God of the Gaps (well then, how did...")

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It’s mathematically impossible for 52 lines of code to randomly assemble themselves into a working program during the life of the Universe.

Selection is not random.

Francis I can see that all The Times we have gone over this, you were just wasting my time to troll.

 

[ChemEngineer]

Mathematical Proof of Nature's God

mathprovesgod.blogspot.com

All of the work in that website is my work, so I need not duplicate here. Please open it and browse. Feel free to ask any questions on the biochemistry or statistical analysis. Calculations show the utter impossibility of ever synthesizing a molecule of titin by any naturalistic means. Now multiply this analysis by 20,000 other proteins in the human body.

"I am fearfully and wonderfully made and that my soul knoweth right well." - Psalm 139:14
_________________________________________

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Mathematical Proof of Nature's God

mathprovesgod.blogspot.com

All of the work in that website is my work, so I need not duplicate here. Please open it and browse. Feel free to ask any questions on the biochemistry or statistical analysis. Calculations show the utter impossibility of ever synthesizing a molecule of titin by any naturalistic means. Now multiply this analysis by 20,000 other proteins in the human body.

"I am fearfully and wonderfully made and that my soul knoweth right well." - Psalm 139:14
_________________________________________

Deconstructing this nonsense would be a good exercise for a college freshman.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Mathematical Proof of Nature's God

mathprovesgod.blogspot.com

All of the work in that website is my work, so I need not duplicate here. Please open it and browse.

Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley

Strange choice to quote and none too Christian being plainly NOT ChemEngineer's work.

Huxley described himself as agnostic, a word coined by his grandfather Thomas Henry Huxley, a scientist who championed the scientific method and was a major supporter of Darwin's theories

 

[scruffy]

Deconstructing this nonsense would be a good exercise for a college freshman.

Or even a smart high school kid.

It's not worth talking to these idiots. They're going to believe what they believe, no matter what.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Or even a smart high school kid.

It's not worth talking to these idiots. They're going to believe what they believe, no matter what.

But if they trespass in the science section, they get to take their medicine.

 

[Grumblenuts]

But if they trespass in the science section, they get to take their medicine.

Damned straight!

 

[scruffy]

Mathematical Proof of Nature's God

mathprovesgod.blogspot.com

All of the work in that website is my work, so I need not duplicate here. Please open it and browse. Feel free to ask any questions on the biochemistry or statistical analysis. Calculations show the utter impossibility of ever synthesizing a molecule of titin by any naturalistic means. Now multiply this analysis by 20,000 other proteins in the human body.

"I am fearfully and wonderfully made and that my soul knoweth right well." - Psalm 139:14
_________________________________________

YOUR calculations show a thorough lack of understanding of this universe.

They demonstrate the utter ignorance of the last 400 years of scientific discovery.

And the futility of attempting to deny that which is plainly obvious and right in front of you.

Thankfully all creationists are not this stupid.

A significant fraction are, though.

 

[scruffy]

But if they trespass in the science section, they get to take their medicine.

Maybe there's some mRNA technology for these people?

 

[ding]

Maybe there's some mRNA technology for these people?

Is mRNA technology random?

 

[scruffy]

Is mRNA technology random?

More trolling from ding dong.

You're a one trick pony

And it's not much a trick

 

[Grumblenuts]

If ding had brains and ambition:

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Then accept that and move on. You have chosen to disbelieve the most well supported theory in history.

The most well supported scientific theory might be general relativity of perhaps the standard model, neither of which I take issue with.

So accept your choice and get out of these threads. No?

Ahh the modern Spanish inquisition, suppress dissenting views, how poignant.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The most well supported scientific theory might be general relativity of perhaps the standard model, neither of which I take issue with.

No, it's evolution. And it's not even close. Only AGW comes close.

Ahh the modern Spanish inquisition, suppress dissenting views, how poignant.

Oh my, you're quite the drama queen, haha

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

No, it's evolution. And it's not even close. Only AGW comes close.

Personally I agree completely with Berlinski here, who does not regard evolution as true theory in the sense we use that term in empirical science.



Please understand I used to be an evolutionist, I was brutal in my attacks on theists and creationists, I studied physics and technology, I am even more aware of evolution's claims than most evolutionists, I have books by the truck load on this.

This was one of my early favorites:

Bronowski was a gifted mathematician initially who developed a strong interest later, in biology and fully embraced evolution. So I am very aware of what I'm saying when I reject evolution as being a scientific theory.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Personally I agree completely with Berlinski here, who does not regard evolution as true theory in the sense we use that term in empirical science

And you're both hilariously wrong.

So I am very aware of what I'm saying when I reject evolution as being a scientific theory.

Yet you can't describe it, outside of posting a youtube video you never watched.

And your attempts have all been factually incorrect.

This is not compelling.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

And you're both hilariously wrong.

Yet you can't describe it, outside of posting a youtube video you never watched.

And your attempts have all been factually incorrect.

This is not compelling.

You speak in exactly the way every closed minded believer speaks, there's no real intellectual difference, a fanatical believer is a fanatical believer no matter the belief, dogma is dogma no matter how you try to dress it up.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You speak in exactly the way every closed minded believer speaks, there's no real intellectual difference, a fanatical believer is a fanatical believer no matter the belief.

These petty ad hominems aren't going to help you. Sorry.

 

[Grumblenuts]

An opponent of biological evolution, Berlinski is a senior fellow of the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture, a Seattle-based think tank that is a hub of the pseudoscientific intelligent design movement.

Berlinski professes to be a skeptic about evolution, but he disavows belief in intelligent design.

Whacko city!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Whacko city!

Yep.

The denier fools can't publish any science.

So they make monetized youtube videos instead.