Graham squirms when confronted with double standard on Subpoenas....

[mudwhistle]

There's no official impeachment...Pelosi knows that calling for a vote on that is political kamikaze attack...There is only the fake "impeachment inquiry" being run by the compulsive lying and leaking crapweasel Schiff....But the linked piece is from the hacks at Salon....GIGO.

Just more swill from one of the forum's top haters.

View attachment 284735

What is the Constitutional reason she needs to call a vote to investigate the President using subpoena power.

To give the president an opportunity to defend himself......

You don't like that possibility.

It would make it a fair fight, and you don't want to allow that.

So Obama should have been given the opportunity to defend himself during the oversight investigations of possible wrong doing where subpoenas were used?

Obama was given plenty of opportunity.
Course what he did was skate out on the process and blame it on rogue agents in Cincinnati.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

There's no official impeachment...Pelosi knows that calling for a vote on that is political kamikaze attack...There is only the fake "impeachment inquiry" being run by the compulsive lying and leaking crapweasel Schiff....But the linked piece is from the hacks at Salon....GIGO.

Just more swill from one of the forum's top haters.

View attachment 284735

What is the Constitutional reason she needs to call a vote to investigate the President using subpoena power.

To give the president an opportunity to defend himself......

You don't like that possibility.

It would make it a fair fight, and you don't want to allow that.

Rump gets his chance when or if it goes to the Senate just like every other President that was ever faced with Impeachment. Are you saying that every other president has one set of laws and Rump has his very own set? Does that mean that you are saying that Rump is above the law? The sooner it goes to the Senate and he gets to defend himself the better off we all are.

 

[JimH52]

Graham plays a few holes of golf with trump and now it seems they are dating.....there is a hole joke there somewhere.....

 

[Third Party]

How about this-the CONGRESS is acting in an impeachable manner-closed courts and secret witnesses-leaking stories to the media-reading

Isn't that what the House did when it was investigating Obama?

I don't know-but if so, it does NOT make it right.

 

[WillowTree]

There's no official impeachment...Pelosi knows that calling for a vote on that is political kamikaze attack...There is only the fake "impeachment inquiry" being run by the compulsive lying and leaking crapweasel Schiff....But the linked piece is from the hacks at Salon....GIGO.

Just more swill from one of the forum's top haters.

View attachment 284735

What is the Constitutional reason she needs to call a vote to investigate the President using subpoena power.

To give the president an opportunity to defend himself......

You don't like that possibility.

It would make it a fair fight, and you don't want to allow that.

Rump gets his chance when or if it goes to the Senate just like every other President that was ever faced with Impeachment. Are you saying that every other president has one set of laws and Rump has his very own set? Does that mean that you are saying that Rump is above the law? The sooner it goes to the Senate and he gets to defend himself the better off we all are.

In every other impeachment the house voted. Should not Trump receive the same treatment?

 

[WillowTree]

Why do the democrats in the house want to operate in secret?

 

[ThisIsMe]

There's no official impeachment...Pelosi knows that calling for a vote on that is political kamikaze attack...There is only the fake "impeachment inquiry" being run by the compulsive lying and leaking crapweasel Schiff....But the linked piece is from the hacks at Salon....GIGO.

Just more swill from one of the forum's top haters.

View attachment 284735

What is the Constitutional reason she needs to call a vote to investigate the President using subpoena power.

To give the president an opportunity to defend himself......

You don't like that possibility.

It would make it a fair fight, and you don't want to allow that.

Rump gets his chance when or if it goes to the Senate just like every other President that was ever faced with Impeachment. Are you saying that every other president has one set of laws and Rump has his very own set? Does that mean that you are saying that Rump is above the law? The sooner it goes to the Senate and he gets to defend himself the better off we all are.

So, are you saying that, the dems in the house get to amass piles of allegations, and then throw it on the trump legal team for them to try and defend DURING the trial? Or are you saying that at the end of the investigation by the dems, they turn it over to the senate, and then the trump legal team gets 6 to 12 months to investigate the allegations, and subpoena those witnesses to question them, and mount a defense against the allegations?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Lol, you better save some butthurt for Trumps second term.

So...the Russian fix is in?

Yup. Putin is gonna give the Republicans 100 more seats in the House and 8 more in the Senate.

It's gonna be YUUUGE!

 

[BlindBoo]

There's no official impeachment...Pelosi knows that calling for a vote on that is political kamikaze attack...There is only the fake "impeachment inquiry" being run by the compulsive lying and leaking crapweasel Schiff....But the linked piece is from the hacks at Salon....GIGO.

Just more swill from one of the forum's top haters.

View attachment 284735

What is the Constitutional reason she needs to call a vote to investigate the President using subpoena power.

To give the president an opportunity to defend himself......

You don't like that possibility.

It would make it a fair fight, and you don't want to allow that.

Rump gets his chance when or if it goes to the Senate just like every other President that was ever faced with Impeachment. Are you saying that every other president has one set of laws and Rump has his very own set? Does that mean that you are saying that Rump is above the law? The sooner it goes to the Senate and he gets to defend himself the better off we all are.

In every other impeachment the house voted. Should not Trump receive the same treatment?

In both modern cases the House Committees didn't have standing subpoena power and a vote was required to give any committee, not just an impeachment inquiry, subpoena power. That has since changed.

 

[mudwhistle]

There's no official impeachment...Pelosi knows that calling for a vote on that is political kamikaze attack...There is only the fake "impeachment inquiry" being run by the compulsive lying and leaking crapweasel Schiff....But the linked piece is from the hacks at Salon....GIGO.

Just more swill from one of the forum's top haters.

View attachment 284735

What is the Constitutional reason she needs to call a vote to investigate the President using subpoena power.

To give the president an opportunity to defend himself......

You don't like that possibility.

It would make it a fair fight, and you don't want to allow that.

Rump gets his chance when or if it goes to the Senate just like every other President that was ever faced with Impeachment. Are you saying that every other president has one set of laws and Rump has his very own set? Does that mean that you are saying that Rump is above the law? The sooner it goes to the Senate and he gets to defend himself the better off we all are.

In every other impeachment the house voted. Should not Trump receive the same treatment?

In both modern cases the House Committees didn't have standing subpoena power and a vote was required to give any committee, not just an impeachment inquiry, subpoena power. That has since changed.

Explain how and why you think it changed?

 

[WillowTree]

There's no official impeachment...Pelosi knows that calling for a vote on that is political kamikaze attack...There is only the fake "impeachment inquiry" being run by the compulsive lying and leaking crapweasel Schiff....But the linked piece is from the hacks at Salon....GIGO.

Just more swill from one of the forum's top haters.

View attachment 284735

What is the Constitutional reason she needs to call a vote to investigate the President using subpoena power.

To give the president an opportunity to defend himself......

You don't like that possibility.

It would make it a fair fight, and you don't want to allow that.

Rump gets his chance when or if it goes to the Senate just like every other President that was ever faced with Impeachment. Are you saying that every other president has one set of laws and Rump has his very own set? Does that mean that you are saying that Rump is above the law? The sooner it goes to the Senate and he gets to defend himself the better off we all are.

In every other impeachment the house voted. Should not Trump receive the same treatment?

In both modern cases the House Committees didn't have standing subpoena power and a vote was required to give any committee, not just an impeachment inquiry, subpoena power. That has since changed.

Link?
And you won’t mind when a Republican house does this to a DemonRat Prez?

 

[mudwhistle]

What is the Constitutional reason she needs to call a vote to investigate the President using subpoena power.

To give the president an opportunity to defend himself......

You don't like that possibility.

It would make it a fair fight, and you don't want to allow that.

Rump gets his chance when or if it goes to the Senate just like every other President that was ever faced with Impeachment. Are you saying that every other president has one set of laws and Rump has his very own set? Does that mean that you are saying that Rump is above the law? The sooner it goes to the Senate and he gets to defend himself the better off we all are.

In every other impeachment the house voted. Should not Trump receive the same treatment?

In both modern cases the House Committees didn't have standing subpoena power and a vote was required to give any committee, not just an impeachment inquiry, subpoena power. That has since changed.

Link?
And you won’t mind when a Republican house does this to a DemonRat Prez?

I think we should just vote to impeach the night after the election if we lose.

 

[BlindBoo]

What is the Constitutional reason she needs to call a vote to investigate the President using subpoena power.

To give the president an opportunity to defend himself......

You don't like that possibility.

It would make it a fair fight, and you don't want to allow that.

Rump gets his chance when or if it goes to the Senate just like every other President that was ever faced with Impeachment. Are you saying that every other president has one set of laws and Rump has his very own set? Does that mean that you are saying that Rump is above the law? The sooner it goes to the Senate and he gets to defend himself the better off we all are.

In every other impeachment the house voted. Should not Trump receive the same treatment?

In both modern cases the House Committees didn't have standing subpoena power and a vote was required to give any committee, not just an impeachment inquiry, subpoena power. That has since changed.

Explain how and why you think it changed?

In 2015 the Republican House changed the rules to give various committee chairs the right to subpoena witnesses without a vote to authorize that power. Before you ask, yes the Dems complained like the Trumpubs are now.

Dems blast House GOP subpoena rules change

So various committee already have that power. Why is there a need to vote to get something they already have?

 

[BlindBoo]

What is the Constitutional reason she needs to call a vote to investigate the President using subpoena power.

To give the president an opportunity to defend himself......

You don't like that possibility.

It would make it a fair fight, and you don't want to allow that.

Rump gets his chance when or if it goes to the Senate just like every other President that was ever faced with Impeachment. Are you saying that every other president has one set of laws and Rump has his very own set? Does that mean that you are saying that Rump is above the law? The sooner it goes to the Senate and he gets to defend himself the better off we all are.

In every other impeachment the house voted. Should not Trump receive the same treatment?

In both modern cases the House Committees didn't have standing subpoena power and a vote was required to give any committee, not just an impeachment inquiry, subpoena power. That has since changed.

Link?
And you won’t mind when a Republican house does this to a DemonRat Prez?

Dems blast House GOP subpoena rules change

They already did it to Obama. Why do you think they changed the rules?

 

[bodecea]

LOL, Dems are mad that Graham isn't willing to go full McCain...

Actually, we have a pool going on what trump has on Graham.

 

[bodecea]

You sure as hell didn’t witness any leftist outfuckingrage when Obama stonewalled. Did ya?

There was certainly a lot of rightist outfuckingrage wasn’t there? The hypocrisy flows both ways. Must be exhausting being a partisan hack

If you were actually a Human Being with a Conscience, you would be outraged at what The Left is trying to do to Democracy and America.

There’s much that the left has done and is doing that I don’t agree with. Over politicizing is counterproductive and done in abundance. Also impeachment is not something I agree with.

I don't care if Trump is impeached or not. I started from a position that impeachment is bad for the country. I still believe that. However, Trump is so crooked, he should be impeached. But I don't care either way.

It doesn't matter to me if the Democrats win the election in 2020 or if Trump wins. The country is fucked either way. Especially when it comes to the debt.

We are never going to have honest government as long as the rubes on both sides line up and BEG to be lied to.

Our politicians are merely symptoms of the disease of willful stupidity and blindness on the part of the rube herd.

We get the politicians we deserve.

Bullshit Putin dingleberry licker.

You have advocated over turning our election and deposing our duly elected president every day for 3 years.

Did you have a glass of Wake The Fuck Up Today, and suddenly are growing a case of Buyer's Remorse?

COUPS aren't pretty nor are they painiless. It's going to cost you and your friends....way more than you think to get what you want.

Won't you get in trouble with Putin, Comrade?

 

[mudwhistle]

To give the president an opportunity to defend himself......

You don't like that possibility.

It would make it a fair fight, and you don't want to allow that.

Rump gets his chance when or if it goes to the Senate just like every other President that was ever faced with Impeachment. Are you saying that every other president has one set of laws and Rump has his very own set? Does that mean that you are saying that Rump is above the law? The sooner it goes to the Senate and he gets to defend himself the better off we all are.

In every other impeachment the house voted. Should not Trump receive the same treatment?

In both modern cases the House Committees didn't have standing subpoena power and a vote was required to give any committee, not just an impeachment inquiry, subpoena power. That has since changed.

Explain how and why you think it changed?

In 2015 the Republican House changed the rules to give various committee chairs the right to subpoena witnesses without a vote to authorize that power. Before you ask, yes the Dems complained like the Trumpubs are now.

Dems blast House GOP subpoena rules change

So various committee already have that power. Why is there a need to vote to get something they already have?

I think you're confused.
Before.....we had a Congress that was working together and interested in doing the People's work.
Then the Democrats became extremely partisan and obstructionist (and became communists). So all they had to do was say no when they were in the minority. They had to change the rules to prevent Democrats from preventing discovery in investigations.

Right now Democrats are calling it an impeachment when in fact it is a one-sided search for crimes in a highly partisan inquisition....similar to a Salem Witch Trial

 

[The Original Tree]

There was certainly a lot of rightist outfuckingrage wasn’t there? The hypocrisy flows both ways. Must be exhausting being a partisan hack

If you were actually a Human Being with a Conscience, you would be outraged at what The Left is trying to do to Democracy and America.

There’s much that the left has done and is doing that I don’t agree with. Over politicizing is counterproductive and done in abundance. Also impeachment is not something I agree with.

I don't care if Trump is impeached or not. I started from a position that impeachment is bad for the country. I still believe that. However, Trump is so crooked, he should be impeached. But I don't care either way.

It doesn't matter to me if the Democrats win the election in 2020 or if Trump wins. The country is fucked either way. Especially when it comes to the debt.

We are never going to have honest government as long as the rubes on both sides line up and BEG to be lied to.

Our politicians are merely symptoms of the disease of willful stupidity and blindness on the part of the rube herd.

We get the politicians we deserve.

Bullshit Putin dingleberry licker.

You have advocated over turning our election and deposing our duly elected president every day for 3 years.

Did you have a glass of Wake The Fuck Up Today, and suddenly are growing a case of Buyer's Remorse?

COUPS aren't pretty nor are they painiless. It's going to cost you and your friends....way more than you think to get what you want.

Won't you get in trouble with Putin, Comrade?

You should ask him directly after you remove his balls from your chin, Joseph Goebbels.

BTW, how is your latest Lying Caper you pulled for Putin working out for you?

Did Orange Man Bad Smash your Game Board Again?

 

[The Original Tree]

Rump gets his chance when or if it goes to the Senate just like every other President that was ever faced with Impeachment. Are you saying that every other president has one set of laws and Rump has his very own set? Does that mean that you are saying that Rump is above the law? The sooner it goes to the Senate and he gets to defend himself the better off we all are.

In every other impeachment the house voted. Should not Trump receive the same treatment?

In both modern cases the House Committees didn't have standing subpoena power and a vote was required to give any committee, not just an impeachment inquiry, subpoena power. That has since changed.

Explain how and why you think it changed?

In 2015 the Republican House changed the rules to give various committee chairs the right to subpoena witnesses without a vote to authorize that power. Before you ask, yes the Dems complained like the Trumpubs are now.

Dems blast House GOP subpoena rules change

So various committee already have that power. Why is there a need to vote to get something they already have?

I think you're confused.
Before.....we had a Congress that was working together and interested in doing the People's work.
Then the Democrats became extremely partisan and obstructionist (and became communists). So all they had to do was say no when they were in the minority. They had to change the rules to prevent Democrats from preventing discovery in investigations.

Right now Democrats are calling it an impeachment when in fact it is a one-sided search for crimes in a highly partisan inquisition....similar to a Salem Witch Trial

This gained momentum and became a regular thing under Obama's Win at ALL Costs, Elections have Consequences Political Kamikaze Warfare.

 

[bodecea]

There's no official impeachment...Pelosi knows that calling for a vote on that is political kamikaze attack...There is only the fake "impeachment inquiry" being run by the compulsive lying and leaking crapweasel Schiff....But the linked piece is from the hacks at Salon....GIGO.

Just more swill from one of the forum's top haters.

View attachment 284735

What is the Constitutional reason she needs to call a vote to investigate the President using subpoena power.

To give the president an opportunity to defend himself......

You don't like that possibility.

It would make it a fair fight, and you don't want to allow that.

Rump gets his chance when or if it goes to the Senate just like every other President that was ever faced with Impeachment. Are you saying that every other president has one set of laws and Rump has his very own set? Does that mean that you are saying that Rump is above the law? The sooner it goes to the Senate and he gets to defend himself the better off we all are.

In every other impeachment the house voted. Should not Trump receive the same treatment?

When there is an impeachment. There is no impeachment............................ yet.