Google admits the Biden regime ordered them to censor free speech, thanks the GOP for exposing it

I didn't refute the substance, dumb ass.

Europe has every right to block crackpot theories on COVID.

"Drink gasoline, it cures liver cancer".

Should that be allowed on Google?
"Drink gasoline, it cures liver cancer" is no more of a crackpot theory than “The Covid vaccine will prevent Covid infection.”

Nothing they told us about the vaccine for the first two years after it came out was true. It did not prevent infection; it did not prevent spread; it did not prevent reinfection and it did not prevent death.

The irony is, the ******* government itself was the largest and worst purveyor of misinformation at that time.
 
"Drink gasoline, it cures liver cancer" is no more of a crackpot theory than “The Covid vaccine will prevent Covid infection.”
Just like the flu vaccine doesn't prevent the flu.

The vaccine HELPS prevent it.

Just like any other vaccine does.
Nothing they told us about the vaccine for the first two years after it came out was true. It did not prevent infection; it did not prevent spread; it did not prevent reinfection and it did not prevent death.
BS.
That's a flat our LIE.
The irony is, the ******* government itself was the largest and worst purveyor of misinformation at that time.
BS.

Those were crackpots, like you.
 
Tell that to the idiots who told us it would.
I don't know where you heard that.

Likely the same people that said the vaccine CAUSES COVID.

Get the facts about COVID-19 vaccines​

1758701825170.webp
Mayo Clinic
https://www.mayoclinic.org › in-depth › art-20484859
In December 2020, the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine was found to be both safe and effective in preventing infection and serious illness among people age 18 or older.


Yep
Hey, they were the ones who said this shit, not me.
BS.

"Nothing they told us about the vaccine for the first two years after it came out was true. It did not prevent infection; it did not prevent spread; it did not prevent reinfection and it did not prevent death".
 
Some people don't get a cold, while everyone else in the house has it.

That doesn't make you immune.

Is every flu vaccine, "experimental"?

A new vaccine comes out every year.
So what does it mean if not natural immunity? Natural immunity exists, don't be a clown.

Flu shots are hit and miss. One of a few variants is chosen, if it is the wrong one, it is totally ineffective. You don't seem to have a clue of what you are talking about.
 
Some of us never got Covid, even though everyone around us did. Why would anyone immune want to take an experimental treatment?
Ironically, lies about the safety of the vaccine are just what the Biden admin wanted social media platforms to remove for the sake of public health.

AI Overview

The assertion that the COVID-19 vaccine was not experimental is factually correct.
The vaccines underwent standard, rigorous testing through clinical trials involving tens of thousands of participants and were held to the same safety and effectiveness standards as other vaccines. The notion that they were "experimental" is a widely debunked falsehood that arose from misunderstandings about the expedited development process.
 
So what does it mean if not natural immunity? Natural immunity exists, don't be a clown.
WTF?

You're ******* brain dead.

Flu shots are hit and miss. One of a few variants is chosen, if it is the wrong one, it is totally ineffective.
You're an idiot and brain dead.

When You get a flu shot, you get the latest flu shot, not last years.
You don't seem to have a clue of what you are talking about.
You're in a different universe of fucked up.
 
WTF?

You're ******* brain dead.


You're an idiot and brain dead.

When You get a flu shot, you get the latest flu shot, not last years.

You're in a different universe of fucked up.
Wow, you truly are a clueless idiot that clearly does not understand the subject matter. Bye.
 
Immune systems are not the same for every human being. Some people have natural immunity, those who got covid more once obviously did not. Try harder.
So people have no way of knowing if they have natural immunity or not, right? Not until they get COVID again.
 
So people have no way of knowing if they have natural immunity or not, right? Not until they get COVID again.
Not true, it means the second time it was not nearly as bad, such as the second time I barely noticed, never lost my taste, and the headaches weren't near as extreme, take your google medical degree back!
 
Not true, it means the second time it was not nearly as bad, such as the second time I barely noticed, never lost my taste, and the headaches weren't near as extreme, take your google medical degree back!
So by your standards, it's not actually immunity, right?
 
15th post
So people have no way of knowing if they have natural immunity or not, right? Not until they get COVID again.
Or never get it all. I never got covid, so why would I inject some experimental treatment into myself? Why do you loons feel you have right to force me to?
 
Or never get it all. I never got covid, so why would I inject some experimental treatment into myself? Why do you loons feel you have right to force me to?
No one is forcing you to do anything.

We know the vaccine prevented deaths, a lot of them. Sorry if we assumed you were interested in not dying.
 
All of us who are aware and able to think clearly know that the Biden regime censored Free Speech. Now actually hold these people responsible, enough talk!
I guess you aren't aware or able to think clearly.

Writing for a liberal-conservative coalition of six justices, Justice Amy Coney Barrett said that neither the five individuals nor the two states who sued the government had legal standing to be in court at all. She said they presented no proof to back up their claims that the government had pressured social media companies like Twitter and Facebook into restricting their speech. "Unfortunately," she said, the Fifth Circuit court of appeals "relied on factual findings that are "clearly erroneous."
 
I guess you aren't aware or able to think clearly.

Writing for a liberal-conservative coalition of six justices, Justice Amy Coney Barrett said that neither the five individuals nor the two states who sued the government had legal standing to be in court at all. She said they presented no proof to back up their claims that the government had pressured social media companies like Twitter and Facebook into restricting their speech. "Unfortunately," she said, the Fifth Circuit court of appeals "relied on factual findings that are "clearly erroneous."
Yeah that's just coping from someone who can't clearly see that the Biden Administration wanted to restrict and clamp down on freedom of speech.
 
Back
Top Bottom