GOP To Withdraw From Colorado Primary If Trump Disallowed

[kyzr]

you mean the only court so corrupt they will support that pos

Actually the USSC upholds the US Constitution, unlike many democrat dominated "activist" (corrupt) courts.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

If one state could control the voting in 49 other states, shitstain obama would never have been elected.

 

[Cellblock2429]

GOP To Withdraw From Colorado Primary If Trump Disallowed​

So, we should care ?

/----/ Yeah, Sparky. It means your election interference scam is dead on arrival by a caucus, if not the USSC.

 

[Darkwind]

you mean the only court so corrupt they will support that pos

It is the ONLY court that has NOT written legislation from the bench in the past 45 years and the ONLY court that follows the exact intent of the Constitution. As they should.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

/----/ Yeah, Sparky. It means your election interference scam is dead on arrival by a caucus, if not the USSC.

No it doesn't. It makes no difference whatsoever.

 

[Edgetho]

If one state could control the voting in 49 other states, shitstain obama would never have been elected.

Let's be honest, the choices were between the bastard son of Frank Marshall Davis and the total dickstain McCain, then between 0 and Mittens.

I mean.......

 

[ColonelAngus]

The GOP showing some BALLS is SHOCKING.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The Crazy Democrat Cult is saving our democracy by only allowing Democrat candidates to be on the ballots.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The Crazy Democrat Cult is saving our democracy by only allowing Democrat candidates to be on the ballots.

The lawsuit was brought by Republicans.

 

[Darkwind]

Former Rep. Justin Amash (L-MI), who was not a supporter of Trump when he was in office, said that “opinion of the Colorado Supreme Court is shameful and runs completely counter to our constitutional system.”

“Donald Trump was not removed from office by Congress for engaging in insurrection. Donald Trump has not been criminally convicted in a court of law of engaging in insurrection,” he said. “Whatever you believe about whether Donald Trump engaged in insurrection has no bearing on whether he’s eligible to run for president. No legislative, executive, or judicial body of a state should engage in extraconstitutional decision-making to disqualify a federal candidate from the ballot.”

“This isn’t accountability; it’s an assault on due process of law,” he concluded. “It undermines our electoral system and threatens every federal candidate for office.”

Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. responded: “Every American should be troubled by the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to remove President Trump from the ballot.”

“This ruling is garbage,” said Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX). “This WILL be appealed to the Supreme Court & the Supreme Court WILL reverse it.”

Cruz added, “To every Dem & media outlet saying ‘save Democracy,’ this is a test: Will you denounce these partisan judges trying to PREVENT THE VOTERS from choosing the next President?”

Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) responded: “One thing is clear: this will help Donald Trump. Do these Colorado clowns in black robes not realize that?”

“The Colorado Resistance judges want to Save Democracy by blocking an election,” said Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR). “These disgraceful hacks should be condemned by every American—Republican and Democrat. The Supreme Court should immediately strike down this unAmerican stunt.”

Republicans Slam Colorado Supreme Court For Keeping Trump Off Ballot | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

 

[Dekster]

The State really had no jurisdiction in this case, why would they care later?

Primaries happen under state laws and it was a question whether or not the secretary of state could allow him on the ballot to begin with. "They" meaning the federal courts may or may not care now or later but that ultimately is where this issue will be settled.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The lawsuit was brought by Republicans.

And the trial was unfair.

 

[martybegan]

Primaries happen under state laws and it was a question whether or not the secretary of state could allow him on the ballot to begin with. "They" meaning the federal courts may or may not care now or later but that ultimately is where this issue will be settled.

But that prevents any federal concern on the federal ballot in the first place, and thus federal law and jurisdiction applies.

A primary for a federal election is still a federal issue as per the Constitution.

 

[DudleySmith]

They don't like Federal elections then they don't have to get Federal money and defense support. All the Boulder welfare bunnies will then scream and cry and so will all the faux 'ranchers' and botique farmers.

 

[L.K.Eder]

They say they will move to a 'Caucus' system. I don't understand the differences.

Anybody?

If Trump ballot decision stands, Colorado GOP says it will move from primary to caucus system

The Colorado Republican Party announced over social media that it intends to move to a "pure caucus system" if the ban against former President Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election is sustained.

www.foxnews.com

how about getting acquainted with your shithole country's election system, instead of your usual queefing around?

would that be an option for you fucktard?

 

[1miseryindex]

The SCOTUS is going to bitch slap these asshole Democrats.

LOL

hope so

Ms "I don't know what a woman" is and the other bimbos on the SCOTUS won't decide in favor of American principles due to their TDS. But the Justices who do care about such will decide. Trump has not been convicted of (Please) "insurrection"

but I guess it's the same old damn thing: dims couldn't care less about American principles like Innocent until proven otherwise

 

[1miseryindex]

you mean the only court so corrupt they will support that pos

what POS?

?

 

[jbrownson0831]

I think the State has to be notified by Jan 4th or Trump can't get on the ballot anyway. Kinda short notice for SCOTUS.

Hey! I made a rhyme!

I'm a fan of that plan...

 

[Cellblock2429]

No it doesn't. It makes no difference whatsoever.

/---/ Explain how a court can stop a political party from choosing a candidate in a private caucus. This ought to be fun to watch.

 

[Dekster]

But that prevents any federal concern on the federal ballot in the first place, and thus federal law and jurisdiction applies.

A primary for a federal election is still a federal issue as per the Constitution.

There is a legal teeter-totter when it comes to elections, but as far as primaries, the Constitution doesn't really offer much other than there can be no poll tax. It is why some states any eligible voter can vote in at least one primary but in other you have to be a registered party member to vote in that party's primary.