Economic growth is not a sustainable policy objective
Economic growth is not a sustainable policy objective
So we can get back to Grantham’s one cubic meter of humanity’s possessions. We can play with the rate of economic growth and the from-to dates, but the insight of this exercise is inescapable: defaulting always to economic growth as the unquestioned policy objective is patently absurd and unsustainable; and that which is unsustainable must inevitably collapse – it is only a matter of time.
Anybody here think this is wrong?
Economic growth is not a sustainable policy objective
So we can get back to Grantham’s one cubic meter of humanity’s possessions. We can play with the rate of economic growth and the from-to dates, but the insight of this exercise is inescapable: defaulting always to economic growth as the unquestioned policy objective is patently absurd and unsustainable; and that which is unsustainable must inevitably collapse – it is only a matter of time.
Anybody here think this is wrong?