Gene Wilder's family owe an apology for his blatant racism in a movie.

[WillowTree]

I have heard of them. The south was under democrat rule too ! Did you know that? Lester Maddox? Ever hear of him? How about a George C Wallace? Ever hear of him?

Yep. Heard of both of them. I was with my parents when they participated in a civil rights march in the 60's. And they both had feces and urine thrown on them.

What's your point?

And who said anything about "Democrats or Republicans"? I likely know that history far better than you do.

I said it! The south was ruled by democrats. Because you mentioned Jim Crow of 1964. Didn’t you? Yes, so say thank you democrats!

AMERICAN SOUTHERN DEMOCRATS. The Civil War is over, or did you fail to get that memo?

The south was a part of AMERICA during that period.

Are you a dumbass or do you actually believe the civil war was fought in 1964?

What I believe is that you and your twin crash dummy are two of the most typical, abjectly stupid individuals that have posted here in years.

He statrted this by saying "you have to go back hundreds of years for evidence that America was a racist country. He was proven to be wrong.

Then you contributed your share of stupidity by trying to bring the same tired old "The Democrat party did it" talking point.

To the average black person living in America during Jim Crow, the north and the south were nearly transparent in what their day to day life experience was like. I have living relatives that are far older than my 65+ years, that experieced it in daily life all over this country. To them it was not a political party issue, it was an "America issue".

The states above the Mason Dixon line did not have the blatant public signs or laws on the books, however, some of the same practices were quietly carried out on a daily basis.

I recall taking two trips across the country from California to the east cost with my parents in the early 60's.

We were denied food, gas and lodging in Needles, California, Tucson, Arizona, and Albuquerque, New Mexico.

There were no signs that said so , but we were just told, "There are places that can help you down the road". So it did not matter as a black person if you were in the north or the south at that time, you were still affected to varying degrees by the Jim Crow culture in America.

As opposed to incessantly parroting the "Democrats did it" talking point, you would become more informed if you did some reading that tells the whole story of how the Jim Crow era affected the entire country before it was finally outlawed.

This is your statement not mine/ post number 43’’’


“No you do not. Jim Crow laws were still in effect in southern states until 1964. There are still quite a few people living today who were affected by those laws, which were justified by a supposedly "seperate but equal" system.

Ever hear of the "Little Rock Nine"? Emmitt Till? The Montgomery Bus Boycott? The 16th Street Baptist church bombing?”


So yes! You never mentioned the north at all. So that makes you the ignorant one. I addressed your dumbasses statement about the South!

The Democrats ruled the Jim Crow era in the South!

 

[Marion Morrison]

I have heard of them. The south was under democrat rule too ! Did you know that? Lester Maddox? Ever hear of him? How about a George C Wallace? Ever hear of him?

Yep. Heard of both of them. I was with my parents when they participated in a civil rights march in the 60's. And they both had feces and urine thrown on them.

What's your point?

And who said anything about "Democrats or Republicans"? I likely know that history far better than you do.

I said it! The south was ruled by democrats. Because you mentioned Jim Crow of 1964. Didn’t you? Yes, so say thank you democrats!

AMERICAN SOUTHERN DEMOCRATS. The Civil War is over, or did you fail to get that memo?

The south was a part of AMERICA during that period.

Are you a dumbass or do you actually believe the civil war was fought in 1964?

What I believe is that you and your twin crash dummy are two of the most typical, abjectly stupid individuals that have posted here in years.

He statrted this by saying "you have to go back hundreds of years for evidence that America was a racist country. He was proven to be wrong.

Then you contributed your share of stupidity by trying to bring the same tired old "The Democrat party did it" talking point.

To the average black person living in America during Jim Crow, the north and the south were nearly transparent in what their day to day life experience was like. I have living relatives that are far older than my 65+ years, that experieced it in daily life all over this country. To them it was not a political party issue, it was an "America issue".

The states above the Mason Dixon line did not have the blatant public signs or laws on the books, however, some of the same practices were quietly carried out on a daily basis.

I recall taking two trips across the country from California to the east cost with my parents in the early 60's.

We were denied food, gas and lodging in Needles, California, Tucson, Arizona, and Albuquerque, New Mexico.

There were no signs that said so , but we were just told, "There are places that can help you down the road". So it did not matter as a black person if you were in the north or the south at that time, you were still affected to varying degrees by the Jim Crow culture in America.

As opposed to incessantly parroting the "Democrats did it" talking point, you would become more informed if you did some reading that tells the whole story of how the Jim Crow era affected the entire country before it was finally outlawed.

You do know it was Democrats that enacted the Jim Crow laws, correct? It got ridiculous and people said "Enough!"

 

[H B Lowrie]

If we can keep the public engaged and participating in this type of irrational nonsense we can keep them off of the fact that ours is an institutionally racist society and was founded as such.

Really blackie?

Would you like me to attempt to be offended for you?

Yes, if we can keep the public engaged and participating in this type of irrational nonsense we can keep them off of the fact that ours is an institutionally racist society and was founded as such.

 

[katsteve2012]

No you do not. Jim Crow laws were still in effect in southern states until 1964. There are still quite a few people living today who were affected by those laws, which were justified by a supposedly "seperate but equal" system.

Ever hear of the "Little Rock Nine"? Emmitt Till? The Montgomery Bus Boycott? The 16th Street Baptist church bombing?


All of these incidents occurred in the 20th century..

And before you go there...no, I don't hate America. But facts are facts.

I have heard of them. The south was under democrat rule too ! Did you know

Yep. Heard of both of them. I was with my parents when they participated in a civil rights march in the 60's. And they both had feces and urine thrown on them.

What's your point?

And who said anything about "Democrats or Republicans"? I likely know that history far better than you do.

I said it! The south was ruled by democrats. Because you mentioned Jim Crow of 1964. Didn’t you? Yes, so say thank you democrats!

AMERICAN SOUTHERN DEMOCRATS. The Civil War is over, or did you fail to get that memo?

The south was a part of AMERICA during that period.

Are you a dumbass or do you actually believe the civil war was fought in 1964?

What I believe is that you and your twin crash dummy are two of the most typical, abjectly stupid individuals that have posted here in years.

He statrted this by saying "you have to go back hundreds of years for evidence that America was a racist country. He was proven to be wrong.

Then you contributed your share of stupidity by trying to bring the same tired old "The Democrat party did it" talking point.

To the average black person living in America during Jim Crow, the north and the south were nearly transparent in what their day to day life experience was like. I have living relatives that are far older than my 65+ years, that experieced it in daily life all over this country. To them it was not a political party issue, it was an "America issue".

The states above the Mason Dixon line did not have the blatant public signs or laws on the books, however, some of the same practices were quietly carried out on a daily basis.

I recall taking two trips across the country from California to the east cost with my parents in the early 60's.

We were denied food, gas and lodging in Needles, California, Tucson, Arizona, and Albuquerque, New Mexico.

There were no signs that said so , but we were just told, "There are places that can help you down the road". So it did not matter as a black person if you were in the north or the south at that time, you were still affected to varying degrees by the Jim Crow culture in America.

As opposed to incessantly parroting the "Democrats did it" talking point, you would become more informed if you did some reading that tells the whole story of how the Jim Crow era affected the entire country before it was finally outlawed.

You do know it was Democrats that enacted the Jim Crow laws, correct? It got ridiculous and people said "Enough!"

Did southern republi

Yep. Heard of both of them. I was with my parents when they participated in a civil rights march in the 60's. And they both had feces and urine thrown on them.

What's your point?

And who said anything about "Democrats or Republicans"? I likely know that history far better than you do.

I said it! The south was ruled by democrats. Because you mentioned Jim Crow of 1964. Didn’t you? Yes, so say thank you democrats!

AMERICAN SOUTHERN DEMOCRATS. The Civil War is over, or did you fail to get that memo?

The south was a part of AMERICA during that period.

Are you a dumbass or do you actually believe the civil war was fought in 1964?

What I believe is that you and your twin crash dummy are two of the most typical, abjectly stupid individuals that have posted here in years.

He statrted this by saying "you have to go back hundreds of years for evidence that America was a racist country. He was proven to be wrong.

Then you contributed your share of stupidity by trying to bring the same tired old "The Democrat party did it" talking point.

To the average black person living in America during Jim Crow, the north and the south were nearly transparent in what their day to day life experience was like. I have living relatives that are far older than my 65+ years, that experieced it in daily life all over this country. To them it was not a political party issue, it was an "America issue".

The states above the Mason Dixon line did not have the blatant public signs or laws on the books, however, some of the same practices were quietly carried out on a daily basis.

I recall taking two trips across the country from California to the east cost with my parents in the early 60's.

We were denied food, gas and lodging in Needles, California, Tucson, Arizona, and Albuquerque, New Mexico.

There were no signs that said so , but we were just told, "There are places that can help you down the road". So it did not matter as a black person if you were in the north or the south at that time, you were still affected to varying degrees by the Jim Crow culture in America.

As opposed to incessantly parroting the "Democrats did it" talking point, you would become more informed if you did some reading that tells the whole story of how the Jim Crow era affected the entire country before it was finally outlawed.

This is your statement not mine/ post number 43’’’


“No you do not. Jim Crow laws were still in effect in southern states until 1964. There are still quite a few people living today who were affected by those laws, which were justified by a supposedly "seperate but equal" system.

Ever hear of the "Little Rock Nine"? Emmitt Till? The Montgomery Bus Boycott? The 16th Street Baptist church bombing?”


So yes! You never mentioned the north at all. So that makes you the ignorant one. I addressed your dumbasses statement about the South!

The Democrats ruled the Jim Crow era in the South!

So you are a master of the obvious? Everyone knows that Jim Crow laws originated in the south. Isn't the south part of America? You speak as if the north and south were in two different countries during that time,


And anyone who lived during that era and was subject to those laws ALSO experienced much of the same treatment in the north, you thick headed moron. I saw it myself.

 

[katsteve2012]

Yep. Heard of both of them. I was with my parents when they participated in a civil rights march in the 60's. And they both had feces and urine thrown on them.

What's your point?

And who said anything about "Democrats or Republicans"? I likely know that history far better than you do.

I said it! The south was ruled by democrats. Because you mentioned Jim Crow of 1964. Didn’t you? Yes, so say thank you democrats!

AMERICAN SOUTHERN DEMOCRATS. The Civil War is over, or did you fail to get that memo?

The south was a part of AMERICA during that period.

Are you a dumbass or do you actually believe the civil war was fought in 1964?

What I believe is that you and your twin crash dummy are two of the most typical, abjectly stupid individuals that have posted here in years.

He statrted this by saying "you have to go back hundreds of years for evidence that America was a racist country. He was proven to be wrong.

Then you contributed your share of stupidity by trying to bring the same tired old "The Democrat party did it" talking point.

To the average black person living in America during Jim Crow, the north and the south were nearly transparent in what their day to day life experience was like. I have living relatives that are far older than my 65+ years, that experieced it in daily life all over this country. To them it was not a political party issue, it was an "America issue".

The states above the Mason Dixon line did not have the blatant public signs or laws on the books, however, some of the same practices were quietly carried out on a daily basis.

I recall taking two trips across the country from California to the east cost with my parents in the early 60's.

We were denied food, gas and lodging in Needles, California, Tucson, Arizona, and Albuquerque, New Mexico.

There were no signs that said so , but we were just told, "There are places that can help you down the road". So it did not matter as a black person if you were in the north or the south at that time, you were still affected to varying degrees by the Jim Crow culture in America.

As opposed to incessantly parroting the "Democrats did it" talking point, you would become more informed if you did some reading that tells the whole story of how the Jim Crow era affected the entire country before it was finally outlawed.

You do know it was Democrats that enacted the Jim Crow laws, correct? It got ridiculous and people said "Enough!"

I know the entire history of Jim Crow. And lived through part of it. I also have living relatives in their 80's and 90's who lived through a lot of it, in the north and the south.

 

[WillowTree]

I have heard of them. The south was under democrat rule too ! Did you know

I said it! The south was ruled by democrats. Because you mentioned Jim Crow of 1964. Didn’t you? Yes, so say thank you democrats!

AMERICAN SOUTHERN DEMOCRATS. The Civil War is over, or did you fail to get that memo?

The south was a part of AMERICA during that period.

Are you a dumbass or do you actually believe the civil war was fought in 1964?

What I believe is that you and your twin crash dummy are two of the most typical, abjectly stupid individuals that have posted here in years.

He statrted this by saying "you have to go back hundreds of years for evidence that America was a racist country. He was proven to be wrong.

Then you contributed your share of stupidity by trying to bring the same tired old "The Democrat party did it" talking point.

To the average black person living in America during Jim Crow, the north and the south were nearly transparent in what their day to day life experience was like. I have living relatives that are far older than my 65+ years, that experieced it in daily life all over this country. To them it was not a political party issue, it was an "America issue".

The states above the Mason Dixon line did not have the blatant public signs or laws on the books, however, some of the same practices were quietly carried out on a daily basis.

I recall taking two trips across the country from California to the east cost with my parents in the early 60's.

We were denied food, gas and lodging in Needles, California, Tucson, Arizona, and Albuquerque, New Mexico.

There were no signs that said so , but we were just told, "There are places that can help you down the road". So it did not matter as a black person if you were in the north or the south at that time, you were still affected to varying degrees by the Jim Crow culture in America.

As opposed to incessantly parroting the "Democrats did it" talking point, you would become more informed if you did some reading that tells the whole story of how the Jim Crow era affected the entire country before it was finally outlawed.

You do know it was Democrats that enacted the Jim Crow laws, correct? It got ridiculous and people said "Enough!"

Did southern republi

I said it! The south was ruled by democrats. Because you mentioned Jim Crow of 1964. Didn’t you? Yes, so say thank you democrats!

AMERICAN SOUTHERN DEMOCRATS. The Civil War is over, or did you fail to get that memo?

The south was a part of AMERICA during that period.

Are you a dumbass or do you actually believe the civil war was fought in 1964?

What I believe is that you and your twin crash dummy are two of the most typical, abjectly stupid individuals that have posted here in years.

He statrted this by saying "you have to go back hundreds of years for evidence that America was a racist country. He was proven to be wrong.

Then you contributed your share of stupidity by trying to bring the same tired old "The Democrat party did it" talking point.

To the average black person living in America during Jim Crow, the north and the south were nearly transparent in what their day to day life experience was like. I have living relatives that are far older than my 65+ years, that experieced it in daily life all over this country. To them it was not a political party issue, it was an "America issue".

The states above the Mason Dixon line did not have the blatant public signs or laws on the books, however, some of the same practices were quietly carried out on a daily basis.

I recall taking two trips across the country from California to the east cost with my parents in the early 60's.

We were denied food, gas and lodging in Needles, California, Tucson, Arizona, and Albuquerque, New Mexico.

There were no signs that said so , but we were just told, "There are places that can help you down the road". So it did not matter as a black person if you were in the north or the south at that time, you were still affected to varying degrees by the Jim Crow culture in America.

As opposed to incessantly parroting the "Democrats did it" talking point, you would become more informed if you did some reading that tells the whole story of how the Jim Crow era affected the entire country before it was finally outlawed.

This is your statement not mine/ post number 43’’’


“No you do not. Jim Crow laws were still in effect in southern states until 1964. There are still quite a few people living today who were affected by those laws, which were justified by a supposedly "seperate but equal" system.

Ever hear of the "Little Rock Nine"? Emmitt Till? The Montgomery Bus Boycott? The 16th Street Baptist church bombing?”


So yes! You never mentioned the north at all. So that makes you the ignorant one. I addressed your dumbasses statement about the South!

The Democrats ruled the Jim Crow era in the South!

So you are a master of the obvious? Everyone knows that Jim Crow laws originated in the south. Isn't the south part of America? You speak as if the north and south were in two different countries during that time,


And anyone who lived during that era and was subject to those laws ALSO experienced much of the same treatment in the north, you thick headed moron. I saw it myself.

Well you big assed dummy. Your first case scenario only included the south and the Jim Crow Democrats! Too ******* late to try to walk it back now!

 

[IM2]

If we can keep the public engaged and participating in this type of irrational nonsense we can keep them off of the fact that ours is an institutionally racist society and was founded as such.

Name a brown or black country that is not a corrupt impoverished dirty hellhole. Not many, if any. Few SA countries with German Nazi influence. India dont count.

Before the arrival of Europeans in West Africa, West Africa had beautiful cities and monuments but Europeans destroyed most of them. We are only left with drawings and descriptions by travelers who have visited the places before the destruction. In some places, ruins are still visible. Many cities have been abandoned into ruin when Europeans brought exotic diseases (smallpox and influenza) which started spreading and killing people. The ruins of those cities are still hidden.

How European Colonial Masters Destroyed Africa’s Cities and Monuments-Part One

Whites have messed up Africa.

The effects of colonialism past and present are visible all over Africa. It is not an overstatement when Edem Kodjo, author of ‘Africa Tomorrow’ describes the condition of African as “torn away from his past, propelled into a universe fashioned from outside that suppresses his values, and dumbfounded by a cultural invasion that marginalises him. The African,... is today the deformed image of others. ”

Effects of colonialism on Africa's past and present | Pambazuka News

Since 1990, there has been no government in Somalia. The country is in the hands of warlords. European and Asiatic ships took advantage of this chaotic situation and fished along the Somali coast without a license or respect for elementary rules. They did not observe the quotas in force in their own country to protect the species and they used fishing techniques –even bombs!- that created huge damages to the wealth of the Somali seas.

That’s not all! Taking also advantage of this lack of any political authority, European companies, with the help of the mafia, dumped nuclear wastes offshore Somali coasts. Europe knew of this but turned a blind eye as that solution presented a practical and economical advantage for the nuclear waste management. Yet, the 2005 Tsunami brought a big part of these wastes into the Somali lands. Unfamiliar diseases appeared for the first time among the population. This is the context in which the piracy mainly developed. Somali fishermen, who had primitive fishing techniques, were no more able to work. So they decided to protect themselves and their seas. This is exactly what the United States did during the civilian war against the British (1756-1763): with no naval forces, President George Washington made a deal with pirates to protect the wealth of the American seas.

No Somali state for almost twenty years! How is that possible?

This is the result of an American strategy. In 1990, the country was bruised by conflicts, famine and lootings; the state collapsed. Facing this situation, the United States, who discovered oil in Somalia a few years ago, launched Operation Restore Hope in 1992. For the first time, US marines intervened in Africa to take control of a country. It was also the first time that a military invasion was launched in the name of humanitarian interference.

The famous rice bag exhibited on a Somali beach by Bernard Kouchner?

Yes, everybody remembers those pictures carefully showcased. But the real reasons were strategic. An US State Department report recommended indeed that the United States must stay the lonely global superpower after the Soviet Bloc collapse. To reach that goal, the report advocated to occupy a hegemonic position in Africa, which enjoys a vast amount of raw materials.

However, Restore Hope will be a failure. There was even that Hollywood movie “Black Hawk Down”, with those poor G.I.’s “attacked by the bad Somali rebels”…

US soldiers were indeed defeated by a Somali nationalist resistance. Since then, American policy was to keep Somalia without any real government, even to balkanize it. This is the old British strategy, already applied in many places: setting weak and divided states in order to better rule them. That is why there has been no Somali state for almost twenty years. The United States has implemented a chaos theory in order to stop any Somali reconciliation and keep the country divided.

In Sudan, due to the civilian war, Exxon has had to leave the country after having discovered oil. So isn’t letting Somalia plunge into chaos contrary to American interests, which cannot exploit the discovered oil?

Oil exploitation is not their priority. The United States know that the reserves are there but doesn’t need it immediately. Two elements are much more important in its strategy. First, prevent the competitors from negotiating with a rich and powerful Somali state. If you consider Sudan, the comparison is interesting. The oil that the American companies discovered there thirty years ago, Sudan is selling it today to China. The same thing could happen in Somalia. When he was president of the transition government, Abdullah Yusuf went to China although he was supported by the United States. US mass media had strongly criticized that visit. The fact is that United States have no guarantee on that point: if a Somali government is established tomorrow, whatever is its political color, it could probably adopt a strategy independent of United States and trade with China. Western imperialists do not want a strong and unified Somali state. The second goal pursued by this chaos theory is linked to the geographical location of Somalia, which is strategic for both European and American imperialists.

Somalia: How Colonial Powers drove a Country into Chaos - Global Research

When Guinea demanded independence from French colonial rule in 1958, the French unleashed their fury with more than 3,000 leaving the country taking their enteire property. In addition, they destroyed anything that couldn’t be taken – destroying schools, nurseries, public administration buildings, cars, books, medicine, research institute instruments, tractors were crushed and sabotaged, animals killed and food in warehouses were burned or poisoned. In effect they were sending a message to all other colonies that the consqueences for jrejecting France would be high.

Colonialism as an enduring stain in Africa’s history, and economic oppression continue to exist. An article by Mawuna Remarque Koutonin, peace activist and editor of SiliconAfrica.com addressed this practice.

The article called attention to an ongoing practice by which former African countries are forced to pay a colonial tax to France – even today. In fact, France continues to thrive on the practice, which extracts approximately 500 billion dollars from African countries each year.

France's Colonial Tax Still Enforced for Africa. "Bleeding Africa and Feeding France" - Global Research

The events that took place in the heart of Rwanda during 1994 were atrocious. More than 800,000 Tutsi were hacked and massacred at the hands and machetes of extremist Hutu while the entire world stood by and watched. How did it come to this? How could such hatred lead to the slaughter of nearly 1 million Tutsi? The roots of the carnage can be tied to European colonialism in Rwanda. Through racist ideologies that led to a distinct classification of Hutu and Tutsi and a falsified history of Rwanda, Europeans successfully birthed an ethnic divide that ultimately led to the Rwandan Genocide.

How Colonialism Affected the Rwandan Genocide

Like I said earlier,

Whites have messed up Africa.

 

[katsteve2012]

You are ignorant and apparantly illiterate. Institutionalized racism. Look it up. It was practiced far less than hundreds of years ago.

post # 64 = you fked up---read the posts more slowly

I do not need to re read anymore of what you post to understand that you are ignorant.

you are like the dumbass MSM/blacks/etc =you twist/turn/ignore/bullshit/etc the FACTS
FACT: not racism but racist nation

This has nothing to do with the "MSM/BLACK BOGEYMAN" that lives rent free inside of your empty head.

It is about YOU making statements that are inaccurate and then hypocritically trying to walk back what you stated with the same tired bullshit.

Go bother someone else.

"Lives rent free inside your head"

What is it that possesses people to reuse the same joke over and over again? That is a sign of stupidity. Its funny the first time you hear it, but not after the thousandth.

Please, can we retire this overly used joke? Lets bury it along side "thats what she said".

In some cases it is not a joke if the shoe fits.

AMERICAN SOUTHERN DEMOCRATS. The Civil War is over, or did you fail to get that memo?

The south was a part of AMERICA during that period.

Are you a dumbass or do you actually believe the civil war was fought in 1964?

What I believe is that you and your twin crash dummy are two of the most typical, abjectly stupid individuals that have posted here in years.

He statrted this by saying "you have to go back hundreds of years for evidence that America was a racist country. He was proven to be wrong.

Then you contributed your share of stupidity by trying to bring the same tired old "The Democrat party did it" talking point.

To the average black person living in America during Jim Crow, the north and the south were nearly transparent in what their day to day life experience was like. I have living relatives that are far older than my 65+ years, that experieced it in daily life all over this country. To them it was not a political party issue, it was an "America issue".

The states above the Mason Dixon line did not have the blatant public signs or laws on the books, however, some of the same practices were quietly carried out on a daily basis.

I recall taking two trips across the country from California to the east cost with my parents in the early 60's.

We were denied food, gas and lodging in Needles, California, Tucson, Arizona, and Albuquerque, New Mexico.

There were no signs that said so , but we were just told, "There are places that can help you down the road". So it did not matter as a black person if you were in the north or the south at that time, you were still affected to varying degrees by the Jim Crow culture in America.

As opposed to incessantly parroting the "Democrats did it" talking point, you would become more informed if you did some reading that tells the whole story of how the Jim Crow era affected the entire country before it was finally outlawed.

You do know it was Democrats that enacted the Jim Crow laws, correct? It got ridiculous and people said "Enough!"

Did southern republi

AMERICAN SOUTHERN DEMOCRATS. The Civil War is over, or did you fail to get that memo?

The south was a part of AMERICA during that period.

Are you a dumbass or do you actually believe the civil war was fought in 1964?

What I believe is that you and your twin crash dummy are two of the most typical, abjectly stupid individuals that have posted here in years.

He statrted this by saying "you have to go back hundreds of years for evidence that America was a racist country. He was proven to be wrong.

Then you contributed your share of stupidity by trying to bring the same tired old "The Democrat party did it" talking point.

To the average black person living in America during Jim Crow, the north and the south were nearly transparent in what their day to day life experience was like. I have living relatives that are far older than my 65+ years, that experieced it in daily life all over this country. To them it was not a political party issue, it was an "America issue".

The states above the Mason Dixon line did not have the blatant public signs or laws on the books, however, some of the same practices were quietly carried out on a daily basis.

I recall taking two trips across the country from California to the east cost with my parents in the early 60's.

We were denied food, gas and lodging in Needles, California, Tucson, Arizona, and Albuquerque, New Mexico.

There were no signs that said so , but we were just told, "There are places that can help you down the road". So it did not matter as a black person if you were in the north or the south at that time, you were still affected to varying degrees by the Jim Crow culture in America.

As opposed to incessantly parroting the "Democrats did it" talking point, you would become more informed if you did some reading that tells the whole story of how the Jim Crow era affected the entire country before it was finally outlawed.

This is your statement not mine/ post number 43’’’


“No you do not. Jim Crow laws were still in effect in southern states until 1964. There are still quite a few people living today who were affected by those laws, which were justified by a supposedly "seperate but equal" system.

Ever hear of the "Little Rock Nine"? Emmitt Till? The Montgomery Bus Boycott? The 16th Street Baptist church bombing?”


So yes! You never mentioned the north at all. So that makes you the ignorant one. I addressed your dumbasses statement about the South!

The Democrats ruled the Jim Crow era in the South!

So you are a master of the obvious? Everyone knows that Jim Crow laws originated in the south. Isn't the south part of America? You speak as if the north and south were in two different countries during that time,


And anyone who lived during that era and was subject to those laws ALSO experienced much of the same treatment in the north, you thick headed moron. I saw it myself.

Well you big assed dummy. Your first case scenario only included the south and the Jim Crow Democrats! Too ******* late to try to walk it back now!

Im not walking back anything, you dunce. This all started with another poster alleging that you had to go back "hundreds of years" to find evidence of racism in America.

I pointed out Jim Crow racism in the south......


THE SOUTH IS IN AMERICA, STUPID.

 

[Picaro]

If we can keep the public engaged and participating in this type of irrational nonsense we can keep them off of the fact that ours is an institutionally racist society and was founded as such.

Name a brown or black country that is not a corrupt hellhole. Not many, if any. Few SA countries with German Nazi influence. India dont count.

Which ones are we not destabilizing and stealing resources from? And additionally, what a great excuse for being a hopelessly racist shithole nation.

sure--the US is a racist nation
hahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahah

The history is what it is son.

Which nation was/is free from racism? Youre grasp of racism in societies around the world is really terrible.

Black people are more racist than any other people; their problems are mostly self-inflicted, and they rob, rape, and kill each other at record levels. During Reconstruction, the main complaint of black politicians was that their white counterparts got bigger bribes; they still complain about that, see Al Sharpton and every other crook they routinely elect to office or influences their votes.

“ Fun Reconstruction Facts”

Another weak seam in the Republican fabric joined predominately mulatto antebellum free Negroes and the largely black ex-slaves.



In Louisiana and N. Carolina, the early monopolization of black leadership by the mulatto class aroused the color and class tensions never far from the surface in the black community.



A mulatto candidate for the 1868 constitutional convention in South Carolina said: “ If ever there is a ****** government – an unmixed ****** government – established in South Carolina, I shall move.”



On the other side, a black leader said of the mulattoes: “To what race do they belong? … I know that my ancestors trod the burning sands of Africa, but why should men in whose veins run a great preponderance of white blood seek to specially ally themselves with the black man, prate of 'our race', when they are simply mongrels.”

p.560, Ordeal By Fire – The Civil War and Reconstruction - James McPherson, Knopf, 1982.

So, I don't give much of hoot about black complaints of 'racism'; they're reaping what they themselves sow for the most part. They like worshipping gangbanger scum and indulging in violent hate crimes, let them keep on rotting and kill each other; most blacks that want to learn, achieve, and advance themselves have few problems rising out of the hood rat mentality, and they have more privileges than most others to do that..

 

[WillowTree]

post # 64 = you fked up---read the posts more slowly

I do not need to re read anymore of what you post to understand that you are ignorant.

you are like the dumbass MSM/blacks/etc =you twist/turn/ignore/bullshit/etc the FACTS
FACT: not racism but racist nation

This has nothing to do with the "MSM/BLACK BOGEYMAN" that lives rent free inside of your empty head.

It is about YOU making statements that are inaccurate and then hypocritically trying to walk back what you stated with the same tired bullshit.

Go bother someone else.

"Lives rent free inside your head"

What is it that possesses people to reuse the same joke over and over again? That is a sign of stupidity. Its funny the first time you hear it, but not after the thousandth.

Please, can we retire this overly used joke? Lets bury it along side "thats what she said".

In some cases it is not a joke if the shoe fits.

Are you a dumbass or do you actually believe the civil war was fought in 1964?

What I believe is that you and your twin crash dummy are two of the most typical, abjectly stupid individuals that have posted here in years.

He statrted this by saying "you have to go back hundreds of years for evidence that America was a racist country. He was proven to be wrong.

Then you contributed your share of stupidity by trying to bring the same tired old "The Democrat party did it" talking point.

To the average black person living in America during Jim Crow, the north and the south were nearly transparent in what their day to day life experience was like. I have living relatives that are far older than my 65+ years, that experieced it in daily life all over this country. To them it was not a political party issue, it was an "America issue".

The states above the Mason Dixon line did not have the blatant public signs or laws on the books, however, some of the same practices were quietly carried out on a daily basis.

I recall taking two trips across the country from California to the east cost with my parents in the early 60's.

We were denied food, gas and lodging in Needles, California, Tucson, Arizona, and Albuquerque, New Mexico.

There were no signs that said so , but we were just told, "There are places that can help you down the road". So it did not matter as a black person if you were in the north or the south at that time, you were still affected to varying degrees by the Jim Crow culture in America.

As opposed to incessantly parroting the "Democrats did it" talking point, you would become more informed if you did some reading that tells the whole story of how the Jim Crow era affected the entire country before it was finally outlawed.

You do know it was Democrats that enacted the Jim Crow laws, correct? It got ridiculous and people said "Enough!"

Did southern republi

Are you a dumbass or do you actually believe the civil war was fought in 1964?

What I believe is that you and your twin crash dummy are two of the most typical, abjectly stupid individuals that have posted here in years.

He statrted this by saying "you have to go back hundreds of years for evidence that America was a racist country. He was proven to be wrong.

Then you contributed your share of stupidity by trying to bring the same tired old "The Democrat party did it" talking point.

To the average black person living in America during Jim Crow, the north and the south were nearly transparent in what their day to day life experience was like. I have living relatives that are far older than my 65+ years, that experieced it in daily life all over this country. To them it was not a political party issue, it was an "America issue".

The states above the Mason Dixon line did not have the blatant public signs or laws on the books, however, some of the same practices were quietly carried out on a daily basis.

I recall taking two trips across the country from California to the east cost with my parents in the early 60's.

We were denied food, gas and lodging in Needles, California, Tucson, Arizona, and Albuquerque, New Mexico.

There were no signs that said so , but we were just told, "There are places that can help you down the road". So it did not matter as a black person if you were in the north or the south at that time, you were still affected to varying degrees by the Jim Crow culture in America.

As opposed to incessantly parroting the "Democrats did it" talking point, you would become more informed if you did some reading that tells the whole story of how the Jim Crow era affected the entire country before it was finally outlawed.

This is your statement not mine/ post number 43’’’


“No you do not. Jim Crow laws were still in effect in southern states until 1964. There are still quite a few people living today who were affected by those laws, which were justified by a supposedly "seperate but equal" system.

Ever hear of the "Little Rock Nine"? Emmitt Till? The Montgomery Bus Boycott? The 16th Street Baptist church bombing?”


So yes! You never mentioned the north at all. So that makes you the ignorant one. I addressed your dumbasses statement about the South!

The Democrats ruled the Jim Crow era in the South!

So you are a master of the obvious? Everyone knows that Jim Crow laws originated in the south. Isn't the south part of America? You speak as if the north and south were in two different countries during that time,


And anyone who lived during that era and was subject to those laws ALSO experienced much of the same treatment in the north, you thick headed moron. I saw it myself.

Well you big assed dummy. Your first case scenario only included the south and the Jim Crow Democrats! Too ******* late to try to walk it back now!

Im not walking back anything, you dunce. This all started with another poster alleging that you had to go back "hundreds of years" to find evidence of racism in America.

I pointed out Jim Crow racism in the south......


THE SOUTH IS IN AMERICA, STUPID.

Yes, you ******* moron. You’ve pointed that out a number of times!

 

[IM2]

Name a brown or black country that is not a corrupt hellhole. Not many, if any. Few SA countries with German Nazi influence. India dont count.

Which ones are we not destabilizing and stealing resources from? And additionally, what a great excuse for being a hopelessly racist shithole nation.

sure--the US is a racist nation
hahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahah

The history is what it is son.

Which nation was/is free from racism? Youre grasp of racism in societies around the world is really terrible.

Black people are more racist than any other people; their problems are mostly self-inflicted, and they rob, rape, and kill each other at record levels. During Reconstruction, the main complaint of black politicians was that their white counterparts got bigger bribes; they still complain about that, see Al Sharpton and every other crook they routinely elect to office or influences their votes.

“ Fun Reconstruction Facts”

Another weak seam in the Republican fabric joined predominately mulatto antebellum free Negroes and the largely black ex-slaves.



In Louisiana and N. Carolina, the early monopolization of black leadership by the mulatto class aroused the color and class tensions never far from the surface in the black community.



A mulatto candidate for the 1868 constitutional convention in South Carolina said: “ If ever there is a ****** government – an unmixed ****** government – established in South Carolina, I shall move.”



On the other side, a black leader said of the mulattoes: “To what race do they belong? … I know that my ancestors trod the burning sands of Africa, but why should men in whose veins run a great preponderance of white blood seek to specially ally themselves with the black man, prate of 'our race', when they are simply mongrels.”

p.560, Ordeal By Fire – The Civil War and Reconstruction - James McPherson, Knopf, 1982.

So, I don't give much of hoot about black complaints of 'racism'; they're reaping what they themselves sow for the most part. They like worshipping gangbanger scum and indulging in violent hate crimes, let them keep on rotting and kill each other; most blacks that want to learn, achieve, and advance themselves have few problems rising out of the hood rat mentality, and they have more privileges than most others to do that..

Psychosis.- a serious mental illness characterized by defective or lost contact with reality often with hallucinations or delusions.

Definition of PSYCHOSIS

 

[Picaro]

Which ones are we not destabilizing and stealing resources from? And additionally, what a great excuse for being a hopelessly racist shithole nation.

sure--the US is a racist nation
hahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahah

The history is what it is son.

Which nation was/is free from racism? Youre grasp of racism in societies around the world is really terrible.

Black people are more racist than any other people; their problems are mostly self-inflicted, and they rob, rape, and kill each other at record levels. During Reconstruction, the main complaint of black politicians was that their white counterparts got bigger bribes; they still complain about that, see Al Sharpton and every other crook they routinely elect to office or influences their votes.

“ Fun Reconstruction Facts”

Another weak seam in the Republican fabric joined predominately mulatto antebellum free Negroes and the largely black ex-slaves.



In Louisiana and N. Carolina, the early monopolization of black leadership by the mulatto class aroused the color and class tensions never far from the surface in the black community.



A mulatto candidate for the 1868 constitutional convention in South Carolina said: “ If ever there is a ****** government – an unmixed ****** government – established in South Carolina, I shall move.”



On the other side, a black leader said of the mulattoes: “To what race do they belong? … I know that my ancestors trod the burning sands of Africa, but why should men in whose veins run a great preponderance of white blood seek to specially ally themselves with the black man, prate of 'our race', when they are simply mongrels.”

p.560, Ordeal By Fire – The Civil War and Reconstruction - James McPherson, Knopf, 1982.

So, I don't give much of hoot about black complaints of 'racism'; they're reaping what they themselves sow for the most part. They like worshipping gangbanger scum and indulging in violent hate crimes, let them keep on rotting and kill each other; most blacks that want to learn, achieve, and advance themselves have few problems rising out of the hood rat mentality, and they have more privileges than most others to do that..

Psychosis.- a serious mental illness characterized by defective or lost contact with reality often with hallucinations or delusions.

Definition of PSYCHOSIS

lol resorting to pop psychology ... what a loser ploy that is. Can't handle the facts about black racism and self-destructive behavior, obviously. this is the main results of Nixon giving black radicals their quota system; they get to have a subsidized black middle class who dumbs down their own education system and uses their hood rat 'bruthas' as hostages to extort more bennies for themselves, and have no incentive to improve education levels in their own ghetto shit holes.

You'e Exhibit A.

 

[IM2]

sure--the US is a racist nation
hahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahah

The history is what it is son.

Which nation was/is free from racism? Youre grasp of racism in societies around the world is really terrible.

Black people are more racist than any other people; their problems are mostly self-inflicted, and they rob, rape, and kill each other at record levels. During Reconstruction, the main complaint of black politicians was that their white counterparts got bigger bribes; they still complain about that, see Al Sharpton and every other crook they routinely elect to office or influences their votes.

“ Fun Reconstruction Facts”

Another weak seam in the Republican fabric joined predominately mulatto antebellum free Negroes and the largely black ex-slaves.



In Louisiana and N. Carolina, the early monopolization of black leadership by the mulatto class aroused the color and class tensions never far from the surface in the black community.



A mulatto candidate for the 1868 constitutional convention in South Carolina said: “ If ever there is a ****** government – an unmixed ****** government – established in South Carolina, I shall move.”



On the other side, a black leader said of the mulattoes: “To what race do they belong? … I know that my ancestors trod the burning sands of Africa, but why should men in whose veins run a great preponderance of white blood seek to specially ally themselves with the black man, prate of 'our race', when they are simply mongrels.”

p.560, Ordeal By Fire – The Civil War and Reconstruction - James McPherson, Knopf, 1982.

So, I don't give much of hoot about black complaints of 'racism'; they're reaping what they themselves sow for the most part. They like worshipping gangbanger scum and indulging in violent hate crimes, let them keep on rotting and kill each other; most blacks that want to learn, achieve, and advance themselves have few problems rising out of the hood rat mentality, and they have more privileges than most others to do that..

Psychosis.- a serious mental illness characterized by defective or lost contact with reality often with hallucinations or delusions.

Definition of PSYCHOSIS

lol resorting to pop psychology ... what a loser ploy that is. Can't handle the facts about black racism and self-destructive behavior, obviously. this is the main results of Nixon giving black radicals their quota system; they get to have a subsidized black middle class who dumbs down their own education system and uses their hood rat 'bruthas' as hostages to extort more bennies for themselves, and have no incentive to improve education levels in their own ghetto shit holes.

You'e Exhibit A.

Since I know that's your method of denying white racism, I see that it is you who has the problem.

 

[Unkotare]

If we can keep the public engaged and participating in this type of irrational nonsense we can keep them off of the fact that ours is an institutionally racist society and was founded as such.

Are you still here?

 

[harmonica]

post # 64 = you fked up---read the posts more slowly

I do not need to re read anymore of what you post to understand that you are ignorant.

you are like the dumbass MSM/blacks/etc =you twist/turn/ignore/bullshit/etc the FACTS
FACT: not racism but racist nation

This has nothing to do with the "MSM/BLACK BOGEYMAN" that lives rent free inside of your empty head.

It is about YOU making statements that are inaccurate and then hypocritically trying to walk back what you stated with the same tired bullshit.

Go bother someone else.

"Lives rent free inside your head"

What is it that possesses people to reuse the same joke over and over again? That is a sign of stupidity. Its funny the first time you hear it, but not after the thousandth.

Please, can we retire this overly used joke? Lets bury it along side "thats what she said".

In some cases it is not a joke if the shoe fits.

Are you a dumbass or do you actually believe the civil war was fought in 1964?

What I believe is that you and your twin crash dummy are two of the most typical, abjectly stupid individuals that have posted here in years.

He statrted this by saying "you have to go back hundreds of years for evidence that America was a racist country. He was proven to be wrong.

Then you contributed your share of stupidity by trying to bring the same tired old "The Democrat party did it" talking point.

To the average black person living in America during Jim Crow, the north and the south were nearly transparent in what their day to day life experience was like. I have living relatives that are far older than my 65+ years, that experieced it in daily life all over this country. To them it was not a political party issue, it was an "America issue".

The states above the Mason Dixon line did not have the blatant public signs or laws on the books, however, some of the same practices were quietly carried out on a daily basis.

I recall taking two trips across the country from California to the east cost with my parents in the early 60's.

We were denied food, gas and lodging in Needles, California, Tucson, Arizona, and Albuquerque, New Mexico.

There were no signs that said so , but we were just told, "There are places that can help you down the road". So it did not matter as a black person if you were in the north or the south at that time, you were still affected to varying degrees by the Jim Crow culture in America.

As opposed to incessantly parroting the "Democrats did it" talking point, you would become more informed if you did some reading that tells the whole story of how the Jim Crow era affected the entire country before it was finally outlawed.

You do know it was Democrats that enacted the Jim Crow laws, correct? It got ridiculous and people said "Enough!"

Did southern republi

Are you a dumbass or do you actually believe the civil war was fought in 1964?

What I believe is that you and your twin crash dummy are two of the most typical, abjectly stupid individuals that have posted here in years.

He statrted this by saying "you have to go back hundreds of years for evidence that America was a racist country. He was proven to be wrong.

Then you contributed your share of stupidity by trying to bring the same tired old "The Democrat party did it" talking point.

To the average black person living in America during Jim Crow, the north and the south were nearly transparent in what their day to day life experience was like. I have living relatives that are far older than my 65+ years, that experieced it in daily life all over this country. To them it was not a political party issue, it was an "America issue".

The states above the Mason Dixon line did not have the blatant public signs or laws on the books, however, some of the same practices were quietly carried out on a daily basis.

I recall taking two trips across the country from California to the east cost with my parents in the early 60's.

We were denied food, gas and lodging in Needles, California, Tucson, Arizona, and Albuquerque, New Mexico.

There were no signs that said so , but we were just told, "There are places that can help you down the road". So it did not matter as a black person if you were in the north or the south at that time, you were still affected to varying degrees by the Jim Crow culture in America.

As opposed to incessantly parroting the "Democrats did it" talking point, you would become more informed if you did some reading that tells the whole story of how the Jim Crow era affected the entire country before it was finally outlawed.

This is your statement not mine/ post number 43’’’


“No you do not. Jim Crow laws were still in effect in southern states until 1964. There are still quite a few people living today who were affected by those laws, which were justified by a supposedly "seperate but equal" system.

Ever hear of the "Little Rock Nine"? Emmitt Till? The Montgomery Bus Boycott? The 16th Street Baptist church bombing?”


So yes! You never mentioned the north at all. So that makes you the ignorant one. I addressed your dumbasses statement about the South!

The Democrats ruled the Jim Crow era in the South!

So you are a master of the obvious? Everyone knows that Jim Crow laws originated in the south. Isn't the south part of America? You speak as if the north and south were in two different countries during that time,


And anyone who lived during that era and was subject to those laws ALSO experienced much of the same treatment in the north, you thick headed moron. I saw it myself.

Well you big assed dummy. Your first case scenario only included the south and the Jim Crow Democrats! Too ******* late to try to walk it back now!

Im not walking back anything, you dunce. This all started with another poster alleging that you had to go back "hundreds of years" to find evidence of racism in America.

I pointed out Jim Crow racism in the south......


THE SOUTH IS IN AMERICA, STUPID.

you keep making a dumbass of yourself
evidence of a racist NATION--NOT racism
post # 10

racist shithole nation.

post # 37

sure--the US is a racist nation

you keep fking up

 

[Godboy]

I do not need to re read anymore of what you post to understand that you are ignorant.

you are like the dumbass MSM/blacks/etc =you twist/turn/ignore/bullshit/etc the FACTS
FACT: not racism but racist nation

This has nothing to do with the "MSM/BLACK BOGEYMAN" that lives rent free inside of your empty head.

It is about YOU making statements that are inaccurate and then hypocritically trying to walk back what you stated with the same tired bullshit.

Go bother someone else.

"Lives rent free inside your head"

What is it that possesses people to reuse the same joke over and over again? That is a sign of stupidity. Its funny the first time you hear it, but not after the thousandth.

Please, can we retire this overly used joke? Lets bury it along side "thats what she said".

In some cases it is not a joke if the shoe fits.

What I believe is that you and your twin crash dummy are two of the most typical, abjectly stupid individuals that have posted here in years.

He statrted this by saying "you have to go back hundreds of years for evidence that America was a racist country. He was proven to be wrong.

Then you contributed your share of stupidity by trying to bring the same tired old "The Democrat party did it" talking point.

To the average black person living in America during Jim Crow, the north and the south were nearly transparent in what their day to day life experience was like. I have living relatives that are far older than my 65+ years, that experieced it in daily life all over this country. To them it was not a political party issue, it was an "America issue".

The states above the Mason Dixon line did not have the blatant public signs or laws on the books, however, some of the same practices were quietly carried out on a daily basis.

I recall taking two trips across the country from California to the east cost with my parents in the early 60's.

We were denied food, gas and lodging in Needles, California, Tucson, Arizona, and Albuquerque, New Mexico.

There were no signs that said so , but we were just told, "There are places that can help you down the road". So it did not matter as a black person if you were in the north or the south at that time, you were still affected to varying degrees by the Jim Crow culture in America.

As opposed to incessantly parroting the "Democrats did it" talking point, you would become more informed if you did some reading that tells the whole story of how the Jim Crow era affected the entire country before it was finally outlawed.

You do know it was Democrats that enacted the Jim Crow laws, correct? It got ridiculous and people said "Enough!"

Did southern republi

What I believe is that you and your twin crash dummy are two of the most typical, abjectly stupid individuals that have posted here in years.

He statrted this by saying "you have to go back hundreds of years for evidence that America was a racist country. He was proven to be wrong.

Then you contributed your share of stupidity by trying to bring the same tired old "The Democrat party did it" talking point.

To the average black person living in America during Jim Crow, the north and the south were nearly transparent in what their day to day life experience was like. I have living relatives that are far older than my 65+ years, that experieced it in daily life all over this country. To them it was not a political party issue, it was an "America issue".

The states above the Mason Dixon line did not have the blatant public signs or laws on the books, however, some of the same practices were quietly carried out on a daily basis.

I recall taking two trips across the country from California to the east cost with my parents in the early 60's.

We were denied food, gas and lodging in Needles, California, Tucson, Arizona, and Albuquerque, New Mexico.

There were no signs that said so , but we were just told, "There are places that can help you down the road". So it did not matter as a black person if you were in the north or the south at that time, you were still affected to varying degrees by the Jim Crow culture in America.

As opposed to incessantly parroting the "Democrats did it" talking point, you would become more informed if you did some reading that tells the whole story of how the Jim Crow era affected the entire country before it was finally outlawed.

This is your statement not mine/ post number 43’’’


“No you do not. Jim Crow laws were still in effect in southern states until 1964. There are still quite a few people living today who were affected by those laws, which were justified by a supposedly "seperate but equal" system.

Ever hear of the "Little Rock Nine"? Emmitt Till? The Montgomery Bus Boycott? The 16th Street Baptist church bombing?”


So yes! You never mentioned the north at all. So that makes you the ignorant one. I addressed your dumbasses statement about the South!

The Democrats ruled the Jim Crow era in the South!

So you are a master of the obvious? Everyone knows that Jim Crow laws originated in the south. Isn't the south part of America? You speak as if the north and south were in two different countries during that time,


And anyone who lived during that era and was subject to those laws ALSO experienced much of the same treatment in the north, you thick headed moron. I saw it myself.

Well you big assed dummy. Your first case scenario only included the south and the Jim Crow Democrats! Too ******* late to try to walk it back now!

Im not walking back anything, you dunce. This all started with another poster alleging that you had to go back "hundreds of years" to find evidence of racism in America.

I pointed out Jim Crow racism in the south......


THE SOUTH IS IN AMERICA, STUPID.

you keep making a dumbass of yourself
evidence of a racist NATION--NOT racism
post # 10

racist shithole nation.

post # 37

sure--the US is a racist nation

you keep fking up

hamonica just smashed you, Katsteve

 

[harmonica]

you are like the dumbass MSM/blacks/etc =you twist/turn/ignore/bullshit/etc the FACTS
FACT: not racism but racist nation

This has nothing to do with the "MSM/BLACK BOGEYMAN" that lives rent free inside of your empty head.

It is about YOU making statements that are inaccurate and then hypocritically trying to walk back what you stated with the same tired bullshit.

Go bother someone else.

"Lives rent free inside your head"

What is it that possesses people to reuse the same joke over and over again? That is a sign of stupidity. Its funny the first time you hear it, but not after the thousandth.

Please, can we retire this overly used joke? Lets bury it along side "thats what she said".

In some cases it is not a joke if the shoe fits.

You do know it was Democrats that enacted the Jim Crow laws, correct? It got ridiculous and people said "Enough!"

Did southern republi

This is your statement not mine/ post number 43’’’


“No you do not. Jim Crow laws were still in effect in southern states until 1964. There are still quite a few people living today who were affected by those laws, which were justified by a supposedly "seperate but equal" system.

Ever hear of the "Little Rock Nine"? Emmitt Till? The Montgomery Bus Boycott? The 16th Street Baptist church bombing?”


So yes! You never mentioned the north at all. So that makes you the ignorant one. I addressed your dumbasses statement about the South!

The Democrats ruled the Jim Crow era in the South!

So you are a master of the obvious? Everyone knows that Jim Crow laws originated in the south. Isn't the south part of America? You speak as if the north and south were in two different countries during that time,


And anyone who lived during that era and was subject to those laws ALSO experienced much of the same treatment in the north, you thick headed moron. I saw it myself.

Well you big assed dummy. Your first case scenario only included the south and the Jim Crow Democrats! Too ******* late to try to walk it back now!

Im not walking back anything, you dunce. This all started with another poster alleging that you had to go back "hundreds of years" to find evidence of racism in America.

I pointed out Jim Crow racism in the south......


THE SOUTH IS IN AMERICA, STUPID.

you keep making a dumbass of yourself
evidence of a racist NATION--NOT racism
post # 10

racist shithole nation.

post # 37

sure--the US is a racist nation

you keep fking up

hamonica just smashed you, Katsteve

I know there is racism because most of it comes from the left/blacks

 

[IM2]

you are like the dumbass MSM/blacks/etc =you twist/turn/ignore/bullshit/etc the FACTS
FACT: not racism but racist nation

This has nothing to do with the "MSM/BLACK BOGEYMAN" that lives rent free inside of your empty head.

It is about YOU making statements that are inaccurate and then hypocritically trying to walk back what you stated with the same tired bullshit.

Go bother someone else.

"Lives rent free inside your head"

What is it that possesses people to reuse the same joke over and over again? That is a sign of stupidity. Its funny the first time you hear it, but not after the thousandth.

Please, can we retire this overly used joke? Lets bury it along side "thats what she said".

In some cases it is not a joke if the shoe fits.

You do know it was Democrats that enacted the Jim Crow laws, correct? It got ridiculous and people said "Enough!"

Did southern republi

This is your statement not mine/ post number 43’’’


“No you do not. Jim Crow laws were still in effect in southern states until 1964. There are still quite a few people living today who were affected by those laws, which were justified by a supposedly "seperate but equal" system.

Ever hear of the "Little Rock Nine"? Emmitt Till? The Montgomery Bus Boycott? The 16th Street Baptist church bombing?”


So yes! You never mentioned the north at all. So that makes you the ignorant one. I addressed your dumbasses statement about the South!

The Democrats ruled the Jim Crow era in the South!

So you are a master of the obvious? Everyone knows that Jim Crow laws originated in the south. Isn't the south part of America? You speak as if the north and south were in two different countries during that time,


And anyone who lived during that era and was subject to those laws ALSO experienced much of the same treatment in the north, you thick headed moron. I saw it myself.

Well you big assed dummy. Your first case scenario only included the south and the Jim Crow Democrats! Too ******* late to try to walk it back now!

Im not walking back anything, you dunce. This all started with another poster alleging that you had to go back "hundreds of years" to find evidence of racism in America.

I pointed out Jim Crow racism in the south......


THE SOUTH IS IN AMERICA, STUPID.

you keep making a dumbass of yourself
evidence of a racist NATION--NOT racism
post # 10

racist shithole nation.

post # 37

sure--the US is a racist nation

you keep fking up

hamonica just smashed you, Katsteve

Only in the mind of the white racist.

 

[harmonica]

This has nothing to do with the "MSM/BLACK BOGEYMAN" that lives rent free inside of your empty head.

It is about YOU making statements that are inaccurate and then hypocritically trying to walk back what you stated with the same tired bullshit.

Go bother someone else.

"Lives rent free inside your head"

What is it that possesses people to reuse the same joke over and over again? That is a sign of stupidity. Its funny the first time you hear it, but not after the thousandth.

Please, can we retire this overly used joke? Lets bury it along side "thats what she said".

In some cases it is not a joke if the shoe fits.

Did southern republi
So you are a master of the obvious? Everyone knows that Jim Crow laws originated in the south. Isn't the south part of America? You speak as if the north and south were in two different countries during that time,


And anyone who lived during that era and was subject to those laws ALSO experienced much of the same treatment in the north, you thick headed moron. I saw it myself.

Well you big assed dummy. Your first case scenario only included the south and the Jim Crow Democrats! Too ******* late to try to walk it back now!

Im not walking back anything, you dunce. This all started with another poster alleging that you had to go back "hundreds of years" to find evidence of racism in America.

I pointed out Jim Crow racism in the south......


THE SOUTH IS IN AMERICA, STUPID.

you keep making a dumbass of yourself
evidence of a racist NATION--NOT racism
post # 10

racist shithole nation.

post # 37

sure--the US is a racist nation

you keep fking up

hamonica just smashed you, Katsteve

Only in the mind of the white racist.

who would that be?

 

[Godboy]

This has nothing to do with the "MSM/BLACK BOGEYMAN" that lives rent free inside of your empty head.

It is about YOU making statements that are inaccurate and then hypocritically trying to walk back what you stated with the same tired bullshit.

Go bother someone else.

"Lives rent free inside your head"

What is it that possesses people to reuse the same joke over and over again? That is a sign of stupidity. Its funny the first time you hear it, but not after the thousandth.

Please, can we retire this overly used joke? Lets bury it along side "thats what she said".

In some cases it is not a joke if the shoe fits.

Did southern republi
So you are a master of the obvious? Everyone knows that Jim Crow laws originated in the south. Isn't the south part of America? You speak as if the north and south were in two different countries during that time,


And anyone who lived during that era and was subject to those laws ALSO experienced much of the same treatment in the north, you thick headed moron. I saw it myself.

Well you big assed dummy. Your first case scenario only included the south and the Jim Crow Democrats! Too ******* late to try to walk it back now!

Im not walking back anything, you dunce. This all started with another poster alleging that you had to go back "hundreds of years" to find evidence of racism in America.

I pointed out Jim Crow racism in the south......


THE SOUTH IS IN AMERICA, STUPID.

you keep making a dumbass of yourself
evidence of a racist NATION--NOT racism
post # 10

racist shithole nation.

post # 37

sure--the US is a racist nation

you keep fking up

hamonica just smashed you, Katsteve

Only in the mind of the white racist.

Says the black racist.