GOP files articles of impeachment against Kamala Harris

WAY overdue, but it's necessary now more than ever.

Harris' intentional failure to uphold our immigration laws, and her role in the cover up of Joe Biden's cognitive failure are the issues at hand.


On Tuesday afternoon, Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN) introduced articles of impeachment against Vice President Kamala Harris for high crimes and misdemeanors. Such a move comes just days after President Joe Biden exited the presidential race on Sunday and endorsed Harris not long after. She also earned enough delegate support on Monday night to become the nominee.
Way too cool!

Good going, Republicans!


:WooHooSmileyWave-vi:
 
WAY overdue, but it's necessary now more than ever.

Harris' intentional failure to uphold our immigration laws, and her role in the cover up of Joe Biden's cognitive failure are the issues at hand.


On Tuesday afternoon, Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN) introduced articles of impeachment against Vice President Kamala Harris for high crimes and misdemeanors. Such a move comes just days after President Joe Biden exited the presidential race on Sunday and endorsed Harris not long after. She also earned enough delegate support on Monday night to become the nominee.
One problem with doing except for Trump there has been no real border enforcement for many years under BOTH parties.
 
Now that the articles are filed, the Harris impeachment inquiry can get under way in the House.

Looking forward to the hearings!
yeh, I wonder if the dims at those hearings will be as "bipartisan" as the ones in the Cheatle hearing? The Ds sounded like Rs in that hearing.. all calling for the Secret Service head to resign! But of course it wasn't so much they hated that the assassination attempt failed & Cheatle was at least partly to blame for BAD security.. No, it was the usual reason: political expediency. In other words, it wouldn't look good for the Ds to in any way whatsoever make light of the assassination attempt against a political rival..
 
Cool story bullshit peddler, but whats this?



Nothing important
 
WAY overdue, but it's necessary now more than ever.

Harris' intentional failure to uphold our immigration laws, and her role in the cover up of Joe Biden's cognitive failure are the issues at hand.


On Tuesday afternoon, Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN) introduced articles of impeachment against Vice President Kamala Harris for high crimes and misdemeanors. Such a move comes just days after President Joe Biden exited the presidential race on Sunday and endorsed Harris not long after. She also earned enough delegate support on Monday night to become the nominee.

By that standard, this asshole should be removed from office. Biden and Republicans worked out a compromise bill. Republican assholes like this killed it. Republicans do not want to solve the problem. They put party over country asshole.
 
By that standard, this asshole should be removed from office. Biden and Republicans worked out a compromise bill. Republican assholes like this killed it. Republicans do not want to solve the problem. They put party over country asshole.

We killed it, because it was an awful bill that did not adequately address the border issue, at all.

That is the reality of the situation.

(when you say Republican assholes like this - you are saying Republicans that are not actually Democrat or Democrat lite, I get that)
 
IF, it were to pass the house, which I highly doubt, schumer would do the same thing he did with myorkis. It would never see the light of day and would turn off a lot of voters. It would appear vindictive. That would play right into the commies narrative.

.
Could Schumer sit on it? Menendez is leaving, the so-call Democrat majority can be challenged due to the lack of actual Democrats. McConnell could force the issue which would make Democrats look lazy and inept.
 
So why couldn't Republicans find any serious evidence of it to include in their official report?

I'll tell you why - you are ignorant of the facts and belive whatever the fuck you happened to have swallowed uncritically.

Hunter isn't qualified to do anything in Ukraine.
 
Hunter isn't qualified to do anything in Ukraine.
Son of an American Vice President in suit and tie…not qualified to make some Ukrainian company look more legit? Not qualified to possibly get that company some high level access, if not outright favor?

Again, you don’t know what you are saying. From perspective of that company Hunter was money well spent, possibly even god-send.
 
Last edited:
Son of an American Vice President in suit and tie…not qualified to make some Ukrainian company look more legit? Not qualified to possibly get that company some high level access, if not outright favor?

Even the appearance of impropriety should be completely avoided.


Again, you don’t know what you are saying. From perspective of that company Hunter was money well spent, possibly even god-send.

Hiring the VP's son to get access to the President should be something no one supports.

It's sad that you do.
 
Even the appearance of impropriety should be completely avoided.

Hiring the VP's son to get access to the President should be something no one supports.

It's sad that you do.

Support? Silly, I'm explaining to you how the world works, not my preferences.

If Hunter was a stand up guy he wouldn't need to trade on his dady's name. But he wasn't and he did.

Thats on Hunter, not Joe.
 
Support? Silly, I'm explaining to you how the world works, not my preferences.

If Hunter was a stand up guy he wouldn't need to trade on his dady's name. But he wasn't and he did.

Thats on Hunter, not Joe.

I heard Joe's words. Locker room talk?
 
You know what I'm talking about.

Why pretend you don't?

User Clip: Biden Tells Story of Getting the Ukraine Prosecutor Fired

In that clip Biden is deservingly bragging about getting a notoriously corrupt prosecutor fired.

DoS wanted him fired, IMF Fund wanted him fired, Ukrainian anti-corruption groups wanted him fired, Republicans signed a letter of concern urging Ukranian government to reform his office, his own deputy called prosecutor's office "swamp".

So I ask you again : WHAT WORDS?
 
In that clip Biden is deservingly bragging about getting a notoriously corrupt prosecutor fired.

He was investigating Hunter and the company he was working for. Like Trump supporters you will defend anything.

It's NONE of Joe's business who Ukrainian prosecutors are investigating.

 
He was investigating Hunter and the company he was working for. Like Trump supporters you will defend anything.

It's NONE of Joe's business who Ukrainian prosecutors are investigating.
He was not investigating Hunter, stop posting counterfactual bullshit.

But even that is moot. EVEN IF HE WAS there was still a legitimate foreign policy interest of United States to have this corrupt prosecutor removed. Removing him was job well done for VP. So you would need a lot more than just circumstantial evidince to prove that Biden specifically pressured Ukranian parlament for inapropriate reason.
 
Last edited:
He was not investigating Hunter, stop posting counterfactual bullshit.

Hunter was working for the company that was being investigated. You'll defend anything just like Trump supporters.
 
Hunter was working for the company that was being investigated. You'll defend anything just like Trump supporters.

Moron, thats NOT THE SAME as Hunter personally being investigated.

When you've said prosecutor investigated Hunter you were posting bullshit and desrvingly got called on it. Case with prosecutor's office was on matters that well predate Hunter's employment with the company.

And to repeat:

All that is moot. There was a legitimate foreign policy interest of United States to have this corrupt prosecutor removed. Removing him was job well done for any VP. So you would need a lot more than just circumstantial evidince to prove that Biden specifically pressured Ukranian parlament for inapropriate reason, while he had all the apropriate ones.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom