GOP Representative supports 12 year olds getting married but opposes gender affirming treatments.

[BS Filter]

Of course you don't.....being a defender of legalized marriage of 12 years olds makes you shameless.

Says you, the defender of murdering innocent defenseless human babies in the womb. I'll never be as depraved as you are.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Wow,

Instead of right wingers on this site saying, "You know, this Moon (R) guy is flat out wrong, 12 year old should NOT be getting married to adults."

But NO, you're all justifying it with, "well they can get divorced later" or "Marriage doesn't have to be permanent."

What about the trauma of sexual relationships at age 12.
Wow. Showing again that you right wingers really don't care about children.

And Yes, all the gender reassignment stuff should be outlawed.

That's because marriage to 12 year olds isn't part of the discussion of damage done by transitioning. While a worthy subject in its own right, the discussion of minor transition is what we're having.

 

[BS Filter]

Well Well Well......NO WONDER the Right is pushing for legalizing marriage with 12 year olds.

When are you going to demonize Muslims for the same thing?

 

[bodecea]

Agree. The democrat party is sick, twisted and perverted.

"It's not pedophilia if they're married."

 

[hadit]

Wow,

Instead of right wingers on this site saying, "You know, this Moon (R) guy is flat out wrong, 12 year old should NOT be getting married to adults."

But NO, you're all justifying it with, "well they can get divorced later" or "Marriage doesn't have to be permanent."

What about the trauma of sexual relationships at age 12.
Wow. Showing again that you right wingers really don't care about children.

And Yes, all the gender reassignment stuff should be outlawed.

Not all. You're applying a very wide brush there. Not surprising, but disappointing. 12 is too young for either marriage or gender reassignment. In neither case is the child old enough to make an informed decision about it.

Of course, we could take into account that, in throughout history, girls were often married off pretty much as soon as they went through puberty. After all, if they weren't going to live much past 30, they needed to get cracking to have the dozen or so kids they'd need to keep the family tree alive and to cement inter-family unions. This idea that they should be old enough to make an informed decision is a recent phenomenon when considered against the entirety of human history.

 

[martybegan]

Acceptance is mandated by extending to your fellow Americans rights you take for granted?

The right to mutilate and drug their kids?

Didn't see that in the Constitution.

LGBT people can vote, and now get married, can hold office, have RKBA, can create whatever religion they feel like, have all criminal and legal protections like 4th amendment, jury trials, and cruel unusual punishment bans everyone else does.

What "rights" are they missing?

 

[bodecea]

That's a question, not a specific. Please pay attention.

Do you? Because if you do, you support the party of:

Legalized marriage to 12 year olds.

Voting for an avowed sexual assaulter.

Voting for an underaged girl sex trafficker.

Voting for a pedo enabler.

Voting for a creep hitting on underaged girls.

 

[Winco]

Mutilation should be more than "extremely rare." It should be extremely never.

Agree 100%.

Same thoughts on 12 year olds getting married to a 35 year old.
Should be NEVER.

 

[bodecea]

When are you going to demonize Muslims for the same thing?

I do. I most definitely do. Funny how you and the Missouri legislature are closer to what Muslims believe than I am.

 

[OldFlame]

What's 'reliable data' in your estimation? Gateway Pundit? QAnon?

And you're insisting that you know better than the parents, the child, and their health care professionals?

Is that what Q told you?

You believe in Q?

 

[martybegan]

You might want to do some self-reflection as to why you are so on board with the legalized marriage of 12 year olds.


Seriously.

Again, if they can procreate at that age, why ban them marrying with substantial parental and governmental input if they so choose to do so?

And picking 12 is a cop out, because the left seems to want to ban marriage before 18, yet are Ok with drugging and mutilating the kids at those ages.

What about 15? Again, biology allows people to procreate at that point, and discounting statutory rapes, which should be prosecuted, why should two 15 year olds who have a kid together be banned from marrying if the parents say OK and say a court agrees they are mature enough to do so?

 

[martybegan]

Marty,

Your word is no good....You're credulous, and a chronic liar.

Do you know what GIYF actually means?

and your use of the word credulous is hilarious coming from someone who thinks women can have penises.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Is marriage of a 12 year old the same as chemical castration of a 12 year old? No. Is marriage of a 12 year old the same as a double mastectomy of a 14 year old. No.

Discussing the marriage of a 12 year old is only brought up to avoid the permanent damage done by transitioning children.

 

[bodecea]

Again, if they can procreate at that age, why ban them marrying with substantial parental and governmental input if they so choose to do so?

And picking 12 is a cop out, because the left seems to want to ban marriage before 18, yet are Ok with drugging and mutilating the kids at those ages.

What about 15? Again, biology allows people to procreate at that point, and discounting statutory rapes, which should be prosecuted, why should two 15 year olds who have a kid together be banned from marrying if the parents say OK and say a court agrees they are mature enough to do so?

Let me share a tidbit of fact you don't seem to get (or don't want to get)...................THEY ARE UNDERAGED.

 

[BS Filter]

"It's not pedophilia if they're married."

Correct. You're too much of a coward to chastise Muslims for doing the exact same thing.

 

[Winco]

That's because marriage to 12 year olds isn't part of the discussion of damage done by transitioning. While a worthy subject in its own right, the discussion of minor transition is what we're having.

Did you read the thread title?

GOP Representative supports 12 year olds getting married but opposes gender affirming treatments.​

 

[martybegan]

So....it's all a lie.

Nope.

 

[BS Filter]

I do. I most definitely do. Funny how you and the Missouri legislature are closer to what Muslims believe than I am.

No, you haven't. Poor people in rural areas have been marrying off children since America was first being settled. Grow the hell up.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Amazing....going ALL IN on the legalized pedo-marriage of 12 year olds.

You really are fighting to avoid the topic which is the permanent damage done by transitioning children. Why?

 

[Zincwarrior]

I'll address it. If it's legal and have parental permission, fine.

I am confused then. An adult banging a twelve year old is bad, yes?
The how is an adult marrying them and banging them forever...good? That defies logic.