I think the BBC just raised the questions which has been said on this forum and number times:
Is the US in a permenant state of campaigning?
Has campaign finances dominated candidates decisions?
How is it every other country has the campaigning season at around 6 - 12 weeks and US is moving closer to 2 years?
Is the Electoral College a fair way to select a candidate when 40 states votes effectively mean nothing?
Is there better way to do this?
Trump's impact is not because of his money, it's because of his message.
He is speaking what a lot of people have wanted to hear for a long time and have NOT gotten from their political class.
It is a good thing.
THe UK? Google UK Rape Rings and ask why yourself how well an anti-immigration populist would do in a presidential election there.
We just had an election and that guy won a grand total of one seat. People in the UK are laughing at Trump rather than taking him seriously. To be honest Donald Duck has more credibility than Donald Trump.
A lot of people in the UK are not laughing at Trump and there was a petition NOT to ban him form the UK, alongside the one to ban him, which was all the BBC was interested in reporting, unsurprisingly. ALso, a Yougov poll showed that a quarter of Brits agreed that Trumps suggestion to halt immigration of Muslims is right for the US. Please don't imply you speak for all Brits, you don't.
Incidentally, because of the unfair voting system:
......He is quick to point out that, despite having just one MP, in terms of the share of the vote Ukip was the third largest party behind Labour and the Conservatives. Overall, Ukip secured 12.6% of the vote, an increase of 9.5 percentage points from the 2010 election, the largest of any major party and more than three times the size of the SNP’s improvement.
Ukip came second in 118 of the 650 parliamentary seats. A map of Britain illustrating second-place voting patterns reveals purple splashed across middle England, suggesting that if the current system were replaced with the
alternative vote (AV), where voters rank the candidates in order of preference, Ukip would fare considerably better.....
Five million votes, two seats: smaller parties demand a change in the rules