GOP To Withdraw From Colorado Primary If Trump Disallowed

Former Rep. Justin Amash (L-MI), who was not a supporter of Trump when he was in office, said that ā€œopinion of the Colorado Supreme Court is shameful and runs completely counter to our constitutional system.ā€

ā€œDonald Trump was not removed from office by Congress for engaging in insurrection. Donald Trump has not been criminally convicted in a court of law of engaging in insurrection,ā€ he said. ā€œWhatever you believe about whether Donald Trump engaged in insurrection has no bearing on whether he’s eligible to run for president. No legislative, executive, or judicial body of a state should engage in extraconstitutional decision-making to disqualify a federal candidate from the ballot.ā€

ā€œThis isn’t accountability; it’s an assault on due process of law,ā€ he concluded. ā€œIt undermines our electoral system and threatens every federal candidate for office.ā€

Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. responded: ā€œEvery American should be troubled by the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to remove President Trump from the ballot.ā€

ā€œThis ruling is garbage,ā€ said Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX). ā€œThis WILL be appealed to the Supreme Court & the Supreme Court WILL reverse it.ā€

Cruz added, ā€œTo every Dem & media outlet saying ā€˜save Democracy,’ this is a test: Will you denounce these partisan judges trying to PREVENT THE VOTERS from choosing the next President?ā€

Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) responded: ā€œOne thing is clear: this will help Donald Trump. Do these Colorado clowns in black robes not realize that?ā€

ā€œThe Colorado Resistance judges want to Save Democracy by blocking an election,ā€ said Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR). ā€œThese disgraceful hacks should be condemned by every American—Republican and Democrat. The Supreme Court should immediately strike down this unAmerican stunt.ā€

I see lots of vapid claims and no arguments.
 
There is a legal teeter-totter when it comes to elections, but as far as primaries, the Constitution doesn't really offer much other than there can be no poll tax. It is why some states any eligible voter can vote in at least one primary but in other you have to be a registered party member to vote in that party's primary.
Yeah, States are pretty much independent when it comes to voting.

Fine, Colorado can just get used to being shit on for the next 20+ years. Couldn't happen to a nicer group of scumbags, IMO.

Makes the whole State look bad. Elections matter, people.
 
I see lots of vapid claims and no arguments.
The main argument has already been made and the post I made highlighted the fact that both sides of the aisle find this ruling wrong.

This isn't about Trump, but about the lengths that the left will go to in order to ensure their hold on power. It is a direct threat to our Republic.
 
The main argument has already been made and the post I made highlighted the fact that both sides of the aisle find this ruling wrong.

This isn't about Trump, but about the lengths that the left will go to in order to ensure their hold on power. It is a direct threat to our Republic.
It's always been known that there are elements of radicalism in both parties. The difference is -- We can control ours, dimocrap FILTH place their radicals at the front, as vanguards.

And when they over-step their bounds, which they always, always do, the cowardly scum in the dimocrap party's main group denounces them.

Don't let them bullshit you -- This ruling by dimocrap scum judge in Colorado was NOT an accident. NOTHING in the dimocrap scum party happens by accident.
 
Yeah, States are pretty much independent when it comes to voting.

Fine, Colorado can just get used to being shit on for the next 20+ years. Couldn't happen to a nicer group of scumbags, IMO.

Makes the whole State look bad. Elections matter, people.
I don't think Colorado particularly cares. It has been a who the hell knows state politically for as long as I can recall. I have never been surprised by which way the fart is blowing in their wind TBH. This will eventually be decided by the SCOTUS and who know which way that might go.
 

GOP To Withdraw From Colorado Primary If Trump Disallowed​


So, we should care ?
You should because you’re a hack who only cares about the result. The result would be: it doesn’t matter if Trump were to be disallowed from the Primary ballot if there is no primary.
 
You should because you’re a hack who only cares about the result. The result would be: it doesn’t matter if Trump were to be disallowed from the Primary ballot if there is no primary.

Republicans don’t want to participate in their own primary?
Who are they hurting?
 

GOP To Withdraw From Colorado Primary If Trump Disallowed​


So, we should care ?
No one expects you to care about the destruction of our Constitution. They expect you to fully support it, which you do.
 
No one expects you to care about the destruction of our Constitution. They expect you to fully support it, which you do.
You mean the Constitution Trump wants to terminate?
 
Republicans don’t want to participate in their own primary?
Who are they hurting?
You’re a retard.

They will participate via caucus instead of primary should the unlawful Co. Supreme Court decision not be overruled in time.
 
You mean the Constitution Trump wants to terminate?
Another false claim by the generally dishonest Leftwhiner.

That’s not what Trump wants nor is it what he said. As Leftwhiner fully well knows.
 
The CO dissenting opinion said that Trump was denied his right to due process. The Trump decision was 4-3, very weak.
Just sayin' the USSC has an easy one.
It'll be a while before the USSC gets to it. It has to go through the district and circuit court first.
 
The SCOTUS is going to bitch slap these asshole Democrats.

confucius too little too late.webp
 
There is a legal teeter-totter when it comes to elections, but as far as primaries, the Constitution doesn't really offer much other than there can be no poll tax. It is why some states any eligible voter can vote in at least one primary but in other you have to be a registered party member to vote in that party's primary.

That doesn't impact who can run. At most States can require signatures to be on a ballot, and not many signatures at that.

Voting and running are two different things, and when it comes to federal office, the Constitution is clear on who is eligible to run for what.

It's why all those tax return disclosure attempts on Trump to be on the ballots in some States fell flat.
 
Another false claim by the generally dishonest Leftwhiner.

That’s not what Trump wants nor is it what he said. As Leftwhiner fully well knows.
Wrong again Skippy..

Trump stated he advocates terminating the Constitution when he finds it to be inconvenient
 
Wrong again Skippy..

Trump stated he advocates terminating the Constitution when he finds it to be inconvenient
Not what he said, Leftwhiner. As you know.

Your reiteration of your lie doesn’t support your dishonest claim.
 
But it just moves the fight from the primary ballot to the general election ballot.
The decision is not long for this world.
SCOTUS cannot let it stand as a Unilateral action unless Colorado wants to secede.
 
The main argument has already been made and the post I made highlighted the fact that both sides of the aisle find this ruling wrong.
That wasn't an argument. Repeating your opinion is not an argument.

You have no argument.
 
Back
Top Bottom