Fraud allegations rock Maine, California as Dems push bill to criminalize investigative journalism

[excalibur]

Augustine_ spending a lot of time defending the proposed First Amendment violating bill.

 

[Augustine_]

You are just an apologist for democrat thievery and incompetence. Your propaganda is just an attempt to defend your ignorance of the facts.

You were given a link To the California bill. Your conspiracy theory is the bill doesn't exist.

Your denial is laughable.

Stopping YouTubers and live streamers from harassing and doxxing people for clicks and views seems perfectly reasonable. They still can if they want. They'll just have some skin in the game, now.

 

[Hollie]

Stopping YouTubers and live streamers from harassing and doxxing people for clicks and views seems perfectly reasonable. They still can if they want. They'll just have some skin in the game, now.

What you want and what the California bill proposes is suppression of the 1st Amendment as a way to protect democrats from their fraud, theft and waste.

Investigation of Democrats and their crime syndicates is perfectly legitimate.

 

[toobfreak]

You are just an apologist for democrat thievery and incompetence. Your propaganda is just an attempt to defend your ignorance of the facts.

The question becomes whether a PAID apologist disseminating organized propaganda?

If not that (sedition and treason), we are dealing with people just too stupid to live.

But even stupid people are willing to try to be smarter usually. Even Moe Howard was willing to learn. These people reject all efforts at learning or even considering the alternative, reject all facts, thus giving full weight to the former.

Paid seditionists.

 

[Augustine_]

What you want and what the California bill proposes is suppression of the 1st Amendment as a way to protect democrats from their fraud, theft and waste.

Investigation of Democrats and their crime syndicates is perfectly legitimate.

Protections against harassment have existed for a long time in this country so you sound pretty dumb and pathetic to me with this hysteria

 

[Hollie]

Stopping YouTubers and live streamers from harassing and doxxing people for clicks and views seems perfectly reasonable. They still can if they want. They'll just have some skin in the game, now.

What you want is to stop all investigative journalism when directed at democrats.

You want to restrict the 1st Amendment because free speech will negatively affect your democrat crime syndicates.

 

[22lcidw]

Considering these cases were already being investigated it seems you are wrong.

You guys are to politics as the gilded age was for the rich. You have control of it and even if foolish you go full speed ahead with your agendas no matter who is affected negatively. You have more respect for an unwed mother with many children and different fathers and rarely works than a person who works long hours to feed and house his family. To the point that the nuclear family is decimated. And yet you continue the same agenda that keep this going. Just one agenda of many.

 

[Hollie]

Protections against harassment have existed for a long time in this country so you sound pretty dumb and pathetic to me with this hysteria

You use the silly harassment slogan as a cheap way to defend democrat fraud.

Investigation of crime you see as a threat to your illegality.

Your hysteria is a panic reaction to legitimate investigation of your fraud.

 

[Augustine_]

What you want is to stop all investigative journalism when directed at democrats.

You want to restrict the 1st Amendment because free speech will negatively affect your democrat crime syndicates.

You are flailing now and inventing nonsense. And you haven't spoken out about any of Trump's actions against speech and dissent so I don't believe you care the slightest bit about the 1st Amendment.

 

[Hollie]

You are flailing now and inventing nonsense. And you haven't spoken out about any of Trump's actions against speech and dissent so I don't believe you care the slightest bit about the 1st Amendment.

"But....but...but what about Trump".

Trump has floated no legislation to eliminate the 1st Amendment. Stop spamming the thread with your off topic blathering.

What a sleazy attempt to deflect. You can't defend your hope to eliminate the 1st Amendment so you retreat to sidestepping and evasion.

 

[Augustine_]

"But....but...but what about Trump".

Trump has floated no legislation to eliminate the 1st Amendment. Stop spamming the thread with your off topic bathering.

What a sleazy attempt to deflect. You can't defend your hope to eliminate the 1st Amendment so you retreat to sidestepping and evasion.

Trump isn't capable of passing legislation so his attacks are by executive order, lawfare, or helping loyalist oligarchs buy media.

California is passing legislation on behalf of constituents to create consequences for harassment and doxxing. Your hysteria is unwarranted, and is a result of how thoroughly you've been propagandized.

 

[Hollie]

Trump isn't capable of passing legislation so his attacks are by executive order, lawfare, or helping loyalist oligarchs buy media.

California is passing legislation on behalf of constituents to create consequences for harassment and doxxing. Your hysteria is unwarranted, and is a result of how thoroughly you've been propagandized.

You're continuing to spam the thread with your TDS nonsense

There are existing laws against harassment and doxing. California Democrats want laws to protect them against the fraud, theft and illegality they are engaged in.

Your hysterical flaming is hilarious.

 

[toobfreak]

What you want is to stop all investigative journalism when directed at democrats.
You want to restrict the 1st Amendment because free speech will negatively affect your democrat crime syndicates.

Just imagine Hollie if republicans were calling for dropping and outlawing/banning by law all investigation into J6 and the J6ers during the J6 hearings? Can you imagine the Left's response?

Curious how much the name Augustine sounds like 'Philistine.'

 

[Augustine_]

California Democrats want laws to protect them against the fraud, theft and illegality they are engaged in.

You keep repeating that blatant lie as if it will have any effect on me

 

[Hollie]

You keep repeating that blatant lie as if it will have any effect on me

The facts regarding fraud, theft and illegality are not lies. Those facts are the reason democrats are attempting to suppress journalism that exposes their crime syndicates.

 

[Augustine_]

The facts regarding fraud, theft and illegality are not lies.

That's probably why they were already being investigated

 

[Hollie]

You keep repeating that blatant lie as if it will have any effect on me

The facts have an effect on you. Thus your frantic tirades in the thread defending the democrats sponsoring a bill to protect them from investigation and your need to spam the thread with your desperate "but...but
...but.... but whst about Trump" deflections.

Your frantic tirades are funny.

 

[Hollie]

That's probably why they were already being investigated

Investigated by who? Other democrats?

That's pretty darn funny.

 

[Augustine_]

The facts have an effect on you. Thus your frantic tirades in the thread defending the democrats sponsoring a bill to protect them from investigation and your need to spam the thread with your desperate "but...but
...but.... but whst about Trump" deflections.

Your frantic tirades are funny.

I've been saying the same thing the whole time

Your premise is a lie, the bill is about harassment, and you are a product of being propagandized.

 

[Hollie]

I've been saying the same thing the whole time

Your premise is a lie, the bill is about harassment, and you are a product of being propagandized.

You have been whining about the same thing the whole time. You're infuriated that journalists have exposed democrat waste, fraud and thievery.

You are a product of democrat lies and theft