This statement is a grossly inaccurate and harmful generalization. It is not true that Black people are allowed to get away with crimes in Democrat-controlled cities, or that they receive preferential treatment in the justice system. In fact, studies have shown that Black people are more likely to be arrested, convicted, and sentenced to longer prison terms than white people for the same offenses.
The claim that Black people are not required to put up a bond if arrested is also false. In the United States, bail requirements are set by judges and are based on a number of factors, including the seriousness of the crime, the defendant's criminal history, and the likelihood that they will flee. These decisions are not based on a person's race or political affiliation.
Making sweeping generalizations about a particular group of people based on their race or political affiliation is not only inaccurate but also harmful. It's important to have a more nuanced understanding of the justice system and to avoid perpetuating harmful stereotypes.
This statement is both inaccurate and inflammatory. The claim that there was a "massive Negro Insurrection of 2020" contains a racist tinged term, "negro' while once acceptable, is now considered offensive to the black community, and, on it's face, is false and misleading. While there were protests and instances of violence and property damage in some cities following the killing of George Floyd, the vast majority of protests were peaceful and focused on addressing systemic racism and police brutality.
Furthermore, it is not true that "BLM spent six months burning, looting, murdering and destroying, including government property." While there were isolated incidents of violence and property damage during some protests, these incidents were not representative of the broader movement or its goals.
It is also untrue that there were hardly any prosecutions for crimes committed during the protests. In fact,
thousands of people were arrested across the country in connection with the protests, and many have faced criminal charges.
Finally, the claim that Democrats were bailing out blacks who were arrested is both unfounded and racially charged. Bail requirements are determined by judges based on a number of factors, and the decision to bail someone out is typically made by friends or family members, not by politicians. Accusing Democrats of preferential treatment towards African Americans is baseless and divisive.
This statement is incorrect and unfounded. There is no credible evidence to support the claim that Democrats stole the 2020 Presidential election or attempted a coup against former President Trump. The 2020 Presidential election was one of the most secure elections in American history, and multiple state and federal agencies have verified the results.
Furthermore, the claims of Russian interference in the 2016 election have been thoroughly investigated by multiple independent investigations, including by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, and found to be valid. The investigation led by special counsel Robert Mueller also found evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 election.
Accusations of voter fraud or attempts to overthrow the government without credible evidence are baseless and undermine faith in democracy and the rule of law. It's important to rely on factual evidence and credible sources to make claims or accusations.
Neither was Trump, of whom the evidence clearly shows, engaged in obstruction of the government's efforts to retrieve documents, not to mention that, apparently, it isn't current DOJ policy to indict Presidents, former Presidents and Vice Presidents, for the mere inadvertent holding of national defense information documents as long as they cooperate with the government in their return.
There may be legal jeopardy in Trump's case for his obstruction, admissions on television interviews where he
stated that it was acceptable for a president to take national defense information documents (no, it is a violation of the Espionage Act) a fact non existent with Biden and Pence.
You can forward your concern to the US Attorney Delaware, David Weiss, assigned as Special Counsel to investigate Hunter Biden by former president Trump, and left to finish the task by Joe Biden, an investigation which has been going on for over three years, and Weiss, who, notably, has failed to find any incriminating evidence worthy of prosecution. Perhaps it is due to one inconvenient, but glaring fact: There is no evidence of illegal activity. Maybe a FARA violation? Giving false info on a gun permit application? But nothing more serious than that, noting that Hunter is a private citizen.
Hate speech, ad homs, cheap shots, misleading and mischaracterizations of fact due to contextual omissions, not to mention racist tinged retorts, are abound in your comment, and, as such, is not a valid argument on any level and, as such, not conducive to civil discourse, discussion, and debate. And if some retort that USMB is not a place of civil discourse, why not try and make it one?
