chanel
Silver Member
All surgery done on minors is done without their consent. Babies can't sign their names. Should kids with crossed eyes, hairlips or a third nipple have to wait until they are 18?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
my dad told me that the amount of skin they took off of mine ...they were able to do 3 skin grafts on some burn patients who needed some skin...so its not all a wasted effort....

Mark Wahlberg, who has a third nipple, is very successful, and apparently happy.All surgery done on minors is done without their consent. Babies can't sign their names. Should kids with crossed eyes, hairlips or a third nipple have to wait until they are 18?
All surgery done on minors is done without their consent. Babies can't sign their names. Should kids with crossed eyes, hairlips or a third nipple have to wait until they are 18?
my dad told me that the amount of skin they took off of mine ...they were able to do 3 skin grafts on some burn patients who needed some skin...so its not all a wasted effort....
Well somebody will support this somewhere.
Why do people feel that there needs to be a law made regarding every little damn detail about peoples lives?
Don't like it? Don't do it.
Tell the government to mind it's own damn business.
True I do not support circumcision, but I am even more against a law banning it.
It is a strange custom as if man is saying that god made man imperfect and he requires mutilation.
I figure it began due to veneral disease and poor hygene. Anyone know? Are Christians/jews the only ones to practice it as a routine thing?
My main thing against it is that it is done to infants without their consent and is almost never required to correct a problem.
It's routinely done in hospitals to all male babies regardless of race, religion or ethnic origin immediately after the birth. Parents can also request that they do not want their son to be circumcised. Jews generally have it done by a Rabbi in a religious ceremony.
It's a barbaric custom that harms a child physically and possibly psychologically (and makes sex less enjoyable for them throughout life) not performed for medical benefit and when they don't have the opportunity to consent.
There's no physical damage done unless the whole damn thing is chopped off and at the ripe old age of 1 or 2 hours the child is not likely to remember the procedure at all, let alone suffer psychological damage.
LMAO I am against infant circumcision and that makes me antisemetic?
I have nothing against semetic people.
to be honest though I do have some issues with the natrion of Israel.
They don't snip a little skin off the clitoris. They remove the entire clitoris.Sorry, I don't think I'd support snipping off skin from the clitoris either. A little trim of flesh off the labia? No thanks. Genital mutilation is genital mutilation.
I'm well aware of that. We are arguing equivalences aren't we? The equivalence of a circumcision would be taking the skin off the clitoris or slicing some meat off the labia. I wouldn't condone that "procedure" any more than circumcision.

It's a (...) custom that harms a child physically and possibly psychologically (and makes sex less enjoyable for them throughout life) not performed for medical benefit and when they don't have the opportunity to consent.(...)
It's a (...) custom that harms a child physically and possibly psychologically (and makes sex less enjoyable for them throughout life) not performed for medical benefit and when they don't have the opportunity to consent.(...)
It does neither harm you psychologically nor is sex less enjoyable.
I am convinced, that most women also prefer a circumcised one for obvious reasons.
my dad told me that the amount of skin they took off of mine ...they were able to do 3 skin grafts on some burn patients who needed some skin...so its not all a wasted effort....
so now some poor bastards arm sticks straight out when the see a hot chick?
Now we know what happened to Dr. Strangelove.
It's a (...) custom that harms a child physically and possibly psychologically (and makes sex less enjoyable for them throughout life) not performed for medical benefit and when they don't have the opportunity to consent.(...)
It does neither harm you psychologically nor is sex less enjoyable.
I am convinced, that most women also prefer a circumcised one for obvious reasons.
I agree.
The city is broke and look at what we spend money on. Why and how does shit like this get on ballots? We cant dewclaw cats, we dont have happy meals, and not you cant get your son circumcised? The city needs to stay the hell out of normal peoples lives and stop forcing their PC views of life on everyone.
All they will do is force parents to have it done in a different city.
Jews do it because it's part of jewish law.

The city is broke and look at what we spend money on. Why and how does shit like this get on ballots? We cant dewclaw cats, we dont have happy meals, and not you cant get your son circumcised? The city needs to stay the hell out of normal peoples lives and stop forcing their PC views of life on everyone.
All they will do is force parents to have it done in a different city.
They just can't understand the concept of "Live and Let Live", They have to be in control, and it will never be enough.