Nothing is free. How much have you personally donated to pay college students?
Everything is free. What is the oil or coal underground? FREE. What is the grass cows or deer out in the field? FREE. What were the trees in the old growth forests that lumber companies cut down in the 18th century? FREE. What are the fish that fishermen catch out to sea? FREE. What is sunlight and the air you breathe? FREE. What is the love of a parent for a child? FREE. Etc. etc. etc. When you are talking about paying, for the most part, you are just talking about BS capitalist concepts.
You are talking crazy talk.
None of what you said is free. Maybe from some suedo definition, but economically, it's not free.
Economically speaking... if you want wood... you have to pay me to get it. I'm not spending my time to cut lumber, if you are not going to pay me. If you want to cut down your own lumber, fine. But unless you intend to hack at it with sharp rocks, my guess is you'll have to buy a chain saw and hatchet. So it's still not free.
If you don't pay me for the fish I catch... I'm keeping them. You want to get your own boat, and catch your own fish, that's fine. But unless you intend to make your own boats, make your own fishing poles, and your own bait... then even that is going to cost you money. So it's not "free".
Just like you want to catch wild game to eat, that's fine. But unless you know how to make your own guns, your own gun powder, and stuff your own bullets, that's all going to cost you money. It's not free.
Intangible things like "love" and "air", that are not the result of hard work and effort are free. Trying to make a comparison between "love" and "lumber" is ridiculous.
YOU are the one talking crazy talk. What if a fisherman supplied the fish he caught for free. What if he needed a boat, fuel or whatever. They would be free too. Everybody uses goods and services that everybody else provides. What if everybody got what they needed for free from everybody else. What if everything was free like the air and sunlight.
Of course, the only drawback to any of this is that for those who are of more value to society because of the difficulty of what they do, such as being a doctor, they would be allowed to have more than others. Bigger houses, better appliances, better cars or whatever. In the past, they used to placate the powerful who wanted to have more than the average person was by only allowing them to be able to wear purple clothing.
Another drawback is giving people incentive to work. But to do that, all you need to do is treat them well. People can exist and live without the driving force of greed. Also, there are many people in the military who simply do what they're told. Despite that, there are many military people who decide to make a career out of the military. People who decide not to work will, so to speak, just dig their own graves.
If I'm given everything I need, why would I go to work at all? Gotta tell you dude... I promise you I wouldn't go to work if I didn't have to.
And that's true for many people. We know this because in the 1990s, the Republicans pushed through welfare reform, and literally millions of people were kicked of welfare.
They went to work. Now they could have gone to work before welfare was reformed, but.... why? They didn't have to, so why do it?
Did you ever read about the original 13 colonies of the 'new world'?
It's amazing what isn't taught in schools. The original colonies in America, where communists based. Everyone worked for a collective pot. Everyone got everything they needed from the collective. Food, water, housing, everything was collective.
Everyone got everything they needed.
The result was, the colony started to starve to death. People said they were too sick to work. Others too tired. Others lame, and injured. Women too busy with other things.
The leadership of the colony was literally looking at mass starvation.
They changed the system. Instead of common land, they partitioned the land up to individual families, and food became rationed. People were told, they could have whatever food they grew themselves, with only 5% of it going to collective.
Suddenly, all the people who had been too sick to work, magically found the strength to plow fields. Men who were too injured to work, magically could move enough to sow seed. Women who had been to busy with other things, suddenly found time to water.
The colony went from on the brink of starvation, to having surplus of food to sell (barter) to other colonies.
Socialism never works. It never does. Capitalism ALWAYS works. It 100%, every single time it is tried, works.