Fox news conspiracies spread all around the republicans!

[Nuthin' Fancy]

.





ROFLMFAO..................

Somebody is suggesting that Fox is any more or less an accurate source than any of the other government-run corporate whore "media".





.

Yeah, Q-NUTS, like yourself, FOX and their guest, also a Q-NUT.
STILL lying, while the video plays right before his very eyes.

 

[playtime]

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Yeah, Q-NUTS, like yourself, FOX and their guest, also a Q-NUT.
STILL lying, while the video plays right before his very eyes.

.





WHOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

But that's okay. We're used to it.

Thanks for your thought provoking post.





.

 

[playtime]

Yeah, Q-NUTS, like yourself, FOX and their guest, also a Q-NUT.
STILL lying, while the video plays right before his very eyes.

remember this?

 

[playtime]

WHOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

finished with yer meal?

 

[struth]

The claim that big names like Elon Musk, Donald Trump, Jr., and Dinesh D’Souza have promoted to millions of their followers: Paul Pelosi and the man who attacked him were gay lovers who had gotten into a fight.

The spurious theory traces back to an incorrect early news report and a handful of pieces of evidence that its proponents have spun wildly out of context. It runs contrary to the explanation police and federal law enforcement have outlined – that the suspect in the attack, David DePape, broke into Pelosi’s house and attacked him.

“There is absolutely no evidence that Mr. Pelosi knew this man,” San Francisco Police Chief William Scott told CNN in an interview. “As a matter of fact, the evidence indicates the exact opposite.”

https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/31/politics/pelosi-attack-right-wing-conspiracy-theories-invs/index.html

you seen one lovers spat you’ve seen them all

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

.





WHOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

But that's okay. We're used to it.

Thanks for your thought provoking post.





.

YES. we are, just like Trump, Q-NUTS like criminal defense attorney and regular Fox News guest Brian Claypool, can't help themselves.
WHATEVER I say is true.............WHATEVER I do that's even caught on tape.........is FALSE.

 

[rightwinger]

Fox news conspiracies spread all around the republicans!​

Are you saying Liberals aren’t secretly grooming our children to become homosexuals?

 

[HaShev]

The claim that big names like Elon Musk, Donald Trump, Jr., and Dinesh D’Souza have promoted to millions of their followers: Paul Pelosi and the man who attacked him were gay lovers who had gotten into a fight.

The spurious theory traces back to an incorrect early news report and a handful of pieces of evidence that its proponents have spun wildly out of context. It runs contrary to the explanation police and federal law enforcement have outlined – that the suspect in the attack, David DePape, broke into Pelosi’s house and attacked him.

“There is absolutely no evidence that Mr. Pelosi knew this man,” San Francisco Police Chief William Scott told CNN in an interview. “As a matter of fact, the evidence indicates the exact opposite.”

https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/31/politics/pelosi-attack-right-wing-conspiracy-theories-invs/index.html

So you are saying all your posts and collegues fake new defemation/ smear posts about Trump and Maga Republicans was wrong, but you just can't seem to read your own posts and reflect it on your own behavior.. I believe you are complaining about the pushback, aka what's good for the goose is good for the gander, in other words, you are kvetching about yourself, exposing yourself so it's mirroring method is working.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

YES. we are, just like Trump, Q-NUTS like criminal defense attorney and regular Fox News guest Brian Claypool, can't help themselves.
WHATEVER I say is true.............WHATEVER I do that's even caught on tape.........is FALSE.

.




What's a "Q-NUT"? Must be something to which you aspire, as you talk about it all the time.

Did you get permission to use that iStock photo? I wonder if mods like you using copyrighted material in here. Could get them in a lot of trouble.

Maybe I need to have a talk.





.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

.




What's a "Q-NUT"? Must be something to which you aspire, as you talk about it all the time.

Did you get permission to use that iStock photo? I wonder if mods like you using copyrighted material in here. Could get them in a lot of trouble.

Maybe I need to have a talk.





.

YOU would.
It's the law, something the Trump cult doesn't know about, ignores and abuses.

Under the "fair use" defense, another author may make limited use of the original author's work without asking permission. Pursuant to 17 U.S. Code § 107, certain uses of copyrighted material "for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright."

As a matter of policy, fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights. If you write or publish, you need a basic understanding of what does and does not constitute fair use.

AND, YOU don't.

 

[Coyote]

Yeah sure. Boxers and a dress shirt. It looks to me like he was frolicking in his undies when his pal wigged out and decided to bean him with a hammer. But whatever was going on there, it sure wasn't normal.

An elderly man brutally assaulted in a home invasion is never “normal”.

The real abnormality is how you make up crap to somehow justify it.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

YOU would.
It's the law, something the Trump cult doesn't know about, ignores and abuses.

Under the "fair use" defense, another author may make limited use of the original author's work without asking permission. Pursuant to 17 U.S. Code § 107, certain uses of copyrighted material "for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright."

As a matter of policy, fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights. If you write or publish, you need a basic understanding of what does and does not constitute fair use.

AND, YOU don't.

.




Sure thing, pixie.

Sure thing.







.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

YOU would.
It's the law, something the Trump cult doesn't know about, ignores and abuses.

Under the "fair use" defense, another author may make limited use of the original author's work without asking permission. Pursuant to 17 U.S. Code § 107, certain uses of copyrighted material "for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright."

As a matter of policy, fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights. If you write or publish, you need a basic understanding of what does and does not constitute fair use.

AND, YOU don't.

.





What's a "Q-NUT"?

You talk about it all the time, as if you wished you had a tube of K-Y.







.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

conspiracies?
like the Hunter Laptop conspiracy?
the Russian collusion conspiracy?
the Ukraine phone call conspiracy?
the Paul Pelosi underwear hammer fight conspiracy?
the Trump documents conspiracy?
the Trump insurrection conspiracy?

 

[rightwinger]

conspiracies?
like the Hunter Laptop conspiracy?
the Russian collusion conspiracy?
the Ukraine phone call conspiracy?
the Paul Pelosi underwear hammer fight conspiracy?
the Trump documents conspiracy?
the Trump insurrection conspiracy?

Yup

Republicans love their conspiracies

 

[playtime]

YOU would.
It's the law, something the Trump cult doesn't know about, ignores and abuses.

Under the "fair use" defense, another author may make limited use of the original author's work without asking permission. Pursuant to 17 U.S. Code § 107, certain uses of copyrighted material "for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright."

As a matter of policy, fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights. If you write or publish, you need a basic understanding of what does and does not constitute fair use.

AND, YOU don't.

... not to mention it has istock's logo all over it which means you gave them their props.

she doesn't know wtf she is talking about.

lol ... meth head?

 

[playtime]

conspiracies?
like the Hunter Laptop conspiracy?
the Russian collusion conspiracy?
the Ukraine phone call conspiracy?
the Paul Pelosi underwear hammer fight conspiracy?
the Trump documents conspiracy?
the Trump insurrection conspiracy?

yes.

 

[Lastamender]

You are hooked on any conspiracies.

The ones that come true? Those?

 

[Leo123]

Fox News reported nothing of the kind. In fact Sean Hannity showed the video of DePape actually breaking in to the Pelosi home and aired the 911 call where Pelosi was giving clues to the operator he was under duress. They also had the cop's video when they knocked on he door and showed Pelosi DePape holding the hammer and Pelosi also holding it. DePape said 'no' when told to drop the hammer and savagely hit Pelosi over the head.