Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 45,224
- 19,758
- 2,173
Executive branch enforces the law.Fuch's wasn't in law enforcement.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Executive branch enforces the law.Fuch's wasn't in law enforcement.
She worked for the SOS office in Georgia.Executive branch enforces the law.
That’s part of the executive branch. They do investigations too. Obviously. That’s why Trump was calling them in the first place.She worked for the SOS office in Georgia.
What you doubt isn't really of concern to me Short Bus. You can doubt Florida isn't in Georgia but thems the facts.Doubt it......seriously. Don't eat the fruit.
However, this right may not extend to individuals who may be unwittingly recorded during the process of filming public officials unless…“The First Amendment protects the right to gather information about what public officials do on public property, and specifically, a right to record matters of public interest”
Vacationing at Grandma's in Florida hardly would be acting in her capacity as SOS.That’s part of the executive branch. They do investigations too. Obviously. That’s why Trump was calling them in the first place.
In reality, it doesn't matter what anyone on an obscure internet forum really thinks now, does it? If it ever got to court, that's where it would be decided.and it's doubtful it will..........from the OP:What you doubt isn't really of concern to me Short Bus. You can doubt Florida isn't in Georgia but thems the facts.
It's in court you fucking moron. The trial in Georgia already has co-conspirators pleading guilty and cutting deals.Vacationing at Grandma's in Florida hardly would be acting in her capacity as SOS.
In reality, it doesn't matter what anyone on an obscure internet forum really thinks now, does it? If it ever got to court, that's where it would be decided.and it's doubtful it will..........from the OP:
Apply what you said above to this. Could be don't mean shit. Wake me when it happens.The new book suffers from poor timing, with Willis and her lover accused of perjury, subornation of perjury, bribery, and kickbacks related to the prosecution. Willis could be removed from the prosecution as early as this week.
And a prosecution team sleeping in a bed of hornets with a looming decision by a judge expected soon.It's in court you fucking moron. The trial in Georgia already has co-conspirators pleading guilty and cutting deals.
Funny thing, if such were true even the incompetents who rep Trump could have had that excluded....
Book Admits Fani Willis' Investigation Began With Illegal Recording
A new book admits that a widely misunderstood phone call, on which Fani Willis' political prosecution rests, was illegally recorded.thefederalist.com
Funny thing, if such were true even the incompetents who rep Trump could have had that excluded.
So why haven't they?
Irrelevant and off topic...Duh....the book was recently published. The accusations from the book may not need to be looked at after all, Fani most likely cooked her goose all by herself.
The new book suffers from poor timing, with Willis and her lover accused of perjury, subornation of perjury, bribery, and kickbacks related to the prosecution. Willis could be removed from the prosecution as early as this week.
Duh.......it's from the third paragraph of the OP.Irrelevant and off topic...
ON YOUR OWN THREAD
How does two prosecutors on the same side affect the case?And a prosecution team sleeping in a bed of hornets with a looming decision by a judge expected soon.
You seem like you need more time to come up with an excuse, because obviously Fuchs was on that phone call as part of their official duties.Vacationing at Grandma's in Florida hardly would be acting in her capacity as SOS.
Accusations of impropriety, lying under oath could have them both removed and possibly disbarred.How does two prosecutors on the same side affect the case?
So you're admitting you're irrelevant and off topic.
Like I said, it won't affect the judges impending decision. Fuch's expressed concerns to J6 about her phone call .....like possible legal concerns and they didn't enter her testimony into the final report.You seem like you need more time to come up with an excuse, because obviously Fuchs was on that phone call as part of their official duties.
Where they were is irrelevant. You can work remotely.
No, you apparently don't bother to read OP's.So you're admitting you're irrelevant and off topic.
Until then it's lawyers around Trump who've actually been disbarred.Accusations of impropriety, lying under oath could have them both removed and possibly disbarred.
You know, nothing big.
Well, I read those that make sense.No, you apparently don't bother to read OP's.