Gov Abbot to pardon SGT Daniel Perry

e02e5ffb5f980cd8262cf7f0ae00a4a9_press-x-to-doubt-memes-memesuper-la-noire-doubt-meme_419-238.webp
 
No, we truly aren't. Take ten democrat controlled cities out of our statistics and our gun violence is less than all of Europe combined.

Ten. DEMOCRAT. Cities.
That's Democrat cities for ya, but why do the facts of news stories get twisted on forums? Agenda?
 
There’s nothing to suggest that they didn’t.
Now you are hiding again

The soros DA removed evidence from the detective’s statement

That is indesputable
 
You’ve said nothing to indicate you know anything.
even if thats true which its not,,
I did provide it in detailed long form even a moron like you can understand it,,
what you do after that I cant control,,
 
Now you are hiding again

The soros DA removed evidence from the detective’s statement

That is indesputable
We have no idea if it’s disputed or not.

But it’s also unrelated.
 
And you still quibble over semantics. SGT was sitting in his car what does it matter? Garret Commie Forrester raised his weapon that is a threat..Why does you care if it was 1 or 3 or 5 AKs isn't 1 enough a threat to life? Stop being an idiot
It's called disinformation. Just stick to the facts in the news story and stop trying to beef it up to bolster your beliefs and agenda, then all's good.

If the Sgt is guilty of manslaughter, murder, or whatever, that was up to the jury, they got all the facts. If they got it wrong, a pardon is justified.

I assuming the Sgt is appealing.
 
A guy who killed a protestor for walking up to his car.
A peaceful protestor with an AK-47 .. with no intention of creating intimidation with that weapon. Exactly. Intimidation which would result in aggravated assault. Minorities are incapable of producing such results though.
 
The PowerPoint references the grand jury. Not the trial.


"Typically, the parties that appear before a grand jury do not have attorneys, and the rules of evidence permit much more evidence than is allowed at a criminal trial."

so if the DA didn't allow all evidence at the Grand Jury what makes you think he would allow it in a trial? That's PROCEDURAL MISCONDUCT YOU ******* IDIOT
 
15th post
It's called disinformation. Just stick to the facts in the news story and stop trying to beef it up to bolster your beliefs and agenda, then all's good.

If the Sgt is guilty of manslaughter, murder, or whatever, that was up to the jury, they got all the facts. If they got it wrong, a pardon is justified.

I assuming the Sgt is appealing.
He's being pardoned and you're stuck on semantics
 
even if thats true which its not,,
I did provide it in detailed long form even a moron like you can understand it,,
what you do after that I cant control,,
Pointing at a YouTube video is not an indication you understand anything
 
Its only unrelated in your mind

Why do you and the Soros DA fear the truth?
How is it related?

There are no claims that any information was kept from the trial jury. In fact, the lead investigators allegations were introduced as evidence in the trial itself.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom