Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Just like the Constitution: you're all about that, until it no longer serves your purpose and then "well, rights aren't unlimited"...lolI thought the Democrats were all about democracy. That must be when it works in their favor.Lol, they make $7,200 per year - Enough for gas and a lunch here or there. Most of them work other jobs and/or are wealthy. They could care less about your lousy stipend.
What a joke this man is. Says new voter suppression laws are an “emergency item” but still can’t show us more than a handful of voter fraud cases in 2020.
F you Greg - F you TX Rethugs. Allow poll watchers to get in people’s faces? NO. Allow a judge to toss out election results without proof that fraud flipped a result? NO. Pick up most of the drop boxes in D strongholds and most populous districts? NO - - - Idiots!!
Redirect Notice
www.google.com
An apt description of sore loser Trumpublicans if ever there was one!
Sign seen at the Fraudit in AZ
Just like the Constitution: you're all about that, until it no longer serves your purpose and then "well, rights aren't unlimited"...lolI thought the Democrats were all about democracy. That must be when it works in their favor.Lol, they make $7,200 per year - Enough for gas and a lunch here or there. Most of them work other jobs and/or are wealthy. They could care less about your lousy stipend.
What a joke this man is. Says new voter suppression laws are an “emergency item” but still can’t show us more than a handful of voter fraud cases in 2020.
F you Greg - F you TX Rethugs. Allow poll watchers to get in people’s faces? NO. Allow a judge to toss out election results without proof that fraud flipped a result? NO. Pick up most of the drop boxes in D strongholds and most populous districts? NO - - - Idiots!!
Redirect Notice
www.google.com
An apt description of sore loser Trumpublicans if ever there was one!
Sign seen at the Fraudit in AZ
not sure how a filibuster does that...do tellI guess TX doesn't have a filibuster to ensure the majority can't enact any laws they want.true dems don’t even want to do their jobs and vote...just whine!are you done whining yet?...these laws are to stop the scum demonRATS from cheating, and stealing ....BOO-HOO for themLol, they make $7,200 per year - Enough for gas and a lunch here or there. Most of them work other jobs and/or are wealthy. They could care less about your lousy stipend.
What a joke this man is. Says new voter suppression laws are an “emergency item” but still can’t show us more than a handful of voter fraud cases in 2020.
F you Greg - F you TX Rethugs. Allow poll watchers to get in people’s faces? NO. Allow a judge to toss out election results without proof that fraud flipped a result? NO. Pick up most of the drop boxes in D strongholds and most populous districts? NO - - - Idiots!!
Redirect Notice
www.google.com
It allows the GOP in the US Senate, being in the minority, to not vote on a law, they don't even have to stand up and walk out. Much more efficient and the results are the same.not sure how a filibuster does that...do tellI guess TX doesn't have a filibuster to ensure the majority can't enact any laws they want.true dems don’t even want to do their jobs and vote...just whine!are you done whining yet?...these laws are to stop the scum demonRATS from cheating, and stealing ....BOO-HOO for themLol, they make $7,200 per year - Enough for gas and a lunch here or there. Most of them work other jobs and/or are wealthy. They could care less about your lousy stipend.
What a joke this man is. Says new voter suppression laws are an “emergency item” but still can’t show us more than a handful of voter fraud cases in 2020.
F you Greg - F you TX Rethugs. Allow poll watchers to get in people’s faces? NO. Allow a judge to toss out election results without proof that fraud flipped a result? NO. Pick up most of the drop boxes in D strongholds and most populous districts? NO - - - Idiots!!
Redirect Notice
www.google.com
Well no, they have to actually be there and a Senator has to actually stand and talk for their to be a filibuster. Whenever they stop, a vote can be taken...moreover the Senate can also vote for cloture to end debate, to make sure a filibuster doesn't happen.It allows the GOP in the US Senate, being in the minority, to not vote on a law, they don't even have to stand up and walk out. Much more efficient and the results are the same.not sure how a filibuster does that...do tellI guess TX doesn't have a filibuster to ensure the majority can't enact any laws they want.true dems don’t even want to do their jobs and vote...just whine!are you done whining yet?...these laws are to stop the scum demonRATS from cheating, and stealing ....BOO-HOO for themLol, they make $7,200 per year - Enough for gas and a lunch here or there. Most of them work other jobs and/or are wealthy. They could care less about your lousy stipend.
What a joke this man is. Says new voter suppression laws are an “emergency item” but still can’t show us more than a handful of voter fraud cases in 2020.
F you Greg - F you TX Rethugs. Allow poll watchers to get in people’s faces? NO. Allow a judge to toss out election results without proof that fraud flipped a result? NO. Pick up most of the drop boxes in D strongholds and most populous districts? NO - - - Idiots!!
Redirect Notice
www.google.com
the same time hit-lery is for treasonTX seems fine with giving their opinion to other states, I'm sure you objected at the time.Don't you live in Oregon or some other left-coast place?Lol, they make $7,200 per year - Enough for gas and a lunch here or there. Most of them work other jobs and/or are wealthy. They could care less about your lousy stipend.
What a joke this man is. Says new voter suppression laws are an “emergency item” but still can’t show us more than a handful of voter fraud cases in 2020.
F you Greg - F you TX Rethugs. Allow poll watchers to get in people’s faces? NO. Allow a judge to toss out election results without proof that fraud flipped a result? NO. Pick up most of the drop boxes in D strongholds and most populous districts? NO - - - Idiots!!
Redirect Notice
www.google.com
Why concern yourself with our affairs?
When Texas wants your opinion, we'll give it to you.
Texas v. Pennsylvania, 592 U.S. ___ (2020), was a lawsuit filed at the United States Supreme Court contesting the administration of the 2020 presidential election in certain states, in which Joe Biden defeated incumbent Donald Trump.[1]
Filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on December 8, 2020, under the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction, Texas v. Pennsylvania alleged that Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin violated the United States Constitution by changing election procedures through non-legislative means. The suit sought to temporarily withhold the certified vote count from these four states prior to the Electoral College vote on December 14. The suit was filed after about 90 lawsuits arising from disputes over the election results filed by Trump and the Republican Party had failed in numerous state and federal courts.
I forgot about Paxton and his meddling far far away. When will that felonious poopstain be hauled in for his securities fraud and bribery trial anyway?
Paxton has been under indictment since 2015 on securities fraud charges relating to activities prior to taking office; he has pleaded not guilty. Additionally, in October 2020, several high-level assistants in Paxton's office accused him of "bribery, abuse of office and other crimes".
The talking filibuster hasn’t been seen since Ted Cruz died. Yep he died last year and few knew. Spine loss issue of some sortWell no, they have to actually be there and a Senator has to actually stand and talk for their to be a filibuster. Whenever they stop, a vote can be taken...moreover the Senate can also vote for cloture to end debate, to make sure a filibuster doesn't happen.It allows the GOP in the US Senate, being in the minority, to not vote on a law, they don't even have to stand up and walk out. Much more efficient and the results are the same.not sure how a filibuster does that...do tellI guess TX doesn't have a filibuster to ensure the majority can't enact any laws they want.true dems don’t even want to do their jobs and vote...just whine!are you done whining yet?...these laws are to stop the scum demonRATS from cheating, and stealing ....BOO-HOO for themLol, they make $7,200 per year - Enough for gas and a lunch here or there. Most of them work other jobs and/or are wealthy. They could care less about your lousy stipend.
What a joke this man is. Says new voter suppression laws are an “emergency item” but still can’t show us more than a handful of voter fraud cases in 2020.
F you Greg - F you TX Rethugs. Allow poll watchers to get in people’s faces? NO. Allow a judge to toss out election results without proof that fraud flipped a result? NO. Pick up most of the drop boxes in D strongholds and most populous districts? NO - - - Idiots!!
Redirect Notice
www.google.com
None of those sort of votes can happen when there is no quorum....like when chicken dems that don't want to do their job simply walk out
I'm absolutely a constitutionalist, Doc. I'm not one of those eggheads that think our rights are limited and that government gets to say what those limits are.Just like the Constitution: you're all about that, until it no longer serves your purpose and then "well, rights aren't unlimited"...lolI thought the Democrats were all about democracy. That must be when it works in their favor.Lol, they make $7,200 per year - Enough for gas and a lunch here or there. Most of them work other jobs and/or are wealthy. They could care less about your lousy stipend.
What a joke this man is. Says new voter suppression laws are an “emergency item” but still can’t show us more than a handful of voter fraud cases in 2020.
F you Greg - F you TX Rethugs. Allow poll watchers to get in people’s faces? NO. Allow a judge to toss out election results without proof that fraud flipped a result? NO. Pick up most of the drop boxes in D strongholds and most populous districts? NO - - - Idiots!!
Redirect Notice
www.google.com
An apt description of sore loser Trumpublicans if ever there was one!
Sign seen at the Fraudit in AZ
Yo Wild - You are no more a #Constitutionalist than I’m a GD monkeyFUK like DJT. Stop playing games!
Scalia said that there WERE limits - Specifically on first and second amendments!I'm absolutely a constitutionalist, Doc. I'm not one of those eggheads that think our rights are limited and that government gets to say what those limits are.Just like the Constitution: you're all about that, until it no longer serves your purpose and then "well, rights aren't unlimited"...lolI thought the Democrats were all about democracy. That must be when it works in their favor.Lol, they make $7,200 per year - Enough for gas and a lunch here or there. Most of them work other jobs and/or are wealthy. They could care less about your lousy stipend.
What a joke this man is. Says new voter suppression laws are an “emergency item” but still can’t show us more than a handful of voter fraud cases in 2020.
F you Greg - F you TX Rethugs. Allow poll watchers to get in people’s faces? NO. Allow a judge to toss out election results without proof that fraud flipped a result? NO. Pick up most of the drop boxes in D strongholds and most populous districts? NO - - - Idiots!!
Redirect Notice
www.google.com
An apt description of sore loser Trumpublicans if ever there was one!
Sign seen at the Fraudit in AZ
Yo Wild - You are no more a #Constitutionalist than I’m a GD monkeyFUK like DJT. Stop playing games!
Texas actually has better filibuster rules than the US Senate does, who knew?Well no, they have to actually be there and a Senator has to actually stand and talk for their to be a filibuster. Whenever they stop, a vote can be taken...moreover the Senate can also vote for cloture to end debate, to make sure a filibuster doesn't happen.It allows the GOP in the US Senate, being in the minority, to not vote on a law, they don't even have to stand up and walk out. Much more efficient and the results are the same.not sure how a filibuster does that...do tellI guess TX doesn't have a filibuster to ensure the majority can't enact any laws they want.true dems don’t even want to do their jobs and vote...just whine!are you done whining yet?...these laws are to stop the scum demonRATS from cheating, and stealing ....BOO-HOO for themLol, they make $7,200 per year - Enough for gas and a lunch here or there. Most of them work other jobs and/or are wealthy. They could care less about your lousy stipend.
What a joke this man is. Says new voter suppression laws are an “emergency item” but still can’t show us more than a handful of voter fraud cases in 2020.
F you Greg - F you TX Rethugs. Allow poll watchers to get in people’s faces? NO. Allow a judge to toss out election results without proof that fraud flipped a result? NO. Pick up most of the drop boxes in D strongholds and most populous districts? NO - - - Idiots!!
Redirect Notice
www.google.com
None of those sort of votes can happen when there is no quorum....like when chicken dems that don't want to do their job simply walk out
they are there to vote. they left their job.Texas actually has better filibuster rules than the US Senate does, who knew?Well no, they have to actually be there and a Senator has to actually stand and talk for their to be a filibuster. Whenever they stop, a vote can be taken...moreover the Senate can also vote for cloture to end debate, to make sure a filibuster doesn't happen.It allows the GOP in the US Senate, being in the minority, to not vote on a law, they don't even have to stand up and walk out. Much more efficient and the results are the same.not sure how a filibuster does that...do tellI guess TX doesn't have a filibuster to ensure the majority can't enact any laws they want.true dems don’t even want to do their jobs and vote...just whine!are you done whining yet?...these laws are to stop the scum demonRATS from cheating, and stealing ....BOO-HOO for themLol, they make $7,200 per year - Enough for gas and a lunch here or there. Most of them work other jobs and/or are wealthy. They could care less about your lousy stipend.
What a joke this man is. Says new voter suppression laws are an “emergency item” but still can’t show us more than a handful of voter fraud cases in 2020.
F you Greg - F you TX Rethugs. Allow poll watchers to get in people’s faces? NO. Allow a judge to toss out election results without proof that fraud flipped a result? NO. Pick up most of the drop boxes in D strongholds and most populous districts? NO - - - Idiots!!
Redirect Notice
www.google.com
None of those sort of votes can happen when there is no quorum....like when chicken dems that don't want to do their job simply walk out
The Dems were doing their job, preventing laws they don't want from being passed. Isn't that why people voted them into office?
Their filibuster would not have worked so they did what they had to do.they are there to vote. they left their job.Texas actually has better filibuster rules than the US Senate does, who knew?Well no, they have to actually be there and a Senator has to actually stand and talk for their to be a filibuster. Whenever they stop, a vote can be taken...moreover the Senate can also vote for cloture to end debate, to make sure a filibuster doesn't happen.It allows the GOP in the US Senate, being in the minority, to not vote on a law, they don't even have to stand up and walk out. Much more efficient and the results are the same.not sure how a filibuster does that...do tellI guess TX doesn't have a filibuster to ensure the majority can't enact any laws they want.true dems don’t even want to do their jobs and vote...just whine!are you done whining yet?...these laws are to stop the scum demonRATS from cheating, and stealing ....BOO-HOO for themLol, they make $7,200 per year - Enough for gas and a lunch here or there. Most of them work other jobs and/or are wealthy. They could care less about your lousy stipend.
What a joke this man is. Says new voter suppression laws are an “emergency item” but still can’t show us more than a handful of voter fraud cases in 2020.
F you Greg - F you TX Rethugs. Allow poll watchers to get in people’s faces? NO. Allow a judge to toss out election results without proof that fraud flipped a result? NO. Pick up most of the drop boxes in D strongholds and most populous districts? NO - - - Idiots!!
Redirect Notice
www.google.com
None of those sort of votes can happen when there is no quorum....like when chicken dems that don't want to do their job simply walk out
The Dems were doing their job, preventing laws they don't want from being passed. Isn't that why people voted them into office?
they didn’t even try to filibuster.
they are bums
Lol, they make $7,200 per year - Enough for gas and a lunch here or there. Most of them work other jobs and/or are wealthy. They could care less about your lousy stipend.
What a joke this man is. Says new voter suppression laws are an “emergency item” but still can’t show us more than a handful of voter fraud cases in 2020.
F you Greg - F you TX Rethugs. Allow poll watchers to get in people’s faces? NO. Allow a judge to toss out election results without proof that fraud flipped a result? NO. Pick up most of the drop boxes in D strongholds and most populous districts? NO - - - Idiots!!
Redirect Notice
www.google.com
i didn’t think they’d be able to win in a debate on the topicTheir filibuster would not have worked so they did what they had to do.they are there to vote. they left their job.Texas actually has better filibuster rules than the US Senate does, who knew?Well no, they have to actually be there and a Senator has to actually stand and talk for their to be a filibuster. Whenever they stop, a vote can be taken...moreover the Senate can also vote for cloture to end debate, to make sure a filibuster doesn't happen.It allows the GOP in the US Senate, being in the minority, to not vote on a law, they don't even have to stand up and walk out. Much more efficient and the results are the same.not sure how a filibuster does that...do tellI guess TX doesn't have a filibuster to ensure the majority can't enact any laws they want.true dems don’t even want to do their jobs and vote...just whine!are you done whining yet?...these laws are to stop the scum demonRATS from cheating, and stealing ....BOO-HOO for themLol, they make $7,200 per year - Enough for gas and a lunch here or there. Most of them work other jobs and/or are wealthy. They could care less about your lousy stipend.
What a joke this man is. Says new voter suppression laws are an “emergency item” but still can’t show us more than a handful of voter fraud cases in 2020.
F you Greg - F you TX Rethugs. Allow poll watchers to get in people’s faces? NO. Allow a judge to toss out election results without proof that fraud flipped a result? NO. Pick up most of the drop boxes in D strongholds and most populous districts? NO - - - Idiots!!
Redirect Notice
www.google.com
None of those sort of votes can happen when there is no quorum....like when chicken dems that don't want to do their job simply walk out
The Dems were doing their job, preventing laws they don't want from being passed. Isn't that why people voted them into office?
they didn’t even try to filibuster.
they are bums
