Grassley: Why Hasn't Anyone Who Lied Under Oath About Kavanaugh Been Prosecuted?

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Feb 16, 2016
15,713
27,669
2,430
Grassley: Why Hasn't Anyone Who Lied Under Oath About Kavanaugh Been Prosecuted?
Grassley: Why Hasn't Anyone Who Lied Under Oath About Kavanaugh Been Prosecuted? by Katie Pavlich (townhall.com)
25 Mar 2021 ~~ By Katie Pavlich
Former Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, who oversaw the chaotic confirmation hearings of now-Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, wants to know why individuals who made false claims under oath still haven't been prosecuted.
After a lengthy investigation, the Committee found that all allegations made against Kavanaugh, including by main Democrat witness Christine Blasey Ford, lacked evidence. Worse, provably false allegations were made under oath and a number of individuals were referred to the Department of Justice for prosecution. The lack of evidence was detailed in a 500-page long report, which was published in November 2018.
"Committee investigators found no verifiable evidence that supported Dr. Ford’s allegations against Justice Kavanaugh. The witnesses that Dr. Ford identified as individuals who could corroborate her allegations failed to do so, and in fact, contradicted her," the report states.


Comment:
Hmmm... If I could take a wild guess? Would it be that the Justice Department is political, and will only prosecute individuals that stand in the way of advancing Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat Left causes? Nahh… no way. It should be very obvious by now....
Actually the PMS/DSA Democrat Left's despicable act of character assassination of Judge Kavanaugh is just another demonstration of the vicious and depraved depths they're willing to embrace to oppose decency and integrity in every person or institution they have not already infected and contaminated.
It is continued in their attack on white people.
 
Surely its a he said she said situation and the cry baby would need to make a complaint. He isnt going to do that because he doesnt know what else will come out.
 
Grassley: Why Hasn't Anyone Who Lied Under Oath About Kavanaugh Been Prosecuted?
Grassley: Why Hasn't Anyone Who Lied Under Oath About Kavanaugh Been Prosecuted? by Katie Pavlich (townhall.com)
25 Mar 2021 ~~ By Katie Pavlich
Former Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, who oversaw the chaotic confirmation hearings of now-Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, wants to know why individuals who made false claims under oath still haven't been prosecuted.
After a lengthy investigation, the Committee found that all allegations made against Kavanaugh, including by main Democrat witness Christine Blasey Ford, lacked evidence. Worse, provably false allegations were made under oath and a number of individuals were referred to the Department of Justice for prosecution. The lack of evidence was detailed in a 500-page long report, which was published in November 2018.
"Committee investigators found no verifiable evidence that supported Dr. Ford’s allegations against Justice Kavanaugh. The witnesses that Dr. Ford identified as individuals who could corroborate her allegations failed to do so, and in fact, contradicted her," the report states.


Comment:
Hmmm... If I could take a wild guess? Would it be that the Justice Department is political, and will only prosecute individuals that stand in the way of advancing Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat Left causes? Nahh… no way. It should be very obvious by now....
Actually the PMS/DSA Democrat Left's despicable act of character assassination of Judge Kavanaugh is just another demonstration of the vicious and depraved depths they're willing to embrace to oppose decency and integrity in every person or institution they have not already infected and contaminated.
It is continued in their attack on white people.

Ask William Barr!!!
 
Grassley: Why Hasn't Anyone Who Lied Under Oath About Kavanaugh Been Prosecuted?
Grassley: Why Hasn't Anyone Who Lied Under Oath About Kavanaugh Been Prosecuted? by Katie Pavlich (townhall.com)
25 Mar 2021 ~~ By Katie Pavlich
Former Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, who oversaw the chaotic confirmation hearings of now-Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, wants to know why individuals who made false claims under oath still haven't been prosecuted.
After a lengthy investigation, the Committee found that all allegations made against Kavanaugh, including by main Democrat witness Christine Blasey Ford, lacked evidence. Worse, provably false allegations were made under oath and a number of individuals were referred to the Department of Justice for prosecution. The lack of evidence was detailed in a 500-page long report, which was published in November 2018.
"Committee investigators found no verifiable evidence that supported Dr. Ford’s allegations against Justice Kavanaugh. The witnesses that Dr. Ford identified as individuals who could corroborate her allegations failed to do so, and in fact, contradicted her," the report states.


Comment:
Hmmm... If I could take a wild guess? Would it be that the Justice Department is political, and will only prosecute individuals that stand in the way of advancing Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat Left causes? Nahh… no way. It should be very obvious by now....
Actually the PMS/DSA Democrat Left's despicable act of character assassination of Judge Kavanaugh is just another demonstration of the vicious and depraved depths they're willing to embrace to oppose decency and integrity in every person or institution they have not already infected and contaminated.
It is continued in their attack on white people.

If I had to guess, I'd say the lack of prosecution was a strategic decision. Public prosecution of a voluntary witness would discourage future witnesses from coming forward. Also, the Justice Dept has limited funds and personnel and much more important cases to work on.
Any prosecution decision is a matter of priorities. The Senate Committees can ferry out lies without Justice getting involved, as they did here. Her lies were not believed and the Justices were confirmed. No damage was done to the legal system.
 
Surely its a he said she said situation and the cry baby would need to make a complaint. He isnt going to do that because he doesnt know what else will come out.
WRONG. The Senate committee did not believe her. They confirmed Judge Cavanaugh.
Her Perjury failed. Grassley said they had lots of evidence to prove she lied. You have a reading problem.
 
I didn't believe Dr. Ford, but I don't believe that she lied either.

What she testified was a 'repressed memory' - it was only brought out under hypnosis or some other therapy (if I recall correctly).

How does anyone know if she recalled a 'repressed memory' or simply a dream?

I sounded a whole lot more like a dream than a memory - which explains why she couldn't fill in any details.

If she was lying she would have made up the details as well.
 
Republicans welcomed the shit show when the knew the allegations hadn't been collaborated. And why is Grassley not asking about charges against Feinstein and her staff for their involvement on coordinating knowingly false testimony?
 
I didn't believe Dr. Ford, but I don't believe that she lied either.

What she testified was a 'repressed memory' - it was only brought out under hypnosis or some other therapy (if I recall correctly).

How does anyone know if she recalled a 'repressed memory' or simply a dream?

I sounded a whole lot more like a dream than a memory - which explains why she couldn't fill in any details.

If she was lying she would have made up the details as well.

She was lying and the few details she gave were proven false by her own witnesses.
 
Republicans welcomed the shit show when the knew the allegations hadn't been collaborated. And why is Grassley not asking about charges against Feinstein and her staff for their involvement on coordinating knowingly false testimony?
What was false?
 
I didn't believe Dr. Ford, but I don't believe that she lied either.

What she testified was a 'repressed memory' - it was only brought out under hypnosis or some other therapy (if I recall correctly).

How does anyone know if she recalled a 'repressed memory' or simply a dream?

I sounded a whole lot more like a dream than a memory - which explains why she couldn't fill in any details.

If she was lying she would have made up the details as well.

She was lying and the few details she gave were proven false by her own witnesses.
Give some examples
 
I didn't believe Dr. Ford, but I don't believe that she lied either.

What she testified was a 'repressed memory' - it was only brought out under hypnosis or some other therapy (if I recall correctly).

How does anyone know if she recalled a 'repressed memory' or simply a dream?

I sounded a whole lot more like a dream than a memory - which explains why she couldn't fill in any details.

If she was lying she would have made up the details as well.

She was lying and the few details she gave were proven false by her own witnesses.
Give some examples

Leland Ingham Keyser, described as a “lifelong friend” of Ford, said that she was asked by one of Ford’s friends to change her story after initially claiming she didn’t remember being at any party with Judge Kavanaugh, and had never met him.

Keyser refused, and has stuck by her story–though she has also claimed that, even though she can’t corroborate the story, she believes Ford’s account.

The Wall Street Journal reported that people “familiar with the matter” had made the bombshell claim. The Journal wrote:

“Leland Keyser, who Dr. Ford has said was present at the gathering where she was allegedly assaulted in the 1980s, told investigators that Monica McLean, a retired Federal Bureau of Investigation agent and a friend of Dr. Ford’s, had urged her to clarify her statement, the people said.


The statement to the FBI offers a glimpse into how Dr. Ford’s allies were working behind the scenes to lobby old classmates to bolster their versions of the alleged incident, as were Judge Kavanaugh’s.

The Journal added:

A person close to the former classmates said it was her understanding that mutual friends of Dr. Ford and Ms. Keyser, including Ms. McLean, had contacted Ms. Keyser after her initial statement to warn her that her statement was being used by Republicans to rebut the allegation against Judge Kavanaugh.




 
I didn't believe Dr. Ford, but I don't believe that she lied either.

What she testified was a 'repressed memory' - it was only brought out under hypnosis or some other therapy (if I recall correctly).

How does anyone know if she recalled a 'repressed memory' or simply a dream?

I sounded a whole lot more like a dream than a memory - which explains why she couldn't fill in any details.

If she was lying she would have made up the details as well.

She was lying and the few details she gave were proven false by her own witnesses.
Give some examples

Leland Ingham Keyser, described as a “lifelong friend” of Ford, said that she was asked by one of Ford’s friends to change her story after initially claiming she didn’t remember being at any party with Judge Kavanaugh, and had never met him.

Keyser refused, and has stuck by her story–though she has also claimed that, even though she can’t corroborate the story, she believes Ford’s account.

The Wall Street Journal reported that people “familiar with the matter” had made the bombshell claim. The Journal wrote:

“Leland Keyser, who Dr. Ford has said was present at the gathering where she was allegedly assaulted in the 1980s, told investigators that Monica McLean, a retired Federal Bureau of Investigation agent and a friend of Dr. Ford’s, had urged her to clarify her statement, the people said.


The statement to the FBI offers a glimpse into how Dr. Ford’s allies were working behind the scenes to lobby old classmates to bolster their versions of the alleged incident, as were Judge Kavanaugh’s.

The Journal added:

A person close to the former classmates said it was her understanding that mutual friends of Dr. Ford and Ms. Keyser, including Ms. McLean, had contacted Ms. Keyser after her initial statement to warn her that her statement was being used by Republicans to rebut the allegation against Judge Kavanaugh.





though she has also claimed that, even though she can’t corroborate the story, she believes Ford’s account.
 

Forum List

Back
Top