Whose "basic theory" is that? Some liberal "journalist's"?
It's just too damn hard to accept things at face value, admit that despite your own delusions MANY see Obama as an utter failure who if successful will take the nation places it doesn't want to go(See the largest tax increase in American history disguised as a federal healthcare take over, as if that were any better, which required the open purchase of the deciding votes), and stop with the lies already; Isn't it?
Well, apparently a lot of people DON'T see it that way and wingnuts like yourself have a hard time acceptng THAT. And don't give us this horseshit about the 2010 election, either. They've pretty much admitted they're gonna be the same dickheads they were after 2008.
We'll find out soon enough where these views really stand.
Indeed we will, however, being that your "obstructionist" narrative has been so beaten into the masses, people like you will be the first to claim that Democrats should resist any and all Republican attempts at reducing federal spending, slashing Obama's 30 year record on major new federal regulations, getting the fed the hell out of the peoples' pocket or anything else they attempt to do to correct the currently dismal state of the nation.
Make no mistake, Obama's radical approach to his punitive brand of leadership has not only been a detriment to the nation, but it's severely degraded our political discourse.
"Tit for tat", with no consideration for the reason behind Obama's lack of support from the right, will be seen as rational and deserved, the nation be damned.