RE: Golan Heights is Officially Part of Israel
⁜→ Billo_Really, et al,
Disinformation and Misinformation
(false & inaccurate information)!
Oh please, crimes against Palestinian's are rarely ever investigated.
From Amnesty International:
Between 10pm on Monday 17 September and 8pm on Tuesday 18 September, Israeli forces killed four Palestinian men in the Gaza Strip using live ammunition . Within the same period, two more died as a result of the actions of Israeli forces in the West Bank, one after being beaten during the process of arrest and another shot dead in a busy street in East Jerusalem.
“The shocking fact that five Palestinians have been killed by the Israeli authorities and one died in their custody in just 24 hours is a chilling demonstration of the utter disregard for right to life. Several of these incidents appear to involve deliberate and wilful killing of unarmed civilians and may amount to war crimes,” said Saleh Higazi, Deputy Director for the Middle East and North Africa at Amnesty International.
“It is the fact that such crimes are rarely, if ever, punished that allows unlawful killings and other violations of the right to life to continue in shameless disregard of international law. These incidents are not new in the OPT and are likely to continue unless this cycle of impunity is broken.”
(COMMENT)
See: IDF Shooting Investigations
No extermination? Tell that to the residents of Deir Yassen.
(COMMENT)
Is this all you have? Deir Yassin happened on April 9, 1948, before the termination of the Mandate, before the exit of the British Administration, and before there was even a State of Israel. The event happened over seventy years ago, during:
This is a Blue-on-Blue event wherein both sides were Citizens of the Government of Palestine
(British Administration).Book Antiqua
Tell the people of Gaza there is no enslavement.
(COMMENT)
Again, Disinformation and Misinformation (false & inaccurate information)!
If the Arab-Palestinians of the West Bank, Jerusalem, or Gaza Strip are under some sort of subjugation; it is a condition of their own making. There is NO principles of property law are applied to the Arab Palestinians of the West Bank, Jerusalem, or Gaza Strip. There is (absolutely) NO
de jure form of property; where the Arab Palestinian is made subservient to or controlled by Israelis.
In a special point of fact, the international law states that: a Territory is considered occupied ONLY when it is actually placed under the authority of the hostile army. The occupation extends only to the territory where such authority has been established and can be exercised. NOTE: While many Israeli's disagreed with the decision, Israel executed a "unilateral disengagement" in August 2005 which involved the withdrawal of all Israeli interests from the Gaza Strip. There is no exploitation of any Arab Palestinians work product or people of the Gaza Strip by the Israelis.
(d) Deportation or forcible transfer of population;
NONE.
You're full of shit!
Israel incarcerates many West Bank and Gaza Palestinian detainees and prisoners inside Israel, violating international humanitarian law requiring that they not be transferred outside the occupied territory and complicating family visits.
(COMMENT)
I simply don't understand where you get these little tidbits. This is was the Customary and International Humanitarian Law has to say about the question:
• Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. Geneva, 12 August 1949.
Location of places of internment. Marking of camps
ARTICLE 83
The Detaining Power shall not set up places of internment in areas particularly exposed to the dangers of war.
The Detaining Power shall give the enemy Powers, through the intermediary of the Protecting Powers, all useful information regarding the geographical location of places of internment.
Whenever military considerations permit, internment camps shall be indicated by the letters IC, placed so as to be clearly visible in the daytime from the air. The Powers concerned may, however, agree upon any other system of marking. No place other than an internment camp shall be marked as such.
The limitation is stated thusly: "No protected person (the Arab Palestinian in this case) may at any time be sent into or retained in an area particularly exposed, nor may his presence be used to protect certain points or certain areas against military operations."
Commentary of 1958
[p.382] ARTICLE 83. -- LOCATION OF PLACES OF INTERNMENT.
PARAGRAPH 1. -- CHOICE OF SITE.
Article 28, whereas the obligation, where possible, to remove non-combatants from areas exposed to the dangers of war concerns the civilian population both in the territory of a party to the conflict (Article 38, para. 4 ) and in the occupied territory (Article 49, para. 5 ). The internees have been treated here by analogy with the prisoners of war. Since the obligation to place prisoners of war outside
danger areas had already been set forth in the 1929 Geneva Conventions (1) it was all the more necessary to give the benefit of a similar clause to civilians detained as a mere precautionary measure.
Claimants committed offences which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power.
People have an inalienable right to resist the occupation of a foreign force.
(COMMENT)
Again, where do you get this law from?
What the Customary and International Humanitarian Law actually says is:
• Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. Geneva, 12 August 1949.
Penal legislation. V. Penalties. Death penalty article
68
Protected persons (that would be the Arab Palestinians of the West Bank, Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip) who commit an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (that would be the Israelis in this case), but which does not constitute an attempt on the life or limb of members of the occupying forces or administration, nor a grave collective danger, nor seriously damage the property of the occupying forces or administration or the installations used by them, shall be liable to internment or simple imprisonment, provided the duration of such internment or imprisonment is proportionate to the offense committed. Furthermore, internment or imprisonment shall, for such offenses, be the only measure adopted for depriving protected persons of liberty. The courts provided for under Article 66 of the present Convention may at their discretion convert a sentence of imprisonment to one of internment for the same period.
The penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power in accordance with Articles 64 and 65 may impose the death penalty on a protected person only in cases where the person is guilty of espionage, of serious acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying Power or of intentional offenses which have caused the death of one or more persons, provided that such offenses were punishable by death under the law of the occupied territory in force before the occupation began.
The death penalty may not be pronounced against a protected person unless the attention of the court has been particularly called to the fact that since the accused is not a national of the Occupying Power, he is not bound to it by any duty of allegiance.
In any case, the death penalty may not be pronounced against a protected person who was under eighteen years of age at the time of the offense.
In other words, the
Arab Palestinians of the West Bank, Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip do NOT have the right to attack Israeli personnel, facilities, installations or property. If they do so, they go to jail. It is as simple as that.
Claimants committed offences which constitute espionage, of serious acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying Power.
Targets of a military nature are legal.
(COMMENT)
Just how many ways can you be wrong? They do not have any such right to attack Israeli personnel, installations, facilities or other property. (See Article 68
supra)
Claimants committed acts which constitute intentional offences causing the death of one or more persons.
Like Israeli drone strikes in Gaza.
(COMMENT)
What the International Law actually says is this: "
Article 51
Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations,
Rule 97. The use of human shields is prohibited.
The Arab Palestinians involved in “utilizing the presence of a civilian or other protected person to render certain points, areas or military forces immune from military operations” are committing what constitutes as a war crime.
You're nuts!
Israeli forces frequently used unnecessary force against children during arrest and physically abused them in custody.
(COMMENT)
They may use such force as is necessary to effect an apprehension and detention of juvenile delinquents.
(h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;
Border barriers established for Israeli law enforcement agencies and security services to enforce the immigration laws and to investigate criminal and terrorist activity of any such organizations and aliens within the Soveriegnty of Israel or attempting to enter Israel.
People seeking medical treatment are not terrorists.
The Israeli army limits travel out of Gaza to what it calls “exceptional humanitarian cases,” meaning mostly medical patients, their companions, and prominent businesspersons with permits. In the first eight months of 2018, the army approved only 60 percent of permit applications from Palestinians seeking medical treatment outside Gaza. In August, the Israeli Supreme Court found unlawful Israel’s practice of denying exit permits to “first-degree relatives of Hamas members.”
(COMMENT)
Every Arab Palestinian of the West Bank, Jerusalem, and Gaza Strip, → by their own admission, → constitute a potential threat to the life, liberty, property, facilities, installations, and equipment.
And you admit as much by encouraging the Arab Palestinian to violence by falsely suggesting they have some sort of right to attack at will. As I've said before that (in my opinion as a layman) that people who advocate the right for Arab Palestinians to commit violence are "unindicted co-conspirators."
(a) Prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts;
(b) Prevent such conduct;
(c) Deny safe haven to any persons with respect to whom there is credibleand relevant information giving serious reasons for considering that they have beenguilty of such conduct;
Israel has the inherent right of national self-defence and to take measures necessary to maintain territorial integrity, as well as the protection of Israeli interests under agreement for peace and security elsewhere.
An occupational force cannot claim self defense.
(COMMENT)
Again, this is absolute nonsense
!
You are inciting violence again by suggesting that Article 68
(supra) and Article 51
(supra) do not apply. If the Arab Palestinians follow your advice and commit some act of violence because you say it is legal and the Arab Palestinians the right to do so, free from consequences, then you are as guilty as well.
I simply defy you to cite a law (an enacted and enforceable law) that substantiates your claim.
(I showed you mine, not it is time for you to show me yours.)
I humbly suggest that you cannot do it. Remember that GA Resolutions like the following are NOT law:
• A/RES/3246 (XXIX) • Armed Struggle - All Means • 29 November 1974 •
• A/RES/33/24 • Armed Struggle - All Means • 29 November 1978 •
We're not talking about repelling intervention, we're talking about apartheid laws.
In July, the Knesset passed the Nation State Law, a law with constitutional status that articulates for Jews alone the right of self-determination, makes it a national priority to build homes for Jews but not others, and revokes the status of Arabic as an official language of Israel.
(COMMENT)
Affirmative action type law of a domestic nature, for the advancement of a national agenda, is not "apartheid." Please look-up what Apartheid means before you spout such nonsense:
"The crime of apartheid" means inhumane acts of a character similar to those referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime;
5. The perpetrator intended to maintain such regime by that conduct.
Israel has the right to protect and defend its existence from external and hostile activity.
So do they. Door swings both ways, homie.
(COMMENT)
Yes, it does. That places the obligation for "peace" on both sets of shoulders. It would be the first step towards peace if the Arab Palestinians of the West Bank, Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, took an interest in furthering Article 43 (HR 1907) restoration of public order and safety.
Most Respectfully,
R
