Funny Pro 2nd Amendment Memes

[HereWeGoAgain]

Um, Ft. Hood was an Army base, and the only guys shooting it up were people who were STATIONED THERE! That the Army taught how to use guns!

The difference is our memes are based on reality - yours are just distorted views.

Yeah, your reality is one where most of the rest of the world where they've already figured this out doesn't exist.

/——-/ you quote the Onion and expect us to take you seriously? Go live somewhere else that bans guns if you’re so skered

It is the gun nuts who are scared. They're scared of life. So scared they have to carry around guns to feel safe. Stupid. Silly. Childish.

/——/That’s the best you got? Childish insults? Keep up the good work

I'm not insulting you when I say you're scared of life. I'm making a statement of fact. It is the only logical explanation for why gun nuts cling to guns when they are absolutely unnecessary. Being scared of life is silly, immature, foolish. That's a fact. There is nothing logical in being afraid of life. You take what I said as an insult because you can't see your foolish behavior. But it's not an insult. It is a statement of FACT.

I guess you should cancel your medical insurance post haste.
What are you afraid of?

 

[Esmeralda]

All of these innocent kids are dead and you create a thread to make fun of any kind of control on guns. You're sick.

/----/ Those kids are dead because of your liberal policies. Part of being liberal is never admitting your policies are failures. You just double down on stupidity.

Those kids are dead because of the gun. Period. End of.

/——/ So if the crazy had used homemade pipe bombs the kids would still be alive?

You're deflecting. Mass shootings. Anytime, anywhere, ever over time, without a gun. Come on, show me one mass shooting without a gun.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Have heard of the causal chain? Probably not as logic seems to be completely foreign to you.

Well then, let's hear that logic in action! Please explain to us, using simple words so we can understand, how the concept of causal chain justifies gun free zones and more importantly, how they deter evil people from doing bad things.

For those who are not as learned nor as intelligent as you clearly are, here's what Webster has to say about the legal definition of chain of causation: the causal connection between an original cause and its subsequent effects especially as a basis for criminal or civil liability.

Enlighten us oh logical one!

The original cause of the murder is the gun. Without the gun there would be no murder, no need for gun free zones. The causal chain begins with the cause, and the cause is the gun. Take the gun away and the entire chain collapses.

/——/ Except for the home made explosives...

Show me one mass shooting that has occurred without a gun.

Not attacks or murders in general: mass shootings.

This has got to be the dumbest question of the year.

 

[Esmeralda]

Have heard of the causal chain? Probably not as logic seems to be completely foreign to you.

Well then, let's hear that logic in action! Please explain to us, using simple words so we can understand, how the concept of causal chain justifies gun free zones and more importantly, how they deter evil people from doing bad things.

For those who are not as learned nor as intelligent as you clearly are, here's what Webster has to say about the legal definition of chain of causation: the causal connection between an original cause and its subsequent effects especially as a basis for criminal or civil liability.

Enlighten us oh logical one!

The original cause of the murder is the gun. Without the gun there would be no murder, no need for gun free zones. The causal chain begins with the cause, and the cause is the gun. Take the gun away and the entire chain collapses.

/——/ Except for the home made explosives...

All the other ways of killing masses of people are more complicated and difficult: so your solution is just to make it easier for the killer and provide him with easy to acquire, cheap, automatic rifles. That's very logical, if your objective is to allow/help depraved people to kill masses and masses of people.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

All of these innocent kids are dead and you create a thread to make fun of any kind of control on guns. You're sick.

/----/ Those kids are dead because of your liberal policies. Part of being liberal is never admitting your policies are failures. You just double down on stupidity.

Those kids are dead because of the gun. Period. End of.

/——/ So if the crazy had used homemade pipe bombs the kids would still be alive?

You're deflecting. Mass shootings. Anytime, anywhere, ever over time, without a gun. Come on, show me one mass shooting without a gun.

Show me where there were no deaths from crashing airplanes from crashing airplanes.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Have heard of the causal chain? Probably not as logic seems to be completely foreign to you.

Well then, let's hear that logic in action! Please explain to us, using simple words so we can understand, how the concept of causal chain justifies gun free zones and more importantly, how they deter evil people from doing bad things.

For those who are not as learned nor as intelligent as you clearly are, here's what Webster has to say about the legal definition of chain of causation: the causal connection between an original cause and its subsequent effects especially as a basis for criminal or civil liability.

Enlighten us oh logical one!

The original cause of the murder is the gun. Without the gun there would be no murder, no need for gun free zones. The causal chain begins with the cause, and the cause is the gun. Take the gun away and the entire chain collapses.

/——/ Except for the home made explosives...

All the other ways of killing masses of people are more complicated and difficult: so you solution is just to make it easier for the killer and provide him with easy to acquire, cheap, automatic rifles.

Oh I dont know...it's pretty easy to kill a bunch of people by driving a truck through a crowd,as we've seen.

 

[Cellblock2429]

All of these innocent kids are dead and you create a thread to make fun of any kind of control on guns. You're sick.

/----/ Those kids are dead because of your liberal policies. Part of being liberal is never admitting your policies are failures. You just double down on stupidity.

Those kids are dead because of the gun. Period. End of.

/——/ So if the crazy had used homemade pipe bombs the kids would still be alive?

You're deflecting. Mass shootings. Anytime, anywhere, ever over time, without a gun. Come on, show me one mass shooting without a gun.

/——/ I’m not deflecting. The crazy loon was determined to kill at his old school. He would have found a different method.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Have heard of the causal chain? Probably not as logic seems to be completely foreign to you.

Well then, let's hear that logic in action! Please explain to us, using simple words so we can understand, how the concept of causal chain justifies gun free zones and more importantly, how they deter evil people from doing bad things.

For those who are not as learned nor as intelligent as you clearly are, here's what Webster has to say about the legal definition of chain of causation: the causal connection between an original cause and its subsequent effects especially as a basis for criminal or civil liability.

Enlighten us oh logical one!

The original cause of the murder is the gun. Without the gun there would be no murder, no need for gun free zones. The causal chain begins with the cause, and the cause is the gun. Take the gun away and the entire chain collapses.

/——/ Except for the home made explosives...

All the other ways of killing masses of people are more complicated and difficult: so your solution is just to make it easier for the killer and provide him with easy to acquire, cheap, automatic rifles. That's very logical, if your objective is to allow/help depraved people to kill masses and masses of people.

/——-/ ban guns like in Detroit and Chicago? Is that your solution?

 

[Cellblock2429]

Have heard of the causal chain? Probably not as logic seems to be completely foreign to you.

Well then, let's hear that logic in action! Please explain to us, using simple words so we can understand, how the concept of causal chain justifies gun free zones and more importantly, how they deter evil people from doing bad things.

For those who are not as learned nor as intelligent as you clearly are, here's what Webster has to say about the legal definition of chain of causation: the causal connection between an original cause and its subsequent effects especially as a basis for criminal or civil liability.

Enlighten us oh logical one!

The original cause of the murder is the gun. Without the gun there would be no murder, no need for gun free zones. The causal chain begins with the cause, and the cause is the gun. Take the gun away and the entire chain collapses.

/——/ Except for the home made explosives...

Show me one mass shooting that has occurred without a gun.

Not attacks or murders in general: mass shootings.

/——/ Show me one plane crash without a plane. Show me one vehicular homicide without a vehicle. Show me one stabbing without a knife. Show me one scrambled egg without an egg....

 

[Cellblock2429]

Um, Ft. Hood was an Army base, and the only guys shooting it up were people who were STATIONED THERE! That the Army taught how to use guns!

The difference is our memes are based on reality - yours are just distorted views.

Yeah, your reality is one where most of the rest of the world where they've already figured this out doesn't exist.

/——-/ you quote the Onion and expect us to take you seriously? Go live somewhere else that bans guns if you’re so skered

It is the gun nuts who are scared. They're scared of life. So scared they have to carry around guns to feel safe. Stupid. Silly. Childish.

/——/That’s the best you got? Childish insults? Keep up the good work

I'm not insulting you when I say you're scared of life. I'm making a statement of fact. It is the only logical explanation for why gun nuts cling to guns when they are absolutely unnecessary. Being scared of life is silly, immature, foolish. That's a fact. There is nothing logical in being afraid of life. You take what I said as an insult because you can't see your foolish behavior. But it's not an insult. It is a statement of FACT.

/——/ I’m not afraid of life. Stop locking your front door. What are you afraid of? Stop wearing a seat belt. What are you afraid of?

 

[Esmeralda]

All of these innocent kids are dead and you create a thread to make fun of any kind of control on guns. You're sick.

/----/ Those kids are dead because of your liberal policies. Part of being liberal is never admitting your policies are failures. You just double down on stupidity.

Those kids are dead because of the gun. Period. End of.

/——/ So if the crazy had used homemade pipe bombs the kids would still be alive?

You're deflecting. Mass shootings. Anytime, anywhere, ever over time, without a gun. Come on, show me one mass shooting without a gun.

/——/ I’m not deflecting. The crazy loon was determined to kill at his old school. He would have found a different method.

So you make it easiest for him to go ahead with his murderous plans by providing a semi-automatic military assault weapon at a cheap price and throw in lots of ammunition? How nice of you, to help a depraved murderer out that way.

 

[Esmeralda]

Um, Ft. Hood was an Army base, and the only guys shooting it up were people who were STATIONED THERE! That the Army taught how to use guns!

Yeah, your reality is one where most of the rest of the world where they've already figured this out doesn't exist.

/——-/ you quote the Onion and expect us to take you seriously? Go live somewhere else that bans guns if you’re so skered

It is the gun nuts who are scared. They're scared of life. So scared they have to carry around guns to feel safe. Stupid. Silly. Childish.

/——/That’s the best you got? Childish insults? Keep up the good work

I'm not insulting you when I say you're scared of life. I'm making a statement of fact. It is the only logical explanation for why gun nuts cling to guns when they are absolutely unnecessary. Being scared of life is silly, immature, foolish. That's a fact. There is nothing logical in being afraid of life. You take what I said as an insult because you can't see your foolish behavior. But it's not an insult. It is a statement of FACT.

/——/ I’m not afraid of life. Stop locking your front door. What are you afraid of? Stop wearing a seat belt. What are you afraid of?

I'm not afraid of anything. I've lived on my own for years. I've traveled all over the world independently. I've lived in 6 different countries outside the US: and I've never felt the need to carry a weapon or have one in my home. Being so afraid of life you need a firearm in your home and to carry around with you is not rational, not reasonable, not based in reality.

 

[Esmeralda]

Have heard of the causal chain? Probably not as logic seems to be completely foreign to you.

Well then, let's hear that logic in action! Please explain to us, using simple words so we can understand, how the concept of causal chain justifies gun free zones and more importantly, how they deter evil people from doing bad things.

For those who are not as learned nor as intelligent as you clearly are, here's what Webster has to say about the legal definition of chain of causation: the causal connection between an original cause and its subsequent effects especially as a basis for criminal or civil liability.

Enlighten us oh logical one!

The original cause of the murder is the gun. Without the gun there would be no murder, no need for gun free zones. The causal chain begins with the cause, and the cause is the gun. Take the gun away and the entire chain collapses.

/——/ Except for the home made explosives...

Show me one mass shooting that has occurred without a gun.

Not attacks or murders in general: mass shootings.

/——/ Show me one plane crash without a plane. Show me one vehicular homicide without a vehicle. Show me one stabbing without a knife. Show me one scrambled egg without an egg....

Your argument is fallacious. It is a logical fallacy to compare accidents that happen during the use of every day items to the use of guns. Guns have only one purpose: to kill. Cars, knives, planes, eggs, are all items that belong in every day life and when they result in injury or death, it is because of an accident. When a gun is used to kill, it is fulfilling its purpose. Seriously: you people do not know how to think.

 

[Esmeralda]

Have heard of the causal chain? Probably not as logic seems to be completely foreign to you.

Well then, let's hear that logic in action! Please explain to us, using simple words so we can understand, how the concept of causal chain justifies gun free zones and more importantly, how they deter evil people from doing bad things.

For those who are not as learned nor as intelligent as you clearly are, here's what Webster has to say about the legal definition of chain of causation: the causal connection between an original cause and its subsequent effects especially as a basis for criminal or civil liability.

Enlighten us oh logical one!

The original cause of the murder is the gun. Without the gun there would be no murder, no need for gun free zones. The causal chain begins with the cause, and the cause is the gun. Take the gun away and the entire chain collapses.

/——/ Except for the home made explosives...

All the other ways of killing masses of people are more complicated and difficult: so your solution is just to make it easier for the killer and provide him with easy to acquire, cheap, automatic rifles. That's very logical, if your objective is to allow/help depraved people to kill masses and masses of people.

/——-/ ban guns like in Detroit and Chicago? Is that your solution?

Again, you are making a fallacious argument. A false analogy. The problem of gun deaths in our inner cities is not because people are purposely going out to kill masses of innocent people just to get their rocks off. The problem in the inner cities is the drug culture, gangs, poverty, and lack of education. We have been trying to solve those problems for decades. The availablity of guns has made the situation worse as far as the loss of life. The more guns in circulation, the more guns the criminals get their hands on.

When guns are taken out of circulation, they become less available on the black market. In countries with strict gun laws, crime is lower, especially gun deaths.

Spain, for example, has very strict gun laws and automatic weapons are completely prohibited to private citizens. Spain has one of the lowest crime rates in Europe. There are only 10 guns per 100 people as opposed to 100 in the States.

It is not true that when guns are banned, only the criminals have them. That theory/myth is debunked by all the data.

For example, that girl in San Francisco who was killed by an illegal with a gun: he got the gun out of a car where the legal owner left it unsecured. If it weren't for that legal gun, she'd still be alive. The gun is the first link in the causal gun.

 

[Esmeralda]

Um, Ft. Hood was an Army base, and the only guys shooting it up were people who were STATIONED THERE! That the Army taught how to use guns!

Yeah, your reality is one where most of the rest of the world where they've already figured this out doesn't exist.

/——-/ you quote the Onion and expect us to take you seriously? Go live somewhere else that bans guns if you’re so skered

It is the gun nuts who are scared. They're scared of life. So scared they have to carry around guns to feel safe. Stupid. Silly. Childish.

/——/That’s the best you got? Childish insults? Keep up the good work

I'm not insulting you when I say you're scared of life. I'm making a statement of fact. It is the only logical explanation for why gun nuts cling to guns when they are absolutely unnecessary. Being scared of life is silly, immature, foolish. That's a fact. There is nothing logical in being afraid of life. You take what I said as an insult because you can't see your foolish behavior. But it's not an insult. It is a statement of FACT.

/——/ I’m not afraid of life. Stop locking your front door. What are you afraid of? Stop wearing a seat belt. What are you afraid of?

There is a big difference between common sense and irrational fear.

 

[eflatminor]

Have heard of the causal chain? Probably not as logic seems to be completely foreign to you.

Well then, let's hear that logic in action! Please explain to us, using simple words so we can understand, how the concept of causal chain justifies gun free zones and more importantly, how they deter evil people from doing bad things.

For those who are not as learned nor as intelligent as you clearly are, here's what Webster has to say about the legal definition of chain of causation: the causal connection between an original cause and its subsequent effects especially as a basis for criminal or civil liability.

Enlighten us oh logical one!

The original cause of the murder is the gun. Without the gun there would be no murder, no need for gun free zones. The causal chain begins with the cause, and the cause is the gun. Take the gun away and the entire chain collapses.

The cause of the murder was a gun?!!!!

Clearly, we must stop these evil inanimate objects from getting up, loading themselves, aiming, pulling their own triggers and then hurting someone.

Are you really that delusional?

 

[Cellblock2429]

/——-/ you quote the Onion and expect us to take you seriously? Go live somewhere else that bans guns if you’re so skered

It is the gun nuts who are scared. They're scared of life. So scared they have to carry around guns to feel safe. Stupid. Silly. Childish.

/——/That’s the best you got? Childish insults? Keep up the good work

I'm not insulting you when I say you're scared of life. I'm making a statement of fact. It is the only logical explanation for why gun nuts cling to guns when they are absolutely unnecessary. Being scared of life is silly, immature, foolish. That's a fact. There is nothing logical in being afraid of life. You take what I said as an insult because you can't see your foolish behavior. But it's not an insult. It is a statement of FACT.

/——/ I’m not afraid of life. Stop locking your front door. What are you afraid of? Stop wearing a seat belt. What are you afraid of?

There is a big difference between common sense and irrational fear.

/----/ What irrational fear? You mean like Global Warming? Rising sea levels? SUVs? What?

 

[eflatminor]

Have heard of the causal chain? Probably not as logic seems to be completely foreign to you.

Well then, let's hear that logic in action! Please explain to us, using simple words so we can understand, how the concept of causal chain justifies gun free zones and more importantly, how they deter evil people from doing bad things.

For those who are not as learned nor as intelligent as you clearly are, here's what Webster has to say about the legal definition of chain of causation: the causal connection between an original cause and its subsequent effects especially as a basis for criminal or civil liability.

Enlighten us oh logical one!

The original cause of the murder is the gun. Without the gun there would be no murder, no need for gun free zones. The causal chain begins with the cause, and the cause is the gun. Take the gun away and the entire chain collapses.

/——/ Except for the home made explosives...

Show me one mass shooting that has occurred without a gun.

Not attacks or murders in general: mass shootings.

/——/ Show me one plane crash without a plane. Show me one vehicular homicide without a vehicle. Show me one stabbing without a knife. Show me one scrambled egg without an egg....

Show me one plane that crashed without a pilot. Show me one incident of vehicular homicide without a driver. Show me a stabbing without a stabber.

Show me a scrambled egg that was, you know, scrambled.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Well then, let's hear that logic in action! Please explain to us, using simple words so we can understand, how the concept of causal chain justifies gun free zones and more importantly, how they deter evil people from doing bad things.

For those who are not as learned nor as intelligent as you clearly are, here's what Webster has to say about the legal definition of chain of causation: the causal connection between an original cause and its subsequent effects especially as a basis for criminal or civil liability.

Enlighten us oh logical one!

The original cause of the murder is the gun. Without the gun there would be no murder, no need for gun free zones. The causal chain begins with the cause, and the cause is the gun. Take the gun away and the entire chain collapses.

/——/ Except for the home made explosives...

All the other ways of killing masses of people are more complicated and difficult: so your solution is just to make it easier for the killer and provide him with easy to acquire, cheap, automatic rifles. That's very logical, if your objective is to allow/help depraved people to kill masses and masses of people.

/——-/ ban guns like in Detroit and Chicago? Is that your solution?

Again, you are making a fallacious argument. A false analogy. The problem of gun deaths in our inner cities is not because people are purposely going out to kill masses of innocent people just to get their rocks off. The problem in the inner cities is the drug culture, gangs, poverty, and lack of education. We have been trying to solve those problems for decades. The availablity of guns has made the situation worse as far as the loss of life. The more guns in circulation, the more guns the criminals get their hands on.

When guns are taken out of circulation, they become less available on the black market. In countries with strict gun laws, crime is lower, especially gun deaths.

Spain, for example, has very strict gun laws and automatic weapons are completely prohibited to private citizens. Spain has one of the lowest crime rates in Europe. There are only 10 guns per 100 people as opposed to 100 in the States.

It is not true that when guns are banned, only the criminals have them. That theory/myth is debunked by all the data.

For example, that girl in San Francisco who was killed by an illegal with a gun: he got the gun out of a car where the legal owner left it unsecured. If it weren't for that legal gun, she'd still be alive. The gun is the first link in the causal gun.

/----/ Funny you should mention Spain. I wonder if the people of Catalonia wish they were armed in their struggle for Independence.
Spain Is Dealing With an Unprecedented Political Crisis
BTW Spain had over 95,000 Armed robberies in 2 years. I guess robbers use Nerf Guns to hold people up.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Well then, let's hear that logic in action! Please explain to us, using simple words so we can understand, how the concept of causal chain justifies gun free zones and more importantly, how they deter evil people from doing bad things.

For those who are not as learned nor as intelligent as you clearly are, here's what Webster has to say about the legal definition of chain of causation: the causal connection between an original cause and its subsequent effects especially as a basis for criminal or civil liability.

Enlighten us oh logical one!

The original cause of the murder is the gun. Without the gun there would be no murder, no need for gun free zones. The causal chain begins with the cause, and the cause is the gun. Take the gun away and the entire chain collapses.

/——/ Except for the home made explosives...

All the other ways of killing masses of people are more complicated and difficult: so your solution is just to make it easier for the killer and provide him with easy to acquire, cheap, automatic rifles. That's very logical, if your objective is to allow/help depraved people to kill masses and masses of people.

/——-/ ban guns like in Detroit and Chicago? Is that your solution?

Again, you are making a fallacious argument. A false analogy. The problem of gun deaths in our inner cities is not because people are purposely going out to kill masses of innocent people just to get their rocks off. The problem in the inner cities is the drug culture, gangs, poverty, and lack of education. We have been trying to solve those problems for decades. The availablity of guns has made the situation worse as far as the loss of life. The more guns in circulation, the more guns the criminals get their hands on.

When guns are taken out of circulation, they become less available on the black market. In countries with strict gun laws, crime is lower, especially gun deaths.

Spain, for example, has very strict gun laws and automatic weapons are completely prohibited to private citizens. Spain has one of the lowest crime rates in Europe. There are only 10 guns per 100 people as opposed to 100 in the States.

It is not true that when guns are banned, only the criminals have them. That theory/myth is debunked by all the data.

For example, that girl in San Francisco who was killed by an illegal with a gun: he got the gun out of a car where the legal owner left it unsecured. If it weren't for that legal gun, she'd still be alive. The gun is the first link in the causal gun.

/----/ Spain does have very strict gun laws for the law abiding people. Only the criminals are armed:
Pictured: Huge weapons haul seized by Spanish police - BBC News
www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-39264664
Mar 14, 2017 - It includes over 10,000 assault rifles, machine guns, pistols, revolvers, and 400 shells and grenades. The guns and ... Europol, which supported the investigation, said the firearms were sold in Spain, France and Belgium. ... Reactivating deactivated weapons is one of Europe's main sources of illegal guns.
Police said the weapons would have had an easy journey onto the black market, and into the hands of terrorists or organised crime groups.

The agency said it had seen a significant increase in the number being supplied to criminals since 2014.