Well, if you look at the first comment on the Ed Driscoll post there is a time stamp of 5:08 PM. So the story had to be posted on FOXnews before Driscoll can comment and repost it and before any comment can be posted after the Driscoll posting.
ok, what time did she resign?
you are just another fucking idiot
oh PLEASE
it's already been PROVEN that Foxnews.com ran the story in print, on the internet BEFORE she resigned.
it is true that fox news channel had not aired on cable any stories on her until after she had resigned but Foxnews.com had run the story on the net prior to her being fired and had also sent messages to the usda and to the naacp, asking for their response to the sherrod tape.
WHY is it so important to blatently lie about this willow?
Care
I haven't liked you from day one. You call everyone a liar. I don't like you and your calling everyone liars. Especially me. I don't lie. Now show me the printed copy from Fox News and the date please. You are as stupid as MODMORON.
Because you are lying willow, why would I bother calling you a liar, if you were not lying? I have posted this July 19th fox news.com article from the 19th at least 4 times myself....
PLEASE, look in the upper left hand corner of this snapshot of their article, BEFORE they went in and revised it on July 20th, 2010...
It specifically states July 19th, NOT the 20th.... every single link on the net that states that Published July 19, 2010 for this specific article NOW brings you to a REVISED and rewritten article dated July 20th....INSTEAD of their original article....that was published on 7/19 because FOX is trying to pull a fast one and deny that they had anything out there on the 19th.
this article from fox on the 19th requested responses from the naacp and the usda, so they not only printed it on the net, they requested answers from the naacp and usda, which CLEARLY SHOWS that this article was published BEFORE the NAACP put out their statement asking sherrod to resign and BEFORE the usda reported she resigned, along with a hundred blogs out there on the 19th that used this foxnews.com article as reference....earlier in the day.....that now show the slight of hand article dated the 20th that fox changed it out to...but blogs on the 19th discussing this COULD NOT BE USING AN ARTICLE from the 20th....it was THIS ARTICLE BELOW THAT THEY WERE USING as reference.
So STOP LYING....IT CLEARLY STATES IN THE UPPER LEFT FOXNEWS.COM PUBLISHED JULY 19, 2010.
Oh, and I love you too Willow!
Care
how in the HELL can the whitehouse "fall for their stunt" that NEVER HAPPENED?????
Because you are lying willow, why would I bother calling you a liar, if you were not lying? I have posted this July 19th fox news.com article from the 19th at least 4 times myself....
PLEASE, look in the upper left hand corner of this snapshot of their article, BEFORE they went in and revised it on July 20th, 2010...
It specifically states July 19th, NOT the 20th.... every single link on the net that states that Published July 19, 2010 for this specific article NOW brings you to a REVISED and rewritten article dated July 20th....INSTEAD of their original article....that was published on 7/19 because FOX is trying to pull a fast one and deny that they had anything out there on the 19th.
this article from fox on the 19th requested responses from the naacp and the usda, so they not only printed it on the net, they requested answers from the naacp and usda, which CLEARLY SHOWS that this article was published BEFORE the NAACP put out their statement asking sherrod to resign and BEFORE the usda reported she resigned, along with a hundred blogs out there on the 19th that used this foxnews.com article as reference....earlier in the day.....that now show the slight of hand article dated the 20th that fox changed it out to...but blogs on the 19th discussing this COULD NOT BE USING AN ARTICLE from the 20th....it was THIS ARTICLE BELOW THAT THEY WERE USING as reference.
So STOP LYING....IT CLEARLY STATES IN THE UPPER LEFT FOXNEWS.COM PUBLISHED JULY 19, 2010.
Oh, and I love you too Willow!
Care
Fox News picked up the story. They were all over the story like a hobo on a ham sandwich. Period. They wrote in their article that Sherrod resigned shortly after their initial report and O'Reilly was calling for her to be fired when they taped his show at five. They had their talking points lined up and guns blazing, attacking Sherrod and the NAACP right after her firing was announced and up until the tape turned out to be bogus. From there they seamlessly change talking points and went into full blown CYA mode even giving Breitbart a forum in which to try and cover his own ass with Sean Hannity cupping his balls for him while he was at it.
It was pathetic.
Almost as pathetic as the White House falling for their stunt.
how in the HELL can the whitehouse "fall for their stunt" that NEVER HAPPENED?????Because you are lying willow, why would I bother calling you a liar, if you were not lying? I have posted this July 19th fox news.com article from the 19th at least 4 times myself....
PLEASE, look in the upper left hand corner of this snapshot of their article, BEFORE they went in and revised it on July 20th, 2010...
It specifically states July 19th, NOT the 20th.... every single link on the net that states that Published July 19, 2010 for this specific article NOW brings you to a REVISED and rewritten article dated July 20th....INSTEAD of their original article....that was published on 7/19 because FOX is trying to pull a fast one and deny that they had anything out there on the 19th.
this article from fox on the 19th requested responses from the naacp and the usda, so they not only printed it on the net, they requested answers from the naacp and usda, which CLEARLY SHOWS that this article was published BEFORE the NAACP put out their statement asking sherrod to resign and BEFORE the usda reported she resigned, along with a hundred blogs out there on the 19th that used this foxnews.com article as reference....earlier in the day.....that now show the slight of hand article dated the 20th that fox changed it out to...but blogs on the 19th discussing this COULD NOT BE USING AN ARTICLE from the 20th....it was THIS ARTICLE BELOW THAT THEY WERE USING as reference.
So STOP LYING....IT CLEARLY STATES IN THE UPPER LEFT FOXNEWS.COM PUBLISHED JULY 19, 2010.
Oh, and I love you too Willow!
Care
Fox News picked up the story. They were all over the story like a hobo on a ham sandwich. Period. They wrote in their article that Sherrod resigned shortly after their initial report and O'Reilly was calling for her to be fired when they taped his show at five. They had their talking points lined up and guns blazing, attacking Sherrod and the NAACP right after her firing was announced and up until the tape turned out to be bogus. From there they seamlessly change talking points and went into full blown CYA mode even giving Breitbart a forum in which to try and cover his own ass with Sean Hannity cupping his balls for him while he was at it.
It was pathetic.
Almost as pathetic as the White House falling for their stunt.
LOL oh man
So FOX had it on FOXnation.com at least before noon and on FOXnews.com at least before 5 PM. Clearly FOX was flogging on line this before she was fired.
where is the PROOF??????????
i think i'll just back off and laugh at all you guys posting the same unsubstantiated bullshit over and over
I find it curious that Parrotboy here and MediaMatters gives a shit about character assassination. Robert Bork, Clarence Thomas, Sam Alito, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, and thousands of other conservatives have had their character assassinated with impunity by their allies and not a peep.
O’Reilly was one of the first opinion media journalists to call for Sherrod to resign over her speech that has since been revealed to have been taken out of context, but then later apologized for getting it wrong. But while O’Reilly owned up to his part in this story, he took great exception to Maddow’s accusation that Fox News’ “scare white people” strategy
O'Reilly Slams NBC News And Steve Capus | Mediaite
Fox alters the pictures of people it doesn't like, trying to make them look, oooh, scary:
Not to mention the number of times they used video from one event to "spruce up" video from another event.
Then a dipship like you says to me, "you are a complete fucking IDIOT". I take it as a badge of honor coming from someone with shit for brains.
What do you expect from Fox? It's Arab owner is on the side of those that brought down the WTC. Of course they hate the US. Too bad about those Republican lemmings, supporting them and all.
FoxNation is a BLOG and i dont know how they get their content posted
It sounds like you don't want to admit that FOXnation has anything to do with FOX.
proof of this?
First of all, I notice you give no proof of anything you say.
