martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 94,107
- 44,354
- 2,300
what if one is forty five?
Well that kind of falls under statutory rape laws, and you haven't seen anyone arguing against those in this thread.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
what if one is forty five?
Keep defending it...pedo-marriage marriage by any other name is still pedo-marriage.
Then there's no such thing as a hetero child either.
It meets your definition. If her parents agree its fine and dandy per your definition.Well that kind of falls under statutory rape laws, and you haven't seen anyone arguing against those in this thread.
You have to understand the Conservative mind
A marriage to a 12 year old is not intended to be permanent.
You keep her around until she is 18, divorce her and then go find another 12 year old
That's funny. You're a Democrat and democrats will turn on the Black ghetto jive like a light switch. I've watched Hillary, Obamas, Harris, AOC, and the latest hustlers in Kentucky do it. You're all a bunch of phonies.I don't pander to anyone for votes...but you keep on being you.. defending legalized pedo-marriage.
Correct. You're too much of a coward to chastise Muslims for doing the exact same thing.
It meets your definition. If her parents agree its fine and dandy per your definition.
Alternatively, if they are both males then 45 year old grandpa has happy fun time with Jr., because the parents are ok, per your definition.
I'm sure it's happened here. In fact President Van Buren married a cousin. Franklin Roosevelt married a second cousin I believe. Go back to European royalty and it's common.Not the exact same thing. They obligate their children to marry their cousins.
Then there's no such thing as a hetero child either.
Minors cannot give consent.Did you ignore my other statement saying a court has to make sure "the kids" aren't being forced by their parents to go through with it?
Read the whole thing, fucktard.
Well Well Well......NO WONDER the Right is pushing for legalizing marriage with 12 year olds.
Homo sapiens are heterosexual by nature. That's science. You're the ones who continually preach to us to follow the science. Hypocritical stooge.Then there's no such thing as a hetero child either.
Minors cannot give consent.
So its not the fucking the kid part, its the can they coerce them properly part that you care about.
Whatever, Marty....No, it's a threat.
you're defending twelve, not 18.If two people under 18 have consensual sex, have a kid, and there is nothing forced about them wanting to marry, why should the State prevent them from doing so.
Parents and the government can give it for them, as long as they agree to it.
Notice you didn't apologize for lying about my view on this. Fucktard.
Liberals are offended by 12 year olds getting marriedAnd you are an example of the liberal mind: take what was said and redefine it to try and make your adversary look bad.
Nobody said get married and divorce. They said marriages can be reversed with no harm done if you found you made a mistake. But as a typical leftist, if you couldn't lie, you'd have nothing to say at all.
you're defending twelve, not 18.
So we'll restate if a 45 creeper bangs a 12 year old, knocks her up, and her fucked up parents are ok with it, you're ok with it?
you're defending twelve, not 18.
So we'll restate if a 45 creeper bangs a 12 year old, knocks her up, and her fucked up parents are ok with it, you're ok with it?
You're mentally ill.Conservatives say as long as the 45 year old can pay off the parents it is OK with them