France's top court:UNCONSTITUTIONAL to levy 75% tax on rich

[JoeB131]

Not one penny until the rich start paying their fair share.

Thanks for asking.

Don't deflect, my point stands.

Now, how much EXTRA will you send in for 2012?

^^^^^^^^^^ This is the true face of a COMMUIST. He will DEMAND your money, nearly all of it but the rules don't apply to him ..

Working people are paying their fair share.

The wealthy are not.

 

[J.E.D]

France's top court:UNCONSTITUTIONAL to levy 75% tax on rich

So, now you're taking cues from France?

 

[Antares]

LOL, lame attempt at self justification...but no go.

Just another left wing hypocrite.

I pay a fair share, given what I make. Not to mention that I spent 11 years in the military.

I've done my bit for President and Country, thanks. The rich can do theirs...

You wouldn't no matter what, you are no different than any other lib...selfish as shit when it comes to actually doing anything yourselves.

Not one penny until the rich start paying their fair share.

Thanks for asking.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

France's top court:UNCONSTITUTIONAL to levy 75% tax on rich

So, now you're taking cues from France?

Liberals aren't very bright. One posts a story which in a Zombie's mind means that I am taking cues from an entire country of France?! REALLY?? Pubwik Edumacashun^^^^^^^^^^

 

[Antares]

Ole Josey isn't very bright.

France's top court:UNCONSTITUTIONAL to levy 75% tax on rich

So, now you're taking cues from France?

Liberals aren't very bright. One posts a story which in a Zombie's mind means that I am taking cues from an entire country of France?! REALLY?? Pubwik Edumacashun^^^^^^^^^^

 

[JakeStarkey]

Libertarianism would be the death of the USA.

Socialism is government control of the economy. Examples of socialism are the following.

Public schools.
public universities
social security
Medicare
Medicaid
welfare
virtually any government program
government regulations.

Wow, you are making SOcialism sound pretty awesome. All those things are wonderful.

They all stink. They are ******* up this country.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You have no point, little Roo, except on your pointy head.

Don't deflect, my point stands.

Now, how much EXTRA will you send in for 2012?

Stupid people take things to an illogical conclusion when they have no real argument.

What makes Joe a hypocrite is thet he has NEVER vouluntarily sent an extra dime to the Gov.

He just whines and cries that the "rich" don't pay their "fair" share.

Never mind that you could CONFISCATE their ENTIRE incomes and NEVER touch the deficit.
]

Splendid idea, let's try it.

Look, we produce 16 Trillion a year in Goods and services, and we only spend 4 trillion on the government. Please don't try to tell me that the money isn't there.

 

[asterism]

Using his logic, um... yeah, I would be.

Remember the original argument was that if he found a million dollars in savings by negotiating with a vendor, he should be able to keep it.

Damn straight, I own the company and I take care of my employees. What entitles the government to more of it?

The fact if you didn't have a government, you wouldn't have a business?

Let's say we had no government. No garbage pickup outside your business. No electric unless you put a generator in the basement. No internet. No Police to protect your property. No running water.

And no legal recourse if your vendor who you saved a million dollars with sent you crap product and ran off with your money.

Let's say we get back to the actual question since I never advocated for no government nor no taxes.

Why should the government get a higher percentage when a risk pays off?

 

[asterism]

Stupid people take things to an illogical conclusion when they have no real argument.

What makes Joe a hypocrite is thet he has NEVER vouluntarily sent an extra dime to the Gov.

He just whines and cries that the "rich" don't pay their "fair" share.

Never mind that you could CONFISCATE their ENTIRE incomes and NEVER touch the deficit.
]

Splendid idea, let's try it.

Look, we produce 16 Trillion a year in Goods and services, and we only spend 4 trillion on the government. Please don't try to tell me that the money isn't there.

It appears Economics isn't something you've studied.

Ok, we confiscate all of the income starting with your customers. How will you get paid? How will your suppliers get paid?

 

[bripat9643]

Libertarianism would be the death of the USA.

Wow, you are making SOcialism sound pretty awesome. All those things are wonderful.

They all stink. They are ******* up this country.

If you mean we would dismantle the current totalitarian welfare state empire, right. It would mean the death of that, just as the Civil War meant the death of the United States as it was intended to be by the Founding Fathers, a voluntary union of sovereign states.

 

[bripat9643]

Stupid people take things to an illogical conclusion when they have no real argument.

What makes Joe a hypocrite is thet he has NEVER vouluntarily sent an extra dime to the Gov.

He just whines and cries that the "rich" don't pay their "fair" share.

Never mind that you could CONFISCATE their ENTIRE incomes and NEVER touch the deficit.
]

Splendid idea, let's try it.

Look, we produce 16 Trillion a year in Goods and services, and we only spend 4 trillion on the government. Please don't try to tell me that the money isn't there.

It appears Economics isn't something you've studied.

Ok, we confiscate all of the income starting with your customers. How will you get paid? How will your suppliers get paid?

Like all totalitarian lick-spittles, Joe seems to think that taxpayers and businesses can survive on nothing. He believes a tax rate of 93% is a good idea.

I'm serial!

 

[J.E.D]

France's top court:UNCONSTITUTIONAL to levy 75% tax on rich

So, now you're taking cues from France?

Liberals aren't very bright. One posts a story which in a Zombie's mind means that I am taking cues from an entire country of France?! REALLY?? Pubwik Edumacashun^^^^^^^^^^

Yep. Taking cues from the French. You're not a very good Republican. Go eat some Freedom Fries and get back to me when you have your patriotism in order. Welsher.

 

[J.E.D]

Ole Josey isn't very bright.

So, now you're taking cues from France?

Liberals aren't very bright. One posts a story which in a Zombie's mind means that I am taking cues from an entire country of France?! REALLY?? Pubwik Edumacashun^^^^^^^^^^

Well, I'm at least bright enough to properly spell the name you choose to address me with.

 

[bripat9643]

The fact if you didn't have a government, you wouldn't have a business?

Even if that were true, how does it justify giving government a blank check to take whatever it wants? why should a business be on the hook for anything more than the cost of services government provides?

Let's say we had no government. No garbage pickup outside your business. No electric unless you put a generator in the basement. No internet. No Police to protect your property. No running water.

And no legal recourse if your vendor who you saved a million dollars with sent you crap product and ran off with your money.

Garbage in my neighborhood is picked up by a private company - Waste Management Services. The power utility is also a private company. Internet is also supplied by a private company - Comcast. Many localities also have private water and sewer companies. Many companies also have private security - especially large corporations.

So what are these essential services that businesses can't live without?

Let's say, for the sake of argument, that businesses can't exist without some essential government "service" like police protection. Why does that justify government raping them for everything it can get out of them? Businesses also can't exist without office supplies. Does that mean Office Depot is entitled to hold them up for ransom, to take everything the earn above the minimum needed for survival?

Any rational person would call that criminal behavior, and that's exactly what it is. that's exactly what the liberals are doing when they demand that the rich "pay their fair share." They are nothing more than common thugs extorting money from the rich. Actually the street thug is more honorable than Obama or his drones because he doesn't insist that it's your patriotic duty to hand over your cash to him. He doesn't claim you owe it to him. He doesn't claim it's your "fair share." A street thug knows he's nothing more than a thug. It's too bad that more people don't realize that you and your ilk are also nothing more than common, greedy, vicious thugs.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

Ole Josey isn't very bright.

Liberals aren't very bright. One posts a story which in a Zombie's mind means that I am taking cues from an entire country of France?! REALLY?? Pubwik Edumacashun^^^^^^^^^^

Well, I'm at least bright enough to properly spell the name you choose to address me with.

What are you squealing about? I don't call you by any names, PERIOD. And for the last time, I DIDN'T WELCH on any bet and you know it. Just because you repeat it, doesn't make it true. I'm really sick of you liars on this forum impugning my character when it comes to that stupid bet.. I'm CERTAIN no one will ever wager or make another bet with any liberal on this forum after the way Conservatives have been treated and taunted since the election. You leftists have proven you're sore winners.

 

[Antares]

Thats it?

Thats the best you haver Josey?

Be gone before I have somebody drop a house on you!!!


[/B]

Ole Josey isn't very bright.

Liberals aren't very bright. One posts a story which in a Zombie's mind means that I am taking cues from an entire country of France?! REALLY?? Pubwik Edumacashun^^^^^^^^^^

Well, I'm at least bright enough to properly spell the name you choose to address me with.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Silly comment without any substantiated points.

Define "totalitarian" and apply it to the USA today.

Define "welfare state" and apply it to the USA today.

And you accept that you want a nation without civil liberties for women and minorities instead of a national victory over a southern confederacy of anti-Americans.

Libertarianism would be the death of the USA.

They all stink. They are ******* up this country.

If you mean we would dismantle the current totalitarian welfare state empire, right. It would mean the death of that, just as the Civil War meant the death of the United States as it was intended to be by the Founding Fathers, a voluntary union of sovereign states.

 

[jillian]

French Court Says 75% Tax Rate on Rich Is Unconstitutional - Bloomberg

Even the French are getting a taste of the failed policies of Socialism, to include their courts which will not allow the insane Socialists of that country to rob the wealthy blind. The really telling thing is that although a multitude of business has fled France over the tax inequality, soaking the rich-- these same blind politicians don't care.. Jobs don't matter, only stealing money from the rich to fund their pet projects. Just as here in the United States, you could tax the rich 100% of their income and it would only help to fund the government for 3 months and NOT MAKE ONE single dent in the debt.

and? since when do you loons care about 'foreign law'?

especially you, wacko welsher.

and who is saying that we should tax anyone at 75%?

 

[JakeStarkey]

LGS is simply a twit in a twit.

 

[bripat9643]

Silly comment without any substantiated points.

Define "totalitarian" and apply it to the USA today.

Define "welfare state" and apply it to the USA today.

And you accept that you want a nation without civil liberties for women and minorities instead of a national victory over a southern confederacy of anti-Americans.

Libertarianism would be the death of the USA.

If you mean we would dismantle the current totalitarian welfare state empire, right. It would mean the death of that, just as the Civil War meant the death of the United States as it was intended to be by the Founding Fathers, a voluntary union of sovereign states.

Slavery would have ended quickly without bloodshed if the Confederate states had been allowed to go their own way. That's what happened in every other country on the globe. Brazil was the last country to abolish slaver in 1886. If the slave states were no longer part of the United States, then the Northern states would no longer have been obligated to enforce the Fugitive Slave act, and slavery would have thereby ended very quickly.

Furthermore, we probably wouldn't have entered WW I, which means WW II would never have happened. Germany and England would have come to a negotiated settlement rather than having the atrocious Versailles treaty enforced on the Germans, which lead directly to WW II.

Instead we had 800,000 dead and an entire region of the United States was economically and socially devastated for a century.

Yeah, the Civil War sure was a good deal for everyone!