except if you talk to
BULLDOG you get:
1) no crimes were committed - you shut up!
2) there is no evidence obama did this - at best it was his underlings
3) fake news
kinda depends on when you ask him but the harder you try to pin him down to what he says, the more he squirms and derails things.
ie -
1) no crimes were committed -
well if not, then why did FISA say anything at all? there is evidence based on the very branch of our gov that gives out warrants that power was abused. period. there is no debate despite his refusal to accept this. at times.
2) obama didn't do it - his underlings did it
well even if they did, the using this as a defense of obama while going after trumps "underlings" reeks of bias. how can you hope to get to trump through his underlings, establishing this is a valid criteria for which to investigate, and then 180 that thought process when it works against you? frustrating, these liberals. their own thought process isn't even good enough for them.
3) fake news
talk to FISA
we *have* proven government evidence saying there's serious cause for concern here and from the libs you get SHUT UP!!!! yet we have many gov people saying "nothing - not here, no evidence" and they say SHUT UP - INVESTIGATE!
when liberals use the same criteria for their side that they put on others, credibility will return to their arguments.