Calling him a Jhihadist just lost you credibility.
I have seen nothing to say he is an Islamic fundamentalist.
He's trying to peg him...ewww.
Apparently the bottom line in this "argument" is that the right wing lunatics
feel that it's perfectly okay for the House to not fund parts of the government they it disagrees with based on the fact that there is a new make-up in the House that has a majority GOP. The house was majority Democrat when the ACA was passed.
Basically it is meaning that since Representative Jane Doe wasn't seated when the ACA passed, she needn't vote to fund it.
This is an interesting gambit by the GOP.
So, proceeding with that mantra; the House and Senate should have to re-pass all legislation since 1789. The SEC act of 1934 should have to be re-ratified everytime we get a new member of Congress.
In other words, if a member dies or resigns, and a new rep takes their place they will have to re-pass everything passed before since I guess since, as stated earlier, Rep. Jane Doe didn't vote for the "new" SEC act of 2013.
No adult with more than 2 brain cells would sign on to such a looney plan but this is what the 2013 Congressional GOP has become...a comical sideshow. Jindal's hope that they would shy away from being the "party of stupid" seems to be fading.