You gotta be kidding me!!! Well, Facebook seems to be going along but no reaction yet from Google and Twitter. What bothers me is when will Obama's “anti-radical czar” try to do the same thing here?
Read the story @
Germany springs to action over hate speech against migrants
And it seem that Twitter is now going to give you 1,000 characters to do it in.
This has been a building movement over the years. As a matter of fact I was just reading an article last night by Barbara Kay of the National Post about this movement in Quebec to criminalize any speech that is derogatory to Islam in Quebec..
What was fascinating was this tidbit on how Hillary Clinton under Obama has been coordinating with other countries to move forward with criminalizing speech.
Hillary sponsored the first Istanbul Conference to deal with enacting speech restrictive laws against slandering ISLAM world wide with the exception of the US of course because of the Constitution.I didn't know that.
Very disturbing.Happened in 2011 with Obama's full support.
Here's just part of the movement she and Obama have been involved in. A crime to slander Islam. It's out there and now Quebec is looking at passing a law on this.
Here's a bit of the article. It's worth the whole read.
"The Cairo Declaration asserts the superiority of Islam and defines freedom of speech according to Shariah law, which considers any criticism of Muhammad blasphemy. (Former French screen star and animal-rights activist Brigitte Bardot, for example, who has criticized Islam, mostly for its use of animal sacrifices, has been prosecuted and fined four times for “inciting racial hatred.”)
Clinton could not assent to enacting speech-restrictive laws in the U.S. — that pesky constitution!
Frémont’s fascination with the OIC is hardly unique in North America. In spite of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which is supposed to protect Americans from speech-chilling laws like Bill 59 and the Cairo Declaration, one of the OIC’s biggest fans is the U.S. State Department. Hillary Clinton enthusiastically sponsored the first Istanbul conference in 2011, which included delegates from the U.S., the EU and the OIC, but was largely conducted behind closed doors and attracted little attention.
Clinton could not assent to enacting speech-restrictive laws in the U.S. — that pesky constitution! — but she did assert that the U.S. could advocate for other messages to achieve the same result, such as the use of “good old-fashioned techniques of peer pressure and shaming.” On this file, she and her president march in lockstep.
US President Barack Obama famously announced in 2012 that the "future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam".
Well, if the future does not belong to those who have the
right to say anything they want about the prophet of Islam, just as the past has belonged to those with the right to say anything they want about Moses, Christ, Marx and the Buddha; and if “slander” of Islam is to be defined by the OIC and suppressed by shaming or worse — then to whom exactly do Jacques Frémont, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama intend for the future to belong?"
Barbara Kay: Appeasing the Islamists in Quebec
