GOP Senator Introduces Bill to Make All Porn a Federal Crime, Following Project 2025 Playbook

I don’t shame her
I just call her a slut

Sluts can make art

But you refused to call Kamala a slut, even though she was far sluttier than anything our First Lady may have done.

She was a homewrecker who fucked a married man, Willy Brown to promote her career. That is far sluttier than posing for LGBTQ+ positive art.
 
The biggest problem with slut in 2025, is the way it is available within seconds on anyone's phone.

Back in the day, smut hounds had to get dressed up, go to a seedy part of town, deal with creepy clerks wearing raincoats and pimps in full costume, and sit in a sticky seat in a cinema to watch smut films.

Took effort is the point.

Nowadays, some people grab their phone and are watching all kinds of crazy shit all day.
 
But you refused to call Kamala a slut, even though she was far sluttier than anything our First Lady may have done.

She was a homewrecker who fucked a married man, Willy Brown to promote her career. That is far sluttier than posing for LGBTQ+ positive art.

In that scenario, so is Trump.
 
‘Last year, the rightwing think-tank the Heritage Foundation launched Project 2025, which laid out much of the policy blueprint for the current Trump administration. One of the project’s espoused goals was to permanently criminalize all pornography. Now, a Republican senator with kind words for Trump has introduced a bill that would do just that.

Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) recently introduced the Interstate Obscenity Definition Act (IODA), which would effectively criminalize all pornography nationwide by legally redefining what it means to be obscene. For years, “obscenity” has been all but a defunct legal category that narrowly defines speech that remains unprotected by the First Amendment. Lee would explode this legal category, expanding it to encompass virtually all visual representations of sex.

According to the bill text, “a picture, image, graphic image file, film, videotape, or other visual depiction” of any media that “appeals to the prurient interest in nudity, sex, or excretion” would be considered criminal. In other words, if you have an old VHS tape of some Cinemax-style smut stashed away in your garage, you could, under this law, be considered to be harboring deeply illicit materials. Some critics have suggested that Lee’s definition of obscenity is so ridiculously broad that it could effectively criminalize Game of Thrones. That said, the punishments for merely possessing porn under the proposed law seem unclear at this point, as the legislation seems more focused on punishing the creators and distributors of racy material.

The law would “pave the way for the prosecution of obscene content disseminated across state lines or from foreign countries and open the door to federal restrictions or bans regarding online porn,” The Daily Caller writes.’


The fascist right continues its authoritarian attack on the First Amendment and freedom of speech and expression – for conservatives it’s about more government, bigger government at the expense of individual liberty, seeking to compel conformity and punish dissent.
Getting rid of porn? How is this a bad thing?
 
The biggest problem with slut in 2025, is the way it is available within seconds on anyone's phone.

Back in the day, smut hounds had to get dressed up, go to a seedy part of town, deal with creepy clerks wearing raincoats and pimps in full costume, and sit in a sticky seat in a cinema to watch smut films.

Took effort is the point.

Nowadays, some people grab their phone and are watching all kinds of crazy shit all day.
.

Well said.

It takes no effort these days to live a life of dissipation. That's how he wants it.


.
 
‘Last year, the rightwing think-tank the Heritage Foundation launched Project 2025, which laid out much of the policy blueprint for the current Trump administration. One of the project’s espoused goals was to permanently criminalize all pornography. Now, a Republican senator with kind words for Trump has introduced a bill that would do just that.

Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) recently introduced the Interstate Obscenity Definition Act (IODA), which would effectively criminalize all pornography nationwide by legally redefining what it means to be obscene. For years, “obscenity” has been all but a defunct legal category that narrowly defines speech that remains unprotected by the First Amendment. Lee would explode this legal category, expanding it to encompass virtually all visual representations of sex.

According to the bill text, “a picture, image, graphic image file, film, videotape, or other visual depiction” of any media that “appeals to the prurient interest in nudity, sex, or excretion” would be considered criminal. In other words, if you have an old VHS tape of some Cinemax-style smut stashed away in your garage, you could, under this law, be considered to be harboring deeply illicit materials. Some critics have suggested that Lee’s definition of obscenity is so ridiculously broad that it could effectively criminalize Game of Thrones. That said, the punishments for merely possessing porn under the proposed law seem unclear at this point, as the legislation seems more focused on punishing the creators and distributors of racy material.

The law would “pave the way for the prosecution of obscene content disseminated across state lines or from foreign countries and open the door to federal restrictions or bans regarding online porn,” The Daily Caller writes.’


The fascist right continues its authoritarian attack on the First Amendment and freedom of speech and expression – for conservatives it’s about more government, bigger government at the expense of individual liberty, seeking to compel conformity and punish dissent.
Geez, first your pissed that you can't get 30 baby dolls, now you are pissed that Mike Lee doesn't want you to transport your porno across state lines.

You dembots really have your priorities straight.
 
But you refused to call Kamala a slut, even though she was far sluttier than anything our First Lady may have done.

She was a homewrecker who fucked a married man, Willy Brown to promote her career. That is far sluttier than posing for LGBTQ+ positive art.
Kamala had a consensual relationship

She never made porn
 
‘Last year, the rightwing think-tank the Heritage Foundation launched Project 2025, which laid out much of the policy blueprint for the current Trump administration. One of the project’s espoused goals was to permanently criminalize all pornography. Now, a Republican senator with kind words for Trump has introduced a bill that would do just that.

Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) recently introduced the Interstate Obscenity Definition Act (IODA), which would effectively criminalize all pornography nationwide by legally redefining what it means to be obscene. For years, “obscenity” has been all but a defunct legal category that narrowly defines speech that remains unprotected by the First Amendment. Lee would explode this legal category, expanding it to encompass virtually all visual representations of sex.

According to the bill text, “a picture, image, graphic image file, film, videotape, or other visual depiction” of any media that “appeals to the prurient interest in nudity, sex, or excretion” would be considered criminal. In other words, if you have an old VHS tape of some Cinemax-style smut stashed away in your garage, you could, under this law, be considered to be harboring deeply illicit materials. Some critics have suggested that Lee’s definition of obscenity is so ridiculously broad that it could effectively criminalize Game of Thrones. That said, the punishments for merely possessing porn under the proposed law seem unclear at this point, as the legislation seems more focused on punishing the creators and distributors of racy material.

The law would “pave the way for the prosecution of obscene content disseminated across state lines or from foreign countries and open the door to federal restrictions or bans regarding online porn,” The Daily Caller writes.’


The fascist right continues its authoritarian attack on the First Amendment and freedom of speech and expression – for conservatives it’s about more government, bigger government at the expense of individual liberty, seeking to compel conformity and punish dissent.
Libs are pro porn?

Thats no surprise
 
Kamala had a consensual relationship

She never made porn

Consensual adultery is still sleazy. Particularly as Ms. Harris was doing it to promote her career. Kamala was making money from her actions just like Seka and the porn actresses of her generation.
 
LOL....I bet the OP thought that the right-leaning would hail Mike Lee's proposed Bill when in fact nobody really likes Mike Lee all that much.

OP comes up all zeros again!

How about we dig up some of the laws proposed by the hard lefties in the Senate?

This one isn't going anywhere.
 
Consensual adultery is still sleazy. Particularly as Ms. Harris was doing it to promote her career. Kamala was making money from her actions just like Seka and the porn actresses of her generation.
Don't you dare demean Seka like that! ;)

The Platinum Princess of Porn

seka-biography-age-height-figure-net-worth-h5a1qnzu.jpg
 
Melania is no "porn star". She posed for a handful of LGBTQ+ friendly photos, that BTW, helped to gin up interest in lesbianism. Isn't that "good"?

Melania’s porn shots are some of the most widely downloaded on the Interweb

Makes her a star
 
Back
Top Bottom