DavidS
Anti-Tea Party Member
- Thread starter
- #81
WRONG asshole
shes not FOR THEM
shes just making sure her Alaskan Citizens get they share bacause they will HAVE TO PAY FOR THEM
you are too fucking partisan to even understand that
You can't have it both ways. You are either against them, just like John McCain is and you never allow any earmark spending to flow into your state at all, or you're like every single other Senator and you have no problem with it. You can't say "Oh I'm against earmarks, but hey, might as well get mine as long as everyone else is!" That's not a leader. A leader stands up to earmarks and rejects them if she is against them. She instructs her Senators and representatives to vote NO on any bill with earmarks and to never appropriate them for her state as she will never accept that money. Kind of like the Bridge to Nowhere, except she accepted the money and rejected the bridge!!![]()
Am I the only one who has noticed that David carefully avoids ever having to address the question of whether or not his starting premise is even accurate? Apparently, the only argument he's able to make is dependent on everyone letting him impose his worldview as the standard from the get-go.
I guess we'll have to assume that, in fact, they weren't earmarks at all, and David is desperately trying to keep anyone from noticing that he's been bullshitted by the leftwing talking points again.
I know you want me to argue with you, but I'm not going to do it. Not that I don't think you're intelligent, I think you're quite intelligent, actually. I just... I don't want to argue with you.