Gov. Newsome: Prove to Me You are GAY!

[Captain Creeper]

California’s Insane ‘Prove You’re Gay’ Law

California requires proof of LGBTQ+ status for certain government contracts, sparking controversy.

townhall.com

California has certain set-aside contracts ($633 million) it will give only to homosexual-owned businesses (which is illegal). But, not wanting to be duped by fraudsters like Gov. Tampon, Newsome is requiring verification of the business owner's gayness. So, you apply for your gubmint money, then prove you are a homo. One has to wonder, can you simply take a photo of yourself doing gay stuff and show it to the gal at the window when you return the application?

Remember when Quagmire had to prove to his prostitute wife that he was gay?


This seems really ... awkward. It also seems really stupid. There was once a time where if someone said they were gay, you believed them. It was an admission against the interest of the person claiming it. But today, everyone can be gay. So, I kind of get when Gavin is coming from. But, frankly, I think the only way to prevent against wasteful fraud is to make the applicant have full-on gay sex on a mattress on the floor of the city agency where the application is processed. Nothing else is definitive.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Maybe Newsom is looking for a hook up. He sorta comes across as a little light in the loafers

 

[Concerned American]

California’s Insane ‘Prove You’re Gay’ Law

California requires proof of LGBTQ+ status for certain government contracts, sparking controversy.

townhall.com

California has certain set-aside contracts ($633 million) it will give only to homosexual-owned businesses (which is illegal). But, not wanting to be duped by fraudsters like Gov. Tampon, Newsome is requiring verification of the business owner's gayness. So, you apply for your gubmint money, then prove you are a homo. One has to wonder, can you simply take a photo of yourself doing gay stuff and show it to the gal at the window when you return the application?

Remember when Quagmire had to prove to his prostitute wife that he was gay?


This seems really ... awkward. It also seems really stupid. There was once a time where if someone said they were gay, you believed them. It was an admission against the interest of the person claiming it. But today, everyone can be gay. So, I kind of get when Gavin is coming from. But, frankly, I think the only way to prevent against wasteful fraud is to make the applicant have full-on gay sex on a mattress on the floor of the city agency where the application is processed. Nothing else is definitive.

Wow, I guess the days of the gov't staying out of the bedroom are over. I'm amazed that this program hasn't been sued and taken to the scotus

 

[Crepitus]

California’s Insane ‘Prove You’re Gay’ Law

California requires proof of LGBTQ+ status for certain government contracts, sparking controversy.

townhall.com

California has certain set-aside contracts ($633 million) it will give only to homosexual-owned businesses (which is illegal). But, not wanting to be duped by fraudsters like Gov. Tampon, Newsome is requiring verification of the business owner's gayness. So, you apply for your gubmint money, then prove you are a homo. One has to wonder, can you simply take a photo of yourself doing gay stuff and show it to the gal at the window when you return the application?

Remember when Quagmire had to prove to his prostitute wife that he was gay?


This seems really ... awkward. It also seems really stupid. There was once a time where if someone said they were gay, you believed them. It was an admission against the interest of the person claiming it. But today, everyone can be gay. So, I kind of get when Gavin is coming from. But, frankly, I think the only way to prevent against wasteful fraud is to make the applicant have full-on gay sex on a mattress on the floor of the city agency where the application is processed. Nothing else is definitive.

Not a law.

Nice try though.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Not a law.

Nice try though.

have to agree.....the guy didnt show that part...

 

[MarcATL]

Are you gay OP?

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

 

[Captain Creeper]

Are you gay OP?

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Everybody is a little gay, right?

 

[Captain Creeper]

Not a law.

Nice try though.

Who said it was a law?

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

Maybe Newsom is looking for a hook up. He sorta comes across as a little light in the loafers

I think I can see Newscum bending over and taking the bar of soap from the shower.....

 

[fncceo]

https://www.usmessageboard.com/

Prove to Me You are GAY!​

 

[jknowgood]

California’s Insane ‘Prove You’re Gay’ Law

California requires proof of LGBTQ+ status for certain government contracts, sparking controversy.

townhall.com

California has certain set-aside contracts ($633 million) it will give only to homosexual-owned businesses (which is illegal). But, not wanting to be duped by fraudsters like Gov. Tampon, Newsome is requiring verification of the business owner's gayness. So, you apply for your gubmint money, then prove you are a homo. One has to wonder, can you simply take a photo of yourself doing gay stuff and show it to the gal at the window when you return the application?

Remember when Quagmire had to prove to his prostitute wife that he was gay?


This seems really ... awkward. It also seems really stupid. There was once a time where if someone said they were gay, you believed them. It was an admission against the interest of the person claiming it. But today, everyone can be gay. So, I kind of get when Gavin is coming from. But, frankly, I think the only way to prevent against wasteful fraud is to make the applicant have full-on gay sex on a mattress on the floor of the city agency where the application is processed. Nothing else is definitive.

Oh my, that freak wants free gay porn.

 

[Crepitus]

Who said it was a law?

The OP, one Captain Creeper , I believe.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Who said it was a law?

the headline.....

California’s Insane ‘Prove You’re Gay’ Law​

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

This is a more legit consideration than has been discussed before.
How are homo marriage licenses acquired? Do the homo couple in question have to perform sex acts on each other in front of authorities to qualify for the license? Shouldn’t they have to? Otherwise, any pair of same-sex heteros could say they’re homo, acquire the license and with it get tax breaks.
I suggested this to a friend who shares a lucrative business with a business partner. He immediately realized he could then use the partner’s address as his primary and save tons on property taxes.
Homo marriage is ripe for tax fraud.

 

[Fang]

Really wish I had not clicked on this thread. Although happy to verify lesbians are lesbians as long as they are hot.

 

[TemplarKormac]

California’s Insane ‘Prove You’re Gay’ Law

California requires proof of LGBTQ+ status for certain government contracts, sparking controversy.

townhall.com

California has certain set-aside contracts ($633 million) it will give only to homosexual-owned businesses (which is illegal). But, not wanting to be duped by fraudsters like Gov. Tampon, Newsome is requiring verification of the business owner's gayness. So, you apply for your gubmint money, then prove you are a homo. One has to wonder, can you simply take a photo of yourself doing gay stuff and show it to the gal at the window when you return the application?

Remember when Quagmire had to prove to his prostitute wife that he was gay?


This seems really ... awkward. It also seems really stupid. There was once a time where if someone said they were gay, you believed them. It was an admission against the interest of the person claiming it. But today, everyone can be gay. So, I kind of get when Gavin is coming from. But, frankly, I think the only way to prevent against wasteful fraud is to make the applicant have full-on gay sex on a mattress on the floor of the city agency where the application is processed. Nothing else is definitive.

I mean... it sounds like he is.

I said what I said.

I'll let myself out.

 

[g5000]

This is a more legit consideration than has been discussed before.
How are homo marriage licenses acquired? Do the homo couple in question have to perform sex acts on each other in front of authorities to qualify for the license? Shouldn’t they have to? Otherwise, any pair of same-sex heteros could say they’re homo, acquire the license and with it get tax breaks.
I suggested this to a friend who shares a lucrative business with a business partner. He immediately realized he could then use the partner’s address as his primary and save tons on property taxes.
Homo marriage is ripe for tax fraud.

ANY marriage is ripe for fraud, fool! People have been entering into convenience marriages for a very long time.

 

[fncceo]

ANY marriage is ripe for fraud, fool! People have been entering into convenience marriages for a very long time.

I can attest with all sincerity that there is NOTHING convenient about marriage.