Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
These are legal issues that certainly should affect any judicial decision.Like I said, it won't affect the judges impending decision. Fuch's expressed concerns to J6 about her phone call .....like possible legal concerns and they didn't enter her testimony into the final report.
This won't factor into McAffee's pending decision.These are legal issues that certainly should affect any judicial decision.
Funny you mention that, Fuchs was very concerned about being on record at J6 over her actions........that would tell me she isn't so sure her actions were legal.Unlike you, the judges aren't going to ignore the legal fundamentals.
Like that has to do with anything at hand here......LOLUntil then it's lawyers around Trump who've actually been disbarred.
It was your quote from the Senate report that make no sense.Well, I read those that make sense.
The laws is supposed to protect the privacy of citizens, not corrupt politicians.Funny you mention that, Fuchs was very concerned about being on record at J6 over her actions........that would tell me she isn't so sure her actions were legal
Yet she's worried about her testimony about the call being put on the record.The laws is supposed to protect the privacy of citizens, not corrupt politicians.
There are numerous exclusions for someone like Fuchs.
I have no control over that.Yet she's worried about her testimony about the call being put on the record.
You claim she has the law in her back pocket, yet at the same time she has concerns about the illegal call she made.I have no control over that.
Is that all you have to go on?
Which means nothing.You claim she has the law in her back pocket, yet at the same time she has concerns about the illegal call she made.
As I pointed out.Which means nothing.
Yet you keep bringing it up because you have nothing else to argue.As I pointed out.
since your OP is claiming that Cheney withheld information the report is the ONLY piece of information that is relevant.This won't factor into McAffee's pending decision.
Funny you mention that, Fuchs was very concerned about being on record at J6 over her actions........that would tell me she isn't so sure her actions were legal.
Like that has to do with anything at hand here......LOL
It was your quote from the Senate report that make no sense.
Yet you can't stay away.Yet you keep bringing it up because you have nothing else to argue.
It's all in the article.......in the OP.since your OP is claiming that Cheney withheld information the report is the ONLY piece of information that is relevant.
That actual factual facts are in the report, not some shit job by Trump Law AKA Federalist.Yet you can't stay away.
It's all in the article.......in the OP.
The report you issued is not factual in any way.That actual factual facts are in the report, not some shit job by Trump Law AKA Federalist.
I haven't issued any reports.The report you issued is not factual in any way.
Those two quotes from your Senate report are totally inaccurate.I haven't issued any reports.
I have people who do that for me.
Facts, once again, have proven fatal to your arguments.
Word for word.Those two quotes from your Senate report are totally inaccurate.
Don't mess mine up. Prove your pesky facts then.Word for word.
Again, those pesky facts just mess your crap up don't they.
LOL........wrong thread.Word for word.
Again, those pesky facts just mess your crap up don't they.
My "own" is the J6 reportDon't mess mine up. Prove your pesky facts then.
Your thread so I can't argue your mistake.LOL........wrong thread.
