GOVERNMENT FBI Agents Reportedly ‘Livid’ About Lynch-Clinton Meeting — and ‘Not Just Because of the

[bodecea]

Final post on matter, Fox had experts on. "BHO email mixed sent rec'd to beast" complicates the issue. Why? Not sure? because he on record "I was un- aware"?

Pundits say "yep, that's true, oh I see" etc I saw on TV so must be true or I dreamt it up?

Start the blacksmith, leg-irons XXXL please. Enough crooked crap. Audit the "foundation" too. Get them all at once. Sidney Huma Cheryl....don't leave.

"FOX experts"....becoming a bit problematic these days.

 

[mudwhistle]

I hate to go straight to conspiracy-thinking, but I have a hard time believing the visit was a 'mistake' on the part of the Clintons. They know the implications of this kind of thing. But I can't quite guess what the point would have been. To disgrace Lynch? To flex muscles? I dunno.

did he want Lynch to recuse herself? it makes no sense?

Hillary announced yesterday she would keep Loretta Lynch as AG.....so it was a bribe, offering her a chance to keep her job if she makes the right decision.

link?

Here it is.

Report: Hillary Is Considering Keeping Loretta Lynch As Attorney General

 

[mudwhistle]

I hate to go straight to conspiracy-thinking, but I have a hard time believing the visit was a 'mistake' on the part of the Clintons. They know the implications of this kind of thing. But I can't quite guess what the point would have been. To disgrace Lynch? To flex muscles? I dunno.

did he want Lynch to recuse herself? it makes no sense?

I sure don't get it. I suppose it could have just been a mistake of arrogance. But I assume the Clintons know how to keep a secret meeting secret, if that was the intent.

I agree with you, if they wanted the meeting to be secret, they know how to make a meeting or conversation secret without a gazillion FBI agents and secret service agents and pilots and copilots around to witness such meeting, so it could be it was just an arrogant and thoughtless meeting of Bill's...if so, Bill should be knocked upside of the head by Hillary...

The case was already near it's end, 3 weeks ago, it was leaked there would be no criminal charges against her....this meeting could not have influenced the investigation, it was essentially over already??? So if it was for nefarious reasons on Bill's part, what in the world could the reason be? I swear, sometimes I think he doesn't want Hillary to be President...in 2008 he did something really stupid like this that hurt Hillary's run too! (I can't remember what it was, but just remember it was bad for her)

You are so naive.......lol.

 

[Obiwan]

I hate to go straight to conspiracy-thinking, but I have a hard time believing the visit was a 'mistake' on the part of the Clintons. They know the implications of this kind of thing. But I can't quite guess what the point would have been. To disgrace Lynch? To flex muscles? I dunno.

did he want Lynch to recuse herself? it makes no sense?

I sure don't get it. I suppose it could have just been a mistake of arrogance. But I assume the Clintons know how to keep a secret meeting secret, if that was the intent.

I agree with you, if they wanted the meeting to be secret, they know how to make a meeting or conversation secret without a gazillion FBI agents and secret service agents and pilots and copilots around to witness such meeting, so it could be it was just an arrogant and thoughtless meeting of Bill's...if so, Bill should be knocked upside of the head by Hillary...

The case was already near it's end, 3 weeks ago, it was leaked there would be no criminal charges against her....this meeting could not have influenced the investigation, it was essentially over already??? So if it was for nefarious reasons on Bill's part, what in the world could the reason be? I swear, sometimes I think he doesn't want Hillary to be President...in 2008 he did something really stupid like this that hurt Hillary's run too! (I can't remember what it was, but just remember it was bad for her)

Maybe he's starting to realize the house comes with the job, and Hillary can toss his shit out in the yard if she gets the job and he screws up again...

 

[Care4all]

I hate to go straight to conspiracy-thinking, but I have a hard time believing the visit was a 'mistake' on the part of the Clintons. They know the implications of this kind of thing. But I can't quite guess what the point would have been. To disgrace Lynch? To flex muscles? I dunno.

did he want Lynch to recuse herself? it makes no sense?

Hillary announced yesterday she would keep Loretta Lynch as AG.....so it was a bribe, offering her a chance to keep her job if she makes the right decision.

link?

Here it is.

Report: Hillary Is Considering Keeping Loretta Lynch As Attorney General

I found the original sourced article in the New York Times, that the right wing media is using to promote their ''talking points'' and this is what it said:

Having women make up half of her cabinet would be historic (in recent years, a quarter to a third of cabinet positions have been held by women), and Democrats close to Mrs. Clinton say she may decide to retain Ms. Lynch, the nation’s first black woman to be attorney general, who took office in April 2015.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/04/us/politics/hillary-clinton-president.html?_r=0

So, it is possible... according to other Democrats but not from her directly, that she will consider retaining Loretta Lynch as AG. It's not a definite.... a consideration....which I suppose is close enough, to what you said!

 

[JimBowie1958]

Great, they are pissed. Now, do something about it. Until then, they can take their pissed offness and shove it.

Don't hold your breath. Nothing will come of Hitlery's stupidity. You can't cure stupid.

Yeah, I know. It is all bullshit.

The country is done. Died with great applause from the demented left. One world rule under the new world order is right around the corner.

Let the tribulations begin. Let the book be fulfilled.

No, we still have the bullet box and plenty of rope.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Here it is.

There is not good reason to make that lying criminal POTUS, not one good reason what so ever.

I dont care if she hires a million women to give free BJs on Connecticut Ave.

 

[mudwhistle]

I hate to go straight to conspiracy-thinking, but I have a hard time believing the visit was a 'mistake' on the part of the Clintons. They know the implications of this kind of thing. But I can't quite guess what the point would have been. To disgrace Lynch? To flex muscles? I dunno.

did he want Lynch to recuse herself? it makes no sense?

Hillary announced yesterday she would keep Loretta Lynch as AG.....so it was a bribe, offering her a chance to keep her job if she makes the right decision.

link?

Here it is.

Report: Hillary Is Considering Keeping Loretta Lynch As Attorney General

I found the original sourced article in the New York Times, that the right wing media is using to promote their ''talking points'' and this is what it said:

Having women make up half of her cabinet would be historic (in recent years, a quarter to a third of cabinet positions have been held by women), and Democrats close to Mrs. Clinton say she may decide to retain Ms. Lynch, the nation’s first black woman to be attorney general, who took office in April 2015.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/04/us/politics/hillary-clinton-president.html?_r=0

So, it is possible... according to other Democrats but not from her directly, that she will consider retaining Loretta Lynch as AG. It's not a definite.... a consideration....which I suppose is close enough, to what you said!

Well, anyone with half a brain can see the timing of this leak was designed to let her know she's got her back if a recommendation to indict came down. Just the Clintons covering all the bases.

Regardless, Director Comey said Hillary checked every box when it comes to bringing felony charges against her, but then stuck his neck out and added that her intent wasn't criminal. Intent isn't even a consideration when it comes to mishandling State Department communications. The fact that she used a private server and allowed people with no clearances to have access to them is enough to indict. He simply chose not to. If nobody wants to bother with a prosecution, then a prosecution won't take place. Jobs and reputations are at stake here.

 

[Obiwan]

did he want Lynch to recuse herself? it makes no sense?

Hillary announced yesterday she would keep Loretta Lynch as AG.....so it was a bribe, offering her a chance to keep her job if she makes the right decision.

link?

Here it is.

Report: Hillary Is Considering Keeping Loretta Lynch As Attorney General

I found the original sourced article in the New York Times, that the right wing media is using to promote their ''talking points'' and this is what it said:

Having women make up half of her cabinet would be historic (in recent years, a quarter to a third of cabinet positions have been held by women), and Democrats close to Mrs. Clinton say she may decide to retain Ms. Lynch, the nation’s first black woman to be attorney general, who took office in April 2015.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/04/us/politics/hillary-clinton-president.html?_r=0

So, it is possible... according to other Democrats but not from her directly, that she will consider retaining Loretta Lynch as AG. It's not a definite.... a consideration....which I suppose is close enough, to what you said!

Well, anyone with half a brain can see the timing of this leak was designed to let her know she's got her back if a recommendation to indict came down. Just the Clintons covering all the bases.

Regardless, Director Comey said Hillary checked every box when it comes to bringing felony charges against her, but then stuck his neck out and added that her intent wasn't criminal. Intent isn't even a consideration when it comes to mishandling State Department communications. The fact that she used a private server and allowed people with no clearances to have access to them is enough to indict. He simply chose not to. If nobody wants to bother with a prosecution, then a prosecution won't take place. Jobs and reputations are at stake here.

Of course they are...

After all, Bill Cllinton and Janet Reno gave the approval to burn American women and children alive at Waco...

And the crooked government rules....

 

[Sundance508]

I hate to go straight to conspiracy-thinking, but I have a hard time believing the visit was a 'mistake' on the part of the Clintons. They know the implications of this kind of thing. But I can't quite guess what the point would have been. To disgrace Lynch? To flex muscles? I dunno.

did he want Lynch to recuse herself? it makes no sense?

I sure don't get it. I suppose it could have just been a mistake of arrogance. But I assume the Clintons know how to keep a secret meeting secret, if that was the intent.

I agree with you, if they wanted the meeting to be secret, they know how to make a meeting or conversation secret without a gazillion FBI agents and secret service agents and pilots and copilots around to witness such meeting, so it could be it was just an arrogant and thoughtless meeting of Bill's...if so, Bill should be knocked upside of the head by Hillary...

The case was already near it's end, 3 weeks ago, it was leaked there would be no criminal charges against her....this meeting could not have influenced the investigation, it was essentially over already??? So if it was for nefarious reasons on Bill's part, what in the world could the reason be? I swear, sometimes I think he doesn't want Hillary to be President...in 2008 he did something really stupid like this that hurt Hillary's run too! (I can't remember what it was, but just remember it was bad for her)

I think now it is rather clear what this meeting between bill clinton and the attorney general was all about....not complex, but very clever.....aka......to give the attorney general an excuse to lay the responsibility for not prosecuting hillary onto the FBI....thus she escapes the political heat for not prosecuting hillary.

 

[Asclepias]

Despite the spin the liberals are trying to put on the infamous meeting between Loreta Lynch and Bill Clinton....the implications of that huge mistake by Clinton of confronting The Attorney General are reverbrating around the nation.....aka The FBI is very upset....and the signals they are emitting are not ones the liberals want to hear.FBI Agents Reportedly ‘Livid’ About Lynch-Clinton Meeting — and ‘Not Just Because of the Optics’

i wonder why they decided not to go after Clinton then?

Wait on the fat lady.

What fat lady? You mean the one that sang "we are not recommending charges"?

Post the quote.

"Our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case," Comey announced after a lengthy recap of the investigation apparently designed to protect the integrity of his agency in a highly charged political atmosphere.

 

[rdean]

Despite the spin the liberals are trying to put on the infamous meeting between Loreta Lynch and Bill Clinton....the implications of that huge mistake by Clinton of confronting The Attorney General are reverbrating around the nation.....aka The FBI is very upset....and the signals they are emitting are not ones the liberals want to hear.FBI Agents Reportedly ‘Livid’ About Lynch-Clinton Meeting — and ‘Not Just Because of the Optics’

i wonder why they decided not to go after Clinton then?

No precedent.

 

[Asclepias]

I hate to go straight to conspiracy-thinking, but I have a hard time believing the visit was a 'mistake' on the part of the Clintons. They know the implications of this kind of thing. But I can't quite guess what the point would have been. To disgrace Lynch? To flex muscles? I dunno.

did he want Lynch to recuse herself? it makes no sense?

I sure don't get it. I suppose it could have just been a mistake of arrogance. But I assume the Clintons know how to keep a secret meeting secret, if that was the intent.

I agree with you, if they wanted the meeting to be secret, they know how to make a meeting or conversation secret without a gazillion FBI agents and secret service agents and pilots and copilots around to witness such meeting, so it could be it was just an arrogant and thoughtless meeting of Bill's...if so, Bill should be knocked upside of the head by Hillary...

The case was already near it's end, 3 weeks ago, it was leaked there would be no criminal charges against her....this meeting could not have influenced the investigation, it was essentially over already??? So if it was for nefarious reasons on Bill's part, what in the world could the reason be? I swear, sometimes I think he doesn't want Hillary to be President...in 2008 he did something really stupid like this that hurt Hillary's run too! (I can't remember what it was, but just remember it was bad for her)

I think now it is rather clear what this meeting between bill clinton and the attorney general was all about....not complex, but very clever.....aka......to give the attorney general an excuse to lay the responsibility for not prosecuting hillary onto the FBI....thus she escapes the political heat for not prosecuting hillary.

So youre saying that Bill had to suggest your conspiracy theory to this woman thats 20x more intelligent than you are but you were able to think it up?

 

[Care4all]

I hate to go straight to conspiracy-thinking, but I have a hard time believing the visit was a 'mistake' on the part of the Clintons. They know the implications of this kind of thing. But I can't quite guess what the point would have been. To disgrace Lynch? To flex muscles? I dunno.

did he want Lynch to recuse herself? it makes no sense?

I sure don't get it. I suppose it could have just been a mistake of arrogance. But I assume the Clintons know how to keep a secret meeting secret, if that was the intent.

I agree with you, if they wanted the meeting to be secret, they know how to make a meeting or conversation secret without a gazillion FBI agents and secret service agents and pilots and copilots around to witness such meeting, so it could be it was just an arrogant and thoughtless meeting of Bill's...if so, Bill should be knocked upside of the head by Hillary...

The case was already near it's end, 3 weeks ago, it was leaked there would be no criminal charges against her....this meeting could not have influenced the investigation, it was essentially over already??? So if it was for nefarious reasons on Bill's part, what in the world could the reason be? I swear, sometimes I think he doesn't want Hillary to be President...in 2008 he did something really stupid like this that hurt Hillary's run too! (I can't remember what it was, but just remember it was bad for her)

I think now it is rather clear what this meeting between bill clinton and the attorney general was all about....not complex, but very clever.....aka......to give the attorney general an excuse to lay the responsibility for not prosecuting hillary onto the FBI....thus she escapes the political heat for not prosecuting hillary.

Why in the world would Bill Clinton give two poops about that...?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Despite the spin the liberals are trying to put on the infamous meeting between Loreta Lynch and Bill Clinton....the implications of that huge mistake by Clinton of confronting The Attorney General are reverbrating around the nation.....aka The FBI is very upset....and the signals they are emitting are not ones the liberals want to hear.FBI Agents Reportedly ‘Livid’ About Lynch-Clinton Meeting — and ‘Not Just Because of the Optics’

i wonder why they decided not to go after Clinton then?

Wait on the fat lady.

What fat lady? You mean the one that sang "we are not recommending charges"?

Post the quote.

"Our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case," Comey announced after a lengthy recap of the investigation apparently designed to protect the integrity of his agency in a highly charged political atmosphere.

Nonsense. Nixon resigned over far less, and would have been fully prosecuted had he not been pardoned.

 

[Picaro]

For a lawyer and AG she sure stuck her foot in her mouth on this one.

Lynch should have known better than to meet with Clinton. Common Sense sure ain't her forte.

Pure arrogance on their part. they know their base are the same sort of sociopathic weasels and vermin as themselves, and don't need to fear losing their support. This will, however, cripple her if she does win and get into office, as no one is going to take her seriously; her leadership cache just went to zero.

 

[Picaro]

Nonsense. Nixon resigned over far less, and would have been fully prosecuted had he not been pardoned.

Yes, but that was when there were still accepted standards of conduct, public and private; now they openly brag about their criminality and scamming, and their bases cheer them for it. That goes for left and right wingers both.

 

[Care4all]

i wonder why they decided not to go after Clinton then?

Wait on the fat lady.

What fat lady? You mean the one that sang "we are not recommending charges"?

Post the quote.

"Our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case," Comey announced after a lengthy recap of the investigation apparently designed to protect the integrity of his agency in a highly charged political atmosphere.

Nonsense. Nixon resigned over far less, and would have been fully prosecuted had he not been pardoned.

Nixon resigned over far less???

Read a book or two, to inform yourself!!!!! NOTE! tweets don't count as books!

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Wait on the fat lady.

What fat lady? You mean the one that sang "we are not recommending charges"?

Post the quote.

"Our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case," Comey announced after a lengthy recap of the investigation apparently designed to protect the integrity of his agency in a highly charged political atmosphere.

Nonsense. Nixon resigned over far less, and would have been fully prosecuted had he not been pardoned.

Nixon resigned over far less???

Read a book or two, to inform yourself!!!!! NOTE! tweets don't count as books!

I lived through it, and I suspect I have read more books on the subject than you have functioning brain cells.

Yes, it was far less than this coattail-clutching ***** is now - for the time being anyway - getting away with.

 

[JoeB131]

Nonsense. Nixon resigned over far less, and would have been fully prosecuted had he not been pardoned.

Nixon did a lot more than "use the wrong e-mail". He openly conspired - on tape - to bribe witnesses.