What's new

GQ:Can a Socialist Truck Driver Who Wants To Abolish The CIA Become the Youngest Member of Congress?

Daryl Hunt

Your Worst Nightmare
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
15,418
Reaction score
933
Points
290
Location
O.D. (Stands for Out Dere

CrusaderFrank

Diamond Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
110,295
Reaction score
20,619
Points
2,220
Location
Location, location
Socialism worked in Venezuela, it's working in CA it will work in the USA.

Surrender your weapons, property and freedoms and you'll be better off!
 

Daryl Hunt

Your Worst Nightmare
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
15,418
Reaction score
933
Points
290
Location
O.D. (Stands for Out Dere
Socialism worked in Venezuela, it's working in CA it will work in the USA.

Surrender your weapons, property and freedoms and you'll be better off!
Socialism failed in Venezuela when it became a Dictatorship. Just like Fascism failed in Italy when it became a Dictatorship. What fails in the Dictatorship. I have been in both a socialist and a fascist country and didn't care for either one but they weren't failing. Spain is still a Fascist Government and they are doing just fine. It doesn't matter whether you come from the right (fascist) or the left (socialist), when you go that one step too far, both meet in the circle as a dictatorship. I like the Federal Republic where we are about halfway around the circle with room to go either way without getting in too much trouble and can find our way back again. So keep using the Socialist insult. It only shows just how misinformed you really are.
 

Mac-7

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
6,521
Reaction score
1,206
Points
180

CrusaderFrank

Diamond Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
110,295
Reaction score
20,619
Points
2,220
Location
Location, location
Socialism worked in Venezuela, it's working in CA it will work in the USA.

Surrender your weapons, property and freedoms and you'll be better off!
Socialism failed in Venezuela when it became a Dictatorship. Just like Fascism failed in Italy when it became a Dictatorship. What fails in the Dictatorship. I have been in both a socialist and a fascist country and didn't care for either one but they weren't failing. Spain is still a Fascist Government and they are doing just fine. It doesn't matter whether you come from the right (fascist) or the left (socialist), when you go that one step too far, both meet in the circle as a dictatorship. I like the Federal Republic where we are about halfway around the circle with room to go either way without getting in too much trouble and can find our way back again. So keep using the Socialist insult. It only shows just how misinformed you really are.
Ask the Catalan political prisoners about Spanish Fascism. Sounds a lot like what the Sanders campaign has in store for Republicans
 
Last edited:

Daryl Hunt

Your Worst Nightmare
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
15,418
Reaction score
933
Points
290
Location
O.D. (Stands for Out Dere
You toss the word Socialist around like it was 1958. I really don't see a lot wrong with what he believes in whether I believe in it or not. It takes all kinds to make a world. And, take it from someone that actually been in Socialist Countries, he ain't no Socialist.
He calls himself a bernie sanders democrat socialist
Not the same thing. Denmark is calls itself a Democratic Socialist as well. And it's completely functional. It also beats the US in almost all categories as a nation in a positive way. Maybe we can learn a thing or two from such a success. And in Denmark Capitalism is doing quite well.
 

pknopp

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
11,631
Reaction score
565
Points
195
Abolish the CIA? Sounds good to me.
 

Daryl Hunt

Your Worst Nightmare
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
15,418
Reaction score
933
Points
290
Location
O.D. (Stands for Out Dere
Socialism worked in Venezuela, it's working in CA it will work in the USA.

Surrender your weapons, property and freedoms and you'll be better off!
Socialism failed in Venezuela when it became a Dictatorship. Just like Fascism failed in Italy when it became a Dictatorship. What fails in the Dictatorship. I have been in both a socialist and a fascist country and didn't care for either one but they weren't failing. Spain is still a Fascist Government and they are doing just fine. It doesn't matter whether you come from the right (fascist) or the left (socialist), when you go that one step too far, both meet in the circle as a dictatorship. I like the Federal Republic where we are about halfway around the circle with room to go either way without getting in too much trouble and can find our way back again. So keep using the Socialist insult. It only shows just how misinformed you really are.
Ask the Catalan political prisoners about Spanish Fascism. Sounds a lot like what the Sanders campaign has in store for Republicans
I remember the Franco Fascism. Not a fun place to not know the rules. Too much authoritarianism. I also remember the Polish Communist Rule. Another not so fun place. One was on the right and the other was on the left. In reality, when you go that far, not much difference except Franco did it better.

I also studied the Fascist rule under the first man to actually try it at a national level. You remember Mussolini, right? He taught Adolf everything he needed to know to take over Germany. Contrary to popular (or misinformed) opinion, it was Fascism that allowed Adolf to gain power and he used the Benito Fascism for Dummies book to do it. Both were extreme right wing. But both made the mistake of taking it too far and into Dictatorships. Stalin did the same thing from Socialism from the left. At that point, there is NO difference. When the circle is completed, both meet at the top which is Dictatorship. Franco never allowed it to get that far. But even then, under Franco, it was a bit stifling for me. But under Franco, Capitalism thrived. Study up on Franco. It's fascinating how he was all but forced to take over the Revolutionary forces of Spain and financed and supported by the Capitalists who were being disassembled by the Socialists that were in power at the time. But the problem is, Fascism is to the right of a Federal Republic and you do have to give up civil liberties to have it. As for Socialism, going the other direction, you have to give up a completely different set of civil liberties. But the Democratic Socialist and Federal Republics are somewhere between the two and just barrow from both of them when times require. The USofA is a mix of both. Now, I don't think you will ever understand but I tried.
 

CrusaderFrank

Diamond Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
110,295
Reaction score
20,619
Points
2,220
Location
Location, location
Socialism worked in Venezuela, it's working in CA it will work in the USA.

Surrender your weapons, property and freedoms and you'll be better off!
Socialism failed in Venezuela when it became a Dictatorship. Just like Fascism failed in Italy when it became a Dictatorship. What fails in the Dictatorship. I have been in both a socialist and a fascist country and didn't care for either one but they weren't failing. Spain is still a Fascist Government and they are doing just fine. It doesn't matter whether you come from the right (fascist) or the left (socialist), when you go that one step too far, both meet in the circle as a dictatorship. I like the Federal Republic where we are about halfway around the circle with room to go either way without getting in too much trouble and can find our way back again. So keep using the Socialist insult. It only shows just how misinformed you really are.
Ask the Catalan political prisoners about Spanish Fascism. Sounds a lot like what the Sanders campaign has in store for Republicans
I remember the Franco Fascism. Not a fun place to not know the rules. Too much authoritarianism. I also remember the Polish Communist Rule. Another not so fun place. One was on the right and the other was on the left. In reality, when you go that far, not much difference except Franco did it better.

I also studied the Fascist rule under the first man to actually try it at a national level. You remember Mussolini, right? He taught Adolf everything he needed to know to take over Germany. Contrary to popular (or misinformed) opinion, it was Fascism that allowed Adolf to gain power and he used the Benito Fascism for Dummies book to do it. Both were extreme right wing. But both made the mistake of taking it too far and into Dictatorships. Stalin did the same thing from Socialism from the left. At that point, there is NO difference. When the circle is completed, both meet at the top which is Dictatorship. Franco never allowed it to get that far. But even then, under Franco, it was a bit stifling for me. But under Franco, Capitalism thrived. Study up on Franco. It's fascinating how he was all but forced to take over the Revolutionary forces of Spain and financed and supported by the Capitalists who were being disassembled by the Socialists that were in power at the time. But the problem is, Fascism is to the right of a Federal Republic and you do have to give up civil liberties to have it. As for Socialism, going the other direction, you have to give up a completely different set of civil liberties. But the Democratic Socialist and Federal Republics are somewhere between the two and just barrow from both of them when times require. The USofA is a mix of both. Now, I don't think you will ever understand but I tried.
You lost me at Fascism is "extreme right wing", literally stopped reading there

Spain is currently Fascist, stay tuned on current events
 

Daryl Hunt

Your Worst Nightmare
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
15,418
Reaction score
933
Points
290
Location
O.D. (Stands for Out Dere
Socialism worked in Venezuela, it's working in CA it will work in the USA.

Surrender your weapons, property and freedoms and you'll be better off!
Socialism failed in Venezuela when it became a Dictatorship. Just like Fascism failed in Italy when it became a Dictatorship. What fails in the Dictatorship. I have been in both a socialist and a fascist country and didn't care for either one but they weren't failing. Spain is still a Fascist Government and they are doing just fine. It doesn't matter whether you come from the right (fascist) or the left (socialist), when you go that one step too far, both meet in the circle as a dictatorship. I like the Federal Republic where we are about halfway around the circle with room to go either way without getting in too much trouble and can find our way back again. So keep using the Socialist insult. It only shows just how misinformed you really are.
Ask the Catalan political prisoners about Spanish Fascism. Sounds a lot like what the Sanders campaign has in store for Republicans
I remember the Franco Fascism. Not a fun place to not know the rules. Too much authoritarianism. I also remember the Polish Communist Rule. Another not so fun place. One was on the right and the other was on the left. In reality, when you go that far, not much difference except Franco did it better.

I also studied the Fascist rule under the first man to actually try it at a national level. You remember Mussolini, right? He taught Adolf everything he needed to know to take over Germany. Contrary to popular (or misinformed) opinion, it was Fascism that allowed Adolf to gain power and he used the Benito Fascism for Dummies book to do it. Both were extreme right wing. But both made the mistake of taking it too far and into Dictatorships. Stalin did the same thing from Socialism from the left. At that point, there is NO difference. When the circle is completed, both meet at the top which is Dictatorship. Franco never allowed it to get that far. But even then, under Franco, it was a bit stifling for me. But under Franco, Capitalism thrived. Study up on Franco. It's fascinating how he was all but forced to take over the Revolutionary forces of Spain and financed and supported by the Capitalists who were being disassembled by the Socialists that were in power at the time. But the problem is, Fascism is to the right of a Federal Republic and you do have to give up civil liberties to have it. As for Socialism, going the other direction, you have to give up a completely different set of civil liberties. But the Democratic Socialist and Federal Republics are somewhere between the two and just barrow from both of them when times require. The USofA is a mix of both. Now, I don't think you will ever understand but I tried.
You lost me at Fascism is "extreme right wing", literally stopped reading there

Spain is currently Fascist, stay tuned on current events
I lost you when I typed, "The".
 

Mac-7

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
6,521
Reaction score
1,206
Points
180
You toss the word Socialist around like it was 1958. I really don't see a lot wrong with what he believes in whether I believe in it or not. It takes all kinds to make a world. And, take it from someone that actually been in Socialist Countries, he ain't no Socialist.
He calls himself a bernie sanders democrat socialist
Not the same thing. Denmark is calls itself a Democratic Socialist as well. And it's completely functional. It also beats the US in almost all categories as a nation in a positive way. Maybe we can learn a thing or two from such a success. And in Denmark Capitalism is doing quite well.
Denmark does not call itself democrat socislist

outsiders in US do

Denmark labels itself a high tax welfare state with a capitalist economy

Dumb rocks like AOC just dont know the difference

and there appears to be a backlash even in denmark against the taxes and inrush of immigrants
 

Aletheia4u

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
4,754
Reaction score
566
Points
195
Corporations supports socialism. Because they can pay the government to have the public to buy their products. And politicians can get rich from socialism.
But the CIA (Corporations International Assassins) needs to be shut down. They were only create to play on our intelligence. They are apart of the psyop operations. They branched from the Military Industrial Complex (Office of Strategic Services). That they were given more power that the other agencies couldn't have. They are only here to protect Big Corporations.

 

Eric Arthur Blair

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2015
Messages
11,263
Reaction score
1,916
Points
290
Denmark does not call itself democrat socislist

outsiders in US do

Denmark labels itself a high tax welfare state with a capitalist economy

Dumb rocks like AOC just dont know the difference

and there appears to be a backlash even in denmark against the taxes and inrush of immigrants
Denmark wishes dummies would stop calling Denmark a "socialist" state in order to legitimize their own biased preference for a political system that has never worked anywhere it's been tried.
https://www.thelocal.dk/20151101/danish-pm-in-us-denmark-is-not-socialist

The Danish Prime Minister states plainly Denmark is not a socialist state. It runs a market economy.
Socialism is the new flavor among Generation Z, or whatever they are.

Send morons like this truck driver back to school. Fads and lemming like behavior is no way to run a country.
 
Last edited:

Daryl Hunt

Your Worst Nightmare
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
15,418
Reaction score
933
Points
290
Location
O.D. (Stands for Out Dere
You toss the word Socialist around like it was 1958. I really don't see a lot wrong with what he believes in whether I believe in it or not. It takes all kinds to make a world. And, take it from someone that actually been in Socialist Countries, he ain't no Socialist.
He calls himself a bernie sanders democrat socialist
Not the same thing. Denmark is calls itself a Democratic Socialist as well. And it's completely functional. It also beats the US in almost all categories as a nation in a positive way. Maybe we can learn a thing or two from such a success. And in Denmark Capitalism is doing quite well.
Denmark does not call itself democrat socislist

outsiders in US do

Denmark labels itself a high tax welfare state with a capitalist economy

Dumb rocks like AOC just dont know the difference

and there appears to be a backlash even in denmark against the taxes and inrush of immigrants
I use Denmark as an example for success. They have universal healthcare, almost full employment, every citizen enjoys 4 weeks paid vacation, and the list goes on and on. Yes, Rump would allow people from Denmark to immigrate to the US but I don't think there are going to be too many takers. Life is just pretty damned good there. And the Rich aren't the only ones that use what would be considered high priced vacation spots and hotels. Every Citizen has the right to use them. We have a ton of Ex Patriots living there but not to many Danes move here.
 

Mac-7

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
6,521
Reaction score
1,206
Points
180
You toss the word Socialist around like it was 1958. I really don't see a lot wrong with what he believes in whether I believe in it or not. It takes all kinds to make a world. And, take it from someone that actually been in Socialist Countries, he ain't no Socialist.
He calls himself a bernie sanders democrat socialist
Not the same thing. Denmark is calls itself a Democratic Socialist as well. And it's completely functional. It also beats the US in almost all categories as a nation in a positive way. Maybe we can learn a thing or two from such a success. And in Denmark Capitalism is doing quite well.
Denmark does not call itself democrat socislist

outsiders in US do

Denmark labels itself a high tax welfare state with a capitalist economy

Dumb rocks like AOC just dont know the difference

and there appears to be a backlash even in denmark against the taxes and inrush of immigrants
I use Denmark as an example for success. They have universal healthcare, almost full employment, every citizen enjoys 4 weeks paid vacation, and the list goes on and on. Yes, Rump would allow people from Denmark to immigrate to the US but I don't think there are going to be too many takers. Life is just pretty damned good there. And the Rich aren't the only ones that use what would be considered high priced vacation spots and hotels. Every Citizen has the right to use them. We have a ton of Ex Patriots living there but not to many Danes move here.
Denmark does not have almost full employment because of the immigrant influx

nor does it have a military budget worthy of the name

in truth danes are having second thoughts about their expensive wipe-every-nose welfare system
 

Daryl Hunt

Your Worst Nightmare
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
15,418
Reaction score
933
Points
290
Location
O.D. (Stands for Out Dere
You toss the word Socialist around like it was 1958. I really don't see a lot wrong with what he believes in whether I believe in it or not. It takes all kinds to make a world. And, take it from someone that actually been in Socialist Countries, he ain't no Socialist.
He calls himself a bernie sanders democrat socialist
Not the same thing. Denmark is calls itself a Democratic Socialist as well. And it's completely functional. It also beats the US in almost all categories as a nation in a positive way. Maybe we can learn a thing or two from such a success. And in Denmark Capitalism is doing quite well.
Denmark does not call itself democrat socislist

outsiders in US do

Denmark labels itself a high tax welfare state with a capitalist economy

Dumb rocks like AOC just dont know the difference

and there appears to be a backlash even in denmark against the taxes and inrush of immigrants
I use Denmark as an example for success. They have universal healthcare, almost full employment, every citizen enjoys 4 weeks paid vacation, and the list goes on and on. Yes, Rump would allow people from Denmark to immigrate to the US but I don't think there are going to be too many takers. Life is just pretty damned good there. And the Rich aren't the only ones that use what would be considered high priced vacation spots and hotels. Every Citizen has the right to use them. We have a ton of Ex Patriots living there but not to many Danes move here.
Denmark does not have almost full employment because of the immigrant influx

nor does it have a military budget worthy of the name

in truth danes are having second thoughts about their expensive wipe-every-nose welfare system
I am speaking of Danes, not immigrants. And the Danes don't need a huge military budget. They rely on Nato and the EU like many of the smaller EU countries. As for Medical, they are doing fine but you keep telling us how others think inside their own country. Maybe we can ask them how WE think here.
 

Mac-7

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
6,521
Reaction score
1,206
Points
180
He calls himself a bernie sanders democrat socialist
Not the same thing. Denmark is calls itself a Democratic Socialist as well. And it's completely functional. It also beats the US in almost all categories as a nation in a positive way. Maybe we can learn a thing or two from such a success. And in Denmark Capitalism is doing quite well.
Denmark does not call itself democrat socislist

outsiders in US do

Denmark labels itself a high tax welfare state with a capitalist economy

Dumb rocks like AOC just dont know the difference

and there appears to be a backlash even in denmark against the taxes and inrush of immigrants
I use Denmark as an example for success. They have universal healthcare, almost full employment, every citizen enjoys 4 weeks paid vacation, and the list goes on and on. Yes, Rump would allow people from Denmark to immigrate to the US but I don't think there are going to be too many takers. Life is just pretty damned good there. And the Rich aren't the only ones that use what would be considered high priced vacation spots and hotels. Every Citizen has the right to use them. We have a ton of Ex Patriots living there but not to many Danes move here.
Denmark does not have almost full employment because of the immigrant influx

nor does it have a military budget worthy of the name

in truth danes are having second thoughts about their expensive wipe-every-nose welfare system
I am speaking of Danes, not immigrants. And the Danes don't need a huge military budget. They rely on Nato and the EU like many of the smaller EU countries. As for Medical, they are doing fine but you keep telling us how others think inside their own country. Maybe we can ask them how WE think here.
Comparing the budget of a country that hides behind the skirt of its neighbors for national defense to the country that provides that protection is misleading

as for the immigrants I guess the danes will just have to work harder and pay more taxes to support them

no wonder the opposition is rising
 

Daryl Hunt

Your Worst Nightmare
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
15,418
Reaction score
933
Points
290
Location
O.D. (Stands for Out Dere
Not the same thing. Denmark is calls itself a Democratic Socialist as well. And it's completely functional. It also beats the US in almost all categories as a nation in a positive way. Maybe we can learn a thing or two from such a success. And in Denmark Capitalism is doing quite well.
Denmark does not call itself democrat socislist

outsiders in US do

Denmark labels itself a high tax welfare state with a capitalist economy

Dumb rocks like AOC just dont know the difference

and there appears to be a backlash even in denmark against the taxes and inrush of immigrants
I use Denmark as an example for success. They have universal healthcare, almost full employment, every citizen enjoys 4 weeks paid vacation, and the list goes on and on. Yes, Rump would allow people from Denmark to immigrate to the US but I don't think there are going to be too many takers. Life is just pretty damned good there. And the Rich aren't the only ones that use what would be considered high priced vacation spots and hotels. Every Citizen has the right to use them. We have a ton of Ex Patriots living there but not to many Danes move here.
Denmark does not have almost full employment because of the immigrant influx

nor does it have a military budget worthy of the name

in truth danes are having second thoughts about their expensive wipe-every-nose welfare system
I am speaking of Danes, not immigrants. And the Danes don't need a huge military budget. They rely on Nato and the EU like many of the smaller EU countries. As for Medical, they are doing fine but you keep telling us how others think inside their own country. Maybe we can ask them how WE think here.
Comparing the budget of a country that hides behind the skirt of its neighbors for national defense to the country that provides that protection is misleading

as for the immigrants I guess the danes will just have to work harder and pay more taxes to support them

no wonder the opposition is rising
And the Danes closed it off to Immigrants without visas. Of course, with their topography, that's not hard to do. Stop making shit up as you go.
 

Mac-7

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
6,521
Reaction score
1,206
Points
180
Denmark does not call itself democrat socislist

outsiders in US do

Denmark labels itself a high tax welfare state with a capitalist economy

Dumb rocks like AOC just dont know the difference

and there appears to be a backlash even in denmark against the taxes and inrush of immigrants
I use Denmark as an example for success. They have universal healthcare, almost full employment, every citizen enjoys 4 weeks paid vacation, and the list goes on and on. Yes, Rump would allow people from Denmark to immigrate to the US but I don't think there are going to be too many takers. Life is just pretty damned good there. And the Rich aren't the only ones that use what would be considered high priced vacation spots and hotels. Every Citizen has the right to use them. We have a ton of Ex Patriots living there but not to many Danes move here.
Denmark does not have almost full employment because of the immigrant influx

nor does it have a military budget worthy of the name

in truth danes are having second thoughts about their expensive wipe-every-nose welfare system
I am speaking of Danes, not immigrants. And the Danes don't need a huge military budget. They rely on Nato and the EU like many of the smaller EU countries. As for Medical, they are doing fine but you keep telling us how others think inside their own country. Maybe we can ask them how WE think here.
Comparing the budget of a country that hides behind the skirt of its neighbors for national defense to the country that provides that protection is misleading

as for the immigrants I guess the danes will just have to work harder and pay more taxes to support them

no wonder the opposition is rising
And the Danes closed it off to Immigrants without visas. Of course, with their topography, that's not hard to do. Stop making shit up as you go.
I did not mention migrants

you need to pay closer attention
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Top