GOP Senate Does Not Have The Votes To Dismiss Charges! Trump Agrees To Trial!

mascale

Gold Member
Feb 22, 2009
6,836
800
130
Rep. Adam Schiff created the Family-Friendly basis fact-finding part of the inquiry. The next part of the House inquiry moves on to House Judiciary. Fact-finding was not about creating explosive conclusions: But was adequately jarring. Trump has relented on forcing the Senate to Dismiss the Charges and not proceed to trial: Even already.

Trump agrees not to press Senate Republicans for immediate dismissal of charges

So the Imperfect Phone Call--and the backdrop even Senator Graham calls incoherent: Has so far been exposed: Sufficiently such that doubt among Republican Senators is publically mentionable. The "incoherence" part may likely be a part of the explanation.

The Parody Transcript--a White House with no faith in the actual details--is already public record. Notes and recollections are everywhere reported.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Moses, Prince of Egypt, would eventually return to Egypt--demanding freedom for some of the slaves: Many might say, to become agents of further Egyptian Subjugation Atrocities, (Usury Economics, Deut. 23:19-20.)
 
Why should Trump hold out for a dismissal when his lawyers and the Republican majority can supeona anyone they want, totally expose the Democrats' activities, and DESTROY the Democrat Party???
 
The Impeachment process includes House "Managers" and a presiding Officer--Chief Justice Roberts, who rules on such matters as admissible evidence. One glaring detail is that attention to the proceedings is likely at 100% among Senators polled(?)

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Fact of Deut 23:19-20, created conclusion reached in Matt 25:14-30, even--after some centuries of further atrocity!)
 
If the house dem's are really stupid enough to vote to impeach...BRING ON THE SENATE TRIAL!!!

I can't wait to see obama, biden(s), and hillary get worn in :auiqs.jpg:
 
Rep. Adam Schiff created the Family-Friendly basis fact-finding part of the inquiry. The next part of the House inquiry moves on to House Judiciary. Fact-finding was not about creating explosive conclusions: But was adequately jarring. Trump has relented on forcing the Senate to Dismiss the Charges and not proceed to trial: Even already.

Trump agrees not to press Senate Republicans for immediate dismissal of charges

So the Imperfect Phone Call--and the backdrop even Senator Graham calls incoherent: Has so far been exposed: Sufficiently such that doubt among Republican Senators is publically mentionable. The "incoherence" part may likely be a part of the explanation.

The Parody Transcript--a White House with no faith in the actual details--is already public record. Notes and recollections are everywhere reported.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Moses, Prince of Egypt, would eventually return to Egypt--demanding freedom for some of the slaves: Many might say, to become agents of further Egyptian Subjugation Atrocities, (Usury Economics, Deut. 23:19-20.)
You do understand tho an isn’t working out for you right? Pelosi is begging for a end before this goes to the senate .. they won’t for for months.. they are scared
 
The Senate is already in play for 2020. The AZ Senator picked to replace McCain is already a proven statewide election loser. Hence she got picked, unable to win the Senate election. The Alabama Democratic Senator is a Town Hall campaigner, door-knocking brand. And so it goes on. Pollsters can note that many Republican Senators up for re-election are Trump-leaning states from 2016. The Trump approval ratings across the many, many polls are negative about the Trump Family Zingers.

The spate of negative publicity arising from the trial--possibly a majority voting to eject, then likely with basis in negative publicity: Is soon enough in the overall narrative.

Again, according to nowhere published or conducting polling: 100% of United States Senators are aware of the Impeachment proceedings, and have tuned in to at least a part of the proceedings so far(?)!

(Think of it as hearsay(?)!)

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(And then armed with the Usury Economics, the tribes of Sinai would release themselves to the local nations and empires, then of that world--armed with the Subjugation Mentality arithmetic!)
 
Last edited:
Again, Trump, his sycophants, and other members of the Trump cult should welcome impeachment and a trial in the Senate.

It would allow Trump to crow and strut and boast about how he ‘beat the rap.’

That Trump dreads being impeached so is yet another example of his arrogance and hubris.
 
The president would love for the impeachment to go forward.

It would make Watergate look like child's play. His lawyers would make it an opportunity to smear witnesses that appeared in House hearings and to ensure they receive administrative action detrimental their careers. They would drag out all sorts of officials from the Obama administration for activities before his election and since.

It will be the most amusing and entertaining legal drams in the history of the USA.

I can't wait for it to start. :113:
 
Like the Intelligence Committee hearings, the presentation of the facts in evidence has to proceed with procedural decorum. In the Senate Trial, The Presiding Officer is The US Supreme Court Chief Justice. The circus will further be countered by the House managers--legal team--required in the trial.

Attempts by pond scum, even in uniform, to denigrate the Courts of the United States: Can further be at issue.

The other background problem would be any appellate actions--even if the President seeks a procedural appeal. Then it is all back to Court procedures and rules--like it will be in Senate Trial, history going forward.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Then in Post-Hellenic, Roman Empire--Subjugation from Usury Economics would clearly be Imperial Normal, Ceasar infatuated with a Princess of Egypt, Cleopatra. The Moses Atrocity, valued by Pharoah, worked like presented in Matthew 25:14-30--even then, and way before! Market Friendly Remedy Economics--Financial Inclusion--was also known in Matthew 20:1-16, Catholic or KJV--both versions.)
 
Why should Trump hold out for a dismissal when his lawyers and the Republican majority can supeona anyone they want, totally expose the Democrats' activities, and DESTROY the Democrat Party???

Well, because the Republicans already know that Biden didn't act corruptly and that any testimony about Joe Biden would only backfire in their faces. Many of these Senators were in the Senate and actually VOTED for sending Joe Biden to the Ukraine.

The last thing Republicans want is for the truth about the Ukraine to come out. There is nothing there to help Trump at all, and a whole lot that looks like Trump is a lying piece of shit. Which of course, he is.
 
Why should Trump hold out for a dismissal when his lawyers and the Republican majority can supeona anyone they want, totally expose the Democrats' activities, and DESTROY the Democrat Party???

Well, because the Republicans already know that Biden didn't act corruptly and that any testimony about Joe Biden would only backfire in their faces. Many of these Senators were in the Senate and actually VOTED for sending Joe Biden to the Ukraine.

The last thing Republicans want is for the truth about the Ukraine to come out. There is nothing there to help Trump at all, and a whole lot that looks like Trump is a lying piece of shit. Which of course, he is.
Lol
You’re a fool
 
Why should Trump hold out for a dismissal when his lawyers and the Republican majority can supeona anyone they want, totally expose the Democrats' activities, and DESTROY the Democrat Party???

Well, because the Republicans already know that Biden didn't act corruptly and that any testimony about Joe Biden would only backfire in their faces. Many of these Senators were in the Senate and actually VOTED for sending Joe Biden to the Ukraine.

The last thing Republicans want is for the truth about the Ukraine to come out. There is nothing there to help Trump at all, and a whole lot that looks like Trump is a lying piece of shit. Which of course, he is.
So where did the money come from
To pay for hunter Bidens salary?
 
Last edited:
Billions of people get their money from paydays. The problem is the method used to compute any raises, investment dividends, interest on accounts, interest on loans: Fixed percentage--especially controlled and regulated--usury!

Many will contend that lots of companies do that. Even Bank of Dubai, and Bank of Israel: Use arithmetic to determine how much "cost" is in their contracts for goods and services. Technically, their respective majority religions prohibit usury charges among their kind, The one that sucks originates of the House of Pharoah, spread through some fiction of exile of one of their princes--educated therein--who stumbled on some tribes at the base of Sinai.

Some companies operate illegally or corruptly, often unbeknownst to investors and employees alike. Owners, board members, brokers, and officers then go to Jail.

Hunter Biden is alleged to have worked for an energy company. See paragraph, immediately above(?)!

Billions understand this! See paragraph immediately above regarding how it likely came about(?)!


"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Gospel of Luke would pick up on arithmetic story--apparently, "Never Again!" to be repeated to all of history!"
 
Why should Trump hold out for a dismissal when his lawyers and the Republican majority can supeona anyone they want, totally expose the Democrats' activities, and DESTROY the Democrat Party???
Put your fever swamp fantasy aside for a moment and explain what witness is going to be introduced to factually refute the overwhelming evidence of Individual 1's guilt?
 
Why should Trump hold out for a dismissal when his lawyers and the Republican majority can supeona anyone they want, totally expose the Democrats' activities, and DESTROY the Democrat Party???
Put your fever swamp fantasy aside for a moment and explain what witness is going to be introduced to factually refute the overwhelming evidence of Individual 1's guilt?

Put your TDS fantasies aside and answer the real question. What evidence do you even have? Answer: NONE. Zero, zip, nada, zilch. Not one witness, despite coaching and badgering from Schitt could back up ONE claim you tards made. You may want to worry about even having the votes in the House to proceed before you worry about your loss in the Senate.
 

Forum List

Back
Top