Brain357
Platinum Member
- Mar 30, 2013
- 37,068
- 4,189
- 1,130
See that's the whole point, these idiots don't want you to even have the potential to neutralize the situation with a gun.
They've decided that ONLY one guy dying is a satisfactory outcome. They've decided that no one else should even have an opportunity to alter the equation. They've decided that they know best for you.
Eggzzzactly!
I at least want a fighting chance.
You can bet if the chick had her pistol she would have been unsnapping and loosening it in the holster.
Yes, and it's possible she could have prevented him from getting off as many shots, and possibly saving her husbands life.
Of course unlike some of the others here, I don't know what the outcome would have been. I'm just saying it would have been nice to at least have had the opportunity to perhaps save yourself or a loved one.
And given this was a crowded bar it's possible she went to shoot the shooter and accidently shot others in the process. Did she even have a clear shot at him? Or maybe somebody else who didn't see the original shooter see's her shooting at some guy and shoots her? How exactly can you tell the good guy from the bad in a crowded and chaotic situation like this? We should be glad only one person got shot and killed because that's about the best you can hope for. Unarmed people took down the shooter so armed people weren't needed. I'm sure if any of these people had seen him pull the gun they would have jumped on him before he shot, but I don't think this guy gave anyone the opportunity to do anything.
