No shit. Learn to read you ignorant Dipshit. I said they found him liable for sexual abuse, just like how they found ABC liable here. When ABC is found liable for lying about Trump you think they're liars don't you? Apply that same logic to Trump, Dipshit. You do know what logic is? Right?
Why did they have to pay Trump all that money then, that is, if you are correct?
Because they called him a rapist instead of what he is which is a sexual abuser. That's apparently some important distinction.
She's NOT going to get even one penny from Trump.
You can prove rape with DNA evidence or a witness, how do you prove sexual abuse 30 years later without either?
Used to be that when a reporter got caught doing something like this they got fired on the spot to bring integrity back to the news network. Nowadays they get promoted.
It pleases me to call him someone who was found liable for sexual abuse while you soft MAGAts try to defend it, poorly. And when you celebrate the results of other civil suits that hypocrisy makes it even funnier.
They purpose of the case was to convince the voters and you failedIt pleases me to call him someone who was found liable for sexual abuse while you soft MAGAts try to defend it, poorly. And when you celebrate the results of other civil suits that hypocrisy makes it even funnier.
Nope. The purpose was to find Trump accountable for sexual abuse and for his lies about his sexual abuse and it was successful. He owes E. Jean Carrol over 90 million dollars.
Why won't she exactly?
"One way or another, this darkness got to give......"
No, sexual abuse was not proved. The victim in interviews said there was no sexual assault.
No one believes the lawsuit would have happened had Trump not run for President, just like no one believes that Ford would have come out against Kavanaugh unless he had been appointed to SCOTUS.
He owes E Jean Carrol over 90 million for sex abuse and for lying about it. Moron.
Now you're down to Everyone knows arguments....
No fellow shopper saw it. No fitting room attendant. No sales clerk. It was by every indication a ghost town in that Manhattan department store. Even Carroll acknowledged the peculiarity of such unexpected desolation, writing, “99 percent of the time, you will have an attendant in Bergdorf’s. All I can say is I did not, in this fleeting episode, see an attendant.” As for how the pair ended up in a fitting room without assistance: “And the other odd thing is that a dressing-room door was open. In Bergdorf’s dressing rooms, doors are usually locked until a client wants to try something on.”
