Gov Walz calls out Minnesota National Guard. - will use it to attack ICE agents?

[Zincwarrior]

Polymarket?

? Sorry I don't know what that is

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

 

[MarathonMike]

There won't be any conflict.

Remember, ICE agents are the biggest pussies on the planet.

We can always count on anti-Law enforcement types to jump on the wrong side of the issue. And of course play "tough guy".

 

[yidnar]

Well, your head is tiny.

He's calling out the National Guard because ICE's action is probably going to start riots.

ICE is gonna be out looting and burning ?

 

[Concerned American]

Trump should not be pitting federal agents against Nation Guard members.

ICE is there doing the job that they are tasked to do. Walz called out the guard--after ICE was there. Your TDS is showing again.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/5677541-walz-minnesota-national-guard-ice-shooting/

This could a 2nd Fort Sumter moment

Lets hope libs keep their heads

This must be those unlawful orders the Democrats were talking about.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Lets hope libs keep their heads

The guy is crazy (and corrupt )Don't expect much sense from him

 

[scruffy]

? Sorry I don't know what that is

Polymarket | The World's Largest Prediction Market

Polymarket is the world's largest prediction market, allowing you to stay informed and profit from your knowledge by betting on future events across various topics.

polymarket.com

 

[scruffy]

ICE is gonna be out looting and burning ?

No. That's the difference between us and Venezuela. There, the cops run over the citizens with their vehicles. Here, the citizens run over the cops.

 

[SmokeALib]

Well, your head is tiny.

He's calling out the National Guard because ICE's action is probably going to start riots.

Do you actually think Timmy will use the state national guard for riot control? Don't pick your nose - your head will cave in.

 

[jknowgood]

The one that was aggressively approaching, yelling, and pulling on the door handle was not the one who shot the driver. That Texas ICE thug in Minnesota approached from around the front of the vehicle, placing himself there on his own accord after/as the altercation was beginning. Because he moved to stand directly in front of the vehicle, it was impossible not to impact him even lightly when moving, but that doesn't matter because he already had his gun out of the holster before the vehicle started moving forward.

His actions placed him in harms way and his preemptive arming shows that he intended to threaten and/or fire upon the victim regardless of "threat" posed.

Her actions blocking the ice agents, started it. Don't forget that, if she didn't do that. She would be alive now, lesson learned. Don't block a road.

 

[struth]

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/5677541-walz-minnesota-national-guard-ice-shooting/

This could a 2nd Fort Sumter moment

Lets hope libs keep their heads

Tampon Timmy is in major trouble, he’ll do just about anything to stay in power

 

[TemplarKormac]

And you'd lose that wager.

You do realize that are laws don't prevent things from happening. They describe what is unlawful and what the penalty is for violating them (except perhaps when it comes to Trump).

Just because Trump claimed to have deployed the guardsmen to various cities throughout the country, doesn't mean that he successfully or properly invoked the law which allows this.

---

What Actually Happened in Los Angeles​

1. Federal Guard Deployments Were Issued​

Yes — federal authorities deployed National Guard troops in and around Los Angeles during the mid‑2025 period.

The administration argued the deployments were necessary due to unrest — but it did not explicitly invoke the Insurrection Act in the formal statutory sense.
Instead:

• They attempted to place the Guard in federal service under other authorities.
• They suggested the Insurrection Act could justify actions, but no formal declaration was issued in a way that would clearly meet the statutory criteria.

---

2. Courts Ruled Against the Government​

Federal judges ruled that the deployments in Los Angeles and other cities exceeded the administration’s authority:

• A federal district court in California determined the deployments violated federal law, including the Posse Comitatus Act, because they were tantamount to using military forces for civilian law enforcement — which is restricted absent a proper Insurrection Act invocation.
• That judge ordered the Guard returned to state control, holding that the administration lacked the necessary legal justification to override the governor’s authority.
• Higher courts may have temporarily stayed some orders during appeal, but there was no final appellate endorsement of the Act as lawfully applied for Los Angeles.

So, while troops were present, the presence was ruled unlawful and subject to reversal — it did not mean the Insurrection Act was upheld or successfully invoked.

---

Difference Between Deployment vs. Valid Legal Basis​

There’s a critical distinction here:

Action	Status
Federal forces being physically deployed	Occurred
Formal invocation of the Insurrection Act	Did not occur in the way needed for legal effect
Court upholding that invocation as lawful	No

Deploying troops and having courts say it was lawful are two very different outcomes.

---

Why Courts Blocked It​

Federal courts — including trial and appellate judges — repeatedly found:

1. The administration did not satisfy the Insurrection Act’s statutory conditions (e.g., a true insurrection or inability of state authorities to enforce law).
2. The use of military/Guard forces in a domestic law enforcement context violated Posse Comitatus absent a valid statutory exception.
3. Governors’ authority over the National Guard in non‑federalized status remains protected under law and the Constitution.

Judge Allows Trump To Deploy Troops To Chicago — For Now

A federal judge declined to block President Donald Trump’s deployment of Texas troops to Chicago Monday.While the case is ongoing, the latest decision will allow the feds to send 200 Texas National Guard soldiers to quell anti-ICE violence across the sanctuary city. The next hearing in the case...

www.dailywire.com

DHS Scores Major Victory at Supreme Court | Homeland Security

DHS landed a major legal victory Monday morning when the Supreme Court issued a stay in the case of Perdomo v. Noem. The ruling allows DHS to continue carrying out immigration operations in the Los Angeles area.

www.dhs.gov

 

[Quasar44]

Jews and Trump were promised Greenland 35000 years ago

???

 

[yidnar]

Her actions blocking the ice agents, started it. Don't forget that, if she didn't do that. She would be alive now, lesson learned. Don't block a road.

actually there's another video from a different angle that shows shit hit the officer that shot her pretty hard with her car before he opened fire .

 

[TheInfiniteSadness]

I think that governor Walz doesn't get whose side the MN NG is on.

Time to show those videos about "illegal orders"?

here you go

 

[Rogue AI]

The smart thing to do would be to pull ICE Back, given the history of Minneapolis of rioting over this sort of thing.

If local law enforcement cannot keep the peace then Trump will have to. We will not return to those lawless days.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

In case you hadn't heard, Mark Kelly of the six who made that video has been censured by the Military, reduced in rank and now for the rest of his life will collect a much smaller pension.

Had not heard or seen that. Got a link?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Trump can call in the 82nd Airborne, Rangers, and the USMC to put the secessionist Gov. Walz in Gitmo.

That part he cannot do. Why waste the fuel flying him down there? There are plenty of federal prisons that will put him up.

 

[Leo123]

Any one else notice that in all the videos there were no city cops?