I thought I would put this topic in the Asia forum. On second thought I decided it belongs in History.
Here is a reminder of Communist justice:
PHNOM PENH: One of the Khmer Rouge's top surviving leaders on Wednesday (Feb 18) challenged his life sentence for crimes against humanity and said he had only fought for "social justice" in Cambodia, in rare comments made to a UN-backed court.
XXXXX
The men were convicted of committing crimes against humanity in 2014 for their pivotal role in the communist government that oversaw the deaths of up to two million Cambodians from 1975-1979 - nearly one-quarter of the population.
XXXXX
. . . in pursuit of an agrarian Marxist utopia.
XXXXX
The pair are also currently facing a second trial on charges of genocide for the killings of ethnic Vietnamese and Muslim minorities, as well as for their regime's use of forced marriage and rape.
Asia Pacific
Top Khmer Rouge leader tells court he fought for 'social justice'
Posted 18 Feb 2016 22:46 Updated 18 Feb 2016 22:47
Top Khmer Rouge leader tells court he fought for 'social justice'
Remember how Americans Communists during the Vietnam War defended Communism by swearing they were only opposing an unjust war. Thousands of Americans died in Vietnam because John Kerry et al. prolonged the war by given the enemy hope for a political victory —— which they got in 1973. In short: Cambodian Communists did their killing for “social justice.” The cover stories were the same.
NOTE: Both Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton base their campaigns on “social justice” defined by Karl Marx.
I’ve been asking the Vietnam War question on message boards for years. I am still waiting for somebody in the media to put the question to the Vietnam War traitors.
Do you oppose the Korean War in hindsight?
If they answer “Yes” they admit that fighting against Communism is what they oppose.
If they answer “No.” ask them why not since both wars were fought for the same reason?
NOTE: Younger Americans probably know some things about ISIS. This article shows the propaganda path American Communists and the media have been traveling since the Vietnam War:
Genocide: the Communist and Islamic Versions
By Cliff Kincaid August 9, 2014
Genocide: the Communist and Islamic Versions | Canada Free Press
Now for a compilation of observations recalled on my trip down memory lane.
Most Americans cannot find Cambodia, or Vietnam, on a map. That is tragic because the slaughter COMMUNISTS perpetrated in those two countries should be a reminder of exactly what Communists do the instant they acquire the political power. Taqiyya the Liar brought this country a giant step closer to Communism than did all of the Democrats that came before him. Keep that in mind if you are thinking about voting for any Democrat who will take the final step to Communism. If you doubt it just ask yourself which part of the sewer rat’s legacy do they want to preserve and advance?
Government-sponsored slow death genocide is one thing. Lenin and Stalin killed millions by starvation, while latter-day Communists like Pol Pot (1925 - 1998) preferred the hands-on version in Cambodia.
American Communists get away with glorifying Stalin, Mao, Castro, et al., while they secretly admired Pol Pot. He was the ultimate Communist they are all proud of but dare not mention.
Question: Why do Socialists always romanticize Communist butchers by calling them freedom fighters when Communism enslaves? To this day, Castro, and fellow butcher Che Guevara, are hailed as heros by Democrats.
Statue of Che Guevara in NYC’s Central Park
https://tse2.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.Mf58fc51e5d49ce8aba09474d7f1b217bo0&pid=Api&w=239&h=239
Did you ever see a statue of Joseph Goebbels in Central Park or anywhere for that matter?
A lot of public voices and well-known touchy-feely liberals pay a whole lot of lip service to the horrors of genocide. The fact is this: Genocide became a tool of government in the last century thanks to the very people who advocate government control over every aspect of life —— and the method of death.
Print press Socialists had a lot to do with the success of Communism before television came to dominate political dialogue; hence, mass murder done by governments to their own people in the last century did not register on the Left’s conscience meter. So I’ll rest my case against genocide-hypocrites by pointing to Cambodian genocide in the hope younger Americans will learn the truth about SE Asia and see the danger coming their way.
In Clinton’s case every word she uttered is carefully crafted to avoid giving anyone an opening that would demand an explanation for her pro-Communist sympathies during the Vietnam War years. She will not justify her views on Communism; so I’m beginning to think she actually forgot the harm that was done during the Battle of Vietnam because of the things she and her kind defended.
NOTE: The Vietnam War was one hot battle fought against Communism in a Cold War setting. That is why I often call it the Battle of Vietnam.
Interestingly, then-Senator Clinton said this about Islamic terrorism:
"But our country may be of good cheer. Nothing like this has ever defeated civilization. Terrorism never won before and won't now."
Oh really! Communist terrorism was —— and still is —— a direct threat to the American people. Terrorism did win in Southeast Asia after the Battle of Vietnam ended. If not, I’d sure like to know what did win in Cambodia when the Communist Khmer Rouge killed about two million Cambodians between 1975 and 1979? Does Clinton still think those murdered Cambodians were of good cheer when they were being slaughtered by Socialist/Communist terrorists?
Bottom line: Democrats have been fighting for Communism since it took root in this country. I can only conclude that Hillary Clinton does not see Communism as terrorism.
What happened in Cambodia scared the hell out of educated American Limousine Liberals who like to dabble in universal brotherly love —— when they’re not demanding more tax dollars for themselves. Khmer Rouge Communists —— led by Pol Pot who was a teacher by profession —— killed all of the educated Cambodians. This was done after American Communists brought defeat to their own country.
In 1979, Vietnamese Communists deposed Pol Pot because he was giving Socialism/Communism a bad name —— if you can imagine such a thing! By then it was too late to whitewash Socialism’s reputation because Pol Pot had already demonstrated that Socialist priests of every stripe always promise a better world, while they always deliver a butcher’s block every time they get the power.
Pol Pot and Castro are cut from the cloth; yet the sewer rat and John Kerry brag about embracing a Communist regime 90 miles from Florida.
Historically, the world knew what Hitler was going to do before he did it. The same is true of Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Castro, and every other butcher. It is precisely because they state their brutal intentions beforehand that they attracted enough followers to carry out their slaughters.
Rank & file Democrats represent the personality types that were attracted to butchers throughout history. Isn’t it time Americans face the facts. Just about everyone in Taqiyya the Liar’s administration is worse than anybody Hitler ever attracted. When Nazis began their march they had hard financial times as an excuse. Even Lenin could claim he was ending the czar’s oppression although I never knew how starving millions to death had anything to do with ending oppression. Taqiyya’s people are free men and women living in the wealthiest society in the world, yet they are determined to eliminate the weak and defenseless out of sheer cruelty. Calling it population control is their way of saying social justice.
If history is any guide Taqiyya & Company will not be stopped until their gruesome work is finished. Remember that Hitler was a failure only in the sense that he was stopped,. On the other hand nobody ever stopped any of the “successful” Communist butchers.
Why do butchers succeed to any degree? Answer: Decent human beings fear that killing the killers will turn them into killers. The same philosophical trap is seen in war: If decent people treat the enemy the same way they are treated by the enemy they become become like them. It is that moral dilemma that gives butchers all of the courage they need. Hitler understood it:
“The great strength of the totalitarian state is that it forces those who fear it to imitate it.”
Perhaps that is why Taqiyya the Liar adopted Hitler’s blueprint. See this thread when I still called him by his middle name —— Hussein:
Good guys wear white hats
Unfortunately, when WWII ended decent men and women failed to imitate totalitarian government just enough to deal with “peacetime” butchers. Winning a war is easy, but until the world learns how to deal with peacetime butchers the human race will always lose the peace.
Nor is democracy conducive to stopping peacetime butchers. Democracy actually encourages slaughter by making it legal. The Netherlands is a sign of where democracy always goes. The Dutch welfare state has gone from meals on wheels to home-delivery killing:
Go-ahead for world's first mobile euthanasia unit that will allow patients to die at home
Teams will end the lives of additional 1,000 a year
2,700 Dutch people a year choose assisted suicide
By Simon Caldwell
Last updated at 12:17 AM on 10th February 2012
Go-ahead for world's first mobile euthanasia unit that will allow patients to die at home
There is no better example of peacetime butchers at work than those in Holland. The Dutch rejected Nazi euthanasia but now Dutch Communists lead the world in peacetime euthanasia. The Netherlands is the proving ground for worldwide Socialism’s Culture of Death. As I’ve said many times “Nazi Germany’s occupation was the last good thing to happen in Holland.”
The problem begins with legalized killing. If a person cannot commit suicide on their own the government should not help them do it.
Finally, if there is one immutable rule for stopping government slaughters it is this: Never, never, never, give a government the authority to kill their own people for any reason.
Here is a reminder of Communist justice:
PHNOM PENH: One of the Khmer Rouge's top surviving leaders on Wednesday (Feb 18) challenged his life sentence for crimes against humanity and said he had only fought for "social justice" in Cambodia, in rare comments made to a UN-backed court.
XXXXX
The men were convicted of committing crimes against humanity in 2014 for their pivotal role in the communist government that oversaw the deaths of up to two million Cambodians from 1975-1979 - nearly one-quarter of the population.
XXXXX
. . . in pursuit of an agrarian Marxist utopia.
XXXXX
The pair are also currently facing a second trial on charges of genocide for the killings of ethnic Vietnamese and Muslim minorities, as well as for their regime's use of forced marriage and rape.
Asia Pacific
Top Khmer Rouge leader tells court he fought for 'social justice'
Posted 18 Feb 2016 22:46 Updated 18 Feb 2016 22:47
Top Khmer Rouge leader tells court he fought for 'social justice'
Remember how Americans Communists during the Vietnam War defended Communism by swearing they were only opposing an unjust war. Thousands of Americans died in Vietnam because John Kerry et al. prolonged the war by given the enemy hope for a political victory —— which they got in 1973. In short: Cambodian Communists did their killing for “social justice.” The cover stories were the same.
NOTE: Both Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton base their campaigns on “social justice” defined by Karl Marx.
I’ve been asking the Vietnam War question on message boards for years. I am still waiting for somebody in the media to put the question to the Vietnam War traitors.
Do you oppose the Korean War in hindsight?
If they answer “Yes” they admit that fighting against Communism is what they oppose.
If they answer “No.” ask them why not since both wars were fought for the same reason?
NOTE: Younger Americans probably know some things about ISIS. This article shows the propaganda path American Communists and the media have been traveling since the Vietnam War:
Genocide: the Communist and Islamic Versions
By Cliff Kincaid August 9, 2014
Genocide: the Communist and Islamic Versions | Canada Free Press
Now for a compilation of observations recalled on my trip down memory lane.
Most Americans cannot find Cambodia, or Vietnam, on a map. That is tragic because the slaughter COMMUNISTS perpetrated in those two countries should be a reminder of exactly what Communists do the instant they acquire the political power. Taqiyya the Liar brought this country a giant step closer to Communism than did all of the Democrats that came before him. Keep that in mind if you are thinking about voting for any Democrat who will take the final step to Communism. If you doubt it just ask yourself which part of the sewer rat’s legacy do they want to preserve and advance?
Government-sponsored slow death genocide is one thing. Lenin and Stalin killed millions by starvation, while latter-day Communists like Pol Pot (1925 - 1998) preferred the hands-on version in Cambodia.
American Communists get away with glorifying Stalin, Mao, Castro, et al., while they secretly admired Pol Pot. He was the ultimate Communist they are all proud of but dare not mention.
Question: Why do Socialists always romanticize Communist butchers by calling them freedom fighters when Communism enslaves? To this day, Castro, and fellow butcher Che Guevara, are hailed as heros by Democrats.
Statue of Che Guevara in NYC’s Central Park
https://tse2.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.Mf58fc51e5d49ce8aba09474d7f1b217bo0&pid=Api&w=239&h=239
Did you ever see a statue of Joseph Goebbels in Central Park or anywhere for that matter?
A lot of public voices and well-known touchy-feely liberals pay a whole lot of lip service to the horrors of genocide. The fact is this: Genocide became a tool of government in the last century thanks to the very people who advocate government control over every aspect of life —— and the method of death.
Print press Socialists had a lot to do with the success of Communism before television came to dominate political dialogue; hence, mass murder done by governments to their own people in the last century did not register on the Left’s conscience meter. So I’ll rest my case against genocide-hypocrites by pointing to Cambodian genocide in the hope younger Americans will learn the truth about SE Asia and see the danger coming their way.
In Clinton’s case every word she uttered is carefully crafted to avoid giving anyone an opening that would demand an explanation for her pro-Communist sympathies during the Vietnam War years. She will not justify her views on Communism; so I’m beginning to think she actually forgot the harm that was done during the Battle of Vietnam because of the things she and her kind defended.
NOTE: The Vietnam War was one hot battle fought against Communism in a Cold War setting. That is why I often call it the Battle of Vietnam.
Interestingly, then-Senator Clinton said this about Islamic terrorism:
"But our country may be of good cheer. Nothing like this has ever defeated civilization. Terrorism never won before and won't now."
Oh really! Communist terrorism was —— and still is —— a direct threat to the American people. Terrorism did win in Southeast Asia after the Battle of Vietnam ended. If not, I’d sure like to know what did win in Cambodia when the Communist Khmer Rouge killed about two million Cambodians between 1975 and 1979? Does Clinton still think those murdered Cambodians were of good cheer when they were being slaughtered by Socialist/Communist terrorists?
Bottom line: Democrats have been fighting for Communism since it took root in this country. I can only conclude that Hillary Clinton does not see Communism as terrorism.
What happened in Cambodia scared the hell out of educated American Limousine Liberals who like to dabble in universal brotherly love —— when they’re not demanding more tax dollars for themselves. Khmer Rouge Communists —— led by Pol Pot who was a teacher by profession —— killed all of the educated Cambodians. This was done after American Communists brought defeat to their own country.
In 1979, Vietnamese Communists deposed Pol Pot because he was giving Socialism/Communism a bad name —— if you can imagine such a thing! By then it was too late to whitewash Socialism’s reputation because Pol Pot had already demonstrated that Socialist priests of every stripe always promise a better world, while they always deliver a butcher’s block every time they get the power.
Pol Pot and Castro are cut from the cloth; yet the sewer rat and John Kerry brag about embracing a Communist regime 90 miles from Florida.
Historically, the world knew what Hitler was going to do before he did it. The same is true of Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Castro, and every other butcher. It is precisely because they state their brutal intentions beforehand that they attracted enough followers to carry out their slaughters.
Rank & file Democrats represent the personality types that were attracted to butchers throughout history. Isn’t it time Americans face the facts. Just about everyone in Taqiyya the Liar’s administration is worse than anybody Hitler ever attracted. When Nazis began their march they had hard financial times as an excuse. Even Lenin could claim he was ending the czar’s oppression although I never knew how starving millions to death had anything to do with ending oppression. Taqiyya’s people are free men and women living in the wealthiest society in the world, yet they are determined to eliminate the weak and defenseless out of sheer cruelty. Calling it population control is their way of saying social justice.
If history is any guide Taqiyya & Company will not be stopped until their gruesome work is finished. Remember that Hitler was a failure only in the sense that he was stopped,. On the other hand nobody ever stopped any of the “successful” Communist butchers.
Why do butchers succeed to any degree? Answer: Decent human beings fear that killing the killers will turn them into killers. The same philosophical trap is seen in war: If decent people treat the enemy the same way they are treated by the enemy they become become like them. It is that moral dilemma that gives butchers all of the courage they need. Hitler understood it:
“The great strength of the totalitarian state is that it forces those who fear it to imitate it.”
Perhaps that is why Taqiyya the Liar adopted Hitler’s blueprint. See this thread when I still called him by his middle name —— Hussein:
Good guys wear white hats
Unfortunately, when WWII ended decent men and women failed to imitate totalitarian government just enough to deal with “peacetime” butchers. Winning a war is easy, but until the world learns how to deal with peacetime butchers the human race will always lose the peace.
Nor is democracy conducive to stopping peacetime butchers. Democracy actually encourages slaughter by making it legal. The Netherlands is a sign of where democracy always goes. The Dutch welfare state has gone from meals on wheels to home-delivery killing:
Go-ahead for world's first mobile euthanasia unit that will allow patients to die at home
Teams will end the lives of additional 1,000 a year
2,700 Dutch people a year choose assisted suicide
By Simon Caldwell
Last updated at 12:17 AM on 10th February 2012
Go-ahead for world's first mobile euthanasia unit that will allow patients to die at home
There is no better example of peacetime butchers at work than those in Holland. The Dutch rejected Nazi euthanasia but now Dutch Communists lead the world in peacetime euthanasia. The Netherlands is the proving ground for worldwide Socialism’s Culture of Death. As I’ve said many times “Nazi Germany’s occupation was the last good thing to happen in Holland.”
The problem begins with legalized killing. If a person cannot commit suicide on their own the government should not help them do it.
Finally, if there is one immutable rule for stopping government slaughters it is this: Never, never, never, give a government the authority to kill their own people for any reason.
