Gay Adult Wants vs Children's Needs: Mississippi Weighs Gay Adoption

[bodecea]

i suppose I'm not as fearful of homosexuality as you are. I don't see a threat there.

I also am not as judgmental as you seem to be. Groups don't threaten, individuals do. And as no individual homosexual has ever posed any threat at all against me or my family, I have no reason to see them or their peccadilloes as "wrong" against anything.

You've got to be taught to judge. You've got to be taught to hate.

I'm not fearful of it either. Sad you consider thinking something is wrong as being afraid of it.

It's wrong against nature. When you can show me where two males can butt **** each other and produce a child, I'll change my opinion.

Flying in an airplane is "against nature". You can't flap your arms and fly no matter how hard you try. And?

Trying to flap your arms and fly is against nature. Flying in something that simulates the same concept of things that naturally fly is natural.

What's not natural is two people of the same sex pretending that's the way it is designed to be.

Says you. Marriage also isn't natural. It's a human societal construct.

Says you. If it's a societal construct, it's natural. Society made it so.

That was priceless.

 

[bodecea]

So? Do you not understand the concept of 2nd or step parent?

A legally married couple uses a sperm bank, has a child. Why should the non biological parent be prevented from taking legal responsibility for their child?

When you say legally married couple, do you mean homosexual couples?

It doesn't matter. Marriage is marriage. Answer the question.

Let me correct something for you. Based on your example, if the couple has to go to a sperm bank, one would assume it means the male is where the problem lies. The only biological parent in that situation is the female. That being the case, for the male, it isn't HIS child. To say "their" child is factually incorrect from a scientific standpoint.

If the couple is homosexual, the only way that can happen is with lesbians. One lesbian can get pregnant from a sperm bank but the other one can't provide the sperm. Therefore, it isn't the non-birthing lesbian's child. It's the one that gave birth and sperm donor's child.

Marriage isn't marriage. No matter how much you freaks want to believe so, your unnatural marriages to the same sex will never be to the level of my normal heterosexual marriage. You don't have to like it as that will never be a requirement for it to be so.

You certainly think on this and the process.....a lot.

And our marriages are just as legal as yours.......perhaps even more so since we've worked so hard to get where we are and you.......have Las Vegas quicky marriages and have had them for a while.

I respond to those who think differently.

I didn't say it wasn't as legal just not to the same level as a natural marriage between male/female. You won't ever be to my level as long as you are with the same sex.

Ah....one of life's blessings.

 

[Conservative65]

Our children are doing just fine. They are all wanted and cherished......not oopsies.

You know...these haters refuse to answer why they are opposed to even a partner adopting their own children as a 2nd/step parent. These are children born into the relationship.

A child can't be born into a homo relationship unless you're willing to prove to males can produce a child. One of them can be the biological parent of their own child but the partner can't be.

And.....? You want to stick your nose into that, why?

Because people like you expect those of us that consider it unnatural to accept it happening.

Well, you are certainly allowed to pretend all you want. We continue to legally marry and live our lives. Sorry you seem to have a bad day because gay couples are legally marry. You can stand outside courthouses and pout if you'd like.

You continue to be freaks and 2nd class.

 

[Conservative65]

I'm not fearful of it either. Sad you consider thinking something is wrong as being afraid of it.

It's wrong against nature. When you can show me where two males can butt **** each other and produce a child, I'll change my opinion.

Flying in an airplane is "against nature". You can't flap your arms and fly no matter how hard you try. And?

Trying to flap your arms and fly is against nature. Flying in something that simulates the same concept of things that naturally fly is natural.

What's not natural is two people of the same sex pretending that's the way it is designed to be.

Says you. Marriage also isn't natural. It's a human societal construct.

Says you. If it's a societal construct, it's natural. Society made it so.

That was priceless.

The difference is faggots marrying isn't a societal construct, it's something a very small number of agenda minded judges said can happen. There is a difference you don't get.

 

[Conservative65]

When you say legally married couple, do you mean homosexual couples?

It doesn't matter. Marriage is marriage. Answer the question.

Let me correct something for you. Based on your example, if the couple has to go to a sperm bank, one would assume it means the male is where the problem lies. The only biological parent in that situation is the female. That being the case, for the male, it isn't HIS child. To say "their" child is factually incorrect from a scientific standpoint.

If the couple is homosexual, the only way that can happen is with lesbians. One lesbian can get pregnant from a sperm bank but the other one can't provide the sperm. Therefore, it isn't the non-birthing lesbian's child. It's the one that gave birth and sperm donor's child.

Marriage isn't marriage. No matter how much you freaks want to believe so, your unnatural marriages to the same sex will never be to the level of my normal heterosexual marriage. You don't have to like it as that will never be a requirement for it to be so.

You certainly think on this and the process.....a lot.

And our marriages are just as legal as yours.......perhaps even more so since we've worked so hard to get where we are and you.......have Las Vegas quicky marriages and have had them for a while.

I respond to those who think differently.

I didn't say it wasn't as legal just not to the same level as a natural marriage between male/female. You won't ever be to my level as long as you are with the same sex.

Ah....one of life's blessings.

Don't assume that meant as high of a level as me. That you choose to be unnatural is a curse.

 

[bodecea]

You know...these haters refuse to answer why they are opposed to even a partner adopting their own children as a 2nd/step parent. These are children born into the relationship.

A child can't be born into a homo relationship unless you're willing to prove to males can produce a child. One of them can be the biological parent of their own child but the partner can't be.

And.....? You want to stick your nose into that, why?

Because people like you expect those of us that consider it unnatural to accept it happening.

Well, you are certainly allowed to pretend all you want. We continue to legally marry and live our lives. Sorry you seem to have a bad day because gay couples are legally marry. You can stand outside courthouses and pout if you'd like.

You continue to be freaks and 2nd class.

You keep telling yourself that. I'm sure it makes you feel less of a failure when you do.

 

[bodecea]

Flying in an airplane is "against nature". You can't flap your arms and fly no matter how hard you try. And?

Trying to flap your arms and fly is against nature. Flying in something that simulates the same concept of things that naturally fly is natural.

What's not natural is two people of the same sex pretending that's the way it is designed to be.

Says you. Marriage also isn't natural. It's a human societal construct.

Says you. If it's a societal construct, it's natural. Society made it so.

That was priceless.

The difference is faggots marrying isn't a societal construct, it's something a very small number of agenda minded judges said can happen. There is a difference you don't get.

I understand the Constitution. I understand the 14th amendment. I understand you seem to have some issue with your fellow American citizens, some demons of your own. *shrug* Not my problem to accept your demons.

 

[Conservative65]

A child can't be born into a homo relationship unless you're willing to prove to males can produce a child. One of them can be the biological parent of their own child but the partner can't be.

And.....? You want to stick your nose into that, why?

Because people like you expect those of us that consider it unnatural to accept it happening.

Well, you are certainly allowed to pretend all you want. We continue to legally marry and live our lives. Sorry you seem to have a bad day because gay couples are legally marry. You can stand outside courthouses and pout if you'd like.

You continue to be freaks and 2nd class.

You keep telling yourself that. I'm sure it makes you feel less of a failure when you do.

I'm a male married to a female. That automatically means I have value. You're with the same sex which automatically makes you unnatural. I don't have to tell myself anything. It's an automatic much like breathing.

 

[bodecea]

It doesn't matter. Marriage is marriage. Answer the question.

Let me correct something for you. Based on your example, if the couple has to go to a sperm bank, one would assume it means the male is where the problem lies. The only biological parent in that situation is the female. That being the case, for the male, it isn't HIS child. To say "their" child is factually incorrect from a scientific standpoint.

If the couple is homosexual, the only way that can happen is with lesbians. One lesbian can get pregnant from a sperm bank but the other one can't provide the sperm. Therefore, it isn't the non-birthing lesbian's child. It's the one that gave birth and sperm donor's child.

Marriage isn't marriage. No matter how much you freaks want to believe so, your unnatural marriages to the same sex will never be to the level of my normal heterosexual marriage. You don't have to like it as that will never be a requirement for it to be so.

You certainly think on this and the process.....a lot.

And our marriages are just as legal as yours.......perhaps even more so since we've worked so hard to get where we are and you.......have Las Vegas quicky marriages and have had them for a while.

I respond to those who think differently.

I didn't say it wasn't as legal just not to the same level as a natural marriage between male/female. You won't ever be to my level as long as you are with the same sex.

Ah....one of life's blessings.

Don't assume that meant as high of a level as me. That you choose to be unnatural is a curse.

This is getting more and more interesting watching you try to boost your own self esteem like that.

 

[bodecea]

And.....? You want to stick your nose into that, why?

Because people like you expect those of us that consider it unnatural to accept it happening.

Well, you are certainly allowed to pretend all you want. We continue to legally marry and live our lives. Sorry you seem to have a bad day because gay couples are legally marry. You can stand outside courthouses and pout if you'd like.

You continue to be freaks and 2nd class.

You keep telling yourself that. I'm sure it makes you feel less of a failure when you do.

I'm a male married to a female. That automatically means I have value. You're with the same sex which automatically makes you unnatural. I don't have to tell myself anything. It's an automatic much like breathing.

I bet you have to stand in front of a mirror each day to tell yourself that. "I have value" "I have value" "I have value"..........

 

[Conservative65]

Trying to flap your arms and fly is against nature. Flying in something that simulates the same concept of things that naturally fly is natural.

What's not natural is two people of the same sex pretending that's the way it is designed to be.

Says you. Marriage also isn't natural. It's a human societal construct.

Says you. If it's a societal construct, it's natural. Society made it so.

That was priceless.

The difference is faggots marrying isn't a societal construct, it's something a very small number of agenda minded judges said can happen. There is a difference you don't get.

I understand the Constitution. I understand the 14th amendment. I understand you seem to have some issue with your fellow American citizens, some demons of your own. *shrug* Not my problem to accept your demons.

Apparently the agenda minded judges don't.

You say you agree with the decision about faggots and equal protection. Does that mean you would support someone marrying more than one spouse if all were consenting? What about a brother/sister, mother/son, or father/daughter under the same conditions?

 

[bodecea]

Says you. Marriage also isn't natural. It's a human societal construct.

Says you. If it's a societal construct, it's natural. Society made it so.

That was priceless.

The difference is faggots marrying isn't a societal construct, it's something a very small number of agenda minded judges said can happen. There is a difference you don't get.

I understand the Constitution. I understand the 14th amendment. I understand you seem to have some issue with your fellow American citizens, some demons of your own. *shrug* Not my problem to accept your demons.

Apparently the agenda minded judges don't.

You say you agree with the decision about faggots and equal protection. Does that mean you would support someone marrying more than one spouse if all were consenting? What about a brother/sister, mother/son, or father/daughter under the same conditions?

Make your case in a court of law. Good luck to you.

 

[Conservative65]

Let me correct something for you. Based on your example, if the couple has to go to a sperm bank, one would assume it means the male is where the problem lies. The only biological parent in that situation is the female. That being the case, for the male, it isn't HIS child. To say "their" child is factually incorrect from a scientific standpoint.

If the couple is homosexual, the only way that can happen is with lesbians. One lesbian can get pregnant from a sperm bank but the other one can't provide the sperm. Therefore, it isn't the non-birthing lesbian's child. It's the one that gave birth and sperm donor's child.

Marriage isn't marriage. No matter how much you freaks want to believe so, your unnatural marriages to the same sex will never be to the level of my normal heterosexual marriage. You don't have to like it as that will never be a requirement for it to be so.

You certainly think on this and the process.....a lot.

And our marriages are just as legal as yours.......perhaps even more so since we've worked so hard to get where we are and you.......have Las Vegas quicky marriages and have had them for a while.

I respond to those who think differently.

I didn't say it wasn't as legal just not to the same level as a natural marriage between male/female. You won't ever be to my level as long as you are with the same sex.

Ah....one of life's blessings.

Don't assume that meant as high of a level as me. That you choose to be unnatural is a curse.

This is getting more and more interesting watching you try to boost your own self esteem like that.

I don't have to boost it. That I married the natural way to a female, it's self boosting. That you are with someone of the same sex is more life defecation. In other words, it's shit.

 

[Conservative65]

Says you. If it's a societal construct, it's natural. Society made it so.

That was priceless.

The difference is faggots marrying isn't a societal construct, it's something a very small number of agenda minded judges said can happen. There is a difference you don't get.

I understand the Constitution. I understand the 14th amendment. I understand you seem to have some issue with your fellow American citizens, some demons of your own. *shrug* Not my problem to accept your demons.

Apparently the agenda minded judges don't.

You say you agree with the decision about faggots and equal protection. Does that mean you would support someone marrying more than one spouse if all were consenting? What about a brother/sister, mother/son, or father/daughter under the same conditions?

Make your case in a court of law. Good luck to you.

I expect those of you that argue equal protection to support it. If you support equal protection, surely you support those who want those types of marriages being treated equally. Since you don't, you're about nothing more than an agenda. One can only hope your partner brings AIDS to the relationship.

 

[bodecea]

You certainly think on this and the process.....a lot.

And our marriages are just as legal as yours.......perhaps even more so since we've worked so hard to get where we are and you.......have Las Vegas quicky marriages and have had them for a while.

I respond to those who think differently.

I didn't say it wasn't as legal just not to the same level as a natural marriage between male/female. You won't ever be to my level as long as you are with the same sex.

Ah....one of life's blessings.

Don't assume that meant as high of a level as me. That you choose to be unnatural is a curse.

This is getting more and more interesting watching you try to boost your own self esteem like that.

I don't have to boost it. That I married the natural way to a female, it's self boosting. That you are with someone of the same sex is more life defecation. In other words, it's shit.

I see that your issues with self esteem are pretty severe, my friend. How did you get to this....place....where the only way you can feel right about yourself is by saying such things to your fellow citizens?

 

[Conservative65]

Because people like you expect those of us that consider it unnatural to accept it happening.

Well, you are certainly allowed to pretend all you want. We continue to legally marry and live our lives. Sorry you seem to have a bad day because gay couples are legally marry. You can stand outside courthouses and pout if you'd like.

You continue to be freaks and 2nd class.

You keep telling yourself that. I'm sure it makes you feel less of a failure when you do.

I'm a male married to a female. That automatically means I have value. You're with the same sex which automatically makes you unnatural. I don't have to tell myself anything. It's an automatic much like breathing.

I bet you have to stand in front of a mirror each day to tell yourself that. "I have value" "I have value" "I have value"..........

Not necessary.

What you should do is stand in front of the mirror and look at a 2nd rate freak and be ashamed of what you are.

 

[bodecea]

That was priceless.

The difference is faggots marrying isn't a societal construct, it's something a very small number of agenda minded judges said can happen. There is a difference you don't get.

I understand the Constitution. I understand the 14th amendment. I understand you seem to have some issue with your fellow American citizens, some demons of your own. *shrug* Not my problem to accept your demons.

Apparently the agenda minded judges don't.

You say you agree with the decision about faggots and equal protection. Does that mean you would support someone marrying more than one spouse if all were consenting? What about a brother/sister, mother/son, or father/daughter under the same conditions?

Make your case in a court of law. Good luck to you.

I expect those of you that argue equal protection to support it. If you support equal protection, surely you support those who want those types of marriages being treated equally. Since you don't, you're about nothing more than an agenda. One can only hope your partner brings AIDS to the relationship.

Make your legal case for bigamy, my friend. If it stands up Constitutionally, I will not condemn you. I will not call you names. I will support the legality of your marriage(s). But, like we gays did, make your legal case first.

 

[Conservative65]

I respond to those who think differently.

I didn't say it wasn't as legal just not to the same level as a natural marriage between male/female. You won't ever be to my level as long as you are with the same sex.

Ah....one of life's blessings.

Don't assume that meant as high of a level as me. That you choose to be unnatural is a curse.

This is getting more and more interesting watching you try to boost your own self esteem like that.

I don't have to boost it. That I married the natural way to a female, it's self boosting. That you are with someone of the same sex is more life defecation. In other words, it's shit.

I see that your issues with self esteem are pretty severe, my friend. How did you get to this....place....where the only way you can feel right about yourself is by saying such things to your fellow citizens?

I have high self esteem. That's what doing thing the natural and normal way produce.

I felt good about myself before ever conversing with you for that same reason.

I'm speaking at you not to you.

 

[bodecea]

Well, you are certainly allowed to pretend all you want. We continue to legally marry and live our lives. Sorry you seem to have a bad day because gay couples are legally marry. You can stand outside courthouses and pout if you'd like.

You continue to be freaks and 2nd class.

You keep telling yourself that. I'm sure it makes you feel less of a failure when you do.

I'm a male married to a female. That automatically means I have value. You're with the same sex which automatically makes you unnatural. I don't have to tell myself anything. It's an automatic much like breathing.

I bet you have to stand in front of a mirror each day to tell yourself that. "I have value" "I have value" "I have value"..........

Not necessary.

What you should do is stand in front of the mirror and look at a 2nd rate freak and be ashamed of what you are.

I look in the mirror and see a person who does not need to denigrate my fellow citizens in order to feel like I have some worth.

 

[Conservative65]

The difference is faggots marrying isn't a societal construct, it's something a very small number of agenda minded judges said can happen. There is a difference you don't get.

I understand the Constitution. I understand the 14th amendment. I understand you seem to have some issue with your fellow American citizens, some demons of your own. *shrug* Not my problem to accept your demons.

Apparently the agenda minded judges don't.

You say you agree with the decision about faggots and equal protection. Does that mean you would support someone marrying more than one spouse if all were consenting? What about a brother/sister, mother/son, or father/daughter under the same conditions?

Make your case in a court of law. Good luck to you.

I expect those of you that argue equal protection to support it. If you support equal protection, surely you support those who want those types of marriages being treated equally. Since you don't, you're about nothing more than an agenda. One can only hope your partner brings AIDS to the relationship.

Make your legal case for bigamy, my friend. If it stands up Constitutionally, I will not condemn you. I will not call you names. I will support the legality of your marriage(s). But, like we gays did, make your legal case first.

Your case wasn't decided on marriage. If you think so, you're a fool and a freak. The case was decided on equal protection, something you obviously oppose for others.