GOP Success: We removed Saddam and replaced him with Islam

The Anglo-American alliance has removed one of the most repressive totalitarian regimes and allowed Iraq to become a wealthy representative republic with the most progressive constitution in the Arab world, thanks to the compromise and pragmaticism of elected delegates from the Kurdish and Arab secular and religious parties who debated and drafted it, and thanks also to the Iraqis who overwhelmingly ratified it. Liberal democracies with open, tolerant societies have never sprung up from generations of fascist tyranny overnight; but they can get a foothold where ever people are willing to fight for them.
 
Last edited:
The Anglo-American alliance has removed one of the most repressive totalitarian regimes and allowed Iraq to become a wealthy representative republic with the most progressive constitution in the Arab world, thanks to the compromise and pragmaticism of elected delegates from the Kurdish and Arab secular and religious parties who debated and drafted it, and thanks also to the Iraqis who overwhelmingly ratified it. Liberal democracies with open, tolerant societies have never sprung up from generations of fascist tyranny overnight; but they can get a foothold where ever people are willing to fight for them.

Lol.....I can't even begin to believe people actually buy this bullshit. By helping to install an islamic theocracy we have pushed the clock back in iraq but this was done for the long term goal of lighting it up to justify attacking iran.
 
The Anglo-American alliance has removed one of the most repressive totalitarian regimes and allowed Iraq to become a wealthy representative republic with the most progressive constitution in the Arab world, thanks to the compromise and pragmaticism of elected delegates from the Kurdish and Arab secular and religious parties who debated and drafted it, and thanks also to the Iraqis who overwhelmingly ratified it. Liberal democracies with open, tolerant societies have never sprung up from generations of fascist tyranny overnight; but they can get a foothold where ever people are willing to fight for them.

Lol.....I can't even begin to believe people actually buy this bullshit. By helping to install an islamic theocracy we have pushed the clock back in iraq but this was done for the long term goal of lighting it up to justify attacking iran.

Ar you still spewing this left wing bullshit? Try growing up and getting a clue instead of getting your information from toilet stall graffiti while waiting for your next customer.
 
The Anglo-American alliance has removed one of the most repressive totalitarian regimes and allowed Iraq to become a wealthy representative republic with the most progressive constitution in the Arab world, thanks to the compromise and pragmaticism of elected delegates from the Kurdish and Arab secular and religious parties who debated and drafted it, and thanks also to the Iraqis who overwhelmingly ratified it. Liberal democracies with open, tolerant societies have never sprung up from generations of fascist tyranny overnight; but they can get a foothold where ever people are willing to fight for them.

Democrats miss Uncle Saddam.

You ***** need some new material. Trying to ignore facts by accusing people of supporting terrorists is so last decade.
 
The Anglo-American alliance has removed one of the most repressive totalitarian regimes and allowed Iraq to become a wealthy representative republic with the most progressive constitution in the Arab world, thanks to the compromise and pragmaticism of elected delegates from the Kurdish and Arab secular and religious parties who debated and drafted it, and thanks also to the Iraqis who overwhelmingly ratified it. Liberal democracies with open, tolerant societies have never sprung up from generations of fascist tyranny overnight; but they can get a foothold where ever people are willing to fight for them.

Democrats miss Uncle Saddam.

You ***** need some new material. Trying to ignore facts by accusing people of supporting terrorists is so last decade.

Democrats supported the Islamic Insurgency in Iraq by trying to cut funding to our troops and that was so this decade.

Did you send Mooky al Sadr a Birthday Card? Remember how you Libs used to tell us that Mooky was the real power in Iraq?
 
Democrats miss Uncle Saddam.

Democrats miss their money and our young soldiers.

Republicans miss Saddam. They need another boogeyman to scare the American people with.

Is that why Nancy and the Dems tried 47 separate times to cut funding to our troops on the battlefield, you miss the money?

Is that how you honor our young soldiers?
 
Last edited:
The Anglo-American alliance has removed one of the most repressive totalitarian regimes and allowed Iraq to become a wealthy representative republic with the most progressive constitution in the Arab world, thanks to the compromise and pragmaticism of elected delegates from the Kurdish and Arab secular and religious parties who debated and drafted it, and thanks also to the Iraqis who overwhelmingly ratified it. Liberal democracies with open, tolerant societies have never sprung up from generations of fascist tyranny overnight; but they can get a foothold where ever people are willing to fight for them.

Democrats miss Uncle Saddam.

You ***** need some new material. Trying to ignore facts by accusing people of supporting terrorists is so last decade.

Democrats supported the Islamic Insurgency in Iraq by trying to cut funding to our troops and that was so this decade.

Did you send Mooky al Sadr a Birthday Card? Remember how you Libs used to tell us that Mooky was the real power in Iraq?

I'm not a lib you dumbfuck. The iraq and afghanistan occupations are Liberal Policies but you're too fucking stoopid to realize the obvious. I've also never said al Sadr was in charge. What other strawmen you got bitch?
 
Democrats miss Uncle Saddam.

Democrats miss their money and our young soldiers.

Republicans miss Saddam. They need another boogeyman to scare the American people with.

Is that why Nancy and the Dems tried 47 separate times to cut funding to our troops on the battlefield, you miss the money?

Is that how you honor our young soldiers?

You don't honor our Troops by keeping them in bullshit occupations you cocksucking idiot.
 
Democrats miss their money and our young soldiers.

Republicans miss Saddam. They need another boogeyman to scare the American people with.

Is that why Nancy and the Dems tried 47 separate times to cut funding to our troops on the battlefield, you miss the money?

Is that how you honor our young soldiers?

You don't honor our Troops by keeping them in bullshit occupations you cocksucking idiot.

Yeah. You send them to do a job and then half way through you accuse them of terrorizing women and children and threaten to cut off their funding while holding them to Article 32 hearings. Shoot, everyone know that!
 
See the immediate attacks. No argument. No disagreement. Nothing to say I'm wrong. Just name calling.

And these people want to take over the US government. Scary.

We didn't replace him. The Iraqi people replaced him - IT IS THEIR COUNTRY.

Then the Iraqis must be curious about the foreign military occupation they've been suffering for the last seven years.


Yep because before the "7 year occupation they have suffered" everything was peachy king in Iraq and nearly 1 million people were not kill yearly by the Saddam and his Bath Party.
 
We didn't replace him. The Iraqi people replaced him - IT IS THEIR COUNTRY.

Then the Iraqis must be curious about the foreign military occupation they've been suffering for the last seven years.


Yep because before the "7 year occupation they have suffered" everything was peachy king in Iraq and nearly 1 million people were not kill yearly by the Saddam and his Bath Party.

A poor human rights record does not give the United States license to launch a crusade.
 
We didn't replace him. The Iraqi people replaced him - IT IS THEIR COUNTRY.

Then the Iraqis must be curious about the foreign military occupation they've been suffering for the last seven years.


Yep because before the "7 year occupation they have suffered" everything was peachy king in Iraq and nearly 1 million people were not kill yearly by the Saddam and his Bath Party.


Nobody asked for a non-sequitur strawman dish. What else you got not-quite-bright?
 
Then the Iraqis must be curious about the foreign military occupation they've been suffering for the last seven years.


Yep because before the "7 year occupation they have suffered" everything was peachy king in Iraq and nearly 1 million people were not kill yearly by the Saddam and his Bath Party.

A poor human rights record does not give the United States license to launch a crusade.

We didn't. The Iraqi Constitution is irrefutable proof of that. WTFU.
 
Yep because before the "7 year occupation they have suffered" everything was peachy king in Iraq and nearly 1 million people were not kill yearly by the Saddam and his Bath Party.

A poor human rights record does not give the United States license to launch a crusade.

We didn't. The Iraqi Constitution is irrefutable proof of that. WTFU.
Don't worry. It's a sham, just like the pretense under which the invasion was launched in the first place.
 
We didn't replace him. The Iraqi people replaced him - IT IS THEIR COUNTRY.

Then the Iraqis must be curious about the foreign military occupation they've been suffering for the last seven years.


Yep because before the "7 year occupation they have suffered" everything was peachy king in Iraq and nearly 1 million people were not kill yearly by the Saddam and his Bath Party.

Yep because before the "7 year occupation they have suffered" everything was peachy king in Iraq and nearly 1 million people were not kill yearly by the Saddam and his Bath Party.

A poor human rights record does not give the United States license to launch a crusade.

We didn't. The Iraqi Constitution is irrefutable proof of that. WTFU.

American soldiers died to install an Islamic based government in what was a secular nation. Even your active willful blindness cannot ignore that fact.
 
A poor human rights record does not give the United States license to launch a crusade.

We didn't. The Iraqi Constitution is irrefutable proof of that. WTFU.
Don't worry. It's a sham, just like the pretense under which the invasion was launched in the first place.

The sham is a Nation that persecutes people over issues of faith Shalom. Why not put your best foot forward????? Sadam violated the terms of the peace treaty every day. Daddy Bush made the first mistake by falling for the bullshit. Classic Neocon sell out. If you can't finish the job, why bother starting it???? We should have backed the Shah of Iran, We should have stayed in Lebanon. Unlike You, we were there to help. ;)
 
Then the Iraqis must be curious about the foreign military occupation they've been suffering for the last seven years.


Yep because before the "7 year occupation they have suffered" everything was peachy king in Iraq and nearly 1 million people were not kill yearly by the Saddam and his Bath Party.

A poor human rights record does not give the United States license to launch a crusade.

We didn't. The Iraqi Constitution is irrefutable proof of that. WTFU.

American soldiers died to install an Islamic based government in what was a secular nation. Even your active willful blindness cannot ignore that fact.

There is no willful blindness here CL. I acknowledge what was done and disagree with it. Saddam may have been secular, Iraq was not. It was divided between Shiite, Sunni, and Kurd, for the most part.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top