George Baker (Mayor, Portland OR) and numerous local officers and Reps in various states such as one Albert Johnson:

>> Johnson was the chief author of the Immigration Act of 1924, which in 1927 he justified as a bulwark against "a stream of alien blood, with all its inherited misconceptions respecting the relationships of the governing power to the governed."[2] Johnson has been described as "an unusually energetic and vehement racist and nativist."[3] He was the head of 'The Eugenics Research Association', a group which opposed interracial marriage and supported forced sterilization of the mentally disabled. In support of his 1919 proposal to suspend immigration he included this quote from a State Department Official referring to Jewish people as "filthy, un-American, and often dangerous in their habits."[4]

– The Klan was public and effusive in its support of Albert Johnson. Time Magazine noted in 1924 that Johnson’s immigration restriction law was “generally supported by the West and South, admittedly with the backing of the Ku Klux Klan.” It reported in 1926 that one of the national KKK’s top four political priorities was the “Renomination and re-election of Representative Albert Johnson of Washington, so he can continue to be Chairman of the House Committee on Immigration and fight for restricted immigration laws.” << (Wiki)​

All of the aforementioned --- Johnson, Means, Brewster, Paulen, Morley, Jackson, Baker --- were Republicans. Not to mention the same Klan endorsed Calvin Cooldige in 1924 and Herbert Hoover in 1928 while running a national smear campaign against the Democrat Al Smith.

None of this of course makes the Klan "Republicans" --- that would require Ass-ociation Fallacy, which is your domain. But it sure as hell doesn't make them "Democrats" either. That Klan opposed not just blacks but Jews (part of its founding contingent had participated in the Leo Frank lynch mob), immigrants, Catholics and labor unions, all of which were and are Democratic Party constituents. Not real smart to organize a hate group against your own base, now is it.

DUH.

• 1960s — “I’ll have those ******* voting Democratic for the next 200 years” – Lyndon B. Johnson

Unsourced uncorroborated myth-quote.




Prove *ANYTHING* I've posted above to be inaccurate. You know, like I just did yours.

What's more you've been told *ALL* of this in the past, REPEATEDLY, have *NEVER* refuted a single one of my facts, and yet here you are spraying the same shitstorm expecting different results. Message board masturbation.

Funeral services for this OP will be held Feb 6th, 2019, 10:00 am...at Mt. Calvary Baptist Church By The Rock On The Hill....Rev. Jeremiah Wright will give the eulogy....

View attachment 244253

Then, Obama chooses as his spiritual guide, the anti-American pastor-nee-Muslim, Jeremiah Wright.

“Long before Reverend Wright entered the national stage, Ryan Lizza of The New Republic, in the March 19, 2007 issue, dropped this little gem:

Wright was a former Muslim and black nationalist who had studied at Howard and Chicago, and Trinity’s guiding principles–what the church calls the “Black Value System”

The racist paranoia of AIDS being developed by white America to kill blacks and other inexcusable statements are from the same framework of the NOI and Farrakhan. In fact:

In 1984, Wright was one of the inner circle that traveled with Farrakhan to visit Libyan strongman Col. Muammar Khadafy.

…why did Wright’s church put the racist and anti-Semitic Farrakhan on the cover of its magazine Trumpet? Why did Trinity Church post:
a manifesto by Hamas that defended terrorism as legitimate resistance, refused to recognize the right of Israel to exist and compared the terror group’s official charter – which calls for the murder of Jews – to America’s Declaration of Independence[?]


The three points above show a consistent pattern of Wright parroting not only the language and but also the attitude of the Nation of Islam.

The Reverend Wright may no longer be a Muslim, but he clearly embraces Hamas, Minister Farrakhan and others because they dovetail with his established world view, as with other syncretic religions.

Reverend Wright’s hate speeches are a glimpse of someone who has blended Nation of Islam and Black Nationalist Liberation Theology into a subversive Christianity,…”
Jeremiah Wright Was a Muslim: Why That Matters


A comfortable arena for our Muslim former President.

Really, Obama was a Muslin bullshit

you ger dumber with every post you make.

Wright hated America??? Really?

The Democrats champion abortion, yet not one of their voters can come up with a way to support it.



Is there any argument for the "right" of a woman to authorize the killing of her unborn baby that would not apply to her authorizing the similar slaughter of a year old that she was breastfeeding?


'cause....if there isn't, and one is murder, so, then, is the other.

That's called logic.

So, you are sayting awomabn can just decide to have an abortion at any time without any restraints?

Here comes your tutorial, RealDumb......see if there are any errors.


1. I provide these indicia as proof that Hussein Obama was at the very least, a crypto-Islamist, out to promote that Eastern culture and religion over the one that make America great.


There is no way to explain away the body of evidence herein, other than the conclusion above.


Any mistakes herein??????


2.Know the quote attributed to Aristotle….“Give me a child until he is 7 and I will show you the man.”

In no case it that more revealing than the life of Hussein Obama.

“…Obama's father was from Africa, and Obama has said his father was born a Muslim.

Obama lived in Indonesia with his mother and stepfather from 1967 to 1971, approximately from the ages of 6 to 10.

…Indonesia is a Muslim country, and Obama attended a public school there, ….substantiated evidence indicates Obama attended a public school that taught a small amount of mainstream Islam. The news reports say that Obama's registration form indicates his religion was Muslim,…” Obama attended an Indonesian public school



3. A key difference between Islam and western religion is the doctrine that lying in defense of the faith is required.

“Taqiya is an Islamic term referring to precautionary dissimulation or denial of religious belief and practice in the face of persecution. This practice is emphasized in Shia Islam whereby adherents are permitted to conceal their religion when under threat of persecutionor compulsion. However, it is also permitted in Sunni Islam under certain circumstances.” Taqiyya - Wikiquote


Sometimes, an adherent may slip up….
“ The words "my Muslim faith" were uttered by Barack Obama in an ABC News interview with George Stephanopoulos, excerpted on YouTube.[1]
· Obama: Let's not play games. What I was suggesting - you're absolutely right that John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith, and you're absolutely right that that has not come at my ...

· Stephanopoulos: [breaking in] Christian faith

• Obama: [stuttering] ma - my Christian faith ... “

Did you ever make that mistake….say you were Muslim? Never??? Not even once?????





4. Just for argument’s sake, let’s suppose that Obama was an undercover Muslim….who might want to help him to…..advance?



“…Obama’s ties to a radical Muslim activist who reportedly was raising money for Obama’s Harvard studies during the years 1988 to 1991.

The allegations first surfaced in late March, when former Manhattan Borough president Percy Sutton told a New York cable channel that a former business partner who was “raising money” for Obama had approached him in 1988 to help Obama get into Harvard Law School.

In the interview, Sutton says he first heard of Obama about twenty years ago from Khalid Al-Mansour, a Black Muslim and Black Nationalist who was a “mentor” to the founders of the Black Panther party at the time the party was founded in the early 1960s.

Sutton described al-Mansour as advisor to “one of the world’s richest men,” Saudi prince Alwaleed bin Talal.” Daily Thought Pad: Obama's Harvard Years: Questions Swirl




“But when you’re watching this in the campaign, and you’re onto this story, you’re saying, “Why isn’t anyone in the major media asking how it is that this radical anti-Semite, Khalid al Mansour, was pushing Obama into Harvard twenty years before the election?” Isn’t this worth investigating, this connection? No it wasn’t—it was worth burying…But they just buried that whole story, and when I saw that—I mean, you know this, and you and Accuracy Media have been confronting this for years, how they bury stories that they simply don’t want to share with the rest of the world.”
Obama Deconstructed: An Interview with Jack Cashill





Or…put it this way: why would a Black Muslim and Black Nationalist, and the Saudis….want to see Obama as President?




5. Jump to 2009….Obama as President…time to re-pay for all the help: President Barack Obama delivers a speech at American University in Cairo, Egypt, that “promised a new beginning with Muslim and Arab countries.”



“Obama gave front-row seats to Muslim Brotherhood in 2009 Cairo Speech” Obama gave front-row seats to Muslim Brotherhood in 2009 Cairo Speech





Know anything about this group favored by Hussein Obama?

The Nazis were largely responsible for the creation of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, the first modern mass movement of political Islam (1928): they hoped to use the Brotherhood against the British in the Middle East.
Paul Berman, “Terror and Liberalism,” p. 60,
and John Loftus, ‘The Muslim Brotherhood,
The Muslim Brotherhood, Nazis and al-Qaeda


Hassan al-Banna, the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, was a devout admirer of Adolf Hitler.http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=28588







"The Muslim Brotherhood is a group that worries us not because it deals with philosophical or ideological ideas but because it defends the use of violence against civilians". Poole, Patrick, (26 March 2007). "Mainstreaming the Muslim Brotherhood". FrontPage Magazine. p. 39.

6."Obama White House Declares Muslim Brotherhood Is Not a Terrorist OrganizationLatest Blog Posts | CBN.com
"The Muslim Brotherhood called for “a long, uncompromising jihad” in Egypt just days after a delegation of the Islamist group’s key leaders and allies met with the State Department, according to an official statement released this week.

Just days after a delegation that included two top Brotherhood leaders was hosted at the State Department, the organization released an official statement calling on its supporters to “prepare” for jihad, according to an independent translation of the statement first posted on Tuesday."
Open Jihad Declared in Egypt Following State Dept. Meeting with Muslim Brotherhood-Aligned Leaders


7. What is the reason behind these lies that Obama released on an unsuspecting public:

And for the next item in this fully documented and linked, thesis:


Obama “told you that radical Islamist terrorism does not stem from ideology.” Pompeo, at site of Obama's address to Muslim world, rebukes his legacy: 'Age of self-inflicted American shame is over'



“Obama: ‘We’ are to blame, not Islamic terrorism, for massacre” https://nypost.com/2016/06/12/obama-says-we-are-to-blame-not-islamic-terrorism-for-orlando-massacre/




“Isis is not about Islam, says Obama”
Subscribe to read | Financial Times




“Obama on ISIS: ‘They’re not an existential threat to us’”
Obama on ISIS: 'They're not an existential threat to us'




If Obama weren't exactly what I have revealed him to be.....why would he posit those lies??????




8. As President, Obama actually worked to establish the Muslim Brotherhood in control of Egypt, known as the ‘army of the Arabs.’

When the people of Egypt refused the fundamentalism that Obama represented, he actually cut off aid to Egypt.


When the Egyptian people declined to be governed by the 7th century savages, the Muslim Brotherhood, Obama had a fit:

"The U.S. government has decided privately to act as if the military takeover of Egypt was a coup, temporarily suspending most forms of military aid, despite deciding not to announce publicly a coup determination one way or the other, according to a leading U.S. senator.
In the latest example of its poorly understood Egypt policy, the Obama administration has decided to temporarily suspend the disbursement of most direct military aid, the delivery of weapons to the Egyptian military, and some forms of economic aid to the Egyptian government while it conducts a broad review of the relationship."
Senator: Obama Administration Secretly Suspended Military Aid to Egypt - The Daily Beast



"…Obama administration used the language of “moderate Islamists” to describe the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, and he called Iran’s President Rouhani, a “moderate” reformist, despite the rise of human rights violations in Iran on Rouhani’s watch.

The Muslim Brotherhood, on the other hand was better known for sponsoring terrorist proxies and ideological movements that reflected its Islamist ideology. "
Why did the Obama administration support Morsi's Muslim Brotherhood?



Why would some Muslims not want President al-Sisi in place of the fundamentalist Muslim Brotherhood, who Obama favored?

“In the small village of al-Ur, in the south of Egypt, a cathedral dedicated to the 21 Copts beheaded in 2015 by the Islamic State in Libya was inaugurated in February.

Financed by the government, the new church is part of the strategy of President ‘Abd al Fattah al-Sisi, who will run for a second term in office in an election in March, to strengthen the alliance with the Coptic Church.

… the current President, ‘Abd al Fattah al-Sisi, who wanted to publicly renew the pact with a majestic ceremony. On January 6, 2018, on the occasion of the Coptic Christmas, the current Egyptian rais inaugurated with Patriarch Tawadros II the new cathedral that, according to the President’s intentions, should become the largest Christian church in the Middle East.” From Nasser to Sisi, the Difficult Balance of the Copts




Sisi......embracing Christians......no Islamist President could abide that!!!!!!!


9. In his battle to abet the creation of a Muslim Caliphate, Obama clearing the field for the creation of ISIS by refusing to leave any troops as a counterweight in Iraq

"With regards to Iraq, you and I agreed, I believe, that there should be a status of forces agreement,” Romney told Obama as the two convened on the Lynn University campus in Boca Raton, Fla., that October evening.

“That’s not true,” Obama interjected. “Oh, you didn’t want a status of forces agreement?” Romney asked as an argument ensued.“No,” Obama said. “What I would not have done is left 10,000 troops in Iraq that would tie us down. That certainly would not help us in the Middle East.”
Obama Suddenly No Longer Interested in Taking Credit for Ending Iraq War | FrontPage Magazinehttp://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dg...erested-in-taking-credit-for-ending-iraq-war/




"The toll wreaked by his disengagement from the world and retreat from the use of American influence is severe. While ISIS expands its reach with summary executions possibly running into the thousands, Obama is left to offload onto Maliki all responsibility for the chaos that’s happened and all that’s to come.

That's the easy way for Obama to escape admitting that he blew it."
What Obama wrought - NY Daily News




[Obama] “… underestimated the tenacity and viciousness of radical Islamism, a debauched strain of the faith that seeks to upend every other form of worship or governance. ISIS drove to the outskirts of Baghdad as America hesitated. They raped and pillaged and murdered tens of thousands of innocents. They birthed a caliphate across Syria and Iraq and launched terror attacks that killed all across continents.”
WATCH: Pompeo Delivers Rip-Snorting Speech In Cairo, Eviscerates Obama





….did you know Hussein installed ISIS-supporting Islamist as senior adviser in Homeland Security???


Would an American do this?????
Not hardly.

10. Then, there’s this: Obama’s support for the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism, the maniacs waiting for 12th Imam to immolate the entire world? An accident? Or based on his faith?
Obama made certain that America showed no support for the ‘Green Revolution’ when the people of Iran protested the savage mullah’s…


“[Obama’s] “reluctance, to wield our influence kept us silent as the people of Iran rose up against the mullahs in Tehran in the Green Revolution. The ayatollahs and their henchmen murdered, jailed, and intimidated freedom-loving Iranians, and they wrongly blamed America for this unrest when it was their own tyranny that had fueled it. Emboldened, the regime spread its cancerous influence to Yemen, to Iraq, to Syria, and still further into Lebanon.”

"... new details on how far Obama went to avoid helping Iran's green movement. Behind the scenes, Obama overruled advisers who wanted to do what America had done at similar transitions from dictatorship to democracy, and signal America's support."
Why Obama Let Iran's Green Revolution Fail



Barack Obama, the #1 funder of radical Islamic fundamentalism and of the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism, in the history of the world.

“US sent plane with $400 million in cash to Iran” US sent plane with $400 million in cash to Iran - CNNPolitics



And, in a textbook example of obstruction of justice, Obama squashed a Justice Department case against Iran and Hezbollah for selling $1 billion of cocaine in the United States.




And contrary to all of his promises not to do so, and in contravention of the non-proliferation agreement that is our policy, Hussein Obama guaranteed nuclear weapons to Iran....

NPR wrote that they were restricted for 10 years:
"Perhaps the biggest unknown is what happens to that breakout time once some of the terms of this deal start to expire 10 and 15 years from now.
In an interview with NPR after the framework of this agreement was reached, President Obama conceded that "at that point the breakout times would have shrunk almost down to zero."

But this deal, Obama argued at the time, buys the United States at least a decade."
6 Things You Should Know About The Iran Nuclear Deal


And that was written four years ago.




There was never....NEVER....any reason to allow the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism to have nuclear weapons.

Unless one was infatuated with the idea of ‘a Muslim Bomb!’


And who would favor that?? A Muslim, perhaps.
Hussein Obama.

11. In so very many ways, Islamofascists and Democrats share a nexus, thus putting Obama in the proverbial ‘catbird seat.’
Here is one of those ways: anti-Semitism.




Who are the eternal targets of Islamists.

Jews.

What is the only country that Obama sent paid apparatchiks to target and destabilize?


“Obama admin. sent taxpayer money to campaign to oust Netanyahu” Obama admin. sent taxpayer money to campaign to oust Netanyahu


“During Israel’s 2015 elections, the Obama administration — led by Secretary of State John Kerry — illegally intervened when they attempted to defeat the reelection of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu by covertly funneling State Department grants to opposition groups. The Obama administration detested Netanyahu due to his refusal to cave into Palestinian demands, a group that even refused to recognize the existence of Israel.”
Obama’s Meddling in Foreign Elections: Six Examples

And who are Obama’s pals?????

Obama-Farrakhan photo cover-up
Obama-Farrakhan photo cover-up | Tulsa Today



12. Anyone recall the hidden tape of Obama with noted anti-Semite Rashid Khalidi?

"The L.A. Times Suppresses Obama’s Khalidi Bash Tape
At the time Khalidi, a PLO adviser turned University of Chicago professor, was headed east to Columbia. There he would take over the University’s Middle East-studies program (which he has since maintained as a bubbling cauldron of anti-Semitism) and assume the professorship endowed in honor of Edward Sayyid, another notorious terror apologist."
The L.A. Times Suppresses Obama’s Khalidi Bash Tape | National Review

13. Remember this, by Obama, in service to his faith:
Obama Saying 'Islam has been Woven into the Fabric of our Country Since its Founding'





Not hardly.



They were enemies of the United States from before the Barbary War.

In March 1785, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams went to London to negotiate with Tripoli's envoy, Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman (or Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja). When they inquired "concerning the ground of the pretensions to make war upon nations who had done them no injury", the ambassador replied:

It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise.

He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck of an enemy's ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into the foe that they cried out for quarter at once.

"American Peace Commissioners to John Jay," March 28, 1786, "Thomas Jefferson Papers," Series 1. General Correspondence. 1651–1827, Library of Congress. LoC: March 28, 1786




But a Muslim is allowed to lie if it benefits the faith.

Even if he is the President of the United States.

14. All of the indicia that I have provided in this thread are true. Proof of same is that the Democrat serfs who evinced their ire at it, have been unable to show otherwise.


And, taken collectively, they provide undeniable truth wabout Hussein Obama: he is either Muslim, or wishes Islam to take over Western Civilization.


There is no other possible conclusion possible.



But wait! There’s more!



All of the things Obama has done to advance Islam pales in comparison to his gargantuan efforts to strengthen the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism: Iran.


As important as Obama’s guaranteeing nuclear weapons to Iran is who rule Iran: these are maniacs who believe that worldwide conflagration will lead to the return of the Muslim Messiah.



Their foreign policy of Iran is aimed at world domination under the leadership of the 12th Imam.

The Hidden Imam, as he is also known by his followers, will only return after a period of cosmic chaos, war and bloodshed – what Christians call the Apocalypse –


“ The hidden Imam who is expected to return....
....beware of doubting, for to doubt the order of God, the Mighty, the Sublime, is apostasy (Kufr). Ibn Khaldun also states that “ When imprisoned with his mother in the house, he entered a sort of well or pit in the house that his family occupies at Samarrah, Iraq, and there he disappeared, but he is to come forth at the end of the age to fill the earth with justice”.
The Twelfth Imam, Muhammad ibn al-Hasan (Al-Mahdi-Sahibuz Zaman) (The hidden Imam who is expected to return)




From the NYTimes:


“We should by now have become used to the death cult that is thriving at the fringes of the Muslim world. This is the cult of people who are proud to declare, "You love life, but we love death." This is the cult that sent waves of defenseless children to be mowed down on the battlefields of the Iran-Iraq war, that trains kindergartners to become bombs, that fetishizes death, that sends people off joyfully to commit mass murder. Because the death cult is not really about the cause it purports to serve. It's about the sheer pleasure of killing and dying.” Cult of Death



If Obama were not a secret Muslim, why would he be supporting this????


15. What a generous fellow, Obama, when it comes to rewarding his co-religionists.


When it comes to Iran, the 7th century homicidal maniacs…

a. He sends them pallets loaded with cash

b. He guarantees them nuclear weapons

c. He removes the sanctions that were killing them

d. He obstructs justice, the DoJ case against Iran’s proxy, Hezbollah, for selling $1 billion of cocaine in the US

e. And….he provides them with the fruits of America’s technological achievements, to make them more formidable as enemies to America….our drone technology.



Obama as President turned over, directly to the 7th century savages, our latest and most technologically advanced, surveillance drone, the RQ-170 Sentinel.....
...of course, by extension, turned it over to Russia and China, as well.
When the drone crash landed in Iran...that's 'Death To America Iran'.....Obama let them keep it.

Answer: it is just one more of the copious and generous gifts from the man Democrats/Liberals called the Messiah, and God and Jesus.
Methinks the reference was to the wrong religion.




"President Obama said on Monday that the United States had asked Iran to return an American surveillance drone that the Iranians say they captured on Dec. 4. It was Mr. Obama’s first public comment about the drone, a remote-controlled spying aircraft,...
...Obama was answering this question: “And speaking of Iran, are you concerned that it will be able to weaken America’s national security by discovering intelligence from the fallen drone that it captured?”
Obama Says America Asked Iran to Return Its Drone





16. But...but......what could he have done?????

This:
"... otherwise I would not explain why the RQ-170 was not remotely destroyed with a kill-switch reportedly used on such systems to prevent them from going in the wrong hands. Such self-destruction systems are designed to bring down the drone should its pilot lose satellite link from the mobile ground control station.

The stealthy UAS (Unmanned Aerial System) is one of the most precious of the U.S. arsenal..."
Iran seizes a U.S. Stealth Drone by taking over controls. Maybe… And what about that Predator virus?


"....It was “standard procedure” for US forces to recover or destroy any drones that are lost, ..."
Iran shows off captured US drone

Unless you were a deep cover mole with the ability to reward your....'allies’ in the ummah (Ummah (Arabic: أمة‎ [ˈʊm.mæ]) is an Arabic word meaning "community").





Any doubt where Hussein Obama’s affections lie?

Soooo……wadda’ ya’ think……Obama, a crypto-Islamist?????

Definitely.

 

[PoliticalChic]

There can be no argument as to the association of the Democrat Party and abortion…..


But there is more: it is the atavistic belief in infanticide that fuels Democrats.




“As Princeton ethicist, Peter Singer, has argued for decades, why don’t we legalise infanticide? After all, if it is legal to murder a baby the moment before it is born, what makes it wrong to murder after it exits the mother’s womb? Why would we ever want to obstruct a woman’s choice?

The true face of the Democratic is grim, and many are even scared to delve into the party’s history. If we wish to understand the true monstrosity of the recent New York abortion legislation, we must understand and acknowledge the history of the party from which it has come. As LifeSiteNews has rightly argued, “The democrats are now the party of infanticide, and no one can deny it.”
Kill More Babies! · Caldron Pool





Not only did the crypto-Islamist, Obama, endorse infacticide….he hired the above psychopath, Peter Singer, as his ‘science adviser.’

“Peter Singer Joins Obama's Health Care Administrators” http://www.experienceproject.com/stories/Am-Not-A-Fan-Of-Peter-Singer/657290

Liar. Obama never endorsed infantcide.

"Obama never endorsed infantcide(sic)."



Let's check:



Jewish World Review April 24, 2008 / 19 Nissan 5768

Infanticide candidate for president

By Nat Hentoff

Jewish World Review: The intersection of faith, culture and politics | I was once strongly inclined to vote for Barack Obama for president (assuming he won his party's nomination) based on his record as a community organizer in Chicago and in the Illinois state legislature. He's had nitty-gritty street experiences absent in the resumes of most aspirants for the Oval Office: He worked in poor neighborhoods to get job training for the unemployed and found ways to reach school dropouts. And in the legislature, he got a bill passed to mandate electronic police recording of interrogations in homicide cases. But then I learned Obama's voting record on abortion.


I am a nonreligious pro-lifer, my only religion being the Constitution.

....on abortion, Obama is an extremist. He has opposed the Supreme Court decision that finally upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act against that form of infanticide. Most startlingly, for a professed humanist, Obama – in the Illinois Senate – also voted against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act. I have reported on several of those cases when, before the abortion was completed, an alive infant was suddenly in the room. It was disposed of as a horrified nurse who was not necessarily pro-life followed the doctors’ orders to put the baby in a pail or otherwise get rid of the child.

As a longtime columnist, John Leo, has written of this form of fatal discrimination, these “mistakes” during an abortion, once born, cannot be “killed or allowed to die simply because they are unwanted.”

.... Obama’s actual votes on abortion, he “voted to kill a bill that would have required an abortionist to notify at least one parent before performing an abortion on a minor girl from another state.”

“But if they make a mistake,” Obama continued, “I don’t want them punished with a baby.”

Among my children and grandchildren are two daughters and three granddaughters; and when I hear anyone, including a presidential candidate, equate having a baby as punishment, I realize with particular force the impact that the millions of legal abortions in this country have had on respect for human life."

Infanticide candidate for president - WND - WND












Gingrich: Obama Voted For Infanticide

"Newt Gingrich deflected a question ...by pointing out that Obama voted in favor of a law that protected abortion providers during his term as state senator of Illinois
"You did not once during the 2008 campaign ask why Barack Obama voted in favor of legalizing infanticide," Gingrich said. "If we're going to debate about who is the extremist on this issues, it is President Obama, who, as a state senator, voted to protect doctors who killed babies."
Newt Gingrich Calls Obama An 'Extremist' Who Supported 'Infanticide' At GOP Debate

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Funeral services for this OP will be held Feb 6th, 2019, 10:00 am...at Mt. Calvary Baptist Church By The Rock On The Hill....Rev. Jeremiah Wright will give the eulogy....

View attachment 244253

Then, Obama chooses as his spiritual guide, the anti-American pastor-nee-Muslim, Jeremiah Wright.

“Long before Reverend Wright entered the national stage, Ryan Lizza of The New Republic, in the March 19, 2007 issue, dropped this little gem:

Wright was a former Muslim and black nationalist who had studied at Howard and Chicago, and Trinity’s guiding principles–what the church calls the “Black Value System”

The racist paranoia of AIDS being developed by white America to kill blacks and other inexcusable statements are from the same framework of the NOI and Farrakhan. In fact:

In 1984, Wright was one of the inner circle that traveled with Farrakhan to visit Libyan strongman Col. Muammar Khadafy.

…why did Wright’s church put the racist and anti-Semitic Farrakhan on the cover of its magazine Trumpet? Why did Trinity Church post:
a manifesto by Hamas that defended terrorism as legitimate resistance, refused to recognize the right of Israel to exist and compared the terror group’s official charter – which calls for the murder of Jews – to America’s Declaration of Independence[?]


The three points above show a consistent pattern of Wright parroting not only the language and but also the attitude of the Nation of Islam.

The Reverend Wright may no longer be a Muslim, but he clearly embraces Hamas, Minister Farrakhan and others because they dovetail with his established world view, as with other syncretic religions.

Reverend Wright’s hate speeches are a glimpse of someone who has blended Nation of Islam and Black Nationalist Liberation Theology into a subversive Christianity,…”
Jeremiah Wright Was a Muslim: Why That Matters


A comfortable arena for our Muslim former President.

Rev Wright was both a former marine and naval medical officer (serving on president LBJ's medical team) --- he later got a masters degree in English and a masters degree in divinity from University of Chicago Divinity School ...all back in the late 60's..he also has a doctorate in divinity from United Theological Seminary...he became pastor of Trinity United Church of Christ, back in 1971....

Where is it that he was a muslim again?

You people are astoundingly pathetic with the lies....

I never lie.

Let's prove it together:


Now….if Wright is a Christian….as Obama claims to be, too….how to explain this:


“Muslim Brotherhood – Jeremiah Wright Declares that Yahweh is Allah


Jeremiah Wright declares that the God he worships is the same as Allah, the God of the Muslims.”

Muslim Brotherhood – Jeremiah Wright Declares that Yahweh is Allah

You are almost too stupid to be taken seriously....

You do understand that his point is that Allah, Yahweh, etc is all one God right?

Do you know that the Quran mentions Jesus over a 100 times? Does that make muslims Christians?

Muslims also believe:

1. Jesus, Mary, and the angel Gabriel are all in the Quran (as are Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, and a bunch of other Bible characters).
2. Muslims believe that Jesus (called "Isa" in Arabic) was a prophet of God, was born to a virgin (Mary), and will return to Earth before the Day of Judgment to restore justice and to defeat al-Masih ad-Dajjal ("the false messiah"), also known as the Antichrist. All of which may sound pretty familiar to many Christians.
3. Mary (called "Maryam" in Arabic) has an entire chapter in the Quran named for her — the only chapter in the Quran named for a female figure. In fact, Mary is the only woman to be mentioned by name in the entire Quran.
4. Just as with all the other prophets, including Mohammed, Muslims recite, "Peace be upon him" every time they refer to Jesus.

But since you think acknowledging that all 3 of the major faiths pray to the same God -- you think that makes someone a muslim? You people are pathetic...

Can you actually be this stupid???????


In no way are those identified in the Bible the same as those with the same names in the Q'ran.


" According to the Quran, Jesus, although appearing to have been crucified, was not killed by crucifixion or by any other means. This view disagrees with the foundation of the Gospel. Instead, the Quran says "God raised him unto Himself," which happens to agree with the Gospel message of Isa ascending into heaven. In the 19th Sura of the Quran (verse 33), Jesus is believed to have said "And peace is on me the day I was born and the day I will die and the day I am raised alive", a similar statement that John the Baptistdeclared a few verses earlier in the same Sura. Muslim tradition believes this to mean Jesus will experience a natural death with all mankind after returning to earth, being raised to life again on the day of judgment.

Like all prophets in Islam, Jesus is considered a Muslim (i.e., one who submits to the will of God), as he preached that his followers should adopt the "straight path" as commanded by God. Traditionally, Islam teaches the rejection of the Trinitarian Christian view that Jesus was God incarnate or the son of God. The Quran says that Jesus himself never claimed to be the Son of God, and it furthermore indicates that Jesus will deny having ever claimed divinity at the Last Judgment, and God will vindicate him.[5] "
Jesus in Islam - Wikipedia

Even you must begin to notice that I don't simply
destroy the lies you've been taught.....


.....I pulverize them.



Why are you Liberal drones such cowards, and have never done your own research????

This is why you folks continue to nominate people that you have to pretend you were ashamed of or didn't really support -- years later...you did it with Bush, you did it with McCain, you did it with Romney, and you will do it with Trump...

This happens because you people are so easy to manipulate and con.....because you people don't read and definitely under no circumstances do you challenge your own delusional beliefs....you just simply claim you never held them once the history is clear...

 

[PoliticalChic]

Then, Obama chooses as his spiritual guide, the anti-American pastor-nee-Muslim, Jeremiah Wright.

“Long before Reverend Wright entered the national stage, Ryan Lizza of The New Republic, in the March 19, 2007 issue, dropped this little gem:

Wright was a former Muslim and black nationalist who had studied at Howard and Chicago, and Trinity’s guiding principles–what the church calls the “Black Value System”

The racist paranoia of AIDS being developed by white America to kill blacks and other inexcusable statements are from the same framework of the NOI and Farrakhan. In fact:

In 1984, Wright was one of the inner circle that traveled with Farrakhan to visit Libyan strongman Col. Muammar Khadafy.

…why did Wright’s church put the racist and anti-Semitic Farrakhan on the cover of its magazine Trumpet? Why did Trinity Church post:
a manifesto by Hamas that defended terrorism as legitimate resistance, refused to recognize the right of Israel to exist and compared the terror group’s official charter – which calls for the murder of Jews – to America’s Declaration of Independence[?]


The three points above show a consistent pattern of Wright parroting not only the language and but also the attitude of the Nation of Islam.

The Reverend Wright may no longer be a Muslim, but he clearly embraces Hamas, Minister Farrakhan and others because they dovetail with his established world view, as with other syncretic religions.

Reverend Wright’s hate speeches are a glimpse of someone who has blended Nation of Islam and Black Nationalist Liberation Theology into a subversive Christianity,…”
Jeremiah Wright Was a Muslim: Why That Matters


A comfortable arena for our Muslim former President.

Rev Wright was both a former marine and naval medical officer (serving on president LBJ's medical team) --- he later got a masters degree in English and a masters degree in divinity from University of Chicago Divinity School ...all back in the late 60's..he also has a doctorate in divinity from United Theological Seminary...he became pastor of Trinity United Church of Christ, back in 1971....

Where is it that he was a muslim again?

You people are astoundingly pathetic with the lies....

I never lie.

Let's prove it together:


Now….if Wright is a Christian….as Obama claims to be, too….how to explain this:


“Muslim Brotherhood – Jeremiah Wright Declares that Yahweh is Allah


Jeremiah Wright declares that the God he worships is the same as Allah, the God of the Muslims.”

Muslim Brotherhood – Jeremiah Wright Declares that Yahweh is Allah

You are almost too stupid to be taken seriously....

You do understand that his point is that Allah, Yahweh, etc is all one God right?

Do you know that the Quran mentions Jesus over a 100 times? Does that make muslims Christians?

Muslims also believe:

1. Jesus, Mary, and the angel Gabriel are all in the Quran (as are Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, and a bunch of other Bible characters).
2. Muslims believe that Jesus (called "Isa" in Arabic) was a prophet of God, was born to a virgin (Mary), and will return to Earth before the Day of Judgment to restore justice and to defeat al-Masih ad-Dajjal ("the false messiah"), also known as the Antichrist. All of which may sound pretty familiar to many Christians.
3. Mary (called "Maryam" in Arabic) has an entire chapter in the Quran named for her — the only chapter in the Quran named for a female figure. In fact, Mary is the only woman to be mentioned by name in the entire Quran.
4. Just as with all the other prophets, including Mohammed, Muslims recite, "Peace be upon him" every time they refer to Jesus.

But since you think acknowledging that all 3 of the major faiths pray to the same God -- you think that makes someone a muslim? You people are pathetic...

Can you actually be this stupid???????


In no way are those identified in the Bible the same as those with the same names in the Q'ran.


" According to the Quran, Jesus, although appearing to have been crucified, was not killed by crucifixion or by any other means. This view disagrees with the foundation of the Gospel. Instead, the Quran says "God raised him unto Himself," which happens to agree with the Gospel message of Isa ascending into heaven. In the 19th Sura of the Quran (verse 33), Jesus is believed to have said "And peace is on me the day I was born and the day I will die and the day I am raised alive", a similar statement that John the Baptistdeclared a few verses earlier in the same Sura. Muslim tradition believes this to mean Jesus will experience a natural death with all mankind after returning to earth, being raised to life again on the day of judgment.

Like all prophets in Islam, Jesus is considered a Muslim (i.e., one who submits to the will of God), as he preached that his followers should adopt the "straight path" as commanded by God. Traditionally, Islam teaches the rejection of the Trinitarian Christian view that Jesus was God incarnate or the son of God. The Quran says that Jesus himself never claimed to be the Son of God, and it furthermore indicates that Jesus will deny having ever claimed divinity at the Last Judgment, and God will vindicate him.[5] "
Jesus in Islam - Wikipedia

Even you must begin to notice that I don't simply
destroy the lies you've been taught.....


.....I pulverize them.



Why are you Liberal drones such cowards, and have never done your own research????

This is why you folks continue to nominate people that you have to pretend you were ashamed of or didn't really support -- years later...you did it with Bush, you did it with McCain, you did it with Romney, and you will do it with Trump...

This happens because you people are so easy to manipulate and con.....because you people don't read and definitely under no circumstances do you challenge your own delusional beliefs....you just simply claim you never held them once the history is clear...

Any quotes there from moi????


None????


You're quite the font of hot air, huh?





BTW......anything herein not true, correct, and accurate??????


"You see, what do slavery, segregation laws, eugenics, and abortion have in common? They were all top priorities for the Democratic Party throughout history.

• 1828 — Democratic Party is founded by Andrew Jackson — a passionate advocate of slavery and key figure behind the ‘Trail of Tears’ — a state-sanctioned slaughter of around 15,000 Native Americans
• 1866 — Ku Klux Klan is founded by a group of Democratic former confederate soldiers who fought to prevent blacks living in the South from voting
• 1868 — Equal protection granted to slaves in the USA: 94% Republican support and 0% Democratic support.
• 1870— Black suffrage: 100% Republicans voted for, 0% Democrats voted against.
• 1915— First motion-picture movie to be shown in the White House is The Birth of Nation, a Democratic-Party produced propaganda film depicting the KKK as heroes.
• 1939 —“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members” – Margaret Sanger (Founder of Planned Parenthood)
• 1960s — “I’ll have those ******* voting Democratic for the next 200 years” – Lyndon B. Johnson
• 2014 — 36% of all abortion in the US were performed on black women compared to the national black population of 13.3%
• 2019 — Reproductive Health Act legalises the murdering of a child up to the day of birth

Even a cursory glance at the dark history of the Democratic Party reveals that they have been the party of death long before the 21st century."

Kill More Babies! · Caldron Pool



Now....your Democrat Party???????



1. The Democrats are, and have always been, the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship, the party that stood in schoolhouse doors to block black school children….until Republicans sent in the 101st airborne

2. It is the party of Jefferson Davis, the KKK, Planned Parenthood, concentration camps for American citizens, and restrictions on free speech.

3. It is the party of Mao ornaments on the White House Christmas tree, and of James Hodgkinson, and of Communist Bernie Sanders, of pretend genders.

4. The Democrat Party is the oldest racist organization in America, the trail of tears, the author of Jim Crow and the bigotry of low expectations, filibustered against women getting the vote and killed every anti-lynching bill to get to Congress

5. The Democrat Party is the number one funder of the Islamic Revolution in Tehran….to the tune of $100 billion to the Ayatollahs….and gave Hezbollah the go-ahead to sell cocaine in America.

6. It is the party of anti-Semitism and Louis Farrakhan, and of the first Cabinet member ever to be held in contempt of Congress.

7. It is the party that admits its future depends on flooding the country with illegal aliens, and telling them to vote.

8. It is the party that couldn't suck up to the Castro Brothers enough, and treats the Bill of Rights like a Chinese menu..

9. The Democrats got us into the Civil War…Jefferson Davis .... Woodrow Wilson, WWI….FDR, WWII……Truman, Korean War….VietNam, JFK and LBJ…..yet they want to weaken our military.

10. The Democrats are the party that looks at the mayhem their gun laws have produced in Chicago, ……and this is their model for the nation.


11. I should mention that the Democrat Party was used as a model by Adolph Hitler and the Nazi Party….another ‘feather’ in the party’s cap?

12. The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism.





Now.....either compose a list that reflects the same evil for the Right, conservatives, the GOP.....or admit to being a windbag proposing moral equivalence.




BTW......while there is a Far Left....and it owns and operates the Democrat Party......

....THERE IS NO FAR RIGHT IN THIS COUNTRY.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Isn’t it interesting that the Democrat voters….at least the ones in this thread……can’t explain what or why they support what they do.

They can’t defend slavery.

They can’t defend segregation.

They can’t defend eugenics, that Nazi/Democrat thing……the Nazis claim they copied the Democrat model.





Now, they’d like to claim that the Democrats don’t champion infanticide…..but I can prove they do:


“Senate Democrats block GOP anti-infanticide bill spurred by Ralph Northam comments

Sen. Ben Sasse: 'You're either for babies, or you're defending infanticide'

“This bill would limit that mother’s decisions and require her doctor to administer unwanted medical care that could prolong her pain and suffering—even putting her health and safety at risk.”

The Sasse bill would require medical practitioners caring for infants born alive after botched abortions to “exercise the same degree of professional skill and care to protect the newborn as would be offered to any other child born alive at the same gestational age.”

“Senate Democrats had the chance today to prove they are not the party of infanticide, and instead they doubled down on extremism,”

Anti-infanticide bill blocked by Senate Democrats






Democrats: disgusting, sub-human, atavistic party.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Divide and Conquer propaganda.

You can find numerous examples of disgusting behavior of the other party as well. All the elites are assholes.

Yet I don't see you're equivalent listing for the other side......


Put your Dinaro where you put your dinner.

So. . . You put up divide and conquer propaganda, bad mouthing folks that identify as democrats, making them feel bad;


. . . . and you want to lure me into generating some toxic propaganda of the opposite sort?



Usually you are pretty smart girl, but you have GOT to be either paid by this forum, or yanking my chain.

Pointing out the history of what the democrat party did in the past doesn't make me feel bad -- I just get involved like others and change the platform of that party to implement policies that expands civil rights, labor rights, womens rights....

One thing you will never see conservatives talk about when it comes to desperation posts like these -- is policies.....

This is how they (try to) deflect from the GOP of 2019.

They appear to convince themselves and each other of this, but no one else is buying.

More alternate universe stuff.
.

It's just plain arguing in bad faith. It's all Cult45 has left these days.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Divide and Conquer propaganda.

You can find numerous examples of disgusting behavior of the other party as well. All the elites are assholes.

Yet I don't see you're equivalent listing for the other side......


Put your Dinaro where you put your dinner.

So. . . You put up divide and conquer propaganda, bad mouthing folks that identify as democrats, making them feel bad;


. . . . and you want to lure me into generating some toxic propaganda of the opposite sort?



Usually you are pretty smart girl, but you have GOT to be either paid by this forum, or yanking my chain.

Pointing out the history of what the democrat party did in the past doesn't make me feel bad -- I just get involved like others and change the platform of that party to implement policies that expands civil rights, labor rights, womens rights....

One thing you will never see conservatives talk about when it comes to desperation posts like these -- is policies.....

This is how they (try to) deflect from the GOP of 2019.

They appear to convince themselves and each other of this, but no one else is buying.

More alternate universe stuff.
.

It's just plain arguing in bad faith. It's all Cult45 has left these days.

Big talk from a small mind.


Watch me put you in your place......last seat in the dumb row:



Let's see you find any mistakes in my post:



"You see, what do slavery, segregation laws, eugenics, and abortion have in common? They were all top priorities for the Democratic Party throughout history.

• 1828 — Democratic Party is founded by Andrew Jackson — a passionate advocate of slavery and key figure behind the ‘Trail of Tears’ — a state-sanctioned slaughter of around 15,000 Native Americans
• 1866 — Ku Klux Klan is founded by a group of Democratic former confederate soldiers who fought to prevent blacks living in the South from voting
• 1868 — Equal protection granted to slaves in the USA: 94% Republican support and 0% Democratic support.
• 1870— Black suffrage: 100% Republicans voted for, 0% Democrats voted against.
• 1915— First motion-picture movie to be shown in the White House is The Birth of Nation, a Democratic-Party produced propaganda film depicting the KKK as heroes.
• 1939 —“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members” – Margaret Sanger (Founder of Planned Parenthood)
• 1960s — “I’ll have those ******* voting Democratic for the next 200 years” – Lyndon B. Johnson
• 2014 — 36% of all abortion in the US were performed on black women compared to the national black population of 13.3%
• 2019 — Reproductive Health Act legalises the murdering of a child up to the day of birth

Even a cursory glance at the dark history of the Democratic Party reveals that they have been the party of death long before the 21st century."

Kill More Babies! · Caldron Pool



Now....your Democrat Party???????



1. The Democrats are, and have always been, the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship, the party that stood in schoolhouse doors to block black school children….until Republicans sent in the 101st airborne

2. It is the party of Jefferson Davis, the KKK, Planned Parenthood, concentration camps for American citizens, and restrictions on free speech.

3. It is the party of Mao ornaments on the White House Christmas tree, and of James Hodgkinson, and of Communist Bernie Sanders, of pretend genders.

4. The Democrat Party is the oldest racist organization in America, the trail of tears, the author of Jim Crow and the bigotry of low expectations, filibustered against women getting the vote and killed every anti-lynching bill to get to Congress

5. The Democrat Party is the number one funder of the Islamic Revolution in Tehran….to the tune of $100 billion to the Ayatollahs….and gave Hezbollah the go-ahead to sell cocaine in America.

6. It is the party of anti-Semitism and Louis Farrakhan, and of the first Cabinet member ever to be held in contempt of Congress.

7. It is the party that admits its future depends on flooding the country with illegal aliens, and telling them to vote.

8. It is the party that couldn't suck up to the Castro Brothers enough, and treats the Bill of Rights like a Chinese menu..

9. The Democrats got us into the Civil War…Jefferson Davis .... Woodrow Wilson, WWI….FDR, WWII……Truman, Korean War….VietNam, JFK and LBJ…..yet they want to weaken our military.

10. The Democrats are the party that looks at the mayhem their gun laws have produced in Chicago, ……and this is their model for the nation.


11. I should mention that the Democrat Party was used as a model by Adolph Hitler and the Nazi Party….another ‘feather’ in the party’s cap?

12. The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism.





Now.....either compose a list that reflects the same evil for the Right, conservatives, the GOP.....or admit to being a windbag proposing moral equivalence.




BTW......while there is a Far Left....and it owns and operates the Democrat Party......

....THERE IS NO FAR RIGHT IN THIS COUNTRY.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Divide and Conquer propaganda.

You can find numerous examples of disgusting behavior of the other party as well. All the elites are assholes.

Yet I don't see you're equivalent listing for the other side......


Put your Dinaro where you put your dinner.

So. . . You put up divide and conquer propaganda, bad mouthing folks that identify as democrats, making them feel bad;


. . . . and you want to lure me into generating some toxic propaganda of the opposite sort?



Usually you are pretty smart girl, but you have GOT to be either paid by this forum, or yanking my chain.

Pointing out the history of what the democrat party did in the past doesn't make me feel bad -- I just get involved like others and change the platform of that party to implement policies that expands civil rights, labor rights, womens rights....

One thing you will never see conservatives talk about when it comes to desperation posts like these -- is policies.....

This is how they (try to) deflect from the GOP of 2019.

They appear to convince themselves and each other of this, but no one else is buying.

More alternate universe stuff.
.

It's just plain arguing in bad faith. It's all Cult45 has left these days.

I sure put a cork in your pie-hole, huh?

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Yet I don't see you're equivalent listing for the other side......


Put your Dinaro where you put your dinner.

So. . . You put up divide and conquer propaganda, bad mouthing folks that identify as democrats, making them feel bad;


. . . . and you want to lure me into generating some toxic propaganda of the opposite sort?



Usually you are pretty smart girl, but you have GOT to be either paid by this forum, or yanking my chain.

Pointing out the history of what the democrat party did in the past doesn't make me feel bad -- I just get involved like others and change the platform of that party to implement policies that expands civil rights, labor rights, womens rights....

One thing you will never see conservatives talk about when it comes to desperation posts like these -- is policies.....

This is how they (try to) deflect from the GOP of 2019.

They appear to convince themselves and each other of this, but no one else is buying.

More alternate universe stuff.
.

It's just plain arguing in bad faith. It's all Cult45 has left these days.

I sure put a cork in your pie-hole, huh?

Nope.

 

[PoliticalChic]

So. . . You put up divide and conquer propaganda, bad mouthing folks that identify as democrats, making them feel bad;


. . . . and you want to lure me into generating some toxic propaganda of the opposite sort?



Usually you are pretty smart girl, but you have GOT to be either paid by this forum, or yanking my chain.

Pointing out the history of what the democrat party did in the past doesn't make me feel bad -- I just get involved like others and change the platform of that party to implement policies that expands civil rights, labor rights, womens rights....

One thing you will never see conservatives talk about when it comes to desperation posts like these -- is policies.....

This is how they (try to) deflect from the GOP of 2019.

They appear to convince themselves and each other of this, but no one else is buying.

More alternate universe stuff.
.

It's just plain arguing in bad faith. It's all Cult45 has left these days.

I sure put a cork in your pie-hole, huh?

Nope.

Yup.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Pointing out the history of what the democrat party did in the past doesn't make me feel bad -- I just get involved like others and change the platform of that party to implement policies that expands civil rights, labor rights, womens rights....

One thing you will never see conservatives talk about when it comes to desperation posts like these -- is policies.....

This is how they (try to) deflect from the GOP of 2019.

They appear to convince themselves and each other of this, but no one else is buying.

More alternate universe stuff.
.

It's just plain arguing in bad faith. It's all Cult45 has left these days.

I sure put a cork in your pie-hole, huh?

Nope.

Yup.

I wasn't engaging you in a discussion. Ergo, bad faith.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Pointing out the history of what the democrat party did in the past doesn't make me feel bad -- I just get involved like others and change the platform of that party to implement policies that expands civil rights, labor rights, womens rights....

One thing you will never see conservatives talk about when it comes to desperation posts like these -- is policies.....

This is how they (try to) deflect from the GOP of 2019.

They appear to convince themselves and each other of this, but no one else is buying.

More alternate universe stuff.
.

It's just plain arguing in bad faith. It's all Cult45 has left these days.

I sure put a cork in your pie-hole, huh?

Nope.

Yup.

and the great Democratic moments continue.....to which you will ALSO IGNORE....


Outlawing The Practice Of Denying Americans Coverage For Pre-Existing Conditions -- liberals...

First-time Home Buyer Credit -- liberals...

COBRA Continuation Coverage for Unemployed Workers -- liberals....

Consumer Protection Bureau --- liberals....

Exclusion of 75% of Small Business Capital Gains from Taxes -- Liberals....

5-Year Carryback of Net Operating Losses for Small Businesses -- Liberals...

Early Voting, Increased Voting Access -- liberals......and this is definitely something conservatives hate because conservatives know that the more people who vote, the less likely they are to vote for conservative policies....because they tend to suck.....and no matter how many lame "the democrats are the KKK" posts you vomit out will change that.

 

[PoliticalChic]

This is how they (try to) deflect from the GOP of 2019.

They appear to convince themselves and each other of this, but no one else is buying.

More alternate universe stuff.
.

It's just plain arguing in bad faith. It's all Cult45 has left these days.

I sure put a cork in your pie-hole, huh?

Nope.

Yup.

and the great Democratic moments continue.....to which you will ALSO IGNORE....


Outlawing The Practice Of Denying Americans Coverage For Pre-Existing Conditions -- liberals...

First-time Home Buyer Credit -- liberals...

COBRA Continuation Coverage for Unemployed Workers -- liberals....

Consumer Protection Bureau --- liberals....

Exclusion of 75% of Small Business Capital Gains from Taxes -- Liberals....

5-Year Carryback of Net Operating Losses for Small Businesses -- Liberals...

Early Voting, Increased Voting Access -- liberals......and this is definitely something conservatives hate because conservatives know that the more people who vote, the less likely they are to vote for conservative policies....because they tend to suck.....and no matter how many lame "the democrats are the KKK" posts you vomit out will change that.

Compared with having advanced slavery, segregation laws, eugenics, and abortion/infanticide.

 

[PoliticalChic]

This is how they (try to) deflect from the GOP of 2019.

They appear to convince themselves and each other of this, but no one else is buying.

More alternate universe stuff.
.

It's just plain arguing in bad faith. It's all Cult45 has left these days.

I sure put a cork in your pie-hole, huh?

Nope.

Yup.

I wasn't engaging you in a discussion. Ergo, bad faith.

You've brought nothing to the table......time for you to leave.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I’ve challenged the Left/Democrats, supporters of abortion/infanticide, to find any way to support the activity.

They weren’t up to the challenge.





Sooo…..watch what would have happened if they had tried the most common sophistry, the false ‘it’s the woman’s body, she can determine what she does with it.’




But it isn’t her body.

It is a separate, unique human being.


There are a number of clear biological facts, and all sorts of legal precedents, that easily refute the claim that the new human being is simply part of the mother's body.


1. Start with DNA: An individual's body parts all share the same genetic code. If the unborn child were actually a part of the mother's body, the unborn's cells would have the same genetic code as the cells of the mother. This is not the case. Every cell of the unborn's body is genetically distinct from every cell in the mother's body.




2. In many cases, the blood type of the unborn child is different than the blood type of the mother. Since one body cannot function with two different blood types, this is clearly not the mother's blood.




3. In half of all pregnancies, the unborn child is a male, meaning that even the sex of the child is different from the mother.




4. As Randy Alcorn states in his book Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments, "A Chinese zygote implanted in a Swedish woman will always be Chinese, not Swedish, because his identity is based on his genetic code, not on that of the body in which he resides."

5. It is possible for a fetus to die while the mother lives, and it is possible for the mother to die while the fetus lives. This could not be true if the mother and child were simply one person.




Enough to eviscerate the Leftist baby-killers?

I'd be happy to provide even more evidence that the unborn baby is not part of her body.....and, therefore, she has no right to end its life.



Just one more Democrat/Liberal lie, put to rest.