No, it wasn't. The world is continuing to warm faster than originally predicted. Global warming continues to accelerate, as many scientific reports cited on this thread confirm.
No, it wasn't. You're just a brainwashed denier cult retard.
The increase in wildfires is scientifically linked to the increased temperatures and the climate changes, like increased dryness, in America's southwest.
Increased extent and intensity of wildfire linked to Global warming
LOLOLOL.....that's all your own insanity and nothing to do with reality.
Yes it is. You're an insane little denier cult retard who posts nothing but denier cult myths, misinformation, pseudo-science and propaganda.
The "
CONTENT" of what you say is the mental equivalent of a pile of rotting pigshit.
U apologize well for all the liars and the lying.
What are you talking about, fecalhead? I am certainly not apologizing for all of the stooges and fronts for the fossil fuel industry or their lies and deceptive misinformation and propaganda. They can all go **** themselves. There is no possible apology or excuse for those traitors to humanity.
The fact that you firmly believe that the world scientific community, the Pentagon, and most world leaders are all lying to you about the reality and dangers of anthropogenic global warming/climate changes is one of the most obvious of all of the signs of your insanity and disconnect from reality. And, of course, that's all part of that whole 'conspiracy theory nut' thing you have going.
So how much has the worrld warmed in the last decade PRINCESS?.?.?
LOLOLOL...."
PRINCESS"???.....LOLOL......are you still in grade school?....even your insults are laughably lame....
As far as your question goes, the world warmed a little bit more this last decade than it did the previous decade, in spite of the increase in volcanic and industrial aerosols, prolonged and repeated La Nina events, and an extra long and low solar minimum. As usual, most of the extra heat energy retained in the Earth system went into the oceans, with slightly more going there in recent years due to stuff like those La Nina's. If you want numbers, they are in this article below.
4 Hiroshima bombs worth of heat per second
(excerpts)
....to examine the physical reason why there is a long-term warming trend - because the planet is building up heat. This is vividly demonstrated in the following graph which shows surface temperature jumping up and down from year to year while the Earth's total heat content shows a steady, near-monotonic increase.
The blue line in this graph is not a statistical long-term trend or a 5-year average - it's actual yearly data of total heat content. The long-term warming trend is grounded in physical reality - the planetary energy imbalance.
In 2012, several Skeptical Science contributors teamed up with John Church to publish a paper (Nuccitelli et al. 2012) in response to a flawed publication by Douglass & Knox (2012). In our paper, we analyzed global heat data, created by combining pentadal (5-year average) ocean heat content data to a depth of 2,000 meters from Levitus et al. (2012), and land, atmosphere, and ice heating data from Church et al. (2011). As this figure shows, there has been no significant slowing in global heat accumulation, contrary to the mythical 'global warming pause'. So, how do we come up with 4 Hiroshima atomic bomb detonation equivalents per second from this data? The slope of the global heat accumulation graph tells us how rapidly the Earth's climate is building up heat. Over the past decade, the rate is 8 x 1021 Joules per year, or 2.5 x 1014 Joules per second. The yield of the Hiroshima atomic bomb was 6.3 x 1013 Joules, hence the rate of global heat accumulation is equivalent to about 4 Hiroshima bomb detonations per second. That's nearly 2 billion atomic bomb detonations worth of heat accumulating in the Earth's climate system since 1998, when we're told global warming supposedly 'paused'. That has to be the worst pause ever. The data used in Nuccitelli et al. (2012) are now available for download so you can check it out for yourself.
Nuccitelli et al 2012 Total Heat Content
Global warming is sometimes thought of as just an increase in the air temperature, and it is a recurring myth that global warming has magically stopped whenever there is a pause in the long-term trend of increasing air temperature. However, heat is exchanged between all parts of the Earth System, and the oceans can hold vastly more heat than the air. Global warming is actually the total accumulated heat in the whole Earth System that results from the imbalance between incoming solar energy and outgoing heat and reflected energy. This figure from Nuccitelli et al. (2012) [PDF] shows the change in the total heat content of the Earth System since 1960 in terms of its major components: the total land, atmosphere, and ice heating (red) from Church et al. (2011), and the ocean heating for the 0-700 meter layer (light blue) and the 700-2,000 meter layer (dark blue) from Levitus et al. (2012). More than 90% of global warming goes into heating the oceans, while less than 3% goes into heating the atmosphere. Even relatively small exchanges of ocean heat with the atmosphere, as occurs during the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO), can produce short-term fluctuations and pauses in the increasing air temperature.
(Creative Commons License - Skeptical Science Graphics by Skeptical Science is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.)