Blues Man
Diamond Member
- Aug 28, 2016
- 35,513
- 14,915
- 1,530
so its better to secure it as far away from humans as possible,, like underground in a secure place,,I wonder what the half life is before we dig it up??The thing is the longer the half life the less radioactive it is.so you cried when you found out we were burying something we dug out of the ground,,If we can build safe nuclear power plants, I have nothing against them. I was reading that they are coming up with ways to manage the radioactive waste that are much improved, too.Well, they need it once every forty years or so, right? I guess we can forgive that.
But it is obvious that Global Warming causes global cooling so the windmills freezing up will happen far more frequently.
Fossil fuel power plants don’t freeze up nor do nukes.
I actually cried when I learned that we were taking it and burying it deep in the Earth. In our Mother. We've only got one, folks.
Something that has a toxic half-life in excess of the entire period humans have existed, fuck yes.
Didn't know that either didja.
The real nasty stuff has the shortest half lives.
The half life of a radioactive isotope is constant.
The problem is more that nuclear waste is much more concentrated than what is found in nature.
Actually it's better to not generate it in the first place.
Ask the residents of Fukushima how "secure" they feel.
Poor design and poor placement were the problems there.
We don't have to build obsolete light water reactors anymore.
Not the point. Poor placement, absofrickinlutely. I was stunned to find out that Japan, of all the nations that should know better, is running nukes at all, let alone in a land of earthquakes and tsunamis.
The point is that that shit is toxic, and it stays toxic for the "duration". Then we think we can build underground tanks that will way way way outlive us, that will never be attacked or rot away. That's just fuggin' stoopid.
We can use almost all the so called nuclear waste we have in this country as fuel for LFTR reactors. We can also use it to manufacture medical isotopes and get a share of that multibillion dollar a year industry.
I just don't think nuclear waste is as much of a problem as people are led to believe.