Globalism is a good thing

[Midnight FM]

The reality is that human rights are universal, and the improvement of human rights around the world, regardless of national or ethnic boundaries, is a good and noble goal.

Sadly many holdovers are more attached to their notions of tribal affiliations than they are to their common humanity, despite it being both a religious and scientific reality - Jesus Christ emphasized the need to connect with one's fellow man, and, in science, the human genome project reveals that all modern humans are descended from the same woman.

So, naturally, tribal affiliations like ethnicity or national origin are secondary, while humanity is first.

 

[luiza]

You will doubtless learn when you become a Baby Adult and refrain from spouting idealiastic clap trap that you usually see tennagers scribble before they have seen anything of life .

Really .
That type of OP is as out of date and comical in hindsight as Communism has become

 

[Midnight FM]

You will doubtless learn when you become a Baby Adult and refrain from spouting idealiastic clap trap that you usually see tennagers scribble before they have seen anything of life .

Really .
That type of OP is as out of date and comical in hindsight as Communism has become

Nothing out of date about it. Human rights are gradually improving around the world, and I predict that will continue to be the case.

The information age and advent of social media, in particular, has allowed people to connect to a wide range of people without regard for geographical boundaries.

The problem is simply that some regressive on both the right and left value tribal affiliations more than they do common humanity.

 

[MisterBeale]

The reality is that human rights are universal, and the improvement of human rights around the world, regardless of national or ethnic boundaries, is a good and noble goal.

Sadly many holdovers are more attached to their notions of tribal affiliations than they are to their common humanity, despite it being both a religious and scientific reality - Jesus Christ emphasized the need to connect with one's fellow man, and, in science, the human genome project reveals that all modern humans are descended from the same woman.

So, naturally, tribal affiliations like ethnicity or national origin are secondary, while humanity is first.

While idealistic, this is just not how the world works.

Hell, you even brought up Jesus. . . do you even know why he was killed, and who was responsible for that?

If you do, that should tell you all you need to understand, that until the entire world shares all the same values & beliefs, (which scholars know, even the United States population does not,) that this is naught but a silly pipe dream not based on reality.


Instead of more government consolidation, we need to have different populations assert their sovereign rights more.

 

[MisterBeale]

The problem is simply that some regressive on both the right and left value tribal affiliations more than they do common humanity.

Again, this is nonsense.

If you were paying attention, you would know the global government is in the process of getting rid of Free Speech.

 

[Independent thinker]

The reality is that human rights are universal, and the improvement of human rights around the world, regardless of national or ethnic boundaries, is a good and noble goal.

Sadly many holdovers are more attached to their notions of tribal affiliations than they are to their common humanity, despite it being both a religious and scientific reality - Jesus Christ emphasized the need to connect with one's fellow man, and, in science, the human genome project reveals that all modern humans are descended from the same woman.

So, naturally, tribal affiliations like ethnicity or national origin are secondary, while humanity is first.

Globalsim can be a good thing indeed, as long as the globe isn't taking advantage of you and using you as their personal piggy bank.

 

[Midnight FM]

Again, this is nonsense.

If you were paying attention, you would know the global government is in the process of getting rid of Free Speech.

That depends on what is is being described as "free speech".

Not everything that someone can stretch that definition to fit is necessarily worth protecting.

 

[Foxfyre]

The reality is that human rights are universal, and the improvement of human rights around the world, regardless of national or ethnic boundaries, is a good and noble goal.

Sadly many holdovers are more attached to their notions of tribal affiliations than they are to their common humanity, despite it being both a religious and scientific reality - Jesus Christ emphasized the need to connect with one's fellow man, and, in science, the human genome project reveals that all modern humans are descended from the same woman.

So, naturally, tribal affiliations like ethnicity or national origin are secondary, while humanity is first.

The danger of a nation without individual states is that we could wind up totally governed by an administration as incompetent and corrupt as Biden's was.

The danger of a world without nations is that it could wind up totally governed by an administration as incompetent and corrupt as Biden's was.

I'll pass on the globalist mentality.

 

[Midnight FM]

While idealistic, this is just not how the world works.

Hell, you even brought up Jesus. . . do you even know why he was killed, and who was responsible for that?

If you do, that should tell you all you need to understand, that until the entire world shares all the same values & beliefs, (which scholars know, even the United States population does not,) that this is naught but a silly pipe dream not based on reality.


Instead of more government consolidation, we need to have different populations assert their sovereign rights more.

It's a moot point whether or not something specifically will "work".

Many were opposed to the Iraq War, because they viewed it as America (or George W Bush in particular) trying to assert its national interests abroad. Obviously, that was a big point of controversy, but it isn't deniable that human rights abuses, such as those committed by Saddam Hussein occur in the world.

The US was founded on the humanistic notion of human rights being a universal thing.

 

[MisterBeale]

Not everything that someone can stretch that definition to fit is necessarily worth protecting.

Not everyone agrees with that, and thus, there can be no global government.

 

[MisterBeale]

The US was founded on the humanistic notion of human rights being a universal thing.

This statement implies you believe that the United States should rule the world.

Not every nation and culture have this view, you do know that, right?

 

[BluesLegend]

The reality is that human rights are universal

Sorry but MY wealth isn't something other human mooching losers have a right to.

 

[elektra]

Dictatorship is best.
Otherwise a group of criminals take over

 

[Midnight FM]

Sorry but MY wealth isn't something other human mooching losers have a right to.

It's not yours, silly.

And it'll be taken from you by force whether your like it or not, your imaginary "rights" be damned.

 

[Midnight FM]

This statement implies you believe that the United States should rule the world.

Not every nation and culture have this view, you do know that, right?

I'm not saying that a nation should rule the world.

I'm saying that human rights should be preserved all over the world. There are organizations which rank the levels of human rights the world over, and I believed the developed world should play a role in their preservation.

I'm aware that 3rd world countries like North Korea may not share this view, but when it comes to blatant human rights violations, I don't care. This obviously isn't the same as stating that one nation or culture should rule the world.

Expanding and Defending Freedom Around the World

Freedom House is founded on the core conviction that freedom flourishes in democratic nations where governments are accountable to their people.

freedomhouse.org

 

[BluesLegend]

It's not yours, silly.

And it'll be taken from you by force whether your like it or not, your imaginary "rights" be damned.

Then you woke up from your drug induced hallucination.

 

[luiza]

The problem is simply that some regressive on both the right and left value tribal affiliations more than they do common humanity.

That is where you show your inexperience .

You present your conclusiion without any attempt to examine other positions .

Your assumption that all factions of our species should happily mix etc etc is laughable, imho .

All you are telling us is that you have a preference and that you imagine Good will result from your choice--- whereas other routes will be less successful etc

A matter if opinion , but I could produce a dozen different reasons to take the opposite view of yours if I had the time or imterest .
But given the present day situation I can only see Deep State efforts to achieve Globalist aims are being rejected and are failing .,

Which is why Clown Showman Trumpfy was gifted the Presidency -- to introduce total individual ID as a means of Control .
And to change the financial system to assist that aim .
All the while Deflecting from those aims as often and as much as possible .

You appear Gullible and have bought the Scam .

 

[Hafar1014]

The reality is that human rights are universal, and the improvement of human rights around the world, regardless of national or ethnic boundaries, is a good and noble goal.

Sadly many holdovers are more attached to their notions of tribal affiliations than they are to their common humanity, despite it being both a religious and scientific reality - Jesus Christ emphasized the need to connect with one's fellow man, and, in science, the human genome project reveals that all modern humans are descended from the same woman.

So, naturally, tribal affiliations like ethnicity or national origin are secondary, while humanity is first.

Incorrect there is no single "Eve" determined by DNA. 5 have been isolated but thats not definitive. We have discovered the original tribe of Sans Bushmen in Africa as the earliest beginning of modern humanity.
Globalism is in reality worldwide socialism which is oppression

 

[Captain Caveman]

The reality is that human rights are universal, and the improvement of human rights around the world, regardless of national or ethnic boundaries, is a good and noble goal.

Sadly many holdovers are more attached to their notions of tribal affiliations than they are to their common humanity, despite it being both a religious and scientific reality - Jesus Christ emphasized the need to connect with one's fellow man, and, in science, the human genome project reveals that all modern humans are descended from the same woman.

So, naturally, tribal affiliations like ethnicity or national origin are secondary, while humanity is first.

Humans are not natural-born egalitarians, it's why such things as multiculturalism and globalism doesn't work. Those that favour their own are at a huge advantage.

 

[Midnight FM]

Humans are not natural-born egalitarians

Superior humans are.

, it's why such things as multiculturalism and globalism doesn't work. Those that favour their own are at a huge advantage.

Rubbish. Up until recent history, most people identified with their family or local community, not larger entities such as nations.

There are examples of tribes who exist in the modern era who are still stuck with stone age technology because they never learned to integrate outside of their tribe.