Freedom Of Expression In France

[Hossfly]

There wasn't any work in Dachau. No food, no medicine,no doctors. 70 pound people. They were well treated.

That wasn't the fault of the Germans.

The allies bombed the rail lines so that food and supplies couldn't reach the camps.

Why were these people in the camps in the first place? In the conditions you state the Germans could have released them. After all they weren't criminals.

 

[Sunni Man]

When one reads the actual documents of the Einsatzgruppen in the Bundesarchiv, it is quite clear that it really happened. No matter how far you wish to bury your head in the sand.

The Einsatzgruppen's main job was to kill bolshevik communists.

Most of the Russian communists were jews and the sworn enemies of Germany.

So all the Einsatzgruppen was doing was killing the enemy.

That they happened to be jews had nothing to do with it.

 

[Sunni Man]

Why were these people in the camps in the first place? In the conditions you state the Germans could have released them. After all they weren't criminals.

The jews were the enemy of Germany and it's people.

They were the one's who back stabbed Germany during WW1 and cause Germany's defeat.

 

[Sunni Man]

There wasn't any work in Dachau. No food, no medicine,no doctors. 70 pound people. They were well treated.

That wasn't the fault of the Germans.

The allies bombed the rail lines so that food and supplies couldn't reach the camps.

My father's uncle used to watch over a small boy in Auschwitz, he was 4 years old. The child's mother was shot on the spot simply for trying to pass her child a piece of bread from under the fense.

So don't try to bring the crap of "no food reached the camps" claim.

^^^^Read the above^^^^^

It was your fellow zionist that said there was no food in the camp.

 

[irosie91]

Why were these people in the camps in the first place? In the conditions you state the Germans could have released them. After all they weren't criminals.

The jews were the enemy of Germany and it's people.

They were the one's who back stabbed Germany during WW1 and cause Germany's defeat.

The nazis used the same "laws" to murder millions including infants that the RAPIST PIG OF ARABIA used to murder and rape----and his followers used to murder and rape in the HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS
sunni has just admitted that he admires people who slit the throats of infants since they EMULATE HIS NABI and his has made the admission in the NAME OF THE UMMAH

when the SUDANESE CHRISTIANS begin to publish their history with the filth sunni loves-----he will DENY THAT IT HAPPENED

when the rapist pig saw something he wanted -----his "god" gave him permission to kill the owner and take it When the rapist pig saw a little girl he wanted-----same PERMISSION GRANTED BY HIS "god"

 

[Roudy]

The children of the Kedoshim and all those who were lost with their families, are resting in our creators arms. People like Sunni who deny the crime that was committed against us, will have to answer to God one day.

Never said that people didn't lose their lives during those terrible times.

I just dispute the forced narrative that is foisted on people as absolute fact.

Amin Al Husseini: Nazi Father of Jihad, Al Qaeda, Arafat, Saddam Hussein and the Muslim Brotherhood - Tell The Children The Truth - Homepage

 

[Hossfly]

There wasn't any work in Dachau. No food, no medicine,no doctors. 70 pound people. They were well treated.

That wasn't the fault of the Germans.

The allies bombed the rail lines so that food and supplies couldn't reach the camps.

My father's uncle used to watch over a small boy in Auschwitz, he was 4 years old. The child's mother was shot on the spot simply for trying to pass her child a piece of bread from under the fense.

So don't try to bring the crap of "no food reached the camps" claim.

We all know that Sunni Man is a convert so perhaps before he was a Muslim he sat at the foot of his Nazi relatives and heard them say everything was a lie. Sunni Man is a good reminder for us of why Hitler and the Mufti were such good friends.

 

[alpine]

How can you compare something that claimed to happen in an age that even people(biologically) were different from this age,

Please provide LINK to any scientific or medical study that says people a thousand years ago were biologically different than the people of today.

Thank You

So you are asking for a link to evolution studies. Sorry but just google it

Google: Evolution

Thank you...

 

[Sunni Man]

How can you compare something that claimed to happen in an age that even people(biologically) were different from this age,

Please provide LINK to any scientific or medical study that says people a thousand years ago were biologically different than the people of today.

Thank You

So you are asking for a link to evolution studies. Sorry but just google it.

No. I am calling out on your bogus claim.

You made the statement so back it up with a link.

Or admit you were just spouting nonsense as usual.

 

[alpine]

Please provide LINK to any scientific or medical study that says people a thousand years ago were biologically different than the people of today.

Thank You

So you are asking for a link to evolution studies. Sorry but just google it.

No. I am calling out on your bogus claim.

You made the statement so back it up with a link.

Or admit you were just spouting nonsense as usual.

Oh, that was you. You changed your avatar so I couldn't realize it was you.

I seriously couldn't care less what you think, cause you lack of the logic to do so...

 

[irosie91]

People---one thousand years ago ---were not biologically DIFFERENT in any reasonbly detectable way to people now. The person who made that claim does not understand human physiology, genetics or "evolution" In fact people world wide -----are essentially the same biologically---that is PHYSIOLOGICALLY overall ------there are very very minor differences in gene pools An interesting factoid is that BRAINS are all -----overall in large groups ----virtually the same as to potential capacity for FUNCTION

 

[alpine]

People---one thousand years ago ---were not biologically DIFFERENT in any reasonbly detectable way to people now. The person who made that claim does not understand human physiology, genetics or "evolution" In fact people world wide -----are essentially the same biologically---that is PHYSIOLOGICALLY overall ------there are very very minor differences in gene pools An interesting factoid is that BRAINS are all -----overall in large groups ----virtually the same as to potential capacity for FUNCTION

Clearly you don't know about the environment effect to human biology. So please do more research.

A small example, the plague by itself changed the biology of whole europe back in the days.

More reading for you...

 

[irosie91]

People---one thousand years ago ---were not biologically DIFFERENT in any reasonbly detectable way to people now. The person who made that claim does not understand human physiology, genetics or "evolution" In fact people world wide -----are essentially the same biologically---that is PHYSIOLOGICALLY overall ------there are very very minor differences in gene pools An interesting factoid is that BRAINS are all -----overall in large groups ----virtually the same as to potential capacity for FUNCTION

Clearly you don't know about the environment effect to human biology. So please do more research.

A small example, the plague by itself changed the biology of whole europe back in the days.

More reading for you...

your statement is IDIOTIC the plague changed nothing there are some theories that some people who SURVIVED the plague did so because they were able ---based on their physiology, to withstand the specific bacerium YERSINNIA PESTIS ----thus more people who could not withstand Yersinnia pestis died than did those who could----that fact does not come close to CHANGING HUMAN BIOLOGY in any significant way

there are a lot more examples of population adaptation than that little one For example----in areas with lots of MALARIA there are more cases of HEMOGLOBINOPATHIES like THALASSEMIA than in places with less malaria-----because the bug needs healthy red blood cells for survival ------but no one in his right mind would describe that fact as PEOPLE ARE NOT THE SAME over there in the area of the MEDITERRNEAN------basically they are about the same as people from New Jersey. Stop playing with ideas that confuse you

 

[alpine]

People---one thousand years ago ---were not biologically DIFFERENT in any reasonbly detectable way to people now. The person who made that claim does not understand human physiology, genetics or "evolution" In fact people world wide -----are essentially the same biologically---that is PHYSIOLOGICALLY overall ------there are very very minor differences in gene pools An interesting factoid is that BRAINS are all -----overall in large groups ----virtually the same as to potential capacity for FUNCTION

Clearly you don't know about the environment effect to human biology. So please do more research.

A small example, the plague by itself changed the biology of whole europe back in the days.

More reading for you...

your statement is IDIOTIC the plague changed nothing there are some theories that some people who SURVIVED the plague did so because they were able ---based on their physiology, to withstand the specific bacerium YERSINNIA PESTIS ----thus more people who could not withstand Yersinnia pestis died than did those who could----that fact does not come close to CHANGING HUMAN BIOLOGY in any significant way

there are a lot more examples of population adaptation than that little one For example----in areas with lots of MALARIA there are more cases of HEMOGLOBINOPATHIES like THALASSEMIA than in places with less malaria-----because the bug needs healthy red blood cells for survival ------but no one in his right mind would describe that fact as PEOPLE ARE NOT THE SAME over there in the area of the MEDITERRNEAN------basically they are about the same as people from New Jersey. Stop playing with ideas that confuse you

Human culture is a part of the human evolution and it effects our biology. Metro dogs in russia changed in their physical appearance in just one generation, simply by migrating to a different environment, cultural area. Apes in different behavioral environments end up being different from their relatives and guess what, in a physical way. If the population is aggressive because the food sources are less in the environment which causes them to be fighting for it all the time, which makes the stronger males more dominant in the population, which ends up having males with more body size than a more peaceful population who doesn't need to fight for food much and parental behavior is more advantageous, which makes body size go down.

So your humans(!?) are so apart from all living things in the nature, they just stay as they are? You have to rethink that part of your logic...

 

[alpine]

People---one thousand years ago ---were not biologically DIFFERENT in any reasonbly detectable way to people now. The person who made that claim does not understand human physiology, genetics or "evolution" In fact people world wide -----are essentially the same biologically---that is PHYSIOLOGICALLY overall ------there are very very minor differences in gene pools An interesting factoid is that BRAINS are all -----overall in large groups ----virtually the same as to potential capacity for FUNCTION

Clearly you don't know about the environment effect to human biology. So please do more research.

A small example, the plague by itself changed the biology of whole europe back in the days.

More reading for you...

your statement is IDIOTIC the plague changed nothing there are some theories that some people who SURVIVED the plague did so because they were able ---based on their physiology, to withstand the specific bacerium YERSINNIA PESTIS ----thus more people who could not withstand Yersinnia pestis died than did those who could----that fact does not come close to CHANGING HUMAN BIOLOGY in any significant way

there are a lot more examples of population adaptation than that little one For example----in areas with lots of MALARIA there are more cases of HEMOGLOBINOPATHIES like THALASSEMIA than in places with less malaria-----because the bug needs healthy red blood cells for survival ------but no one in his right mind would describe that fact as PEOPLE ARE NOT THE SAME over there in the area of the MEDITERRNEAN------basically they are about the same as people from New Jersey. Stop playing with ideas that confuse you

And also calling someone you have never met, seen, heard, but only read a paragraph of his thinking, as an idiot...

You really need to grow up, child.

 

[irosie91]

wrong again alpine-----your silly statement of some sort of APPRECIABLE EVOLUTION taking place in the HUMAN SPECIES over a period of 1000 years to the extent that today's people cannot be compared to PEOPLE of 1000 years ago ---is idiotic enough to recognize a person who thinks he has a GOOGLE doctorate

in general----the kind of issue you described in reference to the BUBONIC PLAGUE is the result of a single mutation ----ie one base change. MOST single mutations get lost in the gene pool------UNLESS it happens to create a survival advantage-----but that advantage is not a FUNDAMENTAL change in the organism----such a change usually has an effect on just one single function MOST ARE SILENT ie they do nothing some kill Hemophilia is an example of a single base mutation-----Because it is X linked---and expressed almost ONLY in males-----the female acts as a preserver to the mutation ie she survives to reproduce

 

[alpine]

wrong again alpine-----your silly statement of some sort of APPRECIABLE EVOLUTION taking place in the HUMAN SPECIES over a period of 1000 years to the extent that today's people cannot be compared to PEOPLE of 1000 years ago ---is idiotic enough to recognize a person who thinks he has a GOOGLE doctorate

in general----the kind of issue you described in reference to the BUBONIC PLAGUE is the result of a single mutation ----ie one base change. MOST single mutations get lost in the gene pool------UNLESS it happens to create a survival advantage-----but that advantage is not a FUNDAMENTAL change in the organism----such a change usually has an effect on just one single function MOST ARE SILENT ie they do nothing some kill Hemophilia is an example of a single base mutation-----Because it is X linked---and expressed almost ONLY in males-----the female acts as a preserver to the mutation ie she survives to reproduce

So we are not biologically different from the people lived 1000 years ago, what so ever. That's your whole argument.

Well too bad because stanford professor Sapolsky doesn't think the same way you do and too bad you are not a professor at stanford, innit...

 

[irosie91]

again Alpine----you are being stupid you do not know my credentials if professor salpolsky has stated that the fact that some people survived the bubonic plague because of a genetic mutation they happened to carry and the fact that this particular genetic mutation became MORE prevalent in the gene pool BECAUSE of that survival advantage and THIS PHENOMENON is an example of HUMAN EVOLUTION----then he is right. If he claims that humans of today are not comparable in physiology to humans of a thousand years ago and that there have been GROSS alterations in the human gene pool and thus in human physiology ----then he is NUTS

 

[alpine]

again Alpine----you are being stupid you do not know my credentials if professor salpolsky has stated that the fact that some people survived the bubonic plague because of a genetic mutation they happened to carry and the fact that this particular genetic mutation became MORE prevalent in the gene pool BECAUSE of that survival advantage and THIS PHENOMENON is an example of HUMAN EVOLUTION----then he is right. If he claims that humans of today are not comparable in physiology to humans of a thousand years ago and that there have been GROSS alterations in the human gene pool and thus in human physiology ----then he is NUTS

Sapolsky says, if you claim people(biologically) are the same as they were 1000 years ago, then sorry but you don't have any credentials as far as the biology is concerned.

Its your pick...

 

[irosie91]

People ----ie the HUMAN SPECIES continues to have virtually the SAME physiology that humans had 1000 years ago ----biology major phi beta kappa and cum laude,