Global Warming? Where?

[Dagosa]

than why can't you ever address a question honestly?

It’s not an honest question.

 

[jc456]

It’s not an honest question.

It’s one of the most honest that exists

 

[Dagosa]

It’s one of the most honest that exists

Bullshit.

 

[jc456]

Bullshit.

Why

 

[Dagosa]

Why

The panel is all scientists. Of course, doubtful you’d know what one is.

 

[jc456]

The panel is all scientists. Of course, doubtful you’d know what one is.

Why’s it not honest?

 

[Dagosa]

Why’s it not honest?

Just like executives for oil companies, it only matters when they give information to Govt and / or testify under oath. Everyone is then subject to prosecution. You can be lied to, you’re gullible.
At Historic Hearing, Fossil Fuel Executives Admit Climate Crisis Is an “Urgent” Threat

 

[jc456]

Just like executives for oil companies, it only matters when they give information to Govt and / or testify under oath. Everyone is then subject to prosecution. You can be lied to, you’re gullible.
At Historic Hearing, Fossil Fuel Executives Admit Climate Crisis Is an “Urgent” Threat

what the government does! all faked and Feazell won and then was awarded 38 million for his lawsuit.

The War in Waco Heats Up

%%cf_subhead%%

www.dmagazine.com

On September 25, the day before he pleaded not guilty at his arraignment, an FBI inventory report was filed with the U.S. District Clerk’s office in Austin, stating that among the items found in the search of the Feazell home were syringes, none with needles, and a water pipe containing marijuana residue.

 

[Dagosa]

what the government does! all faked and Feazell won and then was awarded 38 million for his lawsuit.

The War in Waco Heats Up

%%cf_subhead%%

www.dmagazine.com

On September 25, the day before he pleaded not guilty at his arraignment, an FBI inventory report was filed with the U.S. District Clerk’s office in Austin, stating that among the items found in the search of the Feazell home were syringes, none with needles, and a water pipe containing marijuana residue.

Totally unrelated.

 

[jc456]

Totally unrelated.

It's what they do to entrap people. What you post is suspicious as to why they would go against their own interests. Just saying, you have no fking clue why they took such a position, but know that the FBI corners people to even lie in court. Covered in that trial, the jury was smart enough to see the lies.

 

[Dagosa]

It's what they do to entrap people. What you post is suspicious as to why they would go against their own interests. Just saying, you have no fking clue why they took such a position, but know that the FBI corners people to even lie in court. Covered in that trial, the jury was smart enough to see the lies.

Bullshit…made up shit totally unrelated. Why don’t you bring up the Rodney King besting while you’re at it. You can tell you have nothing important to say. You‘re googling made up shit and throwing it against the wall. You’re 0-10.

 

[Flash]

This is the same article referenced below, described as "Norway paper". It is a pre-print. It has not been reviewed and has not been accepted for publication in any refereed journal.

LOL! "Peer review" in the world of Environmental Wackos means that it has not been blessed by the Church of the AGW Scammers.

The ones that would do the "peer review" have been caught lying, fabrication data and cherry picking data so their blessing means jackshit.

 

[Dagosa]

LOL! "Peer review" in the world of Environmental Wackos means that it has not been blessed by the Church of the AGW Scammers.

Speaking of church, all the major religions are in with the climate change, AGW developed consensus.
So, you’re an atheist ?

 

[Dagosa]

LOL! "Peer review" in the world of Environmental Wackos means that it has not been blessed by the Church of the AGW Scammers.

The ones that would do the "peer review" have been caught lying, fabrication data and cherry picking data so their blessing means jackshit.

Well, they’ve testified under oath, given evidence on their studies payed in part by public grants. That’s a federal offense if they knowingly gave false information and fabricated data. So, either you’re too fking incompetent to take your “evidence” to the DOJ of your state, or you’re FOS. Not much of choice deniers.

 

[jc456]

Bullshit…made up shit totally unrelated. Why don’t you bring up the Rodney King besting while you’re at it. You can tell you have nothing important to say. You‘re googling made up shit and throwing it against the wall. You’re 0-10.

Evidence I hit the nail on the head!!!!

 

[Dagosa]

Evidence I hit the nail on the head!!!!

Your a legend in your own mind. Just a Humper who lies about others lying while you are the one making up shit.
The only nail you have is the one up your nose.

 

[jc456]

Your a legend in your own mind. Just a Humper who lies about others lying while you are the one making up shit.
The only nail you have is the one up your nose.

Boom hit it again

 

[Dagosa]

LOL! "Peer review" in the world of Environmental Wackos means that it has not been blessed by the Church of the AGW Scammers.

The ones that would do the "peer review" have been caught lying, fabrication data and cherry picking data so their blessing means jackshit.

Lying and cherry picking data while being commissioned with grants by the Fed is a CRIMINAL offense. Why hasn’t the gop prosecuted these 30 k university and climate science institutes. According to you, NASA workers commit felony fraud daily. Any charges yet from you ? Nope. You’re all talk and bullshit.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

“The Abstract bluntly declares that ‘standard climate models are rejected by time series data on global temperatures’ while the conclusions state ‘the results imply that the effect of man-made CO2 emissions does not appear to be sufficiently strong to cause systematic changes in the pattern of the temperature fluctuations.'”

Plus: “‘To what extent are temperature levels changing due to greenhouse gas emissions?’ may prove to be the most important scientific paper in the last 10 years.”

The “climate change” nonsense is not about controlling the earth’s “climate,” it’s about controlling the earth’s inhabitants. Most telling is they demand to gut the world economy and control it (aka Communism) while telling you they don’t have a clue as to what, if any, impact they’re demands will have on the environment.

It’s all about control while they live in 12,000 beachfront mansions and fly private jets.

A New Report Throws Cold Water on Man-Made Global Warming Pseudoscience

“To what extent are temperature levels changing due to greenhouse gas emissions?” may prove to be the most important scientific paper in the last 10 years.

legalinsurrection.com

So what is the result of peer review?

 

[jc456]

Lying and cherry picking data while being commissioned with grants by the Fed is a CRIMINAL offense. Why hasn’t the gop prosecuted these 30 k university and climate science institutes. According to you, NASA workers commit felony fraud daily. Any charges yet from you ? Nope. You’re all talk and bullshit.

Why do you care about opposing data paid for by private companies? How’s that different for you?